A new framework for assessing roughness elements in promoting fish passage at low-head instream structures

References

• Acharya M, Kells J, Katopodis C. 2000. Some hydraulic design aspects of nature-like fishways. Building Partnerships. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Amaral SD, Branco P, da Silva AT, Katopodis C, Viseu T, Ferreira MT, Pinheiro AN, Santos JM. 2016. Upstream passage of potamodromous cyprinids over small weirs: the influence of key-hydraulic parameters. J Ecohydraulics. 1(1–2):79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Amaral SD, Quaresma AL, Branco P, Romão F, Katopodis C, Ferreira MT, Pinheiro AN, Santos J. 2019. Assessment of retrofitted ramped weirs to improve passage of potamodromous fish. Water. 11(12):2441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amtstaetter F, O'Connor J, Borg D, Stuart I, Moloney P. 2017. Remediation of upstream passage for migrating Galaxias (Family: Galaxiidae) through a pipe culvert. Fish Manag Ecol. 24(3):186–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CF. 2003. Effect of fall height and notch shape on the passage of inanga (Galaxias maculatus) and common bullies (Gobiomorphus cotidianus) over an experimental weir. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res. 37(2):283–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CF, Boubée J. 2006. Upstream passage of inanga Galaxias maculatus and redfin bullies Gobiomorphus huttoni over artificial ramps. J Fish Biol. 69(3):668–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CO, Votapka FE. 1990. Fish passage through culverts. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-FL-90-006, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Baki ABM, Zhu DZ, Rajaratnam N. 2015. Turbulence characteristics in a rock-ramp-type fish pass. J Hydraul Eng. 141(2):4014075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudoin J-M, Burgun V, Chanseau M, Larinier M, Ovidio M, Sremski W, Steinbach P, Voegtle B. 2015. Assessing the passage of obstacles by fish. Concepts, design and application. Vincennes (France): Onema.
   Google Scholar
• Birnie‐Gauvin K, Franklin P, Wilkes M, Aarestrup K. 2019. Moving beyond fitting fish into equations: Progressing the fish passage debate in the Anthropocene. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 29(7):1095–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bod’ová K, Mitchell GJ, Harpaz R, Schneidman E, Tkačik G. 2018. Probabilistic models of individual and collective animal behavior. PloS One. 13(3):e0193049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouska WW, Paukert CP. 2010. Road crossing designs and their impact on fish assemblages of Great Plains streams. Trans Am Fish Soc. 139(1):214–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco P, Amaral SD, Ferreira MT, Santos JM. 2017. Do small barriers affect the movement of freshwater fish by increasing residency? Sci Total Environ. 581:486–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunt C, Castro-Santos T, Haro A. 2012. Performance of fish passage structures at upstream barriers to migration. River Res Applic. 28(4):457–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabonce J, Wang H, Chanson H. 2018. Ventilated corner baffles to assist upstream passage of small-bodied fish in box culverts. J Irrig Drain Eng. 144(8):4018020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello M, Soria M, Cotel P, Deneubourg J-L, Dagorn L. 2011. Quantifying the interplay between environmental and social effects on aggregated-fish dynamics. PloS One. 6(12):e28109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Santos T, Cotel A, Webb PW. 2009. Fishway evaluations for better bioengineering an integrative approach. In: Challenges for diadromousfishes in a dynamic global environment, Haro AJ, Smith KL, Rulifson RA, Moffit CM, Klauda RJ, Dadswell MJ, Cunjak RA, Cooper JE, Beal KL, Avery TS, editors. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, Symposium 69. p. 557–575.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Santos T, Perry RW. 2012. Time-to-event analysis as a framework for quantifying fish passage performance. In Telemetry techniques: a user guide for fisheries research. Bethesda, Maryland: America Fisheries Society. p. 427–452.
   Google Scholar
• David BO, Tonkin JD, Taipeti KW, Hokianga HT. 2014. Learning the ropes: mussel spat ropes improve fish and shrimp passage through culverts. J Appl Ecol. 51(1):214–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ead S, Rajaratnam N, Katopodis C. 2002. Generalized study of hydraulics of culvert fishways. J Hydraul Eng. 128(11):1018–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders EC, Castro-Santos T, Lacey RJ. 2017. The effects of horizontally and vertically oriented baffles on flow structure and ascent performance of upstream-migrating fish. J Ecohydraulics. 2(1):38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Feurich R, Boubée J, Olsen N. 2011. Spoiler baffles in circular culverts. J Environ Eng. 137(9):854–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feurich R, Boubée J, Olsen N. 2012. Improvement of fish passage in culverts using CFD. Ecol Eng. 47:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin PA, Bartels B. 2012. Restoring connectivity for migratory native fish in a New Zealand stream: effectiveness of retrofitting a pipe culvert. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 22(4):489–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin PA, Gee E. 2019. Living in an amphidromous world: Perspectives on the management of fish passage from an island nation. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 29(9):1424–1437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin PA, Gee E, Baker CF, Bowie S. 2018. New Zealand fish passage guidelines—For structures up to 4 meters. Hamilton (NZ): NIWA.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes-Pérez JF, Tuhtan JA, Carbonell-Baeza R, Musall M, Toming G, Muhammad N, Kruusmaa M. 2015. Current velocity estimation using a lateral line probe. Ecological Engineering 85:296–300.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes-Pérez JF, Eckert M, Tuhtan JA, Ferreira MT, Kruusmaa M, Branco P. 2018. Spatial preferences of Iberian barbel in a vertical slot fishway under variable hydrodynamic scenarios. Ecol Eng. 125:131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson RJ, Haedrich RL, Wernerheim CM. 2005. Loss of fish habitat as a consequence of inappropriately constructed stream crossings. Fisheries. 30(1):10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goettel MT, Atkinson JF, Bennett SJ. 2015. Behavior of western blacknose dace in a turbulence modified flow field. Ecol Eng. 74:230–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrich HR, Watson JR, Cramp RL, Gordos MA, Franklin CE. 2018. Making culverts great again. Efficacy of a common culvert remediation strategy across sympatric fish species. Ecol Eng. 116:143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habit E, Piedra P, Ruzzante DE, Walde SJ, Belk MC, Cussac VE, Gonzalez J, Colin N. 2010. Changes in the distribution of native fishes in response to introduced species and other anthropogenic effects. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 19(5):697–710.
   Google Scholar
• Harpaz R, Tkačik G, Schneidman E. 2017. Discrete modes of social information processing predict individual behavior of fish in a group. Proc Natl Acad Sci Usa. 114(38):10149–10154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockley FA, Wilson C, Brew A, Cable J. 2014. Fish responses to flow velocity and turbulence in relation to size, sex and parasite load. J R Soc Interface. 11(91):20130814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Januchowski-Hartley SR, McIntyre PB, Diebel M, Doran PJ, Infante DM, Joseph C, Allan JD. 2013. Restoring aquatic ecosystem connectivity requires expanding inventories of both dams and road crossings. Front Ecol Environ. 11(4):211–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson GE, Pearson WH, Southard SL, Mueller RP. 2012. Upstream movement of juvenile coho salmon in relation to environmental conditions in a culvert test bed. Trans Am Fish Soc. 141(6):1520–1531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson K, Wait LE, Monk SK, Rader R, Hotchkiss RH, Belk MC. 2019. Effects of substrate on movement patterns and behaviour of stream fish through culverts: An experimental approach. Sustainability. 11(2):470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapitzke R. 2007. Multipurpose design for fish passage at road crossings on a north Queensland stream. Aust J Multidiscip Eng. 5(1):13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Katopodis C, Kells J, Acharya M. 2001. Nature-like and conventional fishways: alternative concepts? Can Water Resour J/Revue Canadienne Des Ressources Hydriques. 26(2):211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Katopodis C, Williams JG. 2012. The development of fish passage research in a historical context. Ecol Eng. 48:8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp PS. 2012. Bridging the gap between fish behaviour, performance and hydrodynamics: an ecohydraulics approach to fish passage research. River Res Applic. 28(4):403–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp PS. 2016. Meta‐analyses, metrics and motivation: Mixed messages in the fish passage debate. River Res Applic. 32(10):2116–2124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodier MA, Tullis BP. 2014. Fish passage behavior for severe hydraulic conditions in baffled culverts. J Hydraul Eng. 140(3):322–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp M, Montgomery J, Whittaker C, Franklin P, Baker CF, Friedrich H. 2019. Fish passage hydrodynamics: insights into overcoming migration challenges for small-bodied fish. J Ecohydraulics. 4(1):43–406.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey RJ, Neary VS, Liao JC, Enders EC, Tritico HM. 2012. The IPOS framework: linking fish swimming performance in altered flows from laboratory experiments to rivers. River Res Applic. 28(4):429–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey RJ, Rennie CD. 2012. Laboratory investigation of turbulent flow structure around a bed-mounted cube at multiple flow stages. J Hydraul Eng. 138(1):71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larousse A, Martinuzzi R, Tropea C. 1991. Flow around surface-mounted, three-dimensional obstacles. Selected Papers of the 8th Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows. Springer; p. 127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Leng X, Chanson H. 2019. Hybrid modelling of low velocity zones in box culverts to assist upstream fish passage. Environ Fluid Mech. doi:10.1007/s10652-019-09700-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao JC. 2006. The role of the lateral line and vision on body kinematics and hydrodynamic preference of rainbow trout in turbulent flow. J Exp Biol. 209(20):4077–4090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao JC. 2007. A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows. Phil Trans R Soc B. 362(1487):1973–1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao JC, Beal DN, Lauder GV, Triantafyllou MS. 2003a. Fish exploiting vortices decrease muscle activity. Science. 302(5650):1566–1569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao JC, Beal DN, Lauder GV, Triantafyllou MS. 2003b. The Kármán gait: novel body kinematics of rainbow trout swimming in a vortex street. J Exp Biol. 206(6):1059–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link O, Sanhueza C, Arriagada P, Brevis W, Laborde A, González A, Wilkes M, Habit E. 2017. The fish Strouhal number as a criterion for hydraulic fishway design. Ecol Eng. 103:118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupandin A. 2005. Effect of flow turbulence on swimming speed of fish. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci. 32(5):461–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald J, Davies P. 2007. Improving the upstream passage of two galaxiid fish species through a pipe culvert. Fisheries Manage. 14(3):221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia A, Sheltzer AP, Tytell ED. 2015. Streamwise vortices destabilize swimming bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). J Exp Biol. 218(Pt 5):786–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallen-Cooper M, Brand D. 2007. Non‐salmonids in a salmonid fishway: what do 50 years of data tell us about past and future fish passage? Fish Manage Ecol. 14(5):319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinuzzi R, Tropea C. 1993. The flow around surface-mounted, prismatic obstacles placed in a fully developed channel flow. Transact Am Soc Mech Eng J Fluids Eng. 115:85–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell C. 1989. Swimming performances of some native freshwater fishes. N Z J Mar Freshw Res. 23(2):181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhawenimana V, Wilson C, Ouro P, Cable J. 2019. Spanwise cylinder wake hydrodynamics and fish behaviour. Water Resour Res. 55(11):8569–8582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraoka K, Nakanishi S, Kayaba Y. 2017. Boulder arrangement on a rocky ramp fishway based on the swimming behaviour of fish. Limnologica. 62:188–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Transport Agency. 2013. Fish passage guidance for state highways. New Zealand: New Zealand Transport Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Newbold L, Karageorgopoulos P, Kemp P. 2014. Corner and sloped culvert baffles improve the upstream passage of adult European eels (Anguilla anguilla). Ecol Eng. 73:752–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikora VI, Aberle J, Biggs B, Jowett I, Sykes J. 2003. Effects of fish size, time‐to‐fatigue and turbulence on swimming performance: a case study of Galaxias maculatus. J Fish Biol. 63(6):1365–1382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan MJ, Grant JW, Jackson CD. 2012. A quantitative assessment of fish passage efficiency. Fish Fish. 13(4):450–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen A, Tullis B. 2013. Laboratory study of fish passage and discharge capacity in slip-lined, baffled culverts. J Hydraul Eng. 139(4):424–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovidio M, Sonny D, Dierckx A, Watthez Q, Bourguignon S, de Le Court B, Detrait O, Benitez JP. 2017. The use of behavioural metrics to evaluate fishway efficiency. River Res Applic. 33(9):1484–1493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybilla A, Kunze S, Rudert A, Bleckmann H, Brücker C. 2010. Entraining in trout: a behavioural and hydrodynamic analysis. J Exp Biol. 213(17):2976–2986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Z-M, Chen YQ. 2017. Feature point based 3D tracking of multiple fish from multi-view images. PloS One. 12(6):e0180254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaresma AL, Romão F, Branco P, Ferreira MT, Pinheiro AN. 2018. Multi slot versus single slot pool-type fishways: a modelling approach to compare hydrodynamics. Ecol Eng. 122:197–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaratnam N, Katopodis C. 1990. Hydraulics of culvert fishways III: weir baffle culvert fishways. Can J Civ Eng. 17(4):558–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaratnam N, Katopodis C, Fairbairn M. 1990. Hydraulics of culvert fishways V: Alberta fish weirs and baffles. Can J Civ Eng. 17(6):1015–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaratnam N, Katopodis C, Lodewyk S. 1988. Hydraulics of offset baffle culvert fishways. Can J Civ Eng. 15(6):1043–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaratnam N, Katopodis C, Lodewyk S. 1991. Hydraulics of culvert fishways IV: spoiler baffle culvert fishways. Can J Civ Eng. 18(1):76–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaratnam N, Katopodis C, McQuitty N. 1989. Hydraulics of culvert fishways II: slotted-weir culvert fishways. Can J Civ Eng. 16(3):375–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers EM, Heaslip BM, Cramp RL, Riches M, Gordos MA, Franklin CE. 2017. Substrate roughening improves swimming performance in two small-bodied riverine fishes: implications for culvert remediation and design. Conserv Physiol. 5(1):cox034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeque M, Rajaratnam N, Loewen M. 2008. Flow around cylinders in open channels. J Eng Mech. 134(1):60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeque M, Rajaratnam N, Loewen MR. 2009. Shallow turbulent wakes behind bed-mounted cylinders in open channels. J Hydraulic Resh. 47(6):727–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailema C, Freire R, Chanson H, Zhang G. 2019. Modelling small ventilated corner baffles for box culvert barrel. Environ Fluid Mech. doi:10.1007/s10652-019-09680-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos JM, Branco P, Katopodis C, Ferreira T, Pinheiro A. 2014. Retrofitting pool-and-weir fishways to improve passage performance of benthic fishes: effect of boulder density and fishway discharge. Ecol Eng. 73:335–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamloo H, Rajaratnam N, Katopodis C. 2001. Hydraulics of simple habitat structures. J Hydraulic Res. 39(4):351–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen H, Zydlewski GB, Viehman HA, Staines G. 2016. Estimating the probability of fish encountering a marine hydrokinetic device. Renewable Energy. 97:746–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X, Xu J, Huang Z, Katopodis C, Ban X, Kynard B, Tan J, Zhu H, Lin C. 2019. A computer-based vision method to automatically determine the 2-dimensional flow-field preference of fish. J Hydraulic Res. 57(4):598–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva AT, Lucas MC, Castro-Santos T, Katopodis C, Baumgartner LJ, Thiem JD, Aarestrup K, Pompeu PS, O'Brien GC, Braun DC, et al. 2018. The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice. Fish Fish. 19(2):340–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva AT, Santos JM, Ferreira MT, Pinheiro AN, Katopodis C. 2011. Effects of water velocity and turbulence on the behaviour of Iberian barbel (Luciobarbus bocagei, Steindachner 1864) in an experimental pool‐type fishway. River Res Applic. 27(3):360–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DL, Brannon EL, Odeh M. 2005. Response of juvenile rainbow trout to turbulence produced by prismatoidal shapes. Trans Am Fish Soc. 134(3):741–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson C, Baker CF. 2009. Fish passage in the Auckland region–a synthesis of current research. Auckland Regional Council Technical Report 2009/84. Prepared by NIWA for Auckland Regional Council. Hamilton. Auckland: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson C, Kopeinig T, Feurich R, Boubée J. 2008. Culvert Barrel Design to Facilitate the Upstream Passage of Small Fish. Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication No. 366, Auckland, New Zealand, 44 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkin JD, Wright LA, David BO. 2012. Mussel spat ropes assist redfin bully Gobiomorphus huttoni passage through experimental culverts with velocity barriers. Water. 4(3):683–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tritico HM, Cotel AJ. 2010. The effects of turbulent eddies on the stability and critical swimming speed of creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus). J Exp Biol. 213(13):2284–2293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vowles AS, Karageorgopoulos P, Kemp PS. 2019. Upstream movement of river lamprey through a culvert retrofitted with spoiler baffles under experimental conditions. J Ecohydraulics. 4:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Vowles AS, Karlsson SP, Uzunova EP, Kemp PS. 2014. The importance of behaviour in predicting the impact of a novel small-scale hydropower device on the survival of downstream moving fish. Ecol Eng. 69:151–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Chanson H. 2018. Modelling upstream fish passage in standard box culverts: Interplay between turbulence, fish kinematics, and energetics. River Res Applic. 34(3):244–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren Jr ML, Pardew MG. 1998. Road crossings as barriers to small‐stream fish movement. Trans Am Fish Soc. 127(4):637–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson JR, Goodrich HR, Cramp RL, Gordos MA, Franklin CE. 2018. Utilising the boundary layer to help restore the connectivity of fish habitats and populations. Ecol Eng. 122:286–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb P. 1998. Entrainment by river chub Nocomis micropogon and smallmuth bass Micropterus dolomieu on cylinders. J Exp Biol. 201(16):2403–2412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb P, Cotel A. 2010. Turbulence: does vorticity affect the structure and shape of body and fin propulsors? Integr Comp Biol. 50(6):1155–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar