Forgiving Sports Celebrities with Ethical Transgressions: The Role of Parasocial Relationships, Ethical Intent and Regulatory Focus Mindset

References

• Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., II, Lim, V. K., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R. (1986). Uncertain outcome values in predicted relationships uncertainty reduction theory then and now. Human Communication Research, 13(1), 34–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommer, M., Gratto, C., Gravander, J., & Tuttle, M. (1987). A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4), 265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey, J. L. (1984). Imaginary social worlds: A cultural approach. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1997). Parasocial relations and romantic attraction: Gender and dating status differences. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41(4), 516–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, R., Paddock, L., Rupp, D. E., Bagger, J., & Baldwin, A. (2008). How regulatory focus impacts the process-by-outcome interaction for perceived fairness and emotions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 36–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bock, T., & Van Kenhove, P. (2010). Consumer ethics: The role of self-regulatory focus. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S., & Hugenberg, K. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 352–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S., & Tippin, B. (2008). Parasocial relationships and self-discrepancies: Faux relationships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals. Personal Relationships, 15(2), 261–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., & Rosaen, S. F. (2011). Parasocial interaction as more than friendship: Evidence for parasocial interactions with disliked media. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(3), 122–132.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz-Uhler, B., End, C., Demakakos, N., Dickirson, A., & Grantz, A. (2002). Fans' reactions to law breaking athletes. International Sports Journal, 6(1), 160–170.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 382–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, K., & Cohen, J. (2006). When good friends say goodbye: A parasocial breakup study. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 50(3), 502–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D. (2000). The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving. Personal Relationships, 7(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationships, 9(3), 239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D., Hall, J., & Beach, S. R. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55(4), 415–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 956–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, S., & Gorr, M. B. (1988). Social isolation and social support as correlates of television viewing motivations. Communication Research, 15(2), 135–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16(8), 631–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraleigh, W. P. (2003). Intentional rules violations—one more time. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 30(2), 166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, W. L., & Knowles, M. L. (2008). Love makes you real: Favorite television characters are perceived as “real” in a social facilitation paradigm. Social Cognition, 26(2), 156–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., & Margolis, J. D. (2011). Bringing ethics into focus: How regulatory focus and risk preferences influence (Un) ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 142–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (1998). Trust, mood, and outcomes of friendship determine preferences for real versus ersatz social capital. Political Psychology, 19(3), 527–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawken, L., Duran, R. L., & Kelly, L. (1991). The relationship of interpersonal communication variables to academic success and persistence in college. Communication Quarterly, 39(4), 297–308.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., & Molden, D. C. (2003). How strategies for making judgments and decisions affect cognition: Motivated cognition revisited. In G. V. Bodenhausen (Ed.), Foundations of social cognition: A festschrift in Honor of Robert S. Wyer, Jr. (pp. 211–236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 276–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanazawa, S. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 167–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, D. L., & Waldron, V. R. (2005). An investigation of forgiveness-seeking communication and relational outcomes. Communication Quarterly, 53(3), 339–358.
   Google Scholar
• Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291–313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, F., & Lessan, G. (1985). Viewers' relationship to television personalities. Psychological Reports, 57(1), 263–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized Marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3), 252–264.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, B. W., O'Fallon, M. J., & Salimath, M. S. (2008). Do competitive environments lead to the rise and spread of unethical behavior? Parallels from Enron. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 703–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labianca, G., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 596–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardelli, G. J., Lakin, J. L., & Arkin, R. M. (2007). A regulatory focus model of self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(6), 1002–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J. (1983). Lying and deception: A behavioral model. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiation in organizations (pp. 68–90). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., & Dasborough, M. T. (2011). Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: A case of unrealized potential. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 144–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it? Current Directions. Psychological Science, 10(6), 194–197.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586–1603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molden, D. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Categorization under uncertainty: Resolving vagueness and ambiguity with eager versus vigilant strategies. Social Cognition, 22(2), 248–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molden, D. C., Lee, A. Y., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Motivation for promotion and prevention. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 169–187). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. (2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 368–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perse, E. M., & Rubin, A. M. (1990). Chronic loneliness and television use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34(1), 37–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perse, E. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16(1), 59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, M. T., & Avnet, T. (2004). Ideals and oughts and the reliance on affect versus substance in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 503–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempel, J. K., Ross, M., & Holmes, J. G. (2001). Trust and communicated attributions in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., & Janiszewski, C. A. (1989). Overcoming obstacles to interpersonal compliance: A principle of message construction. Human Communication Research, 16(1), 33–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roney, C. J., Higgins, E. T., & Shah, J. (1995). Goals and framing: How outcome focus influences motivation and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1151–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosaen, S. F., & Dibble, J. L. (2008). Investigating the relationships among child's age, parasocial interactions, and the social realism of favorite television characters. Communication Research Reports, 25(2), 145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. F. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement a uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14(2), 246–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31(3), 279–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E., Hannon, P. A., Stocker, S. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2005). Forgiveness and relational repair. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of Forgiveness (pp. 185–205). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(1), 53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm, H., & Hartmann, T. (2008). The PSI-Process Scales: A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications, 33(4), 385–401.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., Ordonez, L., & Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 422–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 264–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinel, W., & De Dreu, C. K. (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 419–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 7(1), 227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, J.-A., McCullough, M. E., & Fincham, F. D. (2006). The longitudinal association between forgiveness and relationship closeness and commitment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(4), 448–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao, J. (1996). Compensatory media use: An exploration of two paradigms. Communication Studies, 47(1–2), 89–109.
   Google Scholar
• Ungar, S., & Sev'er, A. (1989). Say it ain't so, Ben: Attributions for a fallen Hero. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(3), 207–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, S. (1989). The development of a scale to measure forgiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(11-B), 5338.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Malhotra, D., & Murninghan, J. K. (2011). Economics education and greed. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(4), 643–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 288–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J., & McGrath, A. (2007). The perception of time heals all wounds: Temporal distance affects willingness to forgive following an interpersonal transgression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 1023–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J., & Reeder, G. D. (2004). When bad deeds are forgiven: Judgments of morality and forgiveness for intergroup aggression. In J. P. Morgan (Ed.), Focus on aggression research (Vol. 59–74, pp. 59–74). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar