From healthy communities to toxic debates: Disqus’ changing ideas about comment moderation

References

• Al Maruf, H., Meshkat, N., & Ali, M. E. (2015, August 2015). 2015 Ieee/Acm Asonam, Human behaviour in different social medias: A case study of Twitter and Disqus (pp. 270–273). https://doi.org/10.1145/2808797.2809395
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, R. (2018). Uncovering online commenting culture: Trolls, Fanboys and Lurkers. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70235-3
   Google Scholar
• Ben-David, A., & Soffer, O. (2019). User comments across platforms and journalistic genres. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1810–1829. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1468919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blood, R. (2004). How blogging software reshapes the online community. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 53–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/1035134.1035165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Boomen, M. (2014). Transcoding the digital. How metaphors matter in new media. Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• BuildWith. (2021). Comment system usage distribution in the top 1 million sites. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from https://trends.builtwith.com/widgets/comment-system.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J. (2015). From ‘Broadcast yourself’ to ‘Follow your interests’: Making over social media. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(3), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877913513684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, L., & Nerlich, B. (2015). Examining user comments for deliberative democracy: A corpus-driven analysis of the climate change debate online. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.981560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coral. (2016). Artificial moderation: A reading list. Coral by Vox Media. Retrieved 23 October, 2021, from https://coralproject.net/blog/artificial-moderation-a-reading-list/
   Google Scholar
• De Zeeuw, D., Hagen, S., Peeters, S., & Jokubauskaite, E. (2020). Tracing normiefication: A cross-platform analysis of the QAnon conspiracy theory. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i11.10643
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N. (2019). Automating the news: How algorithms are rewriting the media. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674239302
   Google Scholar
• Disqus (2021). About Disqus. Reterieved September 9, 2021, from https://disqus.com/company/
   Google Scholar
• Frischlich, L., Boberg, S., & Quandt, T. (2019). Comment sections as targets of dark participation? Journalism Studies, 20(14), 2014–2033. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1556320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, E. (2013). Online comment moderation: emerging best practices. World Association of Newspapers. Reterieved September 9, 2021, from https://netino.fr/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/WAN-IFRA_Online_Commenting.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Halavais, A. (2009). Do dugg diggers digg diligently? Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802660636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmond, A., & van der Vlist, F. N. (2019). Social media and platform historiography: Challenges and opportunities. TMG Journal for Media History, 22(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.18146/tmg.434
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, A. L., Proferes, N., & Zimmer, M. (2018). “Making the world more open and connected”: Mark Zuckerberg and the discursive construction of Facebook and its users. New Media & Society, 20(1), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keulartz, J., & van der Weele, C. (2008). Framing and reframing in invasion biology. Configurations, 16(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.0.0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. W., Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2021). The distorting prism of social media: How self-selection and exposure to incivility fuel online comment toxicity. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 922–946. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ksiazek, T. B., & Springer, N. (2020). User comments and moderation in digital journalism: Disruptive engagement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2016). Learning from Tay’s introduction. The Official Microsoft Blog. Reterieved April 4, 2022, from https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2016/03/25/learning-tays-introduction/.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, L. K. (2020). Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omernick, E., & Sood, S. O. (2013). The Impact of Anonymity in Online Communities [Paper presentation]. 2013 International Conference on Social Computing, September 2013, pp. 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.80
   Google Scholar
• Paßmann, J. (2021). Medien-theoretisches sampling digital methods als Teil qualitativer Methoden. Zeitschrift Für Medienwissenschaft, 13(25-2), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.14361/zfmw-2021-130213
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W., & Milner, R. M. (2021). You are here. A field guide for navigating polarized speech, conspiracy theories, and our polluted media landscape. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reagle, J. M. (2016). Reading the comments: Likers, haters, and manipulators at the bottom of the web. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B., & Skop, Y. (2021). The fabrics of machine moderation: Studying the technical, normative, and organizational structure of Perspective API. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 205395172110461. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211046181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2013). Debanalizing Twitter: The transformation of an object of study [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 2013, pp. 356–365. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2464464.2464511
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, I. (2015). Deliberation 2.0: Comparing the deliberative quality of online news user comments across platforms. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(4), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1093482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert, J. W. (2003). Moderieren. In Auhagen AE and Bierhoff HW (Eds), Angewandte Sozialpsychologie: Das Praxishandbuch (pp. 75–87). Beltz PVU.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, S., Park, S., & Shin, J. (2013). Analytics on online discussion and commenting services. In S Yamamoto (Ed.), HIMI2013 (pp. 250–258). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39209-2_29
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M. (2016). Slashdot, open news and informated media. In Chun WHK, Watkins Fisher A, and Keenan T (Eds.), New media, old media: A history and theory reader (pp. 616–630). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M., & Rogers, P. S. (1995). Discourse and the projection of corporate culture: The mission statement. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott, V., Beckett, J., & Paech, V. (2022). Operationalising ‘toxicity’ in the manosphere: Automation, platform governance and community health. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 135485652211110. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221111075
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., de Winkel, T., & Schäfer, M. T. (2021). Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warzel, C. (2018). How the alt-right manipulates the internet’s biggest commenting platform. Reterieved September 14, 2021, from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/how-the-alt-right-manipulates-disqus-comment-threads.
   Google Scholar
• Weech, S. (2020). Analyzing organizational values over time: A methodological case study [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, New York, NY, USA, 3 October 2020 (pp. 1–6). SIGDOC ‘20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3380851.3416760
   Google Scholar
• Wolfgang, J. D. (2021). Taming the ‘trolls’: How journalists negotiate the boundaries of journalism and online comments. Journalism, 22(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918762362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A. (1992). Wer moderieren will, muß Maß nehmen und Maß geben. Gruppendynamik-Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Sozialpsychologie, 23(3), 215–236.
   Google Scholar