The Personal and Historical Nature of Psychoanalytic Interdisciplinary Work

References

• Atwood, G. E. (2011), The Abyss of Madness. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, G. E. & Stolorow, R. D. (2014), Structures of Subjectivity: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Phenomenology and Contextualism, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., Jaffe, J. & Lachmann, F. (1992), A dyadic systems view of communication. In: Relational Perspectives in Psychoanalysis, eds. N. Skolnick & S. Warshaw. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Brandchaft, B. (2007), Systems of pathological accommodation and change in analysis. Psychoanal. Psychol., 24:667–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandchaft, B., Doctors, S. & Sorter, D. (2010), Towards an Emancipatory Psychoanalysis: Brandchaft’s Intersubjective Vision. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brothers, D. (2008), Toward a Psychology of Uncertainty: Trauma-centered Psychoanalysis. London: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brothers, L. (2002), Mistaken Identity: The Mind-brain Problem Reconsidered. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, W. J. (2009), Attitudes in psychoanalytic complexity: An alternative to postmodernism in psychoanalysis. In: Beyond Postmodernism: New Dimensions in Clinical Theory and Practice, eds. R. Frie & D. Orange. New York: Routledge Press, pp. 183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, W. J. (2014), Psychoanalytic Complexity: Clinical Attitudes for Therapeutic Change. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, P. (2011), So who’s asking: Politics, hermeneutics and individuality. In: Persons in Context: The Challenge of Individuality in Theory and Practice, eds. R. Frie & W. J. Coburn. New York: Routledge Press, pp. 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, R. (1641), Meditationes de Prima Philosophia/Meditations on First Philosophy, bilingual ed., ed./trans. G. Heffernan. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Elkholy, S. N. (2008), Heidegger and a Metaphysics of Feeling: Angst and the Finitude of Being. New York/London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fosshage, J. (2003), Contextualizing self psychology and relational psychoanalysis: Bi-directional influence and proposed syntheses. Contemp. Psychoanal., 39:411–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frie, R. & Coburn, W. J. (2011), Persons in Context: The Challenge of Individuality in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. R. & Mitchell, S. A. (1983), Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1927), Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (1997), Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process: A Dialiectical Constructivist View. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (2009), Doublethinking our way to “scientific” legitimacy: The desiccation of human experience. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 57:1043–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. (in press), Dignity, a sense of dignity, and inspirational shame. Psychoanal. Inq.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1984), How Does Psychoanalysis Cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kundera, M. (1984), The Unbearable Lightness of Being. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Maduro, P. N. (2008), Thou shalt not know thy relational contexts: Blindness to the contextuality of emotional life. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Maduro, P. N. (2011), The mineness of my thrownness-into-relationship: Extending intersubjective-systems theory perspectives on experiences of personal ownership and individuality. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Maduro, P. N. (2013), Existential attitudes in intersubjective-systems theory. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Maduro, P. N. (in press), The experience of relationally embedded individuality, and the analytic attitude of affect-respect that fosters it. Psychoanal. Inq.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1988), Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. & Aron, L. (1999), Relational Psychoanalysis: The Emergence of a Tradition. Vol. 15. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. (1976) [1892]. Thus spoke Zarathustra. In: The Portable Nietzsche, ed./trans. W. Kaufmann. New York: Penguin Books, pp. 103–439.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, D. M. (2008), Recognition as: Intersubjective vulnerability in the psychoanalytic dialogue. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 3:178–194.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, D. M. (2009), Attitudes, values and intersubjective vulnerability. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 4:235–253.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, D. M., Atwood, G. E. & Stolorow, R. D. (1997), Working Intersubjectively: Contextualism in Psychoanalytic Practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowling, J. K. (2000), Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. New York: Scholastic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., Sandler, A. & Davies, R. (2000), Clinical and Observational Psychoanalytic Research: Roots of a Controversy. London/New York: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, M. & Kriegman, D. (1992), The Adaptive Design of the Human Psyche: Psychoanalysis, Evolutionary Biology, and the Therapeutic Process. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (1997), Unformulated Experience: From Dissociation to Imagination in Psychoanalysis. Hillside, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1985), The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D. (2007), Trauma and Human Existence. New York/London: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D. (2011), World, Affectivity, Trauma: Heidegger and Post-Cartesian Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D. (2014), Undergoing the situation: Emotional dwelling is more than empathic understanding. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 9:80–83.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D. & Atwood, G. E. (1979), Faces in a Cloud: Subjectivity in Personality Theory. New York: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D. & Atwood, G. E. (1992), Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Life. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D. Atwood, G. E. & Orange, D. M. (2002). Worlds of Experience: Interweaving Philosophical and Clinical Dimensions in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sucharov, M. (2009), Embracing the limits of psychoanalysis: A dialogic approach to healing. In: Self and Systems, Explorations in Contemporary Self Psychology, eds. N. Vanderheide & W. J. Coburn, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1159:150–163.
   Google Scholar
• Vida, J. E. & Molad, G. J. (2004), The Ferenczian dialogue: Psychoanalysis as a way of life. Free Associations, 11:338–352.
   Google Scholar
• Vida, J. E. & Molad, G. J. (2005), The autobiographical dialogue in the dialogue between analysts: Introductory notes on the use of relational and intersubjective perspectives in conference space. In: Relational and Intersubjective Perspectives in Psychoanalysis: A Critique, ed. J. Mills. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson, pp. 255–278.
   Google Scholar