Chinook Salmon habitat evolution following river restoration, drought, and flood

References

• Akagi Y. 1994. [Sediment transport at sites of spawning gravel enhancement on the Merced River below the Crocker-Huffman Dam]. [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley].
   Google Scholar
• Arthington AH, Bernardo JM, Ilhéu M. 2014. Temporary rivers: linking ecohydrology, ecological quality and reconciliation ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Barbarossa V, Schmitt RJ, Huijbregts MA, Zarfl C, King H, Schipper AM. 2020. Impacts of current and future large dams on the geographic range connectivity of freshwater fish worldwide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117(7):3648–3655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beechie TJ, Sear DA, Olden JD, Pess GR, Buffington JM, Moir H, Roni P, Pollock MM. 2010. Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience. 60(3):209–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt E, S, MA, Palmer JD, Allan G, Alexander K, Barnas S, Brooks J, Carr S, Clayton C, Dahm J, Follstad-Shah, et al. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science. 308(5722):636–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjornn TC, Reiser DW. 1991. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. Am Fish Soc Special Publ. 19:83–138.
   Google Scholar
• Brown LR, Bauer ML. 2009. Effects of hydrologic infrastructure on flow regimes of California’s Central Valley rivers: implications for fish populations. River Res Appl. 26:751–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RA. 2022. Hydrogeomorphic Scaling and Ecohydraulics for Designing Rescaled Channel and Floodplain Geometry in Regulated Gravel–Cobble Bed Rivers for Pacific Salmon Habitat. Water. 14(4):670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RA, Pasternack GB. 2008. Engineered channel controls limiting spawning habitat rehabilitation success on regulated gravel-bed rivers. Geomorphology. 97(3–4):631–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RA, Pasternack GB. 2014. Hydrologic and topographic variability modulate channel change in mountain rivers. J Hydrol. 510:551–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RA, Pasternack GB, Lin T. 2016. The topographic design of river channels for form-process linkages. Environ Manage. 57(4):929–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunte K. 2004. State of the science review, gravel mitigation and augmentation below hydroelectric dams: a geomorphological perspective. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Report submitted to the Stream Systems Technology Center, Fort Collins, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Burner CJ. 1951. Characteristics of spawning nests of Columbia River salmon. Fish Bull. 61(52):97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Caamaño D, Goodwin P, Buffington JM, Liou JC, Daley-Laursen S. 2009. Unifying criterion for the velocity reversal hypothesis in gravel-bed rivers. J Hydraul Eng. 135(1):66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Caamaño D, Goodwin P, Buffington JM. 2012. Flow structure through pool‐riffle sequences and a conceptual model for their sustainability in gravel‐bed rivers. River Res Appl. 28(3):377–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) 1991. Lower Mokelumne River Fisheries Management Plan. November 1991
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) 2018. California Central Valley Chinook Population Database Report. 9 April 2018.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Water Resources (CADWR) 2001. Merced River Salmon Habitat Enhancement Project Phase III: robinson Reach Engineering Report.
   Google Scholar
• Calle M, Alho P, Benito, G, 2. 2017. Channel dynamics and geomorphic resilience in an ephemeral Mediterranean river affected by gravel mining. Geomorphology. 285:333–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman DW. 1988. Critical review of variables used to define effects of fines in redds of large salmonids. Trans Am Fish Society. 117(1):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church M. 2006. Bed material transport and the morphology of alluvial river channels. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 34(1):325–354.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer Fish Sciences (CFS). 2018. Evaluating the risk of salmon redd scour due to extreme hydrology. Prepared for: merced Irrigation District and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Prepared by: rocko Brown, Kirsten Sellheim, Jesse Anderson, and Joseph Merz.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer Fish Sciences (CFS). 2019. Merced River Ranch and Henderson Park restoration projects on the Merced River. California. Final Data Report Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Prepared by Kirsten Sellheim, Rocko Brown, Jesse Anderson, Mehrey Vaghti, Jesse Wiesenfeld, Philip Colombano, Jamie Sweeney, and Joseph Merz. West Sacramento, CA: Cramer Fish Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp DT, Carling PA. 1989. Observations on siting, dimensions and structure of salmonid redds. J Fish Biol. 34(1):119–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVries P. 2012. Salmonid influences on rivers: a geomorphic fish tail. Geomorphology. 157-158:66–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diffenbaugh NS, Swain DL, Touma D. 2015. Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112(13):3931–3936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs PW, Singer MS, Orr BK, Diggory ZE, Church TC, Stella JC. 2011. Restoring ecological integrity in highly regulated rivers: the role of baseline data and analytical references. Environ Manage. 48(4):847–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins EM, Pasternack GB, Merz JE. 2007. Use of slope creation for rehabilitating incised, regulated, gravel bed rivers. Water Resour Res. 43(5):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everest FH, Beschta RL, Scrivener JC, Koski KV, Sedell JR, Cederholm CJ. 1987. Fine sediment and salmonid production: a paradox. In Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. Edited by E.O. Salo and T.W. Cundy. Institute of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Pp. 98–142.
   Google Scholar
• Fremier AK, Yanites BJ, Yager EM. 2018. Sex that moves mountains: the influence of spawning fish on river profiles over geologic timescales. Geomorphology. 305:163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeuman D, Stewart R, Schmandt B, Pryor C. 2017. Geomorphic response to gravel augmentation and high‐flow dam release in the Trinity River. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 42(15):2523–2540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasith A, Resh VH. 1999. Streams in Mediterranean climate regions: abiotic influences and biotic responses to predictable seasonal events. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 30(1):51–81.
   Google Scholar
• Gervasi AA, Pasternack GB, East AE. 2021. Flooding duration and volume more important than peak discharge in explaining 18 years of gravel–cobble river change. Earth Surf Processes Landf. 46(15):3194–3212.
   Google Scholar
• Gibling MR, Davies NS. 2012. Paleozoic landscapes shaped by plant evolution. Nat Geosci. 5(2):99–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleick PH. 2003. Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science. 302(5650):1524–1528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottesfeld AS, Hassan MA, Tunnicliffe JF, Poirier RW. 2004. Sediment dispersion in salmon spawning streams: the influence of floods and salmon redd construction. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 40(4):1071–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf WL. 2006. Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers. Geomorphology. 79(3-4):336–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant GE. 2012. The geomorphic response of gravel-bed rivers to dams: perspectives and prospects. In Church, M.; Biron, PM; Roy, AG, eds. Gravel-bed rivers: processes, tools, environments. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 15:p. 165–181.
   Google Scholar
• Grill G, Lehner B, Thieme M, Geenen B, Tickner D, Antonelli F, Babu S, Borrelli P, Cheng L, Crochetiere H, et al. 2019. Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature. 569(7755):215–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gostner W, Alp M, Schleiss AJ, Robinson CT. 2013. The hydro-morphological index of diversity: a tool for describing habitat heterogeneity in river engineering projects. Hydrobiologia. 712(1):43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzelj M, Hauer C, Egger G. 2020. The third dimension in river restoration: how anthropogenic disturbance changes boundary conditions for ecological mitigation. Sci Rep. 10(1):1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrahan TP. 2007. Bedform morphology of salmon spawning areas in a large gravel-bed river. Geomorphology. 86(3–4):529–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison LR, Bray E, Overstreet B, Legleiter CJ, Brown RA, Merz JE, Bond RM, Nicol CL, Dunne T. 2019. Physical controls on salmon redd site selection in restored reaches of a regulated, gravel‐bed river. Water Resour Res. 55(11):8942–8966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan MA, Gottesfeld AS, Montgomery DR, Tunnicliffe JF, Clarke GK, Wynn G, Jones‐Cox H, Poirier R, MacIsaac E, Herunter H, et al. 2008. Salmon‐driven bed load transport and bed morphology in mountain streams. Geophys Res Lett. 35(4):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer FR, Locke H, Dreitz VJ, Hebblewhite M, Lowe WH, Muhlfeld CC, Nelson CR, Proctor MF, Rood SB. 2016. Gravel-bed river floodplains are the ecological nexus of glaciated mountain landscapes. Sci Adv. 2(6):e1600026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage GL, Milan DJ, Large AR, Fuller IC. 2009. Influence of survey strategy and interpolation model on DEM quality. Geomorphology. 112(3–4):334–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries P, Winemiller KO. 2009. Historical impacts on river fauna, shifting baselines, and challenges for restoration. BioScience. 59(8):673–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries R, Venditti JG, Sklar LS, Wooster JK. 2012. Experimental evidence for the effect of hydrographs on sediment pulse dynamics in gravel‐bedded rivers. Water Resour Res. 48(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson JR, Pasternack GB, Wheaton JM. 2015. Virtual manipulation of topography to test potential pool–riffle maintenance mechanisms. Geomorphology. 228:617–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James LA, Singer MB, Ghoshal S, Megison M. 2009. Historical channel changes in the lower Yuba and Feather Rivers, California: long-term effects of contrasting river-management strategies. In Management and Restoration of Fluvial Systems with Broad Historical Changes and Human Impacts (Vol. 451, p. 57–81. Geological Society of America Boulder, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson AC, Bellmore JR, Haught S, Medel R. 2019. Quantifying the monetary value of Alaska national forests to commercial Pacific salmon fisheries. North Am J Fish Manage. 39(6):1119–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MF, Thorne CR, Castro JM, Kondolf GM, Mazzacano CS, Rood SB, Westbrook C. 2020. Biomic river restoration: a new focus for river management. River Res Appl. 36(1):3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J, Moyle PB, Quiñones RM, Israel J, Purdy S. 2013. Impending extinction of salmon, steelhead, and trout (Salmonidae) in California. Environ Biol Fish. 96(10-11):1169–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller EA. 1971. Areal sorting of bed-load material: the hypothesis of velocity reversal. Geol Soc America Bull. 82(3):753–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J.M., P. Scarpino, H. Berry, J. Syvitski, and M. Meybeck (eds). 2017. Rivers of the Anthropocene. California: university of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy CM, Oakleaf JR, Theobald DM, Baruch-Mordo S, Kiesecker J. 2019. Managing the middle: A shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient. Glob Chang Biol. 25(3):811–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killam D, Bui A, LaDochy S, Ramirez P, Willis J, Patzert W. 2014. California getting wetter to the north, drier to the south: natural variability or climate change? Climate. 2(3):168–180.
   Google Scholar
• Kondolf GM, Wolman MG. 1993. The sizes of salmonid spawning gravels. Water Resour Res. 29(7):2275–2285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondolf GM, Vick JC, Ramirez TM. 1996. Salmon spawning habitat rehabilitation on the Merced River, California: an evaluation of project planning and performance. Trans Am Fish Soc. 125(6):899–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondolf GM. 1997. Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environ Manage. 21(4):533–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondolf GM, Anderson S, Lave R, Pagano L, Merenlender A, Bernhardt ES. 2007. Two decades of river restoration in California: what can we learn? Restor Ecol. 15(3):516–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondolf GM, Williams JG, Horner TC, Milan D. 2008. Assessing physical quality of spawning habitat. In American Fisheries Society Symposium (Vol. 65, p. 000–000.
   Google Scholar
• Lai YG. 2010. Two-dimensional depth-averaged flow modeling with an unstructured hybrid mesh. J Hydraul Eng. 136(1):12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclerc M, Boudreault A, Bechara TA, Corfa G. 1995. Two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling: a neglected tool in the instream flow incremental methodology. Trans Am Fish Soc. 124(5):645–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard C, Legleiter C, Overstreet B. 2017. Effects of lateral confinement in natural and leveed reaches of a gravel‐bed river: Snake River, Wyoming, USA. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 42(13):2119–2138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu M, Hanser SE, Knick ST. 2008. The human footprint in the west: a large‐scale analysis of anthropogenic impacts. Ecol Appl. 18(5):1119–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis SL, Maslin MA. 2015. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature. 519(7542):171–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisle TE, Nelson JM, Pitlick J, Madej MA, Barkett BL. 2000. Variability of bed mobility in natural, gravel‐bed channels and adjustments to sediment load at local and reach scales. Water Resour Res. 36(12):3743–3755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacVicar BJ, Rennie CD, Roy AG. 2010. Discussion of “Unifying Criterion for the Velocity Reversal Hypothesis in Gravel-Bed Rivers” by D. Caamaño, P. Goodwin, J. M. Buffington, J. C. P. Liou, and S. Daley-Laursen. J Hydraul Eng. 136(8):550–552.
   Google Scholar
• MacWilliams ML, Jr, Wheaton JM, Pasternack GB, Street RL, Kitanidis PK. 2006. Flow convergence routing hypothesis for pool‐riffle maintenance in alluvial rivers. Water Resour Res. 42(10):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann ME, Gleick PH. 2015. Climate change and California drought in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112(13):3858–3859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti MP, Moyle PB. 2001. Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in a regulated California stream. Ecol Appl. 11(2):530–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason RJ, Rice SP, Wood PJ, Johnson MF. 2019. The zoogeomorphology of case-building caddisfly: quantifying sediment use. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 44(12):2510–2525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKey D, Rostain S, Iriarte J, Glaser B, Birk JJ, Holst I, Renard D. 2010. Pre-Columbian agricultural landscapes, ecosystem engineers, and self-organized patchiness in Amazonia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(17):7823–7828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz JE, Setka JD. 2004. Evaluation of a spawning habitat enhancement site for Chinook Salmon in a regulated California river. North Am J Fish Manage. 24(2):397–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz JE, Pasternack GB, Wheaton JM. 2006. Sediment budget for salmonid spawning habitat rehabilitation in a regulated river. Geomorphology. 76(1-2):207–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moniz PJ, Pasternack GB, Massa DA, Stearman LW, Bratovich PM. 2020. Do rearing salmonids predictably occupy physical microhabitat? J Ecohydraul. 5(2):132–150.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DR, Buffington JM, Peterson NP, Schuett-Hames D, Quinn TP. 1996. Stream-bed scour, egg burial depths, and the influence of salmonid spawning on bed surface mobility and embryo survival. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 53(5):1061–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DR. 2000. Coevolution of the Pacific salmon and Pacific Rim topography. Geol. 28(12):1107–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Moore HE, Rutherfurd ID. 2017. Lack of maintenance is a major challenge for stream restoration projects. River Res Appl. 33(9):1387–1399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossa J, McLean M. 1997. Channel planform and land cover changes on a mined river floodplain: Amite River, Louisiana, USA. Appl Geogr. 17(1):43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle PB, Mount JF. 2007. Homogenous rivers, homogenous faunas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104(14):5711–5712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle PB. 2014. Novel aquatic ecosystems: the new reality for streams in California and other Mediterranean climate regions. River Res Appl. 30(10):1335–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naiman RJ, Rogers KH. 1997. Large animals and system-level characteristics in river corridors. BioScience. 47(8):521–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JB, Miller SJ, Harper K, Nagler JJ, Wenburg JK. 2006. Contrasting sex ratios in juvenile and adult Chinook salmon from south-west Alaska: sex reversal or differential survival? J Fish Biol. 69(sa):140–144.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer MA, Lettenmaier DP, Poff NL, Postel SL, Richter B, Warner R. 2009. Climate change and river ecosystems: protection and adaptation options. Environ Manage. 44(6):1053–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang B. 1998. River flood flow and its energy loss. J Hydraul Eng. 124(2):228–231.
   Google Scholar
• Parasiewicz P, King EL, Webb JA, Piniewski M, Comoglio C, Wolter C, Buijse AD, Bjerklie D, Vezza P, Melcher A, et al. 2019. The role of floods and droughts on riverine ecosystems under a changing climate. Fish Manag Ecol. 26(6):461–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasternack GB. 2011. 2D modeling and ecohydraulic analysis. California: university of California, Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Pasternack GB, Gilbert AT, Wheaton JM, Buckland EM. 2006. Error propagation for velocity and shear stress prediction using 2D models for environmental management. J Hydrol. 328(1-2):227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasternack GB, Brown RA. 2013. Ecohydraulic design of riffle-pool relief and morphological unit geometry in support of regulated gravel-bed river rehabilitation. University of California, Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Petrosky CE, Schaller HA. 2010. Influence of river conditions during seaward migration and ocean conditions on survival rates of Snake River Chinook Salmon and steelhead. Ecol Freshw Fish. 19(4):520–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer AM, Finnegan NJ, Willenbring JK. 2017. Sediment supply controls equilibrium channel geometry in gravel rivers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 114(13):3346–3351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickup G. 1976. Adjustment of stream-channel shape to hydrologic regime. J Hydrol. 30(4):365–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC. 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience. 47(11):769–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt L, Jerolmack D, Cardinale BJ, Vanacker V, Wright J. 2010. Dynamic interactions of life and its landscape: feedbacks at the interface of geomorphology and ecology. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 35(1):78–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa EA, Rudel TK, York R, Jorgenson AK, Dietz T. 2015. The human (anthropogenic) driving forces of global climate change. Clim Change Soc: Sociol Perspect. 2:32–60.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer AM, Pasternack GB, Moir HJ, Fulton AA. 2010. Riffle-pool maintenance and flow convergence routing observed on a large gravel-bed river. Geomorphology. 114(3):143–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellheim KL, Watry CB, Rook B, Zeug S, Hannon J, Zimmerman J, Dove K, Merz JE. 2016a. Juvenile salmonid utilization of floodplain rearing habitat after gravel augmentation in a regulated river. River Res Appl. 32(4):610–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellheim KL, Vaghti M, Merz JE. 2016b. Vegetation recruitment in an enhanced floodplain: ancillary benefits of salmonid habitat enhancement. Limnol-Ecol Manage Inland Waters. 58:94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields FD, Jr., Copeland RR, Klingeman PC, Doyle MW, Simon A. 2003. Design for stream restoration. J Hydraul Eng. 129(8):575–584.
   Google Scholar
• Stähly S, Franca MJ, Robinson CT, Schleiss AJ. 2019. Sediment replenishment combined with an artificial flood improves river habitats downstream of a dam. Sci Rep. 9(1):1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41575-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanford JA, Ward JV, Liss WJ, Frissell CA, Williams RN, Lichatowich JA, Coutant CC. 1996. A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers. Regul Rivers: res Mgmt. 12(4-5):391–413.
   Google Scholar
• Stein L, Clark MP, Knoben WJ, Pianosi F, Woods RA. 2021. How do climate and catchment attributes influence flood generating processes? A large‐sample study for 671 catchments across the contiguous USA. Water Res. 57(4):e2020WR028300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewardson MJ, McMahon TA. 2002. A stochastic model of hydraulic variations within stream channels. Water Resour Res. 38(1):8–1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillwater Sciences 2002. Merced River Corridor Restoration Plan. Stillwater Sciences, Berkeley, California. p. 245. pages.
   Google Scholar
• Stillwater Sciences 2004. Channel and floodplain surveys of the Merced River Dredger Tailings Reach. Stillwater Sciences, Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar
• Strom MA, Pasternack GB, Wyrick JR. 2016. Reenvisioning velocity reversal as a diversity of hydraulic patch behaviours. Hydrol Process. 30(13):2348–2365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydeman WJ, Santora JA, Thompson SA, Marinovic B, Lorenzo ED. 2013. Increasing variance in North Pacific climate relates to unprecedented ecosystem variability off California. Glob Chang Biol. 19(6):1662–1675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syvitski JPM, Vörösmarty CJ, Kettner AJ, Green P., 2005. Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science. 308(5720):376–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminga A, Eaton B. 2018. Linking geomorphic change due to floods to spatial hydraulic habitat dynamics. Ecohydrology. 11(8):e2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarolli P, Sofia G. 2016. Human topographic signatures and derived geomorphic processes across landscapes. Geomorphology. 255:140–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tockner K, Stanford JA. 2002. Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Envir Conserv. 29(3):308–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson DM. 2005. The history of the use and effectiveness of instream structures in the United States. Humans Geologic Agents. 16:35.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson D, Stull G. 2004. The development and historic use of habitat structures in channel restoration in the United States: the grand experiment in fisheries management. gpq. 56(1):45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson DM. 2011. The velocity-reversal hypothesis revisited. Prog Phys Geogr. 35(1):123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnipseed DP, Sauer VB. 2010. Discharge measurements at gaging stations (No. 3-A8). US Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2001. Final restoration plan for the Anadromous Fish Restoration Program: a plan to increase natural production of anadromous fish in the Central Valley of California. Sacramento, CA: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Vick JC. 1995. [Habitat rehabilitation in the lower Merced River: a geomorphological]. [Perspective. Master’s thesis. University of California, Berkeley].
   Google Scholar
• Weber MD, Pasternack GB. 2017. Valley-scale morphology drives differences in fluvial sediment budgets and incision rates during contrasting flow regimes. Geomorphology. 288:39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton JM, Pasternack GB, Merz JE. 2004a. Spawning habitat rehabilitation– I. Conceptual approach and methods. Int J River Basin Manage. 2(1):3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wheaton JM, Pasternack GB, Merz JE. 2004b. Spawning habitat rehabilitation – II. Using hypothesis development and testing in design, Mokelumne River, California, U.S.A. Int J River Basin Manage. 2(1):21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Wheaton JM, Brasington J, Darby SE, Merz JE, Pasternack GB, Sear D, Vericat D. 2010a. Linking geomorphic changes to salmonid habitat at a scale relevant to fish. River Res Appl. 26(4):469–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton JM, Brasington J, Darby SE, Sear DA. 2010b. Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets. Earth Surf Process Landforms. 35(2):136–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilby RL, Orr H, Watts G, Battarbee RW, Berry PM, Chadd R, Dugdale SJ, Dunbar MJ, Elliott JA, Extence C, et al. 2010. Evidence needed to manage freshwater ecosystems in a changing climate: turning adaptation principles into practice. Sci Total Environ. 408(19):4150–4164.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock PR, Barta AF, Shea CC, Kondolf GM, Matthews WG, Pitlick J. 1996. Observations of flow and sediment entrainment on a large gravel‐bed river. Water Resour Res. 32(9):2897–2909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JG. 2001. Chinook Salmon in the lower American River, California’s largest urban stream. Contributions to the Biology of Central Valley Salmonids. Fish Bull. 179(2):1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson K, S, B, May. 2005. Inheritance studies implicate a genetic mechanism for apparent sex reversal in Chinook salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc. 134(5):1253–1261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl E, Bledsoe BP, Jacobson RB, Poff NL, Rathburn SL, Walters DM, Wilcox AC. 2015. The natural sediment regime in rivers: broadening the foundation for ecosystem management. BioScience. 65(4):358–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyrick JR, Senter AE, Pasternack GB. 2014. Revealing the natural complexity of fluvial morphology through 2D hydrodynamic delineation of river landforms. Geomorphology. 210:14–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshiyama RM, Fisher FW, Moyle PB. 1998. Historical abundance and decline of Chinook Salmon in the Central Valley region of California. North Am J Fish Manage. 18(3):487–521.
   Google Scholar
• Zeug SC, Albertson LK, Lenihan H, Hardy J, Cardinale B. 2011. Predictors of Chinook salmon extirpation in California’s Central Valley. Fish Manage Ecol. 18(1):61–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeug SC, Sellheim K, Watry C, Rook B, Hannon J, Zimmerman J, Cox D, Merz J. 2014. Gravel augmentation increases spawning utilization by anadromous salmonids: a case study from California, USA. River Res Applic. 30(6):707–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar