A modeling and optimization study by response surface methodology (RSM) on UO₂²⁺ ions adsorption using nano-MgO particles prepared with combustion synthesis

References

• Benedict, B.; Pigford, T. H.; Levi, H. W. Nuclear Chemical Engineering; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, S.; Yang, J.; Chen, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, C. Study on Biosorption Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Uranium by Citrobacter freudii. J. Environ. Radioact. 2008, 99, 126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budnyak, T. M.; Strizhak, A. V.; Gładysz-Płaska, A.; Sternik, D.; Komarov, I. V.; Kołodyńska, D.; Majdan, M.; Tertykh, V. А. Silica with Immobilized Phosphinic Acid-Derivative for Uranium Extraction. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 314, 326–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Basic Information about Radionuclides in Drinking Water. http://epa.gov.sci (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Nazari, K.; Maragheh, M. G.; Rad, A. J. Studies on Extraction of Uranium from Phosphoric Acid Using PN-1200 Extractant. Hydrometallurgy 2004, 71, 371–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Cao, X.; Hua, R.; Wang, Y.; Pang, C.; Hua, M.; Li, X. Biosorption Studies of Uranium (VI) on Cross-Linked Chitosan: Isotherm, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Aspects. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2011, 290, 231–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, Y. K.; Shrivastav, P.; Menon, S. K. Solvent Extraction, Separation of Uranium (VI) with Crown Ether. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2000, 20, 177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkat, M.; Nibou, D.; Amokrane, S.; Chegrouche, S.; Mellah, A. Uranium (VI) Adsorption on Synthesized 4A and P1 Zeolites: Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies. C. R. Chim. 2015, 18, 261–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nibou, D.; Khemaissia, S.; Amokrane, S.; Barkat, M.; Chegrouche, S.; Mellah, A. Removal of UO22+ onto Synthetic NaA Zeolite. Characterization, Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 172, 296–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houhoune, F.; Nibou, D.; Chegrouche, S.; Menacer, S. Behaviour of Modified Hexadecyltrimethylammonium Bromide Bentonite toward Uranium Species. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 3459–3467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djamila, H.; Abdelhamid, M.; Djamel, N.; Sihem, K. Promising Enhancement in the Removal of Uranium Ions by Surface-Modified Activated Carbons: Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies. J. Environ. Eng. 2018, 144, 04018027. DOI: 04018027DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynar, U. H.; Ayvacıklı, M.; Kaynar, S. C.; Hıcsonmez, U. Removal of Uranium(VI) from Aqueous Solutions Using Nanoporous ZnO Prepared with Microwave-Assisted Combustion Synthesis. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2014, 299, 1469–1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. Q.; Elliott, D. W.; Zhang, W. X. Zero-Valent Iron Nanoparticles for Abatement of Environmental Pollutants: Materials and Engineering Aspects. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2006, 31, 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beheshtian, J.; Peyghan, A. A.; Bagheri, Z. Adsorption and Dissociation of Cl2 Molecule on ZnO Nanocluster. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 8171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiyan, J.; Xu, J.; Zhu, F. Application of Nanomaterials in Sample Preparation. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1300, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynar, U. H.; Ayvacıklı, M.; Hiçsonmez, U.; Kaynar, S. C. Removal of Thorium (IV) Ions from Aqueous Solution by a Novel Nanoporous ZnO: Isotherms, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies. J. Environ. Radioact. 2015, 150, 145–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y.; Li, C.; Wu, D.; Wang, W.; Tan, F.; Wang, X.; Wong, P. K.; Qiao, X. Highly Active MgO Nanoparticles for Simultaneous Bacterial Inactivation and Heavy Metal Removal from Aqueous Solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 312, 158–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, C.; Wang, W.; Tan, F.; Luo, F.; Chen, J.; Qiao, X. Investigation on the Efficiency and Mechanism of Cd(II) and Pb(II) Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using MgO Nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 299, 664–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poullikkas, A. Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Use of Additives in Heavy Fuel Oil Fired Boilers. Energy Convers. Manage. 2004, 45, 1725–1734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X. L.; Liu, Z. G.; Chen, X. Y.; Zhu, S. N.; Xiong, S. B.; Hu, W. S.; Lin, C. Y. Pulsed Laser Deposition of/MgO Bilayered Films on Si Wafer in Waveguide Form. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1996, 29, 1632–1635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. R.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Jiang, S. W.; Wei, X. H. Growth Modes Transition Induced by Strain Relaxation in Epitaxial MgO Thin Films on SrTiO3 (001) Substrates. Thin Solid Films 2005, 489, 245–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W.; Qiao, X.; Chen, J.; Tan, F.; Li, H. Influence of Titanium Doping on the Structure and Morphology of MgO Prepared by Coprecipitation Method. Mater. Charact. 2009, 60, 858–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W.; Qiao, X.; Chen, J. The Role of Acetic Acid in Magnesium Oxide Preparation via Chemical Precipitation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 91, 1697–1699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, G. W.; Bartram, P. W.; Koper, O.; Klabunde, K. J. Reactions of VX, GD, and HD with Nanosize MgO. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 3225–3228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynar, U. H.; Kaynar, S. C. The Removal of Sr(II) by a Nanoparticles ZnO Prepared by Microwave-Assisted Ignition Reaction. CBU J. Sci. 2017, 13-1, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Çınar, S.; Kaynar, U. H.; Aydemir, T.; Kaynar, S. Ç.; Ayvacıklı, M. An Efficient Removal of RB5 from Aqueous Solution by Adsorption onto Nano-ZnO/Chitosan Composite Beads. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 96, 459–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cojocaru, C.; Zakrzewska-Trznadel, G. Response Surface Modeling and Optimization of Copper Removal from Aqua Solutions Using Polymer Assisted Ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 298, 56–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, K. P.; Gupta, S.; Singh, A. K.; Sinha, S. Optimizing Adsorption of Crystal Violet Dye from Water by Magnetic Nanocomposite Using Response Surface Modeling Approach. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 1462–1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulkumar, M.; Sathishkumar, P.; Palvannan, T. Optimization of Orange G Dye Adsorption by Activated Carbon of Thespesia populnea Pods Using Response Surface Methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 827–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houhoune, F.; Djamel, N.; Samira, A.; Mahfoud, B. Modelling and Adsorption Studies of Removal Uranium (VI) Ions on Synthesised Zeolite NaY. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51, 5583–5591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi, M. A.; Morsali, A. Syntheses and Characterization of Mg(OH)2 and MgO Nanostructures by Ultrasonic Method. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2010, 17, 441–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhas, N. A.; Patil, K. C. Combustion Synthesis and Properties of the NASICON Family of Materials. J. Mater. Chem. 1995, 5, 1463–1468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehru, L. C.; Swaminathan, V.; Sanjeeviraja, C. A New Large – Scale Synthesis of Magnesium Oxide Nanowires: Structural and Antibacterial Properties. Powder Technol. 2012, 226, 29–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S.; Malik, A.; Satya, A. Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for Optimization of Nutrient Supplementation for Cr (VI) Removal by Aspergillus Lentulus AML05. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1198–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezerra, M. A.; Santelli, R. E.; Oliveira, E. P.; Villar, L. S.; Escaleira, L. A. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) as a Tool for Optimization in Analytical Chemistry. Talanta 2008, 76, 965–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H.; Montgomery, D. C. Response Surface Methodology, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 2011; pp. 120–224.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, O.; Talat, M.; Hasan, S. H.; Pandey, R. K. Factorial Design for the Optimization of Enzymatic Detection of Cadmium in Aqueous Solution Using Immobilized Urease from Vegetable Waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7565–7572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A.; Malik, A. Metal and Dye Removal Using Fungal Consortium from Mixed Waste Stream: Optimization and Validation. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 69, 226–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurugan, S.; Ashna, L.; Parthiban, P. Synthesis of Nanocrystalline MgO Particles by Combustion Followed by Annealing Method Using Hexamine as a Fuel. J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 2014, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Selvam, N. C. S.; Kumar, R. T.; Kennedy, L. J.; Vijaya, J. J. Comparative Study of Microwave and Conventional Methods for the Preparation and Optical Properties of Novel MgO-Micro and Nano-Structures. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 9809–9815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mageshwari, K.; Mali, S. S.; Sathyamoorthy, R.; Patil, P. S. Template-Free Synthesis of MgO Nanoparticles for Effective Photocatalytic Applications. Powder Technol. 2013, 249, 456–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakur, H. R.; Rezaee Ebrahim Saraee, K.; Abdi, M. R.; Azimi, G. A Novel PAN/NaX/ZnO Nanocomposite Absorbent: synthesis, Characterization, Removal of Uranium Anionic Species from Contaminated Water. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 9991–10004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R.; Chawla, J. Removal of Cadmium Ion from Water/Wastewater by Nano-Metal Oxides: A Review. Water Qual. Expo. Health 2014, 5, 215–226.
   Google Scholar
• Hamzeh, Y.; Ashori, A.; Azadeh, E.; Abdulkhani, A. Removal of Acid Orange 7 and Remazol Black 5 Reactive Dyes from Aqueous Solutions Using a Novel Biosorbent. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2012, 32, 1394–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q. Facile Preparation of Oxine Functionalized Magnetic Fe3O4 Particles for Enhanced Uranium (VI) Adsorption. Colloids Surf. A 2015, 466, 85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Zidan, W. I.; Abo-Aly, M. M.; Elhefnawy, O. A.; Bakier, E. Batch and Column Studies on Uranium Adsorption by Amberlite XAD-4 Modified with Nano-Manganese Dioxide. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 304, 473–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. E.; Stewart, D. I.; Kee, T. P.; Barton, C. S. Development of a Functionalized Polymer-Coated Silica for the Removal of Uranium from Groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 4011–4016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anirudhan, T. S.; Deepa, J. R. Synthesis and Characterization of Multi-Carboxyl-Functionalized Nanocellulose/Nanobentonite Composite for the Adsorption of Uranium(VI) from Aqueous Solutions: Kinetic and Equilibrium Profiles. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 273, 390–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W.-L.; Zhang, Z.-B.; Cao, X.-H.; Ma, R.-C.; Liu, Y.-H. Uranium Adsorption Studies on Hydrothermal Carbon Produced by Chitosan Using Statistical Design Method. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2014, 301, 197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhri, A.; Adami, S. Adsorption and Thermodynamic Study of Cephalosporins Antibiotics from Aqueous Solution onto MgO Nanoparticles. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. E 2014, 45, 1001–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhri, A. Investigation of Mercury (II) Adsorption from Aqueous Solution onto Copper Oxide Nanoparticles: Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology. Process Saf. Environ. 2015, 93, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhri, A.; Behrouz, S. Comparison Studies of Adsorption Properties of MgO Nanoparticles and ZnO–MgO Nanocomposites for Linezolid Antibiotic Removal from Aqueous Solution Using Response Surface Methodology. Process Saf. Environ. 2015, 94, 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Khateeb, L. A.; Obaid, A. Y.; Asiri, N. A.; Salam, M. A. Adsorption Behavior of Estrogenic Compounds on Carbon Nanotubes from Aqueous Solutions: Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 916–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar