Estimating the AUC with a graphical lasso method for high-dimensional biomarkers with LOD

References

• Bast RC. Perspectives on the future of cancer markers. Clin Chem. 1993;39(11):2444–2451.
   Google Scholar
• Chook JB, Ngeow YF, Yap SF, et al. Combined use of wild-type hbv precore and high serum iron marker as a potential tool for the prediction of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B infection. J Med Virol. 2011;83(4):594–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray P, Le Manach Y, Riou B, et al. Statistical evaluation of a biomarker. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(4):1023–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu A, Schisterman EF, Zhu Y. On linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy. Stat Med. 2005;24(1):37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su JQ, Liu JS. Linear combinations of multiple diagnostic markers. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88(424):1350–1355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics. 2008;9(3):432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petricoin EF, Ornstein DK, Liotta LA. Clinical proteomics: applications for prostate cancer biomarker discovery and detection. In: Urologic oncology: seminars and original investigations. Vol. 22. New York, NY: Elsevier; 2004. p. 322–328.
   Google Scholar
• Hornung RW, Reed LD. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1990;5(1):46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Vexler A, Liu A, Eliseeva E, et al. Maximum likelihood ratio tests for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection. Biometrics. 2008;64(3):895–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomassi D, Forzani L, Bura E, et al. Sufficient dimension reduction for censored predictors. Biometrics. 2017;73(1):220–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augugliaro L, Abbruzzo A, Vinciotti V. L1-penalized censored Gaussian graphical model. Preprint, 2018. arXiv:1801.07981.
   Google Scholar
• Deelen J, Kettunen J, Fischer K, et al. A metabolic profile of all-cause mortality risk identified in an observational study of 44, 168 individuals. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Haider S, Yao CQ, Sabine VS, et al. Pathway-based subnetworks enable cross-disease biomarker discovery. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Craig-Schapiro R, Kuhn M, Xiong C, et al. Multiplexed immunoassay panel identifies novel csf biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and prognosis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4):e18850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudoit S, Fridlyand J, Speed TP. Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2002;97(457):77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skates SJ, Horick NK, Moy JM, et al. Pooling of case specimens to create standard serum sets for screening cancer biomarkers. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark. 2007;16(2):334–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang L, Emerson SS, Zhou X-H. Nonparametric and semiparametric group sequential methods for comparing accuracy of diagnostic tests. Biometrics. 2008;64(4):1137–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang LL, Liu A, Chen Z, et al. Nonparametric roc summary statistics for correlated diagnostic marker data. Stat Med. 2013;32(13):2209–2220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang LL, Liu A, Schisterman EF, et al. Homogeneity tests of clustered diagnostic markers with applications to the biocycle study. Stat Med. 2012;31(28):3638–3648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieand S, Gail MH, James BR, et al. A family of nonparametric statistics for comparing diagnostic markers with paired or unpaired data. Biometrika. 1989;76(3):585–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Li J. Weighted volume under the three-way receiver operating characteristic surface. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019;28(12):3627–3648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee M, Mohapatra S, Ionan A, et al. Diagnostic markers of ovarian cancer by high-throughput antigen cloning and detection on arrays. Cancer Res. 2006;66(2):1181–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Fine JP. Weighted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and its application to gene selection. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Statist). 2010;59(4):673–692.
   Google Scholar
• Izenman AJ. Linear discriminant analysis. In: Modern multivariate statistical techniques. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. p. 237–280.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel PJ, Levina E. Some theory for fisher's linear discriminant function, naive bayes', and some alternatives when there are many more variables than observations. Bernoulli. 2004;10(6):989–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science. 1999;286(5439):531–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan M, Lin Y. Model selection and estimation in the Gaussian graphical model. Biometrika. 2007;94(1):19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim JG, Zhu H, Tang N. Model selection criteria for missing-data problems using the em algorithm. J Am Stat Assoc. 2008;103(484):1648–1658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar