Variegated Platform Urbanism: Social Credit and the City

References

• Alvarez León, L. F., and J. Rosen. 2020. Technology as ideology in urban governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (2):497–506. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1660139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyriou, I. 2019. The smart city of Hangzhou, China: The case of Dream Town Internet village. In Smart city emergence: Cases from around the world, ed. L. Anthopoulos, 195–218. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816169-2.00009-2.
   Google Scholar
• Barns, S. 2020. Platform urbanism: Negotiating platform ecosystems in connected cities. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, L. 2020. The rationality of the digital governmentality. Journal for Cultural Research 23 (4):365–80. doi: 10.1080/14797585.2020.1714878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslow, H. 2021. The smart city and the containment of informality: The case of Dubai. Urban Studies 58 (3):471–86. doi: 10.1177/0042098020903233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridle, J. 2016. Algorithmic citizenship, digital statelessness. GeoHumanities 2 (2):377–81. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2016.1237858.
   Google Scholar
• Brussee, V. 2023. Social credit: The warring states of China’s emerging data empire. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, J., and M. Fourcade. 2021. The society of algorithms. Annual Review of Sociology 47 (1):213–37. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-090820-020800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F. 2020. Smart to green: Smart eco-cities in the green economy. In The Routledge companion to smart cities, ed. K. Willis and A. Aurigi, 200–09. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F., I.-C. C. Chang, and S. Joss. 2022. Beyond the smart city: A typology of platform urbanism. Urban Transformations 4 (1):4. doi: 10.1186/s42854-022-00033-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caprotti, F., and R. Cowley. 2019. Varieties of smart urbanism in the UK: Discursive logics, the state and local urban context. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (3):587–601. doi: 10.1111/tran.12284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F., F. Cugurullo, M. Cook, A. Karvonen, S. Marvin, P. McGuirk, and A.-M. Valdez. 2024. Why does urban artificial intelligence (AI) matter for urban studies? Developing research directions in urban AI research. Urban Geography 45 (5):883–94. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2024.2329401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F., and Z. Gong. 2017. Social sustainability and residents’ experiences in a new Chinese eco-city. Habitat International 61:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F., and D. Liu. 2019. Emerging platform urbanism in China: Reconfigurations of data, citizenship and materialities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151:119690. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.016.
   Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F., and D. Liu. 2022. Platform urbanism and the Chinese smart city: The co-production and territorialisation of Hangzhou City Brain. GeoJournal 87 (3):1559–73. doi: 10.1007/s10708-020-10320-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, I.-C. C., S.-C. Jou, and M.-K. Chung. 2020. Provincializing smart urbanism in Taipei: Smart city as a strategy for urban regime transition. Urban Studies 58 (3):559–80. doi: 10.1177/0042098020947908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, X. 2020. Legal consequences of the “blacklist” of dishonest persons subject to execution. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/109628558.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B. 2024. Performed imaginaries of the AI-controlled city: Conducting urban AI experimentation in China. In Artificial intelligence and the city: Urbanistic perspectives on AI, ed. F. Cugurullo, F. Caprotti, M. Cook, A. Karvonen, P. McGuirk,and S. Marvin, 223–39. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. S. Y., and Y. Chen. 2022. From datafication to data state: Making sense of China’s social credit system and its implications. Law & Social Inquiry 47 (4):1137–71. doi: 10.1017/lsi.2021.56.
   Google Scholar
• China Association of Circular Economy. 2018. Model significance of waste classification in Tianjin Eco-City. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://www.chinacace.org/news/view?id=8940.
   Google Scholar
• Cirolia, L. R., R. Sitas, A. Pollio, A. G. Sebarenzi, and P. K. Guma. 2023. Silicon Savannahs and motorcycle taxis: A Southern perspective on the frontiers of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 55 (8):1989–2008. doi: 10.1177/0308518X231170193.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, N. M., and C. Yang. 2022. Mobile gaming production networks, platform business groups, and the market power of China’s Tencent. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 112 (2):307–30. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2021.1933887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley, R., S. Joss, and Y. Dayot. 2018. The smart city and its publics: Insights from across six UK cities. Urban Research & Practice 11 (1):53–77. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2017.1293150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Credit China. 2018. The demonstration cities of credit construction: Hangzhou, Zhejiang. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://www.creditchina.gov.cn/chengxinwenhua/chengshichengxinwenhua/201802/t20180211_108736.html.
   Google Scholar
• Credit China. 2021. Weihai: Innovative application of “Hai Beifen” to implement “Xinyi+” project to benefit the people. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://www.creditchina.gov.cn/chengxinwenhua/chengshichengxinwenhua/202111/t20211124_249663.html.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, R. 2018. China’s social credit system: An evolving practice of control. SSRN Electronic Journal. Accessed May 9, 2018. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3175792.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, R. 2021. China’s long and winding road in global cyberspace: Great Power relationships or common destiny? SSRN Electronic Journal. Accessed January 31, 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3776814.
   Google Scholar
• Cugurullo, F. 2021. Frankenstein urbanism: Eco, smart and autonomous cities, artificial intelligence and the end of the city. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cugurullo, F., F. Caprotti, M. Cook, A. Karvonen, P. McGuirk, and S. Marvin. 2024. The rise of AI urbanism in post-smart cities: A critical commentary on urban artificial intelligence. Urban Studies 61 (6):1168–82. doi: 10.1177/00420980231203386.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, D., and A. Smart. 2021. Data-driven governance, smart urbanism and risk-class inequalities: Security and social credit in China. Urban Studies 58 (3):487–506. doi: 10.1177/0042098020927855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, X. 2020. Toward a reputation state: A comprehensive view of China’s Social Credit System project. In Social credit rating: Reputation und vertrauen beurteilen, ed. O. Everling, 139–63. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, E., and D. Fu. 2023. Governing “untrustworthy” civil society in China. The China Journal 89 (January):24–44. doi: 10.1086/722908.
   Google Scholar
• Ellul, J. 1980. The technological system. Paris: Le Cherche Midi Editeur.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., and E. van Tuijl. 2020. Uber-production: From global networks to digital platforms. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 52 (5):1005–16. doi: 10.1177/0308518X20916507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hangzhou Credit Office. 2022. Hangzhou social credit regulations. Accessed June 7, 2023. http://credit.hangzhou.gov.cn/art/2022/6/21/art_1229634358_30170.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. J. 2023. Governing through metrics in the digital age. Globalizations 20 (1):137–52. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2022.2156700.
   Google Scholar
• Horsley, J. 2018. China’s Orwellian social credit score isn’t real. Foreign Policy, November 16https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/11/16/chinas-orwellian-social-credit-score-isnt-real/.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, M.-C., C.-Y. Wu, and T. Shih. 2016. Creating a new socio-technical regime in China: Evidence from the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City. Futures 70:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, R. 2019. The state of smart cities in China: The case of Shenzhen. Energies 12 (22):4375. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/22/4375. doi: 10.3390/en12224375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., S. Geertman, and P. Witte. 2019. Comparing smart governance projects in China: A contextual approach. In Computational urban planning and management for smart cities, ed. S. Geertman, Q. Zhan, A. Allan, and C. Pettit, 99–114. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-19424-6_7.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, Y.-M., and T. Tan. 2020. Smart cities in Asia: An introduction. In Smart cities in Asia: Governing development in the era of hyper-connectivity, ed. Y.-M. Joo and T. Tan, 1–17. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. doi: 10.4337/9781788972888.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, X. 2020. “Qianjiang Grade” makes credit valuable. Hangzhou News, December 2. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://en.hangzhou.com.cn/News/content/2020-12/02/content_7865465.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2015. Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1):131–36. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsu027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2022. Conceptualising smart cities. Urban Research & Practice 15 (1):155–59. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2022.2031143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, A., and R. Creemers. 2021. Going viral: The social credit system and COVID-19. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3770208.
   Google Scholar
• Kostka, G. 2019. China’s social credit systems and public opinion: Explaining high levels of approval. New Media & Society 21 (7):1565–93. doi: 10.1177/1461444819826402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., and E. Sheppard. 2016. Provincializing critical urban theory: Extending the ecosystem of possibilities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (1):228–35. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2020. Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38 (2):189–208. doi: 10.1177/0263775819878721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A., and S. Elwood. 2022. Glitch epistemologies for computational cities. Dialogues in Human Geography 12 (3):361–78. doi: 10.1177/20438206221075714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, F., and Y. Chen. 2022. The making of “good” citizens: China’s Social Credit Systems and infrastructures of social quantification. Policy & Internet 14 (1):114–35. doi: 10.1002/poi3.291.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, F., V. Das, N. Kostyuk, and M. M. Hussain. 2018. Constructing a data-driven society: China’s social credit system as a state surveillance infrastructure. Policy & Internet 10 (4):415–53. doi: 10.1002/poi3.183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. 2003. The definition and attributes of credit and the construction of China’s credit system. Fujian Finance 10:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C. 2019. Economic sociology: The European electronic newsletter. Multiple Social Credit Systems in China 21 (1):22–32. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/223109/1/Econsoc-NL-21-1-04.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P., R. Dowling, and P. Chatterjee. 2021. Municipal statecraft for the smart city: Retooling the smart entrepreneurial city? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53 (7):1730–48. doi: 10.1177/0308518X211027905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. 2016. Smart city governance: A local emergent perspective. In Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city, ed. J. Gil-Garcia, T. Pardo, and T. Nam, 73–85. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_4.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. 2018. Datapolis: A public governance perspective on “smart cities.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1 (3):195–206. doi: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvx017.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, P. V., and S. Joyce. 2017. Black box or hidden abode? The expansion and exposure of platform work managerialism. Review of International Political Economy 27 (4):926–48. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2019.1627569.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., F. Voigt, and S. Becker. 2021. Digital urban nature: Probing a void in the smart city discourse. City: Analysis of Urban Change 25 (3–4):255–76. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2021.1935513.
   Google Scholar
• Mouton, M. 2021. Worlding infrastructure in the Global South: Philippine experiments and the art of being “smart.” Urban Studies 58 (3):621–38. doi: 10.1177/0042098019891011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2020. In search of the Global East: Thinking between North and South. Geopolitics 25 (3):734–55. https:// doi: 10.1080/14650045.2018.1477757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., and E. Trubina. 2020. The Global Easts in global urbanism: Views from beyond North and South. Eurasian Geography and Economics 61 (6):627–35. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2020.1777443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, P. H. 2007. China at the crossroads. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 3 (1):1–22. doi: 10.1080/14765280500040327.
   Google Scholar
• Odendaal, N. 2022. Splintering by proxy: A reflection on the spatial impacts and distributed agency of platform urbanism. Journal of Urban Technology 29 (1):21–27. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2021.2007204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orgad, L., and W. Reijers. 2019. A dystopian future? The rise of social credit systems. Badia Fiesolana, Italy: European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Picon, A. 2015. Smart cities: A spatialised intelligence. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pow, C.-P., and H. Neo. 2015. Modelling green urbanism in China. Area 47 (2):132–40. doi: 10.1111/area.12128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeybilovicz, E., M. A. Cunha, S. Geertman, C. Leleux, A. Michels, Z. Tomor, and W. R. Webster. 2022. Citizen participation in the smart city: Findings from an international comparative study. Local Government Studies 40 (1):23–47. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2020.1851204.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2006. Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenbiker, J. 2021. Making ecology developmental: China’s environmental sciences and green modernization in global context. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (7):1–18. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1863766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2020. Actually-existing sociality in a smart city: The social as sociological, neoliberal, cybernetic. City 24 (3–4):512–29. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2020.1781412.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, U. 2016. The variegated economics and the potential politics of the smart city. Territory, Politics, Governance 4 (3):337–53. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2015.1036913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J., and S. Maalsen. 2020. Modes of making smart cities: Or, practices of variegated smart urbanism. Telematics and Informatics 55:101449. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahin, S., and P. Zheng. 2020. Big data and the illusion of choice: Comparing the evolution of India’s Aadhaar and China’s social credit system as technosocial discourses. Social Science Computer Review 38 (1):25–41. doi: 10.1177/0894439318789343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. 2022. Platform urbanism in a pandemic: Dark stores, ghost kitchens, and the logistical-urban frontier. Journal of Consumer Culture 23 (1):168–87. doi: 10.1177/14695405211069983.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, T., and T. Lodato. 2019. Actually existing smart citizens: Expertise and (non)participation in the making of the smart city. City: Analysis of Urban Change 23 (1):35–52. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2019.1575115.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, T., M. Zook, and A. Wiig. 2015. The “actually existing smart city.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1):13–25. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsu026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., Z. Huang, S. W. Wong, S. Liao, and Y. Lou. 2018. A holistic evaluation of smart city performance in the context of China. Journal of Cleaner Production 200:667–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, H. B., L. Lees, and E. López-Morales. 2016. Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East. Urban Studies 53 (3):455–70. doi: 10.1177/0042098015620337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city Management Committee. 2021. Small number, big data and zero-waste city. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://www.eco-city.gov.cn/p1/stcxw/20210517/43460.html.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. 2017. Platform capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• State Council. 2014. Planning outline of the construction of a social credit system (2014–2020). June 14. Accessed June 7, 2023. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-06/27/content_8913.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, G. K. S. 2022. Citizens go digital: A discursive examination of digital payments in Singapore’s Smart Nation project. Urban Studies 59 (12):2582–98. doi: 10.1177/00420980211039407.
   Google Scholar
• Tompson, T. 2017. Understanding the contextual development of smart city initiatives: A pragmatist methodology. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation 3 (3):210–28. doi: 10.1016/j.sheji.2017.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Trauth-Goik, A. 2023. Civilized cities or social credit? Overlap and tension between emergent governance infrastructures in China. Global Media and China 8 (3):305–26. doi: 10.1177/20594364231163444.
   Google Scholar
• US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. 2020. China’s corporate social credit system: Context, competition, technology and geopolitics. Accessed June 7, 2023. https://www.uscc.gov/research/chinas-corporate-social-credit-system-context-competition-technology-and-geopolitics.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. 2021. Circulating value: Convergences of datafication, financialization, and urbanization. Urban Transformations 3 (1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s42854-021-00022-4.
   Google Scholar
• Waley, P. 2016. Speaking gentrification in the languages of the Global East. Urban Studies 53 (3):615–25. doi: 10.1177/0042098015615726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., B. P. Y. Loo, and G. Huang. 2022. Becoming smarter through smart city pilot projects: Experiences and lessons from China since 2013. Journal of Urban Technology 29 (4):3–24. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2021.1962695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. 2018. The model significance of the waste sorting eco-city. Bincheng Times, May 1. Accessed June 7, 2023. http://bhsb.tjbh.com/html/2018-01/05/content_9_1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, M., and X. Han. 2017. Corporations, governments, and socioenvironmental policy in China: China’s water machine as assemblage. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (6):1444–60. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1320211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, N., and Q. Zhang. 2021. Centering social-technical relations in studying platform urbanism: Intersectionality for just futures in European cities. Urban Transformations 3 (1):10. doi: 10.1186/s42854-021-00027-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weihai Social Credit Center. 2022a. Weihai City held the theme publicity activity of “6.14 Credit Record Care Day.” Accessed June 7, 2023. http://credit.weihai.gov.cn/home/detail.html?parent=7&menu=9&data=16333.
   Google Scholar
• Weihai Social Credit Center. 2022b. Weihai Development and Reform Commission’s “Four Grasp” to ensure that the comprehensive level of urban credit continues to move forward. Accessed June 7, 2023. http://credit.weihai.gov.cn/home/detail.html?parent=7&menu=9&data=16173.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, K. L. X., and A. S. Dobson. 2019. We’re just data: Exploring China’s social credit system in relation to digital platform ratings cultures in Westernised democracies. Global Media and China 4 (2):220–32. doi: 10.1177/2059436419856090.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., F. Cugurullo, H. Zhang, A. Gaio, and W. Zhang. 2024. The emergence of artificial intelligence in anticipatory urban governance: Multi-scalar evidence of China’s transition to city brains. Journal of Urban Technology : 1–25. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2023.2292823.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, Y. M. 2011. Rethinking Asian cities and urbanization: Four transformations in four decades. Asian Geographer 28 (1):65–83. doi: 10.1080/10225706.2011.577975.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C. 2020. Governing (through) trustworthiness: Technologies of power and subjectification in China’s social credit system. Critical Asian Studies 52 (4):565–88. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2020.1822194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., J. Bates, and P. Abbott. 2022. State-steered smartmentality in Chinese smart urbanism. Urban Studies 59 (14):2933–50. doi: 10.1177/00420980211062888.
   Google Scholar
• Zhen, F., B. Wang, and Z. Wei. 2015. The rise of the internet city in China: Production and consumption of internet information. Urban Studies 52 (13):2313–29. doi: 10.1177/0042098014547369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., F. Xiao, and W. Deng. 2022. Is smart city a slogan? Evidence from China. Asian Geographer 40 (2):185–202. doi: 10.1080/10225706.2022.2052734.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, Y., and W. Zhao. 2021. Neighbourhood governance during the COVID-19 lockdown in Hangzhou: Coproduction based on digital technologies. Public Management Review 24 (12):1914–32. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1945666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar