References
- Atkinson, C. (2017, May 30). ESPN keeps hemorrhaging subscribers. New York Post. Retrieved from http://nypost.com/2017/05/30/espn-keeps-hemorrhaging-subscribers
- Bellamy, R. V. (2013). Reflections on communication and sport: On institutions and strategies. Communication & Sport, 1(1–2), 43–54.
- Berke, L. H. (2016, May 9–15). Past their prime time: The growing obsolescence of team TV, radio territories. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 19(5), 23.
- Boliek, B. (2014). Antitrust, regulation, and the “new” rules of sports telecasts. Hastings Law Journal, 62(2), 501–551.
- Bunge, J., & Kendall, B. (2015, December 9). Merger of Dow, DuPont likely to get close Antitrust scrutiny. Wall Street Journal, p. B4.
- Chicago Professional Sports Limited Partnership and WGN Continental Broadcasting Company v. National Basketball Association, 754 F. Supp. 1336 ( N.D. Ill. (1991)).
- Chicago Professional Sports Limited Partnership and WGN Continental Broadcasting Company v. National Basketball Association, 961 F. 2d 667 ( 7th Cir. (1992)).
- Chicago Professional Sports Limited Partnership and WGN Continental Broadcasting Company v. National Basketball Association, 95 F. 3d 593 ( 7th Cir. (1996)).
- Deutscher Tennis Bund v. ATP Tour, Inc, 610 F. 3rd 820, ( 3rd Cir. (2010)).
- Fisher, E. (2016a). MLB hails compromise on broadcast territories. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 18(39), 5.
- Fisher, E. (2016b). Labor in focus: Issues in play in CBA talks. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 18(47), 18.
- Fisher, F. M., Maxwell, C., & Schouten, E. S. (1999). The economics of sports leagues – The Chicago Bulls case. Marquette Sports Law Review, 10(1), 1–22.
- Flint, J. (2016, February 2). NFL in Thursday pact with CBS and NBC. Wall Street Journal, p. B2.
- Flint, J., & Cohen, B. (2014, October 7). NBA, media partners defend deal. Wall Street Journal, pp. B1, B2.
- Flint, J., & Futterman, M. (2016, March 28). Sports-TV boom under pressure. Wall Street Journal, pp. B1, B4.
- Fogel, A. S. (1995). The “superstation,” the NBA, and antitrust: An analysis of Chicago Professional Sports Limited Partnership v. National Basketball Association. Rutgers Law Review, 47, 1195–1228.
- Fortunato, J. A. (2013). Television broadcast rights: Still the golden goose. In P. M. Pedersen (Ed.), Routledge handbook of sport communication (pp. 188–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Fortunato, J. A. (2016). Agenda-setting through the television programming schedule: An examination of Major League Baseball on Fox. International Journal on Media Management, 18(3–4), 163–180.
- Francis, T., & Knutson, R. (2015, October 18). Wage of megadeals tests Antitrust limits in U.S. Wall Street Journal, pp. A1, A6.
- Fujak, H., & Frawley, S. (2015). Evaluating broadcast strategy: The case of Australian football. International Journal of Sport Communication, 8(4), 431–451.
- Garber v. Office of the Commissioner of Major League Baseball, No. 12 CIV 3704 ( S.D.N.Y (2012)).
- Harris, E. (1996, December 13). Bulls, NBA, WGN end long battle. Chicago Sun-Times, p. 129.
- Hennagin, N. M. (2013). Blackout or blackmail? How Garber v. MLB will shed light on Major League Baseball's broadcasting cartel. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law, 8(1), 158–186.
- Horowitz, I. (1974). Sports broadcasting. In R. G. Noll (Ed.), Government and the sports business (pp. 275–323). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
- Kendall, B., Fitzgerald, D., & Mann, T. (2015, December 7). Antitrust cops put brakes on Staples, GE deals. Wall Street Journal, p. B1.
- Kingray, Inc. v. National Basketball Association, 188 F. Supp 2d 1177 ( S.D. Cal. (2002)).
- Kintner, E. W. (1973). An antitrust primer: A guide to antitrust and trade regulation laws for businessmen (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The MacMillan Company.
- LaBletta, N. (2001). If per se is dying, why not in TV tying? A case for adopting the rule of reason standard in television block-booking arrangements. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 12(1), 195–234.
- Lacy, S., & Vermeer, J. (1995). Theoretical and practical considerations in operationalizing newspaper and television competition. The Journal of Media Economics, 8(1), 49–61.
- Laumann v. National Hockey League, 907 F. Supp 2d 465 ( S.D.N.Y (2012)).
- Lisovicz, E. (2014). Protecting home: Are MLB's television market protection restrictions reasonable under antitrust law? Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law, 24(1), 203–234.
- Lewis, M. (2001). Franchise relocation and fan allegiance. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 25(1), 6–19.
- Lewis, M., Brown, K. A., & Billings, A. C. (2017). Social media becomes traditional: Sport media consumption and the blending of modern information pathways. Journal of Global Sport Management, 2(2), 111–127.
- McKeown, J. T. (2011). The economics of competitive balance: Sports antitrust claims after American Needle. Marquette Sports Law Review, 21(2), 517–550.
- National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984).
- Newark Star-Ledger (2017, March 31). YES network returns to Comcast. Newark Star-Ledger, p. 32.
- Nielsen Year in Sports Media Report. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2016-reports/nielsen-year-in-sports-report-feb-2016.pdf
- Ourand, J. (2014a). Switch to C7 ad rating unlikely to have big impact on sports. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 17(10), 11.
- Ourand, J. (2014b). With major media rights deals done, how will nets grow revenue? Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 17(29), 1, 16, 20–21.
- Ourand, J. (2015). Falling household distribution. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 18(28), 24.
- Ourand, J. (2016a). The eyes have it: Media companies and leagues shift more sports programming to the powerful pull of broadcast television. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 18(37), 16–17.
- Ourand, J. (2016b). Fox, NHL agree on in-market streaming. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 19(12), 38.
- Ourand, J. (2017a). NBCSN stays true to its rights, picks up subs. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 19(43), 13.
- Ourand, J. (2017b). Digital media embraces sports with recent rush of deals? Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 19(46), 1, 38.
- Ourand, J., & Fisher, E. (2015). MLB, Fox break impasse in streaming talks. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 18(28), 4.
- Perlberg, S. (2016, April 6). March Madness final falls short in ratings. Wall Street Journal, p. B8.
- Petty, R. D. (1992). The impact of advertising law on business and public policy. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
- Ross, S. F. (2001). Antitrust options to redress anticompetitive restraints and monopolistic practices by professional sports leagues. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 52(1), 133–171.
- Ruihley, B. J., & Hardin, R. L. (2013). Focus on fantasy: An overview of fantasy sport consumption. In P. M. Pedersen (Ed.), Routledge handbook of sport communication (pp. 269–278). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Salaga, S., & Tainsky, S. (2015). Betting lines and college football television ratings. Economic Letters, 132, 112–116.
- Shank, M. D. (2008). Sports marketing: A strategic perspective (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.
- Sports Broadcasting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1291–1295.
- Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 U.S. 1, 87 (1911).
- Stempel, J. (2015, June 11). NHL, broadcasters settle lawsuit over TV blackouts. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/nhl-broadcasters-antitrust-settlement-idUSL1N0YX23K20150611
- Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal. (2014a). RSNs and their big league rights. Street & Smith's Sports Business Journal, 16(46), 22–23.
- United States v. National Football League, 116 F. Supp. 319 ( E.D. Pa. (1953)).
- Verducci, T. (2012). The epic Red Sox fail. Sports Illustrated, 117(10), 38–43.