Identification and responses to positivity violations in longitudinal studies: an illustration based on invasively mechanically ventilated ICU patients

References

• Petersen ML, Porter KE, Gruber S, et al. Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012;21(1):31–54. doi: 10.1177/0962280210386207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore KL, Neugebauer R, van der Laan MJ, et al. Causal inference in epidemiological studies with strong confounding. Stat Med. 2012;31(13):1380–1404. doi: 10.1002/sim.4469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology. 2004;15(5):615–625. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000135174.63482.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe CJ, Cole SR, Chmiel JS, et al. Limitation of inverse probability-of-censoring weights in estimating survival in the presence of strong selection bias. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(5):569–577. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Petersen ML, Bangsberg D, et al. Diagnosing bias in the inverse probability of treatment weighted estimator resulting from violation of experimental treatment assignment. Berkeley (CA): Division of Biostatistics, University of California, 2006. (http://www.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper211).
   Google Scholar
• Westreich D, Cole SR. Invited commentary: positivity in practice. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(6):674–677. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Amour A, Ding P, Feller A, et al. Overlap in observational studies with high-dimensional covariates. J Econom. 2020;221(2):644–654. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump RK, Hotz VJ, Imbens GW, et al. Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika. 2009;96(1):187–199. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asn055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz I, van der Laan M. Population intervention causal effects based on stochastic interventions. Biometrics. 2012;68(2):541–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01685.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz I, van der Laan MJ. Assessing the causal effect of policies: an example using stochastic interventions. Int J Biostat. 2013;9(2):161–174. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2013-0014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young JG, Hernán MA, Robins JM. Identification, estimation and approximation of risk under interventions that depend on the natural value of treatment using observational data. Epidemiol Method. 2014;3(1):1–19. doi: 10.1515/em-2012-0001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Laan MJ, Petersen ML. Causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment and intention to treat rules. Int J Biostat. 2007;3(1):3. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schjørring OL, Jensen AKG, Nielsen CG, et al. Rasmussen BS. arterial oxygen tensions in mechanically ventilated icu patients and mortality: a retrospective, multicentre, observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124(4):420–429. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensrud MJ, Aalen JM, Aalen OO, et al. Limitations of hazard ratios in clinical trials. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(17):1378–1383. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernán MA. The hazards of hazard ratios. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.). 2010;21(1):13–15. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c1ea43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Hernán MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2000;11(5):550–560. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel RM, Cousens SN, De Stavola BL, et al. Methods for dealing with time-dependent confounding. Stat Med. 2013;32(9):1584–1618. doi: 10.1002/sim.568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stitelman OM, Hubbard AE, Jewell NP. The impact of coarsening the explanatory variable of interest in making causal inferences: Implicit assumptions behind dichotomizing variables 2010. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 264. https://biostats.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper264
   Google Scholar
• Cain LE, Robins JM, Lanoy E, et al. When to start treatment? A systematic approach to the comparison of dynamic regimes using observational data. Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):18. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cain LE, Saag MS, Petersen M, et al. Using observational data to emulate a randomized trial of dynamic treatment-switching strategies: an application to antiretroviral therapy. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;45(6):2038–2049. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young JG, Logan RW, Robins JM, et al. Inverse probability weighted estimation of risk under representative interventions in observational studies. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2019;114(526):938–947. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1469993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl J. Does obesity shorten life? or is it the soda? on non-manipulable causes. J Causal Inference. 2018;6(2):20182001. doi: 10.1515/jci-2018-2001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernán MA, VanderWeele TJ. Compound treatments and transportability of causal inference. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.). 2011;22(3):368–377. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182109296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen ML. Compound treatments, transportability, and the structural causal model: the power and simplicity of causal graphs. Epidemiology. 2011;22(3):378–381. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182126127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haight T, Tager I, Sternfeld B, et al. Effects of body composition and leisure-time physical activity on transitions in physical functioning in the elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(7):607–617. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernán MA. Invited commentary: hypothetical interventions to define causal effects–afterthought or prerequisite? Am. J. Epidemiol.. 2005;162(7):618–620. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Laan MJ, Haight TJ, Tager IB. van der laan et al. respond to ‘hypothetical interventions to define causal effects’. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(7):621–622. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Laan MJ, Luedtke AR, Díaz I. Discussion of identification, estimation and approximation of risk under interventions that depend on the natural value of treatment using observational data, by jessica young, miguel hernán, and james robins. Epidemiol Method. 2014;3(1):21–31. doi: 10.1515/em-2014-0012
   Google Scholar
• Neugebauer R, van der Laan MJ, Joffe MM, et al. Causal inference in longitudinal studies with history-restricted marginal structural models. Electron J Stat. 2007;1:119–154. doi: 10.1214/07-EJS050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira Guerra S, Schnitzer ME, Forget A, et al. Impact of discretization of the timeline for longitudinal causal inference methods. Stat Med. 2020;39(27):4069–4085. doi: 10.1002/sim.8710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofrygin O, Zhu Z, Schmittdiel JA, et al. Targeted learning with daily EHR data. Stat Med. 2019;38(16):3073–3090. doi: 10.1002/sim.8164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bembom O, Fessel JW, Shafer RW, et al. Data-adaptive selection of the adjustment set in variable importance estimation. 2008. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 231. https://biostats.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper231
   Google Scholar
• Bembom O, van der Laan MJ. Data-adaptive selection of the truncation level for inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted estimators. 2008. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 230. https://biostats.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper230
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy EH. Nonparametric causal effects based on incremental propensity score interventions. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2019;114(526):645–656. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1422737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar