Fragility curves for reinforced concrete (RC)/steel vertical hybrid frame structure under mainshock–aftershock sequences

References

• Abdelnaby, A. E. (2018). Fragility curves for RC frames subjected to Tohoku mainshock-aftershocks sequences. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22(5), 902–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1264328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE. (2010). ASCE/SEI 7-10. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. (2017). ASCE/SEI 7-16. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures.
   Google Scholar
• Bahri, F., Kafi, M. A., & Kheyroddin, A. (2021). Investigation on novel connection in vertically mixed structures under lateral and axial loads. Journal of Structural & Construction Engineering, 8(3), 56–74.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. (2015). Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1193/02113EQS025M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BHRC. (2015). Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings. Building and Housing Research Centre, Standard No. 2800 (in Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Burton, H. V., Sreekumar, S., Sharma, M., & Sun, H. (2017). Estimating aftershock collapse vulnerability using mainshock intensity, structural response and physical damage indicators. Structural Safety, 68, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, A. M., Gattulli, V., & Potenza, F. (2013). Serviceability and damage scenario in irregular RC structures: Post-earthquake observations and modeling predictions. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 27(1), 98–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Trapani, F., & Malavisi, M. (2019). Seismic fragility assessment of infilled frames subject to mainshock/aftershock sequences using a double incremental dynamic analysis approach. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17(1), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0445-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimian, H., Jalayer, F., Lucchini, A., Mollaioli, F., & Manfredi, G. (2015). Preliminary ranking of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shaking. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(10), 2805–2840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9755-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faisal, A., Majid, T. A., & Hatzigeorgiou, G. D. (2013). Investigation of story ductility demands of inelastic concrete frames subjected to repeated earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 44, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA/NIBS methodology HAZUS_MH MR5. (2003). Advanced engineering building module: Technical and user’s manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Washington D.C, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J. Y., Nie, X., Ding, R., & Fan, J. S. (2020). Experimental study on seismic performance of a new transfer joint in the steel-concrete vertical hybrid structure. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 174, 106259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanbari, B., & Akhaveissy, A. H. (2020). Evaluation of characteristic peak ground acceleration (CPGA) as a ground motion intensity measure to reduce the dispersion of IDA curves. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(6), 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00259-7
   Google Scholar
• Hait, P., Sil, A., & Choudhury, S. (2020). Seismic damage assessment and prediction using artificial neural network of RC building considering irregularities. Journal of Structural Integrity & Maintenance, 5(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2019.1692167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., & Liolios, A. A. (2010). Nonlinear behaviour of RC frames under repeated strong ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(10), 1010–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinpour, F., & Abdelnaby, A. E. (2017). Fragility curves for RC frames under multiple earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 98, 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, L. F., Medina, R. A., & Krawinkler, H. (2005). Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(12), 1489–1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INBC. (2013). Design and construction of steel structures. Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Tehran, Iranian National Building Code, Part 10 (in Persian).
   Google Scholar
• INBC. (2014). Design and construction of concrete structures. Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Tehran, Iranian National Building Code, Part 9 (in Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Karavasilis, T. L., Bazeos, N., & Beskos, D. E. (2008). Seismic response of plane steel MRF with setbacks: Estimation of inelastic deformation demands. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64(6), 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. W., Usman, M., Farooq, S. H., Zain, M., & Saleem, S. (2021). Effect of masonry infill on analytical fragility response of RC frame school buildings in high seismic zone. Journal of Structural Integrity & Maintenance, 6(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2020.1865624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lignos, D. G., & Krawinkler, H. (2011). Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(11), 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Song, R., & Van De Lindt, J. W. (2014). Collapse fragility of steel structures subjected to earthquake mainshock-aftershock sequences. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(12), 04014095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z., Li, J., & Zhou, Y. (2018). Shaking table test and numerical simulation on a vertical hybrid structure under seismic excitation. The Structural Design of Tall & Special Buildings, 27(14), e1497. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maley, T. J., Sullivann, T. J., & Pampanin, S. (2012, September). Issues with the seismic design of mixed MRF systems. In Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal (pp. 24–28).
   Google Scholar
• Mashhadi, S., Asadi, A., Homaei, F., & Tajammolian, H. (2021). Seismic response of mid-rise steel MRFs: The role of geometrical irregularity, frequency components of near-fault records, and soil-structure interaction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(9), 3571–3595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2006). OpenSees command language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, 264(1), 137–158.
   Google Scholar
• Nahar, T. T., Rahman, M. M., & Kim, D. (2021). Seismic capacity evaluation of fire-damaged cabinet facility in a nuclear power plant. Nuclear Engineering & Technology, 53(4), 1331–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pnevmatikos, N. G., Papagiannopoulos, G. A., & Papavasileiou, G. S. (2019). Fragility curves for mixed concrete/steel frames subjected to seismic excitation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 709–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghunandan, M., Liel, A. B., & Luco, N. (2015). Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44(3), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-García, J., & Negrete-Manriquez, J. C. (2011). Evaluation of drift demands in existing steel frames under as-recorded far-field and near-fault mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences. Engineering Structures, 33(2), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, J., Hatfield, G., & Kimn, J. H. (2016). Probabilistic structural integrity evaluation of a highway steel bridge under unknown trucks. Journal of Structural Integrity & Maintenance, 1(2), 65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., & Naganuma, T. (2000). Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126(12), 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokrabadi, M., Burton, H. V., & Stewart, J. P. (2018). Impact of sequential ground motion pairing on mainshock-aftershock structural response and collapse performance assessment. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(10), 04018177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, T. T., Cao, A. T., Kim, D., & Chang, S. (2020). Seismic vulnerability of cabinet facility with tuned mass dampers subjected to high-and low-frequency earthquakes. Applied Sciences, 10(14), 4850. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144850
   Google Scholar
• Tran, T. T., Hussan, M., Kim, D., & Nguyen, P. C. (2020). Distributed plasticity approach for the nonlinear structural assessment of offshore wind turbine. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 12(12), 743–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Tran, T. T., Le, T. M. T., Nguyen, P. C., Kim, D., Pham, T. M., Salman, K., & Chang, S. (2021). Probabilistic seismic demand model and seismic fragility analysis of NPP equipment subjected to high-and low-frequency earthquakes. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 195(12), 1327–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1920796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2005). Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(13), 1573–1600. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., & Fragiadakis, M. (2010). Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Ni, C., Chui, Y. H., & Chen, Z. (2014). Seismic performance of a hybrid building system consisting of a light wood frame structure and a reinforced masonry core. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 28(6), A4014013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar