Women's knowledge co-production and sharing in online communities

References

• Allen, M. (2012). What was Web 2.0? Versions as the dominant mode of internet history. New Media & Society, 15(2), 260–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Retrieved from http://21stcenturywalton.pbworks.com/f/What%20is%20Web%202.0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The internet in everyday life. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Vincent, C. (1998). ‘I heard it on the grapevine’: ‘hot’ knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. (2006). Speaking out: The female voice in public contexts. The female voice in public context. HoundMills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K., (2003a) “I think of them as friends” Interpersonal relationships in the online community. In G. Dines & J. M. Humez (Eds.), Gender, race, & class in media (2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA). Sage, 488–496, .
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K., (2003b). Communication practices in the online community. In K. Christensen & D. Levinson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of community, Thousand Oaks, CA:, : Form the Village to the Virtual World, vol.3. Sage., 1015–1017.
   Google Scholar
• Beard, M. (2015). The public voice of women. Journal Women's History Review, 24(5), 809–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beniger, J. R. (1987). Personalization of mass media and the growth of pseudo-community. Communication Research, 14(3), 352–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., Cooper, C., & Ballard, H. (2016). The theory and practice of citizen science: Launching a new journal. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 1. doi:http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.65
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N., Rappert, B., & Webster, A. (Eds.). (2000). Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science. Abingdon: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2011). News produsage in a pro-am mediasphere: Why citizen journalism matters. In G. Meikle & G. Redden (Eds.), News online. Transformations & continuities (pp. 132–147). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, S., & Kim, M. (2010). What makes bloggers share knowledge? An investigation on the role of trust. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 408–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.J., & Hung, S.W. (2010). To give or to receive? Factors influencing members knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management, 47(4), 226–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, T. (2006). Creative teaching and learning in Europe: Promoting a new paradigm. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• De Mauro, T., & Lodi, M. (1979). Lingua e dialetti. Roma: Editori Riuniti.
   Google Scholar
• Drotner, K. (1999). Dangerous media? Panic discourses and dilemmas of modernity. Paedagogica Historica. International Journal of the History of Education, 35(3), 593–619.)).
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. N., & Holzner, B. (1988). Knowledge in society: Anatomy of an emergent field. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 1(1), 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (2013). Perché le università? Retrieved from http://disf.org/files/eco-perche-universita.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A., & Etzioni, O. (1999). Face-to-face and computer-mediated communities; a comparative analysis. The Information Society, 15(4), 241–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. British Medical Journal November 10, 323(7321), 1103–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flichy, P. (2004). L'individualisme connecté entre la technique numérique et la société. Réseaux, 124, 17–52.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. (2004). The adventure of newspapers online. A case study: The Italian women's weekly Donna Moderna. In R. Salaverría & C. Sádaba (Eds.), Towards new media paradigms. Content, producers, organizations and audiences (pp. 71–100). Pamplona: Edizione Eunate.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. (2007). Immaterial Labour and its Machinization. Ephemera. Theory & Politics in Organizations, 7(1), 139–157.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. (2009). Online newspapers interactivity and e-participation: A balance. Communication, Politics & Culture, 42(2), 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L. (2014). Media between power and empowerment: Can we resolve this dilemma? The Information Society: An International Journal, 30(3), 169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L., & Manganelli, A. (2002). A review on the Literature on Gender and ICTs in Italy. In K. H. Sørensen & J. Stewart (Eds.), Digital divides and inclusion measures. A review of literature and statistical trends on gender and ICT (pp. 137–170). Trondheim: NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunati, L., & de Luca, R. (2003). Behind the mask. In Lie M. & K. H. Sørensen (Eds.), Strategies of inclusion: Gender in the information society, vol.1: Experiences from public sector initiatives, center for technology and society (pp. 299–326). Trondheim: NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (1962). The sociology of medicine. Current Sociology, 11(3), 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416. Retrieved from https://cpb-us-east-1-juc1ugur1qwqqqo4.stackpathdns.com/sites.nova.edu/dist/a/4/files/2015/09/fusch1.pdfhttp://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR20/9/fusch1.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. (1999). An Invitation to social construction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Granott, N. (2014). Patterns of interaction in the co-construction of knowledge: Separate minds, join effort, and weird creatures. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fisher (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 183–210). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardey, M. (2001). ‘E-health’: The internet and the transformation of patients into consumers and producers of health knowledge. Information, Communication & Society, 4(3), 388–405.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2008). The digital reproduction of inequality. In D. Grusky (Ed.), Social stratification (pp. 936–944). Boulder, CO: Westview Press CO.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R. (2010). Human expression in the age of communications overload. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, F., Wyatt, S., Hart, A., & Smith, J. (2003). ‘Ignorance is bliss sometimes’: Constraints on the emergence of the ‘informed patient’ in the changing landscapes of health information. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(6), 589–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindman, M. (2008). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, A., McEwen, L., & Garde Hansen, J. (2016). Exploring the co-production of digital storytelling for lay knowledge exchange within and between flood risk communities: The case of the River Severn, UK. Retrieved from https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2016/02/e3sconf_flood2016_15003/e3sconf_flood2016_15003.html
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. K., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. K. (2010). Development of a reading material recommendation system based on a knowledge engineering approach. Computers & Education, 55(1), 76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humm, M. (1995). The dictionary of feminist theory. Columbus: Ohio: State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, N. W. (2007). Exploring e-science: An introduction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), article 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, S., Kim,Y-G., & Koh, J. (2010). An integrative model for knowledge sharing in communities-of-practice.Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 251–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, N. A. (2012). Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society, 15(2), 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. G. (1995). CyberSociety. Computer-mediated communication and community. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, A. (2008). The cult of the amateur. London: Nicholas Breadley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, L. (2000). OH NO! I'M A NERD!. Hegemonic Masculinity on an Online Forum. Gender & Society, 14(2), 256–274.
   Google Scholar
• Kingod, N., Cleal, B., Wahlberg, A., & Husted, G. R. (2017). Online peer-to-peer communities in the daily lives of people with chronic illness. A qualitative systematic review. Qualitative Health Research, 27(1), 89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, J., Kim, Y-G., Butler, B., & Bock, G-W. (2007). Encouraging Participation in Virtual Communities. Communications of the ACM, 50(2), 68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollock, P., & Smith, M.A. (2000). Introduction. In M.A. Smith & P. Kollock (Ed.), Communities in Cyberspace London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K., & Bock, M. A. (Eds.). (2008). The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kurabayashi, N., Yamazaki, T., Yuasa, T., & Hasuike, K. (2002). Proactive information supply for activating conversational interaction in virtual communities. IEEE International Workshop on Knowledge Media Networking (KMN'02); pp. 167–170.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C-P., Wang, Y-J., Tsai, Y-H., & Hsu, Y-F. (2000). Perceived job effectiveness in coopetition: A survey of virtual teams within business organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1598–1606.
   Google Scholar
• Losito, G. (1993). L'analisi del contenuto nella ricerca sociale. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• McClean, S., & Shaw, A. (2005). From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge – an exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 15(6), 729–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, C. (2000). Cyberspace and disadvantaged communities. The Internet as a tool for collective action. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 290–310). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norström, A. V., Balvanera, P., Spierenburg, M., & Bouamrane, M. (2017). Programme on ecosystem change and society: Knowledge for sustainable stewardship of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 22(1), 47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). Learning a living. First results of the adult literacy and life skills survey. Ottawa: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’ Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved October 10, 2017, from http://oreilly.com/
   Google Scholar
• Paltrinieri, R., & Degli Esposti, P. (2013). Processes of inclusion and exclusion in the sphere of prosumerism. Future Internet, 5(1), 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., & Katz, E. J. (2001). The internet and health communication. Experiences and expectations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3-4), 271–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romm, C., Pliskin, N., & Clarke, R. (1997). Virtual communities and society: Toward an integrative three phase model. International Journal of Information Management, 17(4), 261–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapnar Ankerson, M. (2010). Web industries, economis, aesthetics: Mapping the look of the web in the dot-com era. In N. Brügger (Ed.), Web history (pp. 173–194). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sapnar Ankerson, M. (2015). Social media and the £Read-Only” web: Reconfiguring social logics and historical boundaries. Social Media + Society, 1 (2), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody. The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (Ed.). (1997). Doing qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. A., & Kollock, P. (2000). Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand. Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Terranova, T. (2004). Network culture: Politics for the information age. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tessarolo, M. (1991). Il sistema delle comunicazioni. Un approccio sociologico. Padova: Cleup.
   Google Scholar
• The Boston Women's Health Book Collective. (1970). Women and their bodies, a course. Retrieved from https://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/cms/assets/uploads/2014/04/Women-and-Their-Bodies-1970.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tomai, M., Rosa, V., Mebane, ME, D'Acunti, A., Benedetti, M., & Francescato, D. (2010). Virtual Communities in schools as tools to promote social capital with high school students. Computers & Education, 54, (1), 265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. (1999). The network society. An introduction to the social aspects of the new media. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hooff, B., & Huysman, M. (2009). Managing knowledge sharing: Emergent and engineering approaches. Information & Management, 46(1), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. (2000). Concise routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (2000). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don't ride alone. In P. Pollock & M. A. Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167–194). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.). (2002). The internet in everyday life. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practices and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., Stewart, J., & Slack, R. (2005). Social learning in technological innovation. Experimenting with information and communication technologies. Northampton: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zendedel, R., Schouten, B. C., van Weert, J. C. M., & van den Putte, B. (2018). Informal interpreting in general practice: The migrant patient's voice. Ethnicity & Health, 23(2), 158–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar