Morphological and genetic analyses of the first record of longrakered trevally, Ulua mentalis (Perciformes: Carangidae) and of the pinjalo snapper, Pinjalo pinjalo (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) in the Odisha coast, Bay of Bengal

References

• Amaral AR, Sequeira M, Coelho MM. 2007. A first approach to the usefulness of cytochrome c oxidase I barcodes in the identification of closely related delphinid cetacean species. Mar Freshw Res. 58:505–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvedlund M. 2009. First records of unusual marine fish distributions: can they predict climate changes? J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 89:863–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee MJ, Laskar BA, Dhar B, Ghosh SK. 2012. Identification and re-evaluation of freshwater catfishes through DNA barcoding. PLoS One. 7: e49950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borisenko AB, Lim BK, Ivanova NV, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN. 2008. DNA barcoding in surveys of small mammal communities: a field study in Suriname. Mol Ecol Resour. 8:471–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu CH, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2014. BEAST 2: a software platform for bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computat Biol. 10:e1003537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare EL, Lim BK, Engstrom MD, Eger JL, Hebert PDN. 2007. DNA barcoding of neotropical bats: species identification and discovery within Guyana. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:184–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa FO, Carvalho GR. 2007. The barcode of life initiative: synopsis and prospective societal impacts of DNA barcoding of fish. Genomics Soc Policy. 3:29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Cywinska A, Hunter FF, Hebert PDN. 2006. Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Med Vet Entomol. 20:4213–4424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eissa AE, Zaki MM. 2011. The impact of global climatic changes on the aquatic environment. Procedia Environ Sci. 4:251–259.
   Google Scholar
• Eschmeyer WN, ed. (2010). Catalog of Fishes electronic version [Internet]. Available from: http://research.calacademy.org/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:783–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese R, Pauly D. (2009). Fish Base. World Wide Web electronic publication [Internet]. Available from: http://www.fishbase.org, version (02/ 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Froese R, Pauly D. (2016). Fish Base. World Wide Web electronic publication. Ver. 10/2016 Available from: http://www.fishbase.org
   Google Scholar
• Golding GB, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2009. Preface. Mol Ecol Res. 9(Suppl. 1):iv–vi.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstone MH, Rowley DH, Heimbach U, Lundgren JG, Pfannenstiel RS, Rehner SA. 2005. Barcoding generalist predators by polymerase chain reaction: carabids and spiders. Mol Ecol. 14: 3247–3266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. 2006. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:968–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hanner R, Floyd R, Bernard A, Collette BB, Shivji M. 2011. DNA barcoding of billfishes. Mitochondrial DNA. 22:27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL. 2003a. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 270:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR. 2003b. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 270(Suppl 1):96–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2:1657–1663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg ID, Hebert PDN. 2004. Biological identification of springtails (Collenbola: Hexapoda) from Canadian arctic, using mitochondrial DNA barcodes. Can J Zool. 82:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Burns JM. 2005. Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1462:1835–1846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järnegren J, Schander C, Sneli JA, Ronningen V, Young CM. 2007. Four genes, morphology and ecology: distinguishing a new species of Acesta (Mollusca; Bivalvia) from the Gulf of Mexico. Mar Biol. 152:43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr KCR, Lijtmaer DA, Barreira AS, Hebert PDN, Tubaro PL. 2009. Probing evolutionary patterns in neotropical birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS One. 4:e4379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochzius M. (2009). Trends in fishery genetics. In Beamish RJ and BJ Rothschild, Editors. The future of fisheries science in North America. The Netherlands: Fish and Fisheries: Springer, vol. 31, pp. 453–493.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 33:1870–1874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu S, Das KC, Ghosh SK. 2013. Taxonomic rank of Indian tortoise: revisit with DNA barcoding perspective. DNA Barcodes. 1:39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lakra WS, Verma MS, Goswami M, Lal KK, Mohindra V, Punia P, Gopalakrishnan A. 2011. DNA barcoding Indian marine fishes. Mol Ecol Res. 11:60–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskar BA, Bhattacharjee MJ, Dhar B, Mahadani P, Kundu S, Ghosh SK. 2013. The species dilemma of Northeast Indian Mahseer (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae): DNA barcoding in clarifying the riddle. PLoS One. 8: e53704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim BK. 2012. Preliminary assessment of neotropical mammal DNA barcodes: an underestimation of biodiversity. Open Zool J. 5:10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lukhtanov VA, Sourakov A, Zakharov EV, Hebert PDN. 2009. DNA barcoding Central Asian butterflies: increasing geographical dimension does not significantly reduce the success of species identification. Mol Ecol Res. 9:1302–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddison WP. 1991. Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Syst Zool. 40:304–314.
   Google Scholar
• Miller TL, Cribb TH. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of some common Indo-Pacific snappers (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences, with comments on the taxonomic position of the Caesioninae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 44:450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohsin AKM, Ambak MA. 1996. Marine fishes and fisheries of Malaysia and neighbouring countries. Serdang: Universiti Pertanian Malaysia Press, p. 744.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson JS. 2006. Fishes of the World. 4th Ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Occhipinti-Ambrogi A. 2007. Global change and marine communities: alien species and climate change. Marine Poll Bull. 55:342–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP. 2006. Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Syst Biol. 55:595–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 14:817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall JE, Allen GR, Anderson Jr. WD. 1987. Revision of the Indo-Pacific lutjanid genus Pinjalo, with description of a new species. Indo-Pacific Fishes. p. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro AO, Caires RA, Mariguela TC, Pereira LHG, Hanner R, Oliveira C. 2012. DNA barcodes identify marine fishes of São Paulo State, Brazil. Mol Ecol Res. 12:1012–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richly E, Leister D. 2004. NUMTs in sequenced eukaryotic genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1081–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccone C, Giorgic D, Gissi C, Pesol G, Reyes A. 1999. Evolutionary genomics in Metazoa: the mitochondrial DNA as a model system. Gene. 238:195–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambrook SJ, Russel DW, Janssen KA, Irwuin NJ. 2001. Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. 3rd Ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schindel DE, Stoeckle MY, Milensky CM, Trizna M, Schmidt BK, Gebhard CA, Graves GR. 2011. DNA barcodes of bird species in the National Museum of Natural History. Smithsonian Institution, USA. ZooKeys. 152:87–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MA, Wood DM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. 2007. DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:4967–4972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwar PK, Kacker RK. 1984. Commercial sea fishes of India. Calcutta: Zoological Survey of India, p. 997.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Battistuzzi FU, Billing-Ross P, Murillo O, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2012. Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 109:19333–19338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares ES, Baker AJ. 2008. Single mitochondrial gene barcodes reliably identify sister-species in diverse clades of birds. BMC Evol Biol. 8:81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teletchea F. 2009. Molecular identification methods of fish species: reassessment and possible applications. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 19:265–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi S, Ghosh SK, Choudhury A. 2011. Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) Sequence of Macrobrachium rosenbergii collected from Sunderbans, India. J Environ Sociobiol. 8:169–172.
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi S, Ghosh SK, Choudhury A. 2012. Mitochondrial DNA sequence of Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) region of an oyster Crassostrea cuttakensis collected from Sunderbans. J Environ Sociobiol. 9:13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi S, Affan R, Alessa AHA. 2014. DNA barcoding of Red Sea fishes from Saudi Arabia – the first approach. DNA Barcodes. 2:17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi S, Aloufi AA, Ansari AA, Ghosh SK. 2016. Role of DNA barcoding in marine biodiversity assessment and conservation: an update. Saudi J Biol Sci. 23:161–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PD. 2005. DNA Barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:1847–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia X. 2013. DAMBE5: a comprehensive software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 30: 1720–1728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancy HF, Zemlak TS, Mason JA. 2008. Potential use of DNA barcodes in regulatory science: applications of the regulatory fish encyclopedia. J Food Protect. 71: 210–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo HS, Eah JY, Kim JS. 2006. DNA barcoding Korean birds. Mol Cells. 22: 323–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang RL, Zhang B. 2014. Prospects of using DNA barcoding for species identification and evaluation of the accuracy of sequence databases for ticks (Acari: Ixodida). Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 5:352–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar