Big-Five Personality and Motivations Associated with Sport Team Social Networking Site Usage: A Cluster Analysis Approach

References

• Allen, M. S., & Laborde, S. (2014). The role of personality in sport and physical activity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 460–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531–1544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, A. C., Qiao, F., Conlin, L., & Nie, T. (2017). Permanently desiring the temporary? Snapchat, social media, and the shifting motivations of sports fans. Communication and Sport, 5, 10–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehmer, J. (2016). Does the game really change? How students consume mediated sports in the age of social media. Communication and Sport, 4, 460–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2008). Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 441–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper, J. (2007). Sport commitment, participation frequency and purchase intention: Segmentation based on age, gender, income and skill level with US tennis participants. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7, 269–282.
   Google Scholar
• Catalyst 2014 fan engagement study social media behaviors and digital media evolution. (2014, October 14). Retrieved January 20, 2017 from http://sportstechie.net/catalyst-2014-fan-engagement-study-social-media-behaviors-and-digital-media-evolution
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K., & Misra, S. (1990). Characteristics of opinion leaders: A new dimension. Journal of Advertising, 18, 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2016). The influences of personality and motivation on the sharing of misinformation on social media. iConference 2016 Proceeding. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/89327/Chen145.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Clavio, G., & Kian, E. M. (2010). Uses and gratifications of a retired female athlete's Twitter followers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 485–500.
   Google Scholar
• Clavio, G., & Walsh, P. (2014). Dimensions of social media utilization among college sport fans. Communication and Sport, 2, 261–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. G., & Pierce, D. A. (2011). The role of divisional affiliation in athletic department web site coverage. International Journal of Sport Communication, 4, 70–81.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, T., Hinsley, A., & Zuniga, H. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, P. (2010). Teams active in social media build strategic advantage. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 12, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Day, G. (1990). Market driven strategy: Processes for creating value. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, S. W., Bergman, S. M., Bergman, J. Z., & Fearrington, M. (2014). Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 212–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman, J. M. (2002). Historical antecedents of the Five-Factor Model. In P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (pp. 3–7). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22, 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donavan, T. D., Carlson, B. D., & Zimmerman, M. (2005). The influence of personality traits on sports fan identification. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 14, 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, B., & Kim, Y. (2011). For love or money: Exploring and developing a motivational scale for fantasy football participation. Journal of Sport Management, 25, 70–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, B., & Drayer, J. (2010). Fantasy sport consumer segmentation: An investigation into the differing consumption modes of fantasy football participants. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 19, 207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, B., Shapiro, S., & Drayer, J. (2011). Segmenting motivation: An analysis of fantasy baseball motives and mediated sport consumption. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 20, 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Endler, N. S., & Rosenstein, A. J. (1997). Evolution of the personality construct in marketing and its applicability to contemporary personality research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6, 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ewen, R. B. (1998). Personality: A topical approach. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. (2012). Research shows social media moves tickets. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 15, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science, 23, 295–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, E. L., Clavio, G. E., Burch, L. M., & Zimmerman, M. H. (2012). Characteristics of users of a mixed-martial-arts blog: A case study of demographics and usage trends. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5, 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, D., & James, J. (2001). The psychological continuum model: A conceptual framework for understanding an individual's psychological connection to sport. Sport Management Review, 4, 119–150.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, D., & James, J. (2006). Consumer loyalty: The meaning of attachment in the development of sport team allegiance. Journal of Sport Management, 20, 189–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, C., & Haynes, R. (2013). A phenomenological investigation into how Twitter has changed the nature of sport media relations. International Journal of Sport Communication, 6, 394–408.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, C., O'Reilly, N., & Brunette, M. (2014). Professional team sport and Twitter: Gratification sought and obtained by followers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 7, 188–213.
   Google Scholar
• Giglietto, F., & Selva, D. (2014). Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication, 64, 260–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five Personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Eno, C. A. (2008). Who blogs? Personality predictors of blogging. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1993–2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, M. E., Simmons, J. M., Greenhalgh, G. P., & Greenwell, T. C. (2010). Understanding professional athletes’ use of Twitter: A content analysis of athlete tweets. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 454–471.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, M. E., & Sanderson, J. (2013). Gaining primacy in the digital network: Using social network analysis to examine sports journalists’ coverage of the Penn State football scandal via Twitter. Journal of Sports Media, 8, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hamburger, Y. A. (2002). Internet and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamburger, Y. A., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 441–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamburger, Y. A., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). ‘On the internet no one knows I'm an introvert’: Extroversion, neuroticism, and internet interaction. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5, 125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, J., Kang, S., & Bodenhausen, G. (2012). Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science, 23, 578–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., & Wu, F. (2009). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the micro-scope. Retrieved on December 15, 2015 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1313405
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Batey, M., & Lee, A. (2012). A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 561–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, J. D., & Ridinger, L. L. (2002). Female and male sport fans: A comparison of sport consumption motives. Journal of Sport Behavior, 25, 260–278.
   Google Scholar
• James, J. D., & Ross, S. D. (2002). The motives of sport consumers: A comparison of major and minor league baseball. International Journal of Sport Management, 3, 180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. M. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08) (pp. 1027–1036). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Blumler, J., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Kim, S. (2013). Segmenting sport video gamers by motivation: A cluster analysis. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 23, 92–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Kim, S., & Hur, Y. (2015). An exploration of motives and constraints for using sport Facebook pages. International Journal of Sport Management, 16, 199–220.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Ross, S. (2006). An exploration of motives in sport video gaming. International Journal of Sport Marketing & Sponsorship, 8, 34–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kolowich, L. (2016). 20 fascinating things you didn't know about your Facebook News Feed [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/facebook-news-feed-features-facts#sm.00001akv6hgcvffbwwxcpxqm0uqn4
   Google Scholar
• Korgaonkar, P., & Wolin, L. (1999). A multivariate analysis of web usage. Journal of Advertising Research, 1, 53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Principles of marketing (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Paper presented at the International World Wide Web Conference (IW3C2). Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW (pp. 167–170). doi:10.1145/1180875.1180901
   Google Scholar
• Leung, D. (2016). Twitter and Facebook's big push into live sports streaming starts with the NFL. Retrieved from http://www.sporttechie.com/2016/08/30/socialmedia/twitter-facebook-create-sports-live-streaming-viewing-experience
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, H., Leckie, C., Karg, A., Zubcevic-Basic, N., & Lock, D. (2016). Segmenting initial fans of a new team: A taxonomy of sport early adopters. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15, 136–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K., & McElroy, J. C. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 267–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 243–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, L. (2017). Social media streaming can attract sports fans, but it has more to do. Retrieved from https://morningconsult.com/2017/03/27/social-media-can-attract-sports-fans
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 175–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2010). Millennials: Confident. Connected. Open to Change. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/02/24/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change
   Google Scholar
• Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). Myspace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 11, 169–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohm, A., Milne, G., & McDonald, M. (2006). A mixed-method approach for developing market segmentation typologies in the sport industry. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 15, 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, D., & Hutchins, B. (2014). Globalisation and online audiences. In A. C. Billings & M. Hardin (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport and new media (pp. 7–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, T. (2000). Uses and gratification theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 3–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1658–1664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman, L., & Kanuk, L. L. (2010). Consumer behavior (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Difference, 54, 402–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, B., & Sheffer, M. L. (2010). An exploratory study of how Twitter is affecting sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 226–239.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffer, M. L., & Schultz, B. (2010). Paradigm shift or passing fad? Twitter and sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 472–484.
   Google Scholar
• Social networking, the “third place,” and the evolution of communication. (2007). In New media consortium. Retrieved January 20, 2017, from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/Evolution-of-Communication.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stanculescu, E. (2011, April). Online self-presentation from the cyberpsychology perspective. Paper presented at the meeting of the 7th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest.
   Google Scholar
• Stavros, C., Meng, M. D., Westberg, K., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Understanding fan motivation for interacting on social media. Sport Management Review, 17, 455–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., & Limperors, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 57, 504–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunden, J. (2003). Material virtualities: Approaching online textual embodiment. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, D. (1987). Gratification seeking, media exposure, and audience interpretations: Some directions for research. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31, 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trail, G., & James, J. (2001). An analysis of the sport fan motivation scale. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 24, 108–127.
   Google Scholar
• Tuten, T. L., & Bosnjak, M. (2001). Understanding differences in web usage: The role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. Social Behaviour and Personality, 29, 391–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 9, 584–590. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallace, L., Wilson, J., & Miloch, K. (2011). Sporting Facebook: A content analysis of NCAA organizational sport pages and Big 12 conference athletic department pages. International Journal of Sport Communication, 4, 422–444.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, P., Clavio, G., Lovell, M. D., & Blaszka, M. (2013). Differences in event brand personality between social media users and non-users. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 22, 214–223.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2015). Using attitude functions, self-efficacy, and norms to predict attitudes and intentions to use mobile devices to access social media during sporting event attendance. Mobile Media and Communication, 3, 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., Burke, K. A., Jackson, Z. H., & Buning, J. D. (2011). Using stewardship to cultivate fandom online: Comparing how National Football League teams use their web sites and Facebook to engage their fans. International Journal of Sport Communication, 4, 163–177.
   Google Scholar
• Witkemper, C., Lim, C., & Waldburger, A. (2012). Social media and sports marketing: Examining the motivations and constraints of Twitter users. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 21, 170–183.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., & Chinn, S. (2010). Meeting relationship-marketing goals through social media: A conceptual model for sport marketers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 422–437.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. J., Pease, D. G., Hui, S. C., & Michaud, T. J. (1995). Variables affecting the spectator decision to attend NBA games. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 4, 29–39.
   Google Scholar