Tourism Platforms and the Digital Biopolitics of Nature: An Interface Analysis of TripAdvisor in Patagonia-Aysén, Chile

References

• Adams, W. M. 2017. Geographies of conservation II: Technology, surveillance and conservation by algorithm. Progress in Human Geography 43 (2):337–50. doi: 10.1177/0309132517740220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliste, E., M. Folchi, and A. Núñez. 2018. Discourses of nature in new perceptions of the natural landscape in Southern Chile. Frontier Psychology 9:1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altrudi, S. 2021. Connecting to nature through tech? The case of the iNaturalist app. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 27 (1):124–41. doi: 10.1177/1354856520933064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Maldonaldo, M. 2013. Against ecological sovereignty: Ethics, biopolitics, and saving the natural world. Environmental Politics 22 (2):346–47. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.769806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artioli, F. 2018. Digital platforms and cities: A literature review for urban research. In Cities are back in town. Working Papers. Sciences Po Urban School. Accessed August 20, 2022. http://blogs.sciences-po.fr/recherche-villes/files/2018/06/WP01_2018-Artioli.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ash, J., B. Anderson, R. Gordon, and P. Langley. 2018. Unit, vibration, tone: A post-phenomenological method for researching digital interfaces. Cultural Geographies 25 (1):165–81. doi: 10.1177/1474474017726556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astaburuaga, J., A. Leszczynski, M. E. Martin, and J. C. Gaillard. 2022. The multiple environmentalities of conservation mapping in Patagonia-Aysén. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 6 (3):1940–65. doi: 10.1177/25148486221125228.
   Google Scholar
• Astaburuaga, J., M. E. Martin, A. Leszczynski, and J. C. Gaillard. 2022. Maps, volunteered geographic information (VGI) and the spatio-discursive construction of nature. Digital Geography and Society 3:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100029.
   Google Scholar
• Aysen, G. R. 2009. Estrategia Regional de Desarrollo Aysen [Regional development strategy for Aysén]. Gobierno de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann-Vargas, P., and C. S. A. van Koppen. 2020. Disentangling environmental and development discourses in a peripheral spatial context: The case of the Aysén Region, Patagonia, Chile. The Journal of Environment & Development 29 (3):366–90. doi: 10.1177/1070496520937041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, K., and M. Ritts. 2018. Smart Earth: A meta-review and implications for environmental governance. Global Environmental Change 52:201–11. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barns, S. 2019. Negotiating the platform pivot: From participatory digital ecosystems to infrastructures of everyday life. Geography Compass 13 (9):1–13. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjaminsen, T. A., and I. Bryceson. 2012. Conservation, green/blue grabbing and accumulation by dispossession in Tanzania. Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2):335–55. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.667405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, C., and R. M. Anderson. 2017. Conservation, biopolitics, and the governance of life and death. Geography Compass 11 (10):1–13. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, C., and B. Mansfield. 2014. Biodiversity, purity, and death: Conservation biology as biopolitics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (2):257–73. doi: 10.1068/d13047p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluwstein, J. 2017. Creating ecotourism territories: Environmentalities in Tanzania’s community-based conservation. Geoforum 83 (June):101–13. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.009.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, I. 2014. Governing the wild: Databases, algorithms, and population models as biopolitics. Surveillance & Society 12 (1):15–37. doi: 10.24908/ss.v12i1.4579.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, I. 2015. Wild life: The institution of nature. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, I. 2017. Anticipating endangerment: The biopolitics of threatened species lists. BioSocieties 12 (1):132–57. doi: 10.1057/s41292-016-0025-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B. 2016. Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media & Society 18 (5):726–43. doi: 10.1177/1461444814545841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., and R. Fletcher. 2015. Accumulation by conservation. New Political Economy 20 (2):273–98. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2014.923824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., and J. Igoe. 2013. “Prosuming” conservation? Web 2.0, nature and the intensification of value-producing labour in late capitalism. Journal of Consumer Culture 13 (3):283–305. doi: 10.1177/1469540513482691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2003. Commodifying what nature? Progress in Human Geography 27 (3):273–97. doi: 10.1191/0309132503ph428oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2008. Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (1):131–52. doi: 10.1068/a3999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, C. J. 2014. Biopolitics, environmental change, and development studies. Forum for Development Studies 41 (2):273–94. doi: 10.1080/08039410.2014.901243.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney-Lippold, J. 2011. A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (6):164–81. doi: 10.1177/0263276411424420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. 1996. The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature in uncommon ground. Toward reinventing nature. Environmental History 1 (1):7–28. doi: 10.2307/3985059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, S. 2020. “Who doesn’t like dolphins?!” Neoliberalization, variegated environmentalities, and value alterations in a cross-national comparison of Irrawaddy dolphin conservation. Geoforum 114 (June):159–71. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.010.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, H. T., and C. Abidin. 2022. Understanding identity and platform cultures. In The SAGE handbook of digital society, ed. W. Housley, A. Edwards, R. Beneito-Montagut, and R. Fitzgerald, 170–87. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1996. Construction nature: Elements for a post-structuralist political ecology. Futures 28 (4):325–43. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(96)00011-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1999. After nature. Current Anthropology 40 (1):1–30. doi: 10.1086/515799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essen, von E., J. Turnbull, A. Searle, F. A. Jorgensen, T. R. Hofmeester, and R. van der Wal. 2021. Wildlife in the digital Anthropocene: Examining human–animal relations through surveillance technologies. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2):237–61. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2009. Ecotourism discourse: Challenging the stakeholders theory. Journal of Ecotourism 8 (3):269–85. doi: 10.1080/14724040902767245.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2010. Neoliberal environmentality: Towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. Conservation and Society 8 (3):171–81. doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.73806.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2017. Gaming conservation: Nature 2.0 confronts nature-deficit disorder. Geoforum 79:153–62. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. 2019. Neoliberalismo y turismo [Neoliberalism and tourism]. In Turistificación global: Perspectivas críticas en turismo, ed. E. Cañada and I. Murray, 37–52. Barcelona: Icaria. https://www.academia.edu/40597751/Neoliberalismo_y_Turismo.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., W. H. Dressler, Z. R. Anderson, and B. Büscher. 2019. Natural capital must be defended: Green growth as neoliberal biopolitics. The Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (5):1068–95. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2018.1428953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1990. The history of sexuality: An introduction, volume I. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., A. I. Davidson, and G. Burchell. 2008. The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein J., and E. Nost, eds. 2022. The nature of data infrastructures, environments, politics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, K., and J. Sadowski. 2021. Biopolitical platforms: The perverse virtues of digital labour. Journal of Cultural Economy 14 (6):662–74. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2021.1901766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, K. 2014. Biopolitics and adaptation: Governing socio-ecological contingency through climate change and disaster studies. Geography Compass 8 (3):198–210. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12118.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, K. 2018. Biopolitics. In Companion to environmental studies, ed. N. Castree, M. Hulme, and J. D. Proctor, 152–57. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., and J. J. Silver. 2017. From selfie to #sealfie: Nature 2.0 and the digital cultural politics of an internationally contested resource. Geoforum 79:114–23. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heynen, N., and P. Robbins. 2005. The neoliberalization of nature: Governance, privatization, enclosure and valuation. Capitalism Nature Socialism 16 (1):5–8. doi: 10.1080/1045575052000335339.
   Google Scholar
• Iaconesi, S. 2017. Interface and data biopolitics in the age of hyperconnectivity: Implications for design. The Design Journal 20 (Suppl. 1):S3935–S3944. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352896.
   Google Scholar
• Igoe, J., and D. Brockington. 2007. Neoliberal conservation a brief introduction author. Conservation and Society 5 (4):432–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kiggell, T. 2021. Monitoring extinction: Defaunation, technology and the biopolitics of conservation in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Journal of Political Ecology 28 (1):1–19. doi: 10.2458/jpe.3044.
   Google Scholar
• Koot, S., and R. Fletcher. 2020. Popular philanthrocapitalism? The potential and pitfalls of online empowerment in “free” Nature 2.0 initiatives. Environmental Communication 14 (3):287–99. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2019.1649707.
   Google Scholar
• Laubheimer, P. 2016. Cards: UI-component definition. Accessed October 21, 2014. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/cards-component/.
   Google Scholar
• Leff, E. 2004. Racionalidad ambiental: La reapropiación social de la naturaleza [Environmental rationality: The social reappropriation of nature]. Siglo XXI Editores México.
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, J. 2015. Wildlife in the Anthropocene: Conservation after nature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Louder, E., and K. Bosak. 2023. Spectacle of Nature 2.0: The (re)production of Patagonia National Park. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 113 (2):331–45. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2022.2106176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunden, A. 2022. The biopolitics of Artic tourism development and sustainability. Via Tourism Review 21. Accessed October 15, 2022. https://journals.openedition.org/viatourism/8084
   Google Scholar
• McLean, J., S. Maalsen, and S. Prebble. 2019. A feminist perspective on digital geographies: Activism, affect and emotion, and gendered human-technology relations in Australia. Gender, Place & Culture 26 (5):740–61. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1555146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, I. L., R. Hawkins, and L. Govia. 2023. Feminist digital natures. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 6 (3):2096–2109. doi: 10.1177/25148486221123136.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. 2014. Making political ecology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ni’am, L., S. Koot, and J. Jongerden. 2021. Selling captive nature: Lively commodification, elephant encounters, and the production of value in Sumatran ecotourism, Indonesia. Geoforum 127:162–70. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nost, E. 2020. Infrastructuring “data-driven” environmental governance in Louisiana’s coastal restoration plan. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 5 (1):104–24. doi: 10.1177/2514848620909727.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, A., E. Aliste, A. Bello, and J. P. Astaburuaga. 2019. Eco-extractivismo y los discursos de la naturaleza en Patagonia-Aysén: nuevos imaginarios geográficos y renovados procesos de control territorial [Eco-extractivism and discourses of nature in Patagonia-Aysen: New geographical imaginaries and renewed territorial control processes]. Revista Austral De Ciencias Sociales 35:133–53.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, A., M. Galarce, and E. Aliste. 2018. Geografías de lo sublime y el proceso de turistificación en Aysén-Patagonia. Turismo, territorio y poder [Geographies of the sublime and the process of touristification in Aysén-Patagonia. Tourism, territory, and power]. In Araucania-Norpatagonia II, 249–69. Río Negro, Argentina: Editorial UNRN.
   Google Scholar
• Pennell, S. 2021. Airbnb and the paradox of the body: The biopolitical management of hosts in four tourist towns in New Zealand. Journal of Sociology 58 (4):445–61. doi: 10.1177/14407833211000122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, X.-L., G.-D. Chen, T.-H. Nguyen, and W.-Y. Hwang. 2016. Card-based design combined with spaced repetition: A new interface for displaying learning elements and improving active recall. Computers & Education 98:142–56. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. 2012. Political ecology: A critical introduction. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofsen, M., and C. Minca. 2018. The superhost: Biopolitics, home and community in the Airbnb dream-world of global hospitality. Geoforum 91:170–81. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G., P. Raghuram, S. Watson, and E. Wigley. 2021. Platform urbanism, smartphone applications and valuing data in a smart city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 46 (1):59–72. doi: 10.1111/tran.12400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smessaert, J., A. Missemer, and H. Levrel. 2020. The commodification of nature, a review in social sciences. Ecological Economics 172:106624. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, K. 2017. Conservation biopolitics and the sustainability episteme. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (7):1458–76. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17704198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakholi, L. 2021. The biopolitics of private conservation: Jeopardizing labor and rhino to optimize capital? Journal of Political Ecology 28 (1):1–16. doi: 10.2458/jpe.4764.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, C., D. P. Dixon, L. Bergmann, R. Legg, and A. Crampsie, eds. 2023. Routledge handbook of the digital environmental humanities. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• TripAdvisor. 2018. How does TripAdvisor determine whether a review is biased? Tripadvisor Insights. Accessed December 6, 2022. https://www.tripadvisor.com/TripAdvisorInsights/w3683.
   Google Scholar
• TripAdvisor. 2021. Tripadvisor listings guidelines. Accessed December 6, 2022. https://www.tripadvisor.com/Trust-lvz7RK0Xs9UI-Listings_policies_and_guidelines.html.
   Google Scholar
• TripAdvisor. 2022a. Aisen Region 2022: Best places to visit. Accessed December 6, 2022. https://www.tripadvisor.com/Tourism-g2615231-Aisen_Region-Vacations.html.
   Google Scholar
• TripAdvisor. 2022b. Our approach to content integrity. Accessed December 6, 2022. https://www.tripadvisor.com/Trust-lRbpvspYMg9E-Our_approach_to_content_integrity.html.
   Google Scholar
• TripAdvisor. 2022c. The 15 best things to do in Aisen Region–2022 (with photos). Accessed December 6, 2022. https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attractions-g2615231-Activities-Aisen_Region.html.
   Google Scholar
• TripAdvisor. 2022d. Trust & safety review posting guidelines. Accessed December 6, 2022. https://www.tripadvisor.com/Trust.
   Google Scholar
• TripAdvisor. 2022e. Write a review. Accessed December 6, 2022. https://www.tripadvisor.com/UserReviewEdit-g317798-d8073392-a_referredFromLocationSearch.true.
   Google Scholar
• TripAdvisor. 2023. US press center | About Tripadvisor. Accessed December 6, 2022. https://tripadvisor.mediaroom.com/us-about-us.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, J., A. Searle, O. Hartman Davies, J. Dodsworth, P. Chasseray-Peraldi, E. von Essen, and H. Anderson-Elliott. 2022. Digital ecologies: Materialities, encounters, governance. Progress in Environmental Geography 2 (1–2):3–32. doi: 10.1177/27539687221145698.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). 2022. Glossary of tourism terms. Accessed March 29, 2023. https://www.unwto.org/glossary-tourism-terms.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., T. Poell, and M. de Waal. 2018. The Platform Society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. 2014. Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies 51 (5):883–98. doi: 10.1177/0042098013494427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villavicencio, A. 2021. El ecoturismo degrada la cultura, mercantiliza y destruye la naturaleza [Ecotourism degrades culture, commodifies, and destroys nature]. Andina 4:71–74.
   Google Scholar