198
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Discussions of Magid, Fosshage & Shane’s paper, The Emerging Paradigm of Relational Self Psychology: A Historical Perspective, Psychoanalysis, Self and Context, 16:1, 1-23

Relationalizing Self Psychology:Commentary on Magid, Fosshage and Shane’s The Emerging Paradigm of Relational Self Psychology: An Historical Perspective

, PhD, PsyD

References

  • Aron, L. (1992). Interpretation as expression of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2(4), 475–507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10481889209538947
  • Atwood, G., & Stolorow, R. (1984). Structures of subjectivity: Explorations in psychoanalytic phenomenology. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Bacal, H. (1998). Relational self psychology. Introduction to Vol. 14. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Progress in self psychology (pp. xiii–xviii). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Bacal, H. (2011). The power of specificity in psychotherapy. Lanham, MD: Aronson.
  • Bacal, H. (2017). Credo: My psychoanalytic adventure—A quest to conceptualize therapeutic efficacy. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 27(1), 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2017.1260939
  • Bacal, H. A. (1990). Does an object relations theory exist in self psychology? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 10(1), 197–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07351699009533807
  • Baker, A. (2021). A defense of Kohut’s “self”. Psychoanalysis, Self and Context, 16(1), 85–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24720038.2020.1818751
  • Bálint, A., & Bálint, M. (1939). On transference and counter-transference. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 20, 223–230.
  • Basch, M. F. (1976). Psychoanalysis and communication science. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 4, 385–421.
  • Basch, M. F. (1981). Selfobject disorders and psychoanalytic theory: A historical perspective. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 29(2), 337–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/000306518102900203
  • Basch, M. F. (1995). Kohut’s contribution. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5(3), 367–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10481889509539074
  • Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73(1), 5–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00151.x
  • Bergson, H. (1911). The evolution of life: Mechanism and teleology. In A. Mitchell (Ed.), Creative evolution (pp. 1–97). New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
  • Bollas, C. (1983). Expressive uses of the countertransference—Notes to the patient from oneself. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19(1), 1–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1983.10746587
  • Bromberg, P. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma, and dissociation. New York, NY: Analytic Press.
  • Cieri, F., & Esposito, R. (2019, August 28). Psychoanalysis and neuroscience: The bridge between mind and brain. Frontiers In Psychology, 10, 1790. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01983
  • Coburn, W. J. (2000). The organizing forces of contemporary psychoanalysis: Reflections on nonlinear dynamic systems theory. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17(3), 750–770. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.17.4.750
  • Coburn, W. J. (2006). Introduction: Self psychology after Kohut: One theory or too many? International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 1(1), 1–4.
  • Derrida, J. (2001). The work of mourning. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Etchegoyen, R. H. (1991). Psychoanalysis during the last decade: Clinical and theoretical aspects. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 11(1/2), 88–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07351699109533846
  • Ferenczi, S. (1988). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child—The language of tenderness and of passion. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 24(2), 196–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1988.10746234
  • Freud, S. (1939). Moses and monotheism: Three essays. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, XXIII(1937–1939), 1–138.
  • Fuentes, C. (1988). Myself with others: Selected essays. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Ghent, E. (2002). Wish, need, drive: Motive in the light of dynamic systems theory and Edelman's selectionist theory. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(5), 763–808.
  • Greenberg, J., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Harris, A. (2005). Gender in linear and nonlinear history. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 53(4), 1079–1095. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/000306510505300401
  • Hume, D. (1740). A treatise of human nature: Being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects & dialogues concerning natural religion. London, United Kingdom: Longmans, Green & Co. Isaiah Berlin . Retrieved from Archive.org
  • Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kindler, A. (1999). The case of Joanna Churchill. Progress in Self Psychology, 15, 197–205. Chapter 13.
  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1977). Restoration of the self. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1978). The search for the self: Selected writings of Heinz Kohut, 1950–1978. (Vols. 1 & 2). P. H. Ornstein (ed.), New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1991). On empathy. In P. Ornstein (Ed.), The search for the self, selected writings of Heinz Kohut, 1978–1981 (Vol 3, pp. 525–536). Madison, CT: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1981)
  • Lear, J. (2004). Therapeutic action: An earnest plea for irony. New York, NY: Other Press.
  • Lichtenberg, J. D., Lachmann, F. M., & Fosshage, J. L. (2002). A spirit of inquiry: Communication in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: The Analytic Press.
  • Lichtenberg, J. D., Lachmann, F. M., & Fosshage, J. L. (2011). Psychoanalysis and motivational systems: A new look. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Locke, J. (1689/1836). An essay concerning human understanding. London, United Kingdom: T. Tegg & Son.
  • Lothane, Z. (2003). What did Freud say about persons and relations? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 20(4), 609–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.20.4.609
  • Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). The two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19(4), 576–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07351699909534267
  • Maduro, P. N. (2019). The experience of relationally embedded individuality and the analytic attitude of affect-respect that fosters it. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 39(5), 335–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2019.1623599
  • Magid, B., Fosshage, J., & Shane, E. (2021). The emerging paradigm of relational self psychology: An historical perspective. Psychoanalysis Self and Context, 16(1), 1–23.
  • Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Mitchell, S. (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Mitchell, S. (1997). Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Mitchell, S. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Nyanatiloka, M. (1994). Fundamentals of Buddhism: Four lectures (Wheel Nos. 394/396). Kandy, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society. Retrieved from http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nyanatiloka/wheel394.html
  • Orange, D. M. (2006). For whom the bell tolls: Context, complexity, and compassion in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 1(1), 5–21.
  • Orange, D. M. (2010). Recognition as: Intersubjective vulnerability in the psychoanalytic dialogue. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 5(3), 227–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15551024.2010.491719
  • Orange, D. M. (2017). Review of ghosts in the consulting room. Psychoanalysis, Self and Context, 12(1), 91–96.
  • Pivnick, B. A. (2015). Spaces to stand in: Applying clinical psychoanalysis to the relational design of the National September 11 Memorial Museum. DIVISION/Rev, 13, 19–24.
  • Pollan, M. (2018). How to change your mind. New York: Penguin Press.
  • Rowe, C. E., Jr. (1999). The selfobject transferences reconsidered. Progress in Self Psychology, 15, 15–30. Chapter 2.
  • Sandell, R. (1999, October). Long-term findings of the stockholm outcome of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis project (STOPPP). Paper presented at the meeting psychoanalytic long-term treatments: A challenge for clinical and empirical research in psychoanalysis, Hamburg.
  • Sandmeyer, J. (2015). Save me a seat! Discussion of doctors and orange’s the big tent of contemporary psychoanalytic thinking: Playing with intersubjective, self, and relational constructs. Paper presented at the ICP&P/IAPSP conference, December 4, 2015.
  • Seligman, S. (2020). Creative skepticism and affectionate curiosity: Scholarship, practice, and theory-building in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 30(6), 649–665. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2020.1829434
  • Shane, E. (2021). Personal communication. Los Angeles, California.
  • Shane, M., & Shane, E. (1993). Self psychology after Kohut: One theory or many? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 41(3), 777–797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/000306519304100309
  • Shore, A. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Slavin, M. O. (2016). Relational psychoanalysis and the tragic-existential aspect of the human condition. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 26(5), 537–548. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2016.1214465
  • Slavin, M. O., & Kriegman, D. (1998). Why the analyst needs to change: Toward a theory of conflict, negotiation, and mutual influence in the therapeutic process. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 8(2), 247–284.
  • Stern, D. (1997). Unformulated experience: From dissociation to imagination in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Stern, D. B. (2004). The eye sees itself: Dissociation, enactment, and the achievement of conflict. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 40(2), 197–237.
  • Stern, D. B. (2020). Dissociative multiplicity and unformulated experience: Commentary on diamond. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 68(5), 907–920. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065120967741
  • Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P. Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Bruschweiler-Stern, N., Tronick, E. Z. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The ‘something more’ than interpretation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 79, 903–921.
  • Stolorow & Atwood. (2020). Bewitching oxymorons and illusions of harmony. Language and Psychoanalysis, 10(1), 1–4. (2021). doi:https://doi.org/10.7565/landp.v10i1.5486
  • Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. (1979). Faces in a cloud: Subjectivity in personality theory. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
  • Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. (1992). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. (2018). The power of phenomenology: Psychoanalytic and philosophical perspectives. London, New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Stolorow, R. D. (1995). Introduction: Tensions between loyalism and expansionism in self psychology. Progress in Self Psychology, 11, xi–xvii.
  • Stolorow, R. D. (1999). Antidotes, enactments, rituals, and the dance of reassurance: Comments on the case of Joanna Churchill and Alan Kindler. Progress in Self Psychology, 15, 229–232. Chapter 16.
  • Stolorow, R. D. & Atwood, G. (2021). Why language matters: Reply to August Baker. Psychoanalysis, Self and Context, 16(1).
  • Stolorow, R. D. (2021). Personal communication. Los Angeles, California.
  • Stolorow, R. D., & Atwood, G. E. (2012). Deconstructing “the self” of self psychology. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 7(4), 573–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15551024.2012.710930
  • Strozier, C. (2001). Heinz Kohut: The making of a psychoanalyst. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Tuch, R. (2016). Between knowing and believing: Salvaging illusion’s rightful place in psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 85(1), 35–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/psaq.12057
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41, 585–595.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1969). The use of an object. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 50, 711–716.
  • Wolf, E. (1988). Treating the self: Elements of clinical self psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.