Sampling sufficiency for determining hydraulic habitat diversity

References

• Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2007. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. 2nd ed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 436 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL. 2008. Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev Econ Stat. 90:414–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison AC, Hinkley D V. 1997. Bootstrap methods and their application. Technometrics. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 582–583
   Google Scholar
• Davy-Bowker J, Furse M. 2006. Hydromorphology — major results and conclusions from the STAR project. Hydrobiologia. 188(1):263–265.
   Google Scholar
• Feio MJ, Calapez AR, Elias CL, Cortes RMV, Graça MAS, Pinto P, Almeida SFP. 2016. The paradox of expert judgment in rivers ecological monitoring. J Environ Manage. 184:609–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frissell CA, Liss WJ, Warren CE, Hurley MD. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ Manage. 10:199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilvear DJ, Spray CJ, Casas-Mulet R. 2013. River rehabilitation for the delivery of multiple ecosystem services at the river network scale. J Environ Manage. 126:30–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gostner W. 2012. The hydro-morphological index of diversity: a planning tool for river restoration projects. EPFL Ph.D thesis No. 5408 and communication 51 of laboratory of hydraulic constructions (Schleiss A., editor), Lausanne: Ecole polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL).
   Google Scholar
• Gostner W, Alp M, Schleiss AJ, Robinson CT. 2013. The hydro-morphological index of diversity: a tool for describing habitat heterogeneity in river engineering projects. Hydrobiologia. 712(1):43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heggenes J. 1996. Habitat selection by brown trout (Salmo trutta) and young Atlantic salmon (S-salar) in streams: static and dynamic hydraulic modelling. Regul Rivers–Res. Manag. 12:155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowett IG. 1993. A method for objectively identifying pool, run, and riffle habitats from physical measurements. New Zeal J Mar Freshw Res. 27:241–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondolf GM, Montgomery DR, Piégay H, Schmitt L. 2005. Geomorphic classification of rivers and streams. In: Kondolf GM and Piégay H, editors. Tools in fluvial geomorphology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; p. 171–204.
   Google Scholar
• Lamouroux BN. 1998. Depth probability distributions in stream reaches. J Hydraul Eng. 124(2):224–227.
   Google Scholar
• Lamouroux N. 2007. 25 Hydraulic geometry of stream reaches and ecological implications. Dev Earth Surf Process. 11:661–675.
   Google Scholar
• Lamouroux N, Capra H, Pouilly M. 1998. Predicting habitat suitability for lotic fish: linking statistical hydraulic models with multivariate habitat use models. Regul Rivers Res Manag. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lamouroux N, Jowett IG. 2005. Generalized instream habitat models. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 62:7–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamouroux N, Souchon Y, Herouin E. 1995. Predicting velocity frequency distributions in stream reaches. Water Resour Res. 31:2367–2375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane BA, Pasternack GB, Dahlke HE, Sandoval-Solis S. 2017. The role of topographic variability in river channel classification. Prog Phys Geogr. 41:570–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold LB, Maddock TJ. 1953. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. Geological Survey Professional Paper 252, Washington D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 57 p.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold LB, Wolman MG. 1957. River channel patterns: braided, meandering, and straight. Geological Survey Professional Paper 282-B, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 85 p.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold LB, Wolman MG. 1960. River meanders. Bull Geol Soc Am. 71:769–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasiewicz P. 2001. MesoHABSIM: a concept for application of instream flow models in river restoration planning. Fisheries. 26:6–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi M, Belletti B, Bussettini M, Comiti F, Golfieri B, Lastoria B, Marchese E, Nardi L, Surian N. 2017. New tools for the hydromorphological assessment and monitoring of European streams. J Environ Manage. 202:363–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi M, Surian N, Comiti F, Bussettini M. 2013. A method for the assessment and analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: the Morphological Quality Index (MQI). Geomorphology. 180–181:96–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosgen DL. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena. 22:169–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer S, Borsuk ME, Jowett I, Reichert P. 2007. Predicting joint frequency distributions of depth and velocity for instream habitat assessment. River Res Appl. 23:287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statzner B, Gore JA, Resh VH. 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. J North Am Benthol Soc. 7:307–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewardson M. 2005. Hydraulic geometry of stream reaches. J Hydrol. 306(1–4):97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szoszkiewicz K, Buffagni A, Davy-Bowker J, Lesny J, Chojnicki BH, Zbierska J, Staniszewski R, Zgola T. 2006. Occurrence and variability of River Habitat Survey features across Europe and the consequences for data collection and evaluation. Hydrobiologia. 566(1):267–280.
   Google Scholar
• Tamagni S, Weitbrecht V, Boes RM. 2014. Experimental study on the flow characteristics of unstructured block ramps. J Hydraulic Res. 52(5):600–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl E, Bledsoe BP, Jacobson RB, Poff NL, Rathburn SL, Walters DM, Wilcox AC. 2015. The natural sediment regime in rivers: broadening the foundation for ecosystem management. Bioscience. 65:358–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar