Laboratory testing of an innovative tube fishway concept

References

• Agostinho AA, Agostinho CS, Pelicice FM, Marques EE. 2012. Fish ladders: safe fish passage or hotspot for predation? Neotrop Ichthyol. 10(4):687–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner LJ, Boys CA, Stuart IG, Zampatti P. 2010. Evaluating migratory fish behaviour and fishway performance: testing a combined assessment methodology. Aust J Zool. 58(3):154–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner LJ, Harris JH. 2007. Passage of non-salmonid fish through a Deelder lock on a lowland river. River Res Appl. 23(10):1058–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borthwick S, Liston C. 2003. Survival and injury of rainbow trout (200-300mm) passed through an Archimedes lift and a Hidrostal pump at Red Bluff Research Pumping Plant. In: Tracy Fish Collection Facility Studies. Vol. 25. California: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Brege DA, Farr WE, Johnsen RC. 1990. An air lift pump for juvenile salmonids at John Day Dam. N Am J Fish Manag.10(4):481–483.
   Google Scholar
• Brown RS, Colotelo AH, Pflugrath BD, Boys CA, Baumgartne LJ, Deng ZD, Silva GM, Brauner CJ, Mallen-Cooper M, Phonekhampeng O, et al. 2014. Understanding barotrauma in fish passing hydro structures: a global strategy for sustainable development of water resources. Fisheries 39(3):108–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JJ, Limburg KE, Waldman JR, Stephenson K, Glenn EP, Juanes F, Jordaan A. 2013. Fish and hydropower on the U.S. Atlantic coast: failed fisheries policies from half-way technologies. Conserv Lett. 6(4):280–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunt BM. 2001. Fishway entrance modifications enhance fish attraction. Fish Manag. 8(2):95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Bunt CM, Castro-Santos T, Haro A. 2012. Performance of fish-passage structures at upstream barriers to migration. River Res Appl. 28(4):457–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Santos T, Haro A. 2003. Quantifying migratory delay: a new application of survival analysis methods. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 60(8):986–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay CH. 1995. Design of fishways and other fish facilities. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke SJ, Hinch SG. 2013. Improving the reliability of fishway attraction and passage efficiency estimates to inform fishway engineering, science, and practice. Ecol Eng. 58:123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowx IG, Welcomme RL, editors. 1998. Rehabilitation of rivers for fish. Oxford: FAO and Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• DEEDI 2011. Paradise Dam Upstream Fishway Monitoring Program, Final Report. June 2011. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Queensland Fisheries.
   Google Scholar
• FAO 2002. Fish passes – design, dimensions and monitoring. Rome: FAO and DVWK.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson JW, Healey M, Dugan P, Barlow C. 2011. Potential effects of dams on migratory fish in the Mekong River: lessons from salmon in the Fraser and Columbia Rivers. Environ Manag. 47(1):141–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin A, Haro A, Castro-Santos T, Noreika J. 2012. Evaluation of nature-like and technical fishways for the passage of alewives at two coastal streams in New England. Trans Am Fish Soc.141(3):624–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garavelli L, Linley TJ, Bellgraph BJ, Rhode BM, Janak JM, Colotelo AH. 2019. Evaluation of passage and sorting of adult Pacific salmonids through a novel fish passage technology. Fish Res. 212:40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough P, Philipsen P, Schollema PP and Wanningen H. editors. From sea to source; International Guidance for the Restoration of Fish Migration Highways. Veendam, The Netherlands: Regional Water Authority Hunze en Aa’s.
   Google Scholar
• Haro A, Odeh M, Noreika J, Castro-Santos T. 1998. Effect of water acceleration on downstream migratory behaviour and passage of Atlantic salmon smolts and juvenile American shad at surface bypasses. Trans Am Fish Soc. 127(1):118–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haro A, Watten B, Noreika J. 2016. Passage of downstream migrant eels through an airlift deep bypass system. Ecol Eng. 91:545–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JH, Kingsford RT, Peirson WL, Baumgartner LJ. 2017a. Mitigating the effects of barriers to freshwater fish migrations: the Australian experience. Mar Freshwater Res. 68(4):614–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JH, O’Brien S, Mefford B, Roberts DT. 2019. A trap-and-haul fishway for multispecies upstream fish passage at a challenging site. J Ecohydraulics. doi:10.1080/24705357.2019.1669080
   Google Scholar
• Harris J, Peirson B, Mefford B, Kingsford R. 2016. Seeking better fishways: the Tube fishway Program. Paper 26939. In: Webb JA, Costelloe JF, Casas-Mulet R, Lyon JP, Stewardson MJ, editors. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics; Feb 7–12, 2016; Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne, ISBN: 978 0 7340 5339 8.
   Google Scholar
• Helfrich LA, Bark RC, Liston CR, Mefford B. 2003. Survival and condition of striped bass, steelhead, delta smelt, and Wakasagi passed through a Hidrostal pump at the Tracy Fish Collection Facility. In: Tracy Fish Collection Facility Studies, California, Vol. 23. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
   Google Scholar
• Karelkas K, Elwood RW, Holland RA. 2018. Fish learn collectively, but groups with differing personalities are slower to decide and more likely to split. Biology Open. 7:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katopodis C. 2005. Developing a toolkit for fish passage, ecological flow management and fish habitat works. J Hydraul Res. 43(5):451–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katopodis C, Williams JG. 2012. The development of fish passage research in a historical context. Ecol Eng. 48:8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larinier M, Travade F. 2002. The design of fishways for shad. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic. 364:135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Larinier M, Marmulla G. 2003. Fish passes: types, principles and geographical distribution – an overview. In: Welcomme RL, Petr T, editors. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Management of Large Rivers for Fisheries. Sustaining Livelihoods and Biodiversity in the New Millennium. Phnom Penh: FAO and Mekong River Commission. p. 183–206.
   Google Scholar
• Lehner B, Liermann CR, Revenga C, Vorosmarty C, Fekete B, Crouzet P, Doll P, Endejan M, Frenken K, Magome J, et al. 2011. High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front Ecol Environ. 9(9):494–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long XP. 2016. Impact of the internal flow in a jet pump on the fish. J Eng.
   Google Scholar
• Mallen-Cooper M. 1999. Developing fishways for non-salmonid fishes; a case study from the Murray River in Australia In: Odeh M, editor. Innovations in fish Passage technology. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; p. 173–195.
   Google Scholar
• Mallen-Cooper M, Brand DA. 2007. Non-salmonids in a salmonid fishway: what do 50 years of data tell us about past and future fish passage? Fish Manag Ecol.14(5):319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan MJ, Grant JWA, Jackson CD. 2012. A quantitative assessment of fish passage efficiency. Fish Fish. 13(4):450–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien S, Mefford B, Harris J. 2008. Implementing upstream passage at an existing large dam: Hinze dam trap and Haul fishway. Proceedings, ANCOLD Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland; Oct 2008. Sydney: Australian National Committee on Large Dams Inc.; p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Odeh M. editor. Innovations in fish passage technology. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society.
   Google Scholar
• Oldani NO, Baigun C. 2002. Performance of a fishway system in a major South American dam on the Parana River (Argentina-Paraguay). River Res Appl. 18(2):171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirson WL, Harris J, Felder S, Kingsford R. 2019. Pumping fish over dams. Unpublished Manuscript. https://1drv.ms/b/s!AnWZlx576SqWg7xc-9gtQu5hO–BsA.
   Google Scholar
• Peterken C. 2001. Fishway design process in Queensland; a fisheries perspective In: Keller RJ, Peterken C, editors. Third Australian technical workshop on fishways. Clayton, Victoria: Monash University; p. 42–53.
   Google Scholar
• Puckridge JT, Sheldon F, Walker KF, Boulton AJ. 1998. Flow variability and the ecology of arid zone rivers. Mar Freshwater Res. 49(1):55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe DW, Hinch SG. 2010. Effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities: historical trends, geographic patterns and future directions. Fish Fish. 11(1):12–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva AT, Lucas MC, Castro-Santos T, Katopodis C, Baumgartner LJ, Thiem JD, Aarestrup K, Pompeu PS, O’Brien GC, Braun DC, et al. 2017. The future of fish passage science, engineering and practice. Fish Fish. 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneddon LU. 2003. The bold and the shy: individual differences in rainbow trout. J Fish Biol. 62(4):971–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart IG, Berghuis AP. 2002. Upstream passage of fish through a vertical-slot fishway in an Australian subtropical river. Fish Manage. 9(2):111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart IG, Mallen-Cooper M. 1999. An assessment of the effectiveness of a vertical-slot fishway for non-salmonid fish at a tidal barrier on a large tropical/subtropical river. Regul Rivers: Res Manage. 15:575–590.
   Google Scholar
• Thorncraft GA, Harris JH. 1997. Yarrawonga Weir Fishway Report. Report to the Murray-Darling Basin Commission. Sydney: NSW Fisheries Research Institute and Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology; 23pp.
   Google Scholar
• Timmons MB, Ebeling JM, Wheaton FW, Summerfelt ST, Vinci BJ. 2001. Recirculating aquaculture systems. Ithaca (NY): Cayuga Aqua Ventures.
   Google Scholar
• USBR 2007. Rock ramp design guidelines. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.
   Google Scholar
• USBR 2015. Tracy Research – Peer Reviewed Technical Reports and Technical Bulletins. Tracy Fish Facility Studies California. Denver, CO: US Bureau of Reclamation: Technical Service Center. http://www.usbr.gov/mp/TFFIP/tracyreports/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh C, Rodgers M, Robinson W, Gilligan D. 2014. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Tallowa Dam Fishway. Sydney: NSW Department of Primary Industries.
   Google Scholar
• White LJ, Harris JH, Keller RJ. 2011. Movement of three non-salmonid fish species through a low-gradient vertical-slot fishway. River Res Appl. 27(4):499–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White LJ, Keller RJ, Harris JH, Ladson AR. 2007. On Optimising the Attraction Phase of Fishlock Operation. Proceedings of the 6th Ecohydraulics Conference, Christchurch; Feb 2007. p. 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkes MA, Webb JA, Pompeu PS, Silva LGM, Vowles AS, Baker CF, Franklin P, Link O, Habit E, Kemp PS. 2018. Not just a migration problem: metapopulations, habitat shifts and gene flow are also important for fisheries science and management. River Res Appl Manage. 1–9. https://doi.org/.10.1002/rra.3320
   Google Scholar
• Williams JG, Armstrong G, Katopodis C, Larinier M, Travade F. 2012. Thinking like a fish: a key ingredient for development of effective fish passage facilities at river obstructions. River Res Appl. 28(4):407–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winemiller KO, McIntyre PB, Castello L, Fluet-Chouinard E, Giarrizzo T, Nam S, Baird IG, Darwall W, Lujan NK, Harrison I, et al. 2016. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo and Mekong. Science. 351(6269):128–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurts WA, McNeill SG, Overhults DG. 1994. Performance and design characteristics of airlift pumps for field applications. World Aquacult. 25(4):51–55.
   Google Scholar