Analysis of familial aggregation using recurrence risk for complex survey data

References

• Butcher JN, Mineka S, Hooley JM. Abnormal psychology. 16th ed. New York: Pearson Education; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ayala FJ, Fitch WM. Genetics and the origin of species: an introduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1997;94(15):7691–7697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CC. Population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Risch N. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. I. Multilocus models. Am J Hum Genetics. 1990;46(2):222–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson JM, Cordell HJ. Ascertainment bias in the estimation of sibling genetic risk parameters. Genet Epidemiol. 2000;18(3):217–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou G, Zhao H. The estimation of sibling genetic risk parameters revisited. Genet Epidemiol. 2004;26(4):286–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo SW. Inflation of sibling recurrence-risk ratio, due to ascertainment bias and/or overreporting. Am J Hum Genetics. 1998;63(1):252–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graubard BI, Sirken MG. Estimating sibling recurrence risk in population sample surveys. Hum Hered. 2013;76(1):18–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews AG, Finkelstein DM, Betensky RA. Analysis of familial aggregation in the presence of varying family sizes. J R Stat Soc C Appl Stat. 2005;54(5):847–862.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao LP, Prentice RL. Correlated binary regression using a quadratic exponential model. Biometrika. 1990;77(3):642–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betensky RA, Whittmore AS. An analysis of correlated multivariate binary data: application to familial concerns of the ovary and breast. Appl Stat. 1996;45:411–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbee N, Betensky RA. Power calculations for familial aggregation studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2004;26(4):316–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varin C, Reid N, Firth D. An overview of composite likelihood methods. Stat Sin. 2011;21(1):5–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirken MG. Encyclopedia of biostatistics-network sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Sirken MG, Graubard BI, McDaniel MJ. National network surveys of diabetes. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Section on Survey Research Methods; 1978. p. 631–635.
   Google Scholar
• Rao JNK, Scott AJ, Skinner CJ. Quasi-score tests with survey data. Stat Sin. 1998;8(4):1059–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews AG, Finkelstein DM, Betensky RA. Analysis of familial aggregation studies with complex ascertainment schemes. Stat Med. 2008;27(24):5076–5092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox DR, Reid N. A note on pseudolikelihood constructed from marginal densities. Biometrika. 2004;91(3):729–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larribe F, Fearnhead P. On composite likelihood in statistical genetics. Stat Sin. 2011;21(1):43–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of health surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Casella G, Berger RL. Statistical inference. 16th ed. Pacific Grove: Tomson Learning; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens GW. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Rev Econ Stat. 2004;86(1):4–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway G, Kovalchik SA, Griffin BA, et al. Propensity score analysis with survey weighted data. J Causal Inference. 2015;3(2):237–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuGoff EH, Schuler M, Stuart EA. Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Serv Res. 2014;49:284–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanutto EL. A comparison of propensity score and linear regression analysis of complex survey data. J Data Sci. 2006;4:67–91.
   Google Scholar
• Demnati A, Rao JNK. Linearization variance estimators for model parameters from complex survey data. Surv Methodol. 2010;36(2):193–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovar MG, Poe GS. The national health interview survey design, 1973–84, and procedures, 1975–83. Vital Health Statist. 1985;1(18):3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsberger S, Graubard BI, Korn EL. Testing logistic regression coefficients with clustered data and few positive outcomes. Stat Med. 2008;27(8):1305–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DR, Rao JNK. Small-sample comparisons of level and power for simple goodness-of-fit statistics nder cluster sampling. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82(398):630–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korn EL, Graubard BI. Simultaneous testing of regression coefficients with complex survey data: use of Bonferroni t statistics. Am Stat. 1990;44(4):270–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boos DD. On generalized score test. Am Statistician. 1992;46(4):327–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumley T. Analysis of complex survey samples. J Stat Softw. 2004;9(1):1–19.
   Google Scholar