Performance of constructed fish spawning and rearing channels – development of the Imatra City Brook in Finland

References

• Adolph B. 2003. Lower Seton spawning channel complexing project. Lillooet, B.C., Canada: Cayoose Creek Fisheries.
   Google Scholar
• Aroviita J, Hellsten S, Jyväsjärvi J, Järvenpää L, Järvinen M, Karjalainen SM, Kauppila P, Keto A, Kuoppala M, Manni K, et al. 2012. Guidelines for the ecological and chemical status classification of surface waters for 2012–2013 – updated assessment criteria and their application. Environ Administration Guidelines. 7/2012:1–144. (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Aroviita J, Mitikka S, Vienonen S. 2019. Pintavesien tilan luokittelu ja arviointiperusteet vesienhoidon kolmannella kaudella. Suomen Ympäristökeskuksen Raportteja. 37:1–182. (in Finnish). https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/306745.
   Google Scholar
• Chapelsky AJ, Guzzo MM, Hrenchuk LE, Blanchfield PJ. 2020. Invertebrate colonization of a newly constructed diversion channel in the Canadian Shield. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 77(9):1477–1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KD. 2016. Evaluating habitat compensation in insular newfoundland rivers: what have we learned? Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat. Research Document 2016/069. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306077640_Evaluating_Habitat_Compensation_in_Insular_Newfoundland_Rivers_What_have_we_Learned.
   Google Scholar
• ELAW. 2002. Federal Nature Conservation Act of 25 March 2002. https://www.elaw.org/content/germany-federal-nature-conservation-act-25-march-2002.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Commission decision of 30 October 2008 establishing the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise (2008/915/EC). Official J European Union 332:20–44.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2000. 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32000L0060.
   Google Scholar
• Fenoglio S, Tierno de Figueroa JM, Doretto A, Falasco E, Bona F. 2020. Aquatic insects and benthic diatoms: a history of biotic relationships in freshwater ecosystems. Water. 12(10):2934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forcellini M, Plichard L, Dolédec S, Mérigoux S, Olivier J-M, Cauvy-Fraunié S, Lamouroux N. 2022. Microhabitat selection by macroinvertebrates: generality among rivers and functional interpretation. J Ecohydraulics. 7(1):28–41.
   Google Scholar
• Friberg N, Jacobsen D. 1994. Feeding plasticity of two detritivore-shredders. Freshwater Biol. 32(1):133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson S. 2017. Habitat compensation in nature-like fishways – effect on benthos and fish [doctoral thesis]. Karlstad University Studies; p. 46. http://kau.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1153328&dswid=3387.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson S, Österling M, Skurdal J, Schneider LD. 2013. Macroinvertebrate colonization of a nature-like fishway: the effects of adding habitat heterogeneity. Ecol Eng J Ecosys Restor. 61:345–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinimaa P, Syrjänen J, Kivinen J, Sivonen O, Sivonen K, Keskinen T, Valkeajärvi P. 2016. Keski-Suomen taimenseuranta vuonna 2015 (Brown trout monitoring in Central Finland in 2016). In Finnish. Reports of Konneveden kalatutkimus ry 1/2016. http://konnevedenkalatutkimus.fi/media/Keski-Suomen_taimenseuranta_2015_%282%29.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huttunen K-L, Mykrä H, Paavola R, Muotka T. 2018. Estimates of benthic invertebrate community variability and its environmental determinants differ between snapshot and trajectory designs. Freshwater Sci. 37(4):769–779.
   Google Scholar
• Jormola J, Koljonen S, Koskiaho J, Tammela S, Tapaninen M. 2016. Planning and construction of compensative reproduction channels for salmonid fish. Proceedings of the International Conference on Ecohydraulics, ISE 2016, Melbourne. http://ise-2016.m.asnevents.com.au/schedule/session/8110/abstract/26097.
   Google Scholar
• Junge CO, Libosvarsky J. 1965. Effects of size selectivity on population estimates based on successive removals with electrical fishing gear. Zool. Listy. 14:171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Järvenpää L, Jormola J, Tammela S. 2010. Planning of nature-like bypass channels in a constructed river. (In Finnish, with figure texts and reference in English). The Finnish Environment 5/2010. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/37987.
   Google Scholar
• Katopodis C, Kemp PS. 2018. Challenges of integrating habitat for aquatic life and morphodynamics offer a plethora of opportunities for advances in ecohydraulics. Journal of Ecohydraulics. 3(1):1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Koljonen S, Jormola J, Koskiaho J. 2016. Bypass channels can serve as compensative reproduction habitat for salmonids. Proceedings of the International Conference on Ecohydraulics ISE 2016, Melbourne http://ise-2016.m.asnevents.com.au/schedule/track/1019/session/8133/abstract/26089.
   Google Scholar
• Ledger M, Hildrew AG. 2000. Herbivory on acid stream. Freshwater Biol. 43(4):545–556. http://www.creeweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Compensation_guidance.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenat DR, Crawford JK. 1994. Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina streams. Hydrobiol. 294:85–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louhi P, Mäki-Petäys A, Erkinaro J. 2008. Spawning habitat of Atlantic salmon and brown trout: general criteria and intragravel factors. River Res Applic. 24(3):330–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki-Petäys A, Muotka T, Huusko A, Tikkanen P, Kreivi P. 1997. Seasonal changes in habitat use and preference by juvenile brown trout, Salmo trutta, in a northern boreal river. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 54:520–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki-Petäys A, Huusko A, Erkinaro J, Muotka T. 2002. Transferability of habitat preference criteria of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 59(2):218–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy JH, Sellars B. 2009. Can engineering drawings create fish habitat?. Waterpower XVI. Spokane, Washington: PennWell Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey S. 2008. Dunglass electro-fishing summaries 2004-2006. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB. 2008. An Introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2012. Kansallinen kalatiestrategia (National fishpass strategy, in Finnish). https://mmm.fi/kalat/strategiat-ja-ohjelmat/kalatiestrategia.
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service. 2019. The Salmon Life Cycle. Olympic National Park Washington. https://www.nps.gov/olym/learn/nature/the-salmon-life-cycle.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Nyqvist D, Nilsson PA, Alenäs I, Elghagen J, Hebrand M, Karlsson S, Kläppe S, Calles O. 2017. Upstream and downstream passage of migrating adult Atlantic salmon: remedial measures improve passage performance at a hydropower dam. Ecol Eng. 102:331–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pander J, Mueller M, Geist J. 2013. Ecological functions of fish bypass channels in streams: Migration corridor and habitat for rheophilic species. River Res Applic. 29(4):441–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romakkaniemi A. 2008. Conservation of Atlantic salmon by supplementary stocking of juvenile fish [academic dissertation]. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, University of Helsinki and Finnish Game and Fisheries research Institute. http://ethesis.helsinki.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Roos JF. 1991. Restoring Fraser River salmon. A History of the International Pacific Salmon Comission 1937-1985. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: The Pacific Salmon Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Rost A, Fritsen CH. 2014. Influence of a tributary stream on benthic communities in a Didymosphenia geminata impacted stream in the Sierra Nevada, USA. Diatom Res. 29(3):249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppovaara O. 1962. Zur Systematik und Ökologie des Lachsen und der Forellen in den Binnengewässern in Finland. Ann. Zool. Soc. Vanamo. 24:1–86.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 27(3):379–423.
   Google Scholar
• Syrjänen J, Eloranta A, Sivonen K, Keskinen T, Ruokonen T, Valkeajärvi P. 2021. Brown trout monitoring results of Kivikoski and Simunankoksi rapids in 1983–2021. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Tamario C, Degerman E, Donadi S, Spjut D, Sandin L. 2018. Nature-like fishways as compensatory lotic habitats. River Res Appl. 34(3):253–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich J. 2013. Zwishenergebnis der Fischzählung am neuen Wasserkraftwerk Rheinfelden. Wasserwirtsch. 103(6):54–57.
   Google Scholar
• Vuori KM, Mitikka S, Vuoristo H, 2009. Guidance on ecological classification of surface waters in Finland. Part1 Aroviita J, Hellsten S, Jyväsjärvi J, Järvenpää L, Järvinen M, Karjalainen SM, Kauppila P, et al. 2009. Reference conditions and classification criteria, Part 2: guidelines for the ecological and chemical status classification of surface waters for 2012-2013. Environ Administration Guidelines 7/2012:1–144. (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Wallace C. 2013. River channel, through Dunglass island https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3342834
   Google Scholar