Identification of traditional Chinese medicinal pipefish and exclusion of common adulterants by multiplex PCR based on 12S sequences of specific alleles

References

• Cawthorn DM, Steinman HA, Witthuhn RC. 2012. Evaluation of the 16S and 12S rRNA genes as universal markers for the identification of commercial fish species in South Africa. Gene. 491:40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain JS, Gibbs RA, Ranier JE, Nguyen PN, Caskey CT. 1988. Deletion screening of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus via multiplex DNA amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:11141–11156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Fang T, Ke T, Xiong ZY, He GY. 2005. Multiplex PCR-A molecular biotechnique of high efficiency and speed. J Wuhan Univ Technol. 27:33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Feng SG, Jiang Y, Wang S, Jiang MY, Chen Z, Ying QC, Wang HZ. 2015. Molecular identification of dendrobium species (Orchidaceae) Based on the DNA barcode ITS2 region and its application for phylogenetic study. Int J Mol Sci. 16:21975–21988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanis A, Kourkoutas Y, Tassou CC, Chorianopoulos N. 2015. Detection and identification of Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains by multiplex PCR Using RAPD-derived primers. Int J Mol Sci. 16:25141–25153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser. 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 270:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MAM, Ali ME, Hamid SBA, Asing Mustafa S, Desa MNM, Zaidul ISM. 2016. Double gene targeting multiplex polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism assay discriminates beef, buffalo, and pork substitution in Frankfurter products. J Agric Food Chem. 64:6343–6354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MAM, Ali ME, Hamid SBA, Asing, Mustafa S, Desa MNM, Zaidul ISM. 2017. Targeting double genes in multiplex PCR for discriminating bovine, buffalo and porcine materials in food chain. Food Control. 73B:175–184.
   Google Scholar
• Hu JY, Li BF. 2002. Research on anti-fatigue effect of Syngnathus acus L. Chin J Mar Drugs. 21:48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Huang LQ. 2014. Molecular identification of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) a laboratory manual. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific Technical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Huang LQ, Tang SH, Li JD, Zhao JX. 2011. Research strategy on molecular identification of animal medical material. Chin J Chin Mater Med. 36:234–236.
   Google Scholar
• Huang YH, Hu XX, Xu WZ, Gao Y, Feng JD, Sun Q, Li N. 2003. The factors affecting the efficiency of mutiplex PCR. Hereditas. 25:65–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paab S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC. 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 86:6196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koichiro T, Glen S, Dniel P, Alan F, Sudhir K. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landi M, Dimech M, Arculeo M, Biondo G, Martins R, Carneiro M, Carvalho GR, Brutto SL, Costa FO. 2014. DNA barcoding for species assignment: the case of Mediterranean marine fishes. PLoS One. 9:e106135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JK, Wang ZY, Wei XJ, Cai MY, Liu Y, Liu XD. 2014. Development and application of three multiplex PCR panels of microsatellites in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). J Fish China. 38:470–475.
   Google Scholar
• Li SM, Wu XD, Zeng S, Luan LJ, Shao Q. 2001. Study on anticancer activity of Syngnathus in vitro. Chin J Chin Mater Med. 26:198–199.
   Google Scholar
• Liao J. 2013. DNA barcoding common medicinal snakes in South China and its application in identification of Jinqian Baihua She (Bungarus Parvus). Guangzhou: Southern Medical University.
   Google Scholar
• Lin SJ, Wang L, Zheng LM, Dong YW, Liu SF, Ding SX, Ye NH, Cao WQ, Zhuang ZM. 2014. Current status and future prospect of DNA barcoding in marine biology. Acta Oceanol Sin (in Chinese). 36:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Liu ZB, Gao QR, Wang RX, Qiao XL, Qiu XM. 2005. Application of multiplex PCR to studies on plant biology. Mol Plant Breed. 3:261–268.
   Google Scholar
• Lv JZ, Wu SQ, Zhang YN, Chen Y, Feng CY, Yuan XF, Jia GL, Deng JH, Wang CX, Wang Q, et al. 2014. Assessment of four DNA fragments (COI, 16S rDNA, ITS2, 12S rDNA) for species identification of the Ixodida (Acari: Ixodida). Parasites Vectors. 7:93. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie XY. 2008. Extraction and anti-tumor effect of active proteins from Syngnathus. Shanghai: Shanghai JiaoTong University.
   Google Scholar
• Noell CJ, Donnellan S, Foster R, Haigh L. 2001. Molecular Discrimination of Garfish Hyporhamphus (Beloniformes) Larvae in Southern Australian Waters. Mar Biotechnol. 3:509–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng WB, Tang XL, Li GQ, Hai F, Yan Y, Xu J. 2010. Comparison study on the compositions and pharmacological activities for Solenognathus hardwickii and Syngnathus acus. Chin J Mar Drugs. 29:10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Pharmacopeia of People’s Republic of China. 2015. Pharmacopeia of the People’s Republic of China, Part 1. Beijing: Chinese medical science and technology press; p. 78–79, 294, 372.
   Google Scholar
• Rach J, DeSalle R, Sarkar IN, Schierwater B, Hadrys H. 2008. Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proc Biol Sci. 275:237–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K. 2006. A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for “barcoding identification”. J Hered. 97:581–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Chen FR, Han LH. 2015. Principal component analysis and risk assessment of trace elements in sea dragon. J Xinyang Normal Univ Nat Sci Ed. 28:117–120.
   Google Scholar
• Xu DH, Xie JM, Mei XT, Xu SB. 2005. Advance in the research of Syngnathidae in China. Chin J Mar Drugs. 24:51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Xu YM, Chen JW, Guo X. 1994. Studies on the phospholipids and fatty acids in traditional chinese medicinal matrials Hippocampus and Syngnathus. Chin J Mar Drugs. 13:14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wang MY, Wei JF, Shi HM, Li XB. 2010. Detemination of thymine, hypoxanthine and uracil contents in medica pipefish by HPLC. Chin J Chin Mater Med. 35:2277–2279.
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol. 74:329–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Zhou KY, Zhang ZH, Xu LS. 1998. Molecular genetic marker identification of traditional Chinese drug Hippocampus. Acta Pharm Sin. 33:226–233.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang ZH, Xu GJ, Xu LS, Wang Q. 1995. Hormonic effects of the ethanol extracts of Syngnathus. J Chin Med Mater. 18:197–199.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang ZH, Xu GJ, Xu LS, Wang Q. 1997. Physical and chemical analysis of medicinal animals of syngnathidae. J Chin Med Mater. 20:140–143.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang ZH, Xu GJ, Xu LS, Wang Q, Nambe T, Kadota S. 1998. The study of the pipefish chemical composition. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs. 29:370–372.
   Google Scholar