Assessing the effectiveness of mitochondrial COI and 16S rRNA genes for DNA barcoding of farmland spiders in China

References

• Agnarsson I. 2004. Morphological phylogeny of cobweb spiders and their relatives (Araneae, Araneoidea, Theridiidae). Zool J Linn Soc-Land. 141:447–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrin JJ, Höfer H, Spelda J, Holstein J, Bayer S, Hendrich L, Huber BA, Kielhorn KH, Krammer HJ, Lemke M, et al. 2016. Towards a DNA barcode reference database for spiders and harvestmen of Germany. PLoS One. 11:e0162624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrin JJ, Huber BA, Misof B, Klütsch CF. 2006. Molecular taxonomy in pholcid spiders (Pholcidae, Araneae): evaluation of species identification methods using CO1 and 16S rRNA. Zool Scr. 35:441–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett RD, Hebert PD. 2005. Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Can J Zool. 83:481–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagoev G, Hebert P, Adamowicz S, Robinson E. 2009. Prospects for using DNA barcoding to identify spiders in species-rich genera. ZooKeys. 16:27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagoev GA, deWaard JR, Ratnasingham S, deWaard SL, Lu L, Robertson J, Telfer AC, Hebert PD. 2016. Untangling taxonomy: a DNA barcode reference library for Canadian spiders. Mol Ecol Resour. 16:325–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagoev GA, Nikolova NI, Sobel CN, Hebert PD, Adamowicz SJ. 2013. Spiders (Araneae) of Churchill, Manitoba: DNA barcodes and morphology reveal high species diversity and new Canadian records. BMC Ecol. 13:44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čandek K, Kuntner M. 2015. DNA barcoding gap: reliable species identification over morphological and geographical scales. Mol Ecol Resour. 15:268–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty C, Doss CGP, Patra BC, Bandyopadhyay S. 2014. DNA barcoding to map the microbial communities: current advances and future directions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 98:3425–3436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty M, Ghosh SK. 2014. An assessment of the DNA barcodes of Indian freshwater fishes. Gene. 537:20–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Jiang LY, Qiao GX. 2012. The effectiveness of three regions in mitochondrial genome for aphid DNA barcoding: a case in Lachininae. PLoS One. 7:e46190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coddington JA, Agnarsson I, Cheng RC, Čandek K, Driskell A, Frick H, Gregorič M, Kostanjšek R, Kropf C, Kweskin M, et al. 2016. DNA barcode data accurately assign higher spider taxa. Peer J. 4:e2201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coddington JA, Levi HW. 1991. Systematics and evolution of spiders (Araneae). Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 22:565–592.
   Google Scholar
• Collins RA, Boykin LM, Cruickshank RH, Armstrong KF. 2012. Barcoding’s next top model: an evaluation of nucleotide substitution models for specimen identification. Methods Ecol Evol. 3:457–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 3:294–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaikwad S, Warudkar A, Shouche Y. 2016. Efficacy of DNA barcoding for the species identification of spiders from Western Ghats of India. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 26:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Giudicelli GC, Mäder G, Brandão de Freitas L. 2015. Efficiency of ITS sequences for DNA barcoding in Passiflora (Passifloraceae). Int J Mol Sci. 16:7289–7303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Vaquero RA, Roig-Alsina A, Packer L. 2016. DNA barcoding as a useful tool in the systematic study of wild bees of the tribe Augochlorini (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Genome. 59:889–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PD. 2006. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:968–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi CY, Lewis RV. 2001. Spider flagelliform silk: lessons in protein design, gene structure, and molecular evolution. Bioessays. 23:750–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 270:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PD, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. 2004a. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:14812–14817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PD, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. 2004b. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2:e312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP. 2011. Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS One. 6:e19254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jocque M, Giupponi APL. 2012. Charinus bromeliaea sp. n. (Amblypygi: Charinidae); a new species of bromeliad inhabiting whip spider from French Guyana. Zootaxa. 3158:53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Jocqué R. 2002. Genitalic polymorphism – a challenge for taxonomy. J Arachnol. 30:298–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn-Nentwig L, Schaller J, Nentwig W. 2004. Biochemistry, toxicology and ecology of the venom of the spider Cupiennius salei (Ctenidae). Toxicon. 43:543–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long SM, Lewis S, Jean-Louis L, Ramos G, Richmond J, Jakob EM. 2012. Firefly flashing and jumping spider predation. Anim Behav. 83:81–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcelino VR, Verbruggen H. 2016. Multi-marker metabarcoding of coral skeletons reveals a rich microbiome and diverse evolutionary origins of endolithic algae. Sci Rep. 6:31508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer CP, Paulay G. 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3:e422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JA, Beentjes KK, van Helsdingen P, IJland S. 2013. Which specimens from a museum collection will yield DNA barcodes a time series study of spiders in alcohol. ZooKeys. 365:245–261.
   Google Scholar
• Pechmann M, Khadjeh S, Sprenger F, Prpic NM. 2010. Patterning mechanisms and morphological diversity of spider appendages and their importance for spider evolution. Arthropod Struct Dev. 39:453–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platnick NI. 2017. The World Spider Catalog, Natural History Museum Bern, version 16. [accessed on 20 February 2017] http://wsc.nmbe.ch.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt JN, Riechert SE. 2012. The ecological consequences of temperament in spiders. Curr Zool. 58:589–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassmann K. 1997. Evolutionary age of the Galápagos iguanas predates the age of the present Galápagos Islands. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 7:158–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer J, Hausdorf B. 2012. A comparison of DNA-based methods for delimiting species in a Cretan land snail radiation reveals shortcomings of exclusively molecular taxonomy. Cladistics. 28:300–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivathsan A, Meier R. 2012. On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature. Cladistics. 28:190–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staton JL, Daehler LL, Brown WM. 1997. Mitochondrial gene arrangement of the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus L.: conservation of major features among arthropod classes. Mol Biol Evol. 14:867–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vences M, Thomas M, Van der Meijden A, Chiari Y, Vieites DR. 2005. Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Front Zool. 2:5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Virgilio M, Backeljau T, Nevado B, De Meyer M. 2010. Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders. BMC Bioinformatics. 11:206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks RD, Holtzer TO. 2000. Habitat and season in structuring ground-dwelling spider (Araneae) communities in a shortgrass steppe ecosystem. Environ Entomol. 29:1164–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemers M, Fiedler K. 2007. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? – A case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)). Front Zool. 4:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Y, Gu HF, Peng R, Chen Q, Zheng YC, Murphy RW, Zeng XM. 2012. COI is better than 16S rRNA for DNA barcoding Asiatic salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata: Hynobiidae). Mol Ecol Resour. 12:48–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Zhai Q, Yang Z, Zhang Y. 2016. DNA barcoding Satyrine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in China. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 27:2523–2528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar