25
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Discussion

What makes us competent therapists? And why it is important how we go about it: A discussion of Mustafa Çevrim’s “The vulture in the room”

, MA, PhD

References

  • Brandchaft, B., Doctors, S. R., & Sorter, D. (2015). Emanzipatorische Psychoanalyse: Systeme pathologischer Anpassung - Brandchafts Konzept der Intersubjektivität. Brandes & Apsel.
  • Bruschweiler‐Stern, N., Harrison, A. M., Lyons‐Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Nahum, J. P., Sander, L. W., Stern, D. N., & Tronick, E. Z. (2002). Explicating the implicit: The local level and the microprocess of change in the analytic situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83(5), 1051–1062. https://doi.org/10.1516/B105-35WV-MM0Y-NTAD
  • Çaglayan, H., & Küçükkirca, I. (Eds.). (2023). Frauenbewegungen in der Türkei. Eine historische und intersektionale Perspektive. Orlando Verlag.
  • Kandiyoti, D. (2023). Die Entwicklung der Frauenbewegung in der Türkei im gloablen und lokalen Kontext. In H. Çaglayan & I. Küçükkirca (Eds.), Frauenbewegungen in der Türkei. Eine historische und intersektionale Perspektive (pp. 27–41). Orlando Verlag.
  • Köhler, L. (1984). On selfobject countertransference. The Annual of Psychoanalysis, 12, 39–56.
  • Kohut, H. (1971/2009). The analysis of the self. A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago University Press.
  • Kottler, A. (2015). Feeling at home, belonging, and being human: Kohut, self psychology, twinship, and alienation. International Journal of Self Psychology, 10(4), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551024.2015.1074000
  • Lichtenberg, J. (2012). Twinship—an appreciative discussion. International Journal of Self Psychology, 7(3), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551024.2012.686156
  • Lichtenberg, J., Lachmann, F. M., & Fosshage, J. L. (1996/2000). Zehn Prinzipien psychoanalytischer Behandlungstechnik. Pfeiffer bei Klett-Cotta.
  • Magid, B., Fosshage, J., & Shane, E. (2021). The emerging paradigm of relational self psychology: An historical perspective. Psychoanalysis, Self and Context, 16(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/24720038.2020.1856111
  • Ornstein, A. (2009). Do words still matter? further comments on the interpretive process and the theory of change. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 4(4), 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551020903185824
  • Rhode, A. (2019). The therapeutic action of intersubjective self psychology. Part 2: The case of Ricky. In G. Hagman, H. Paul, & P. Zimmermann (Eds.), Intersubjective self psychology. A primer (pp. 57–68). Routledge.
  • Sauer, B., & Penz, O. (2023). Konjunktur der Männlichkeit. Affektive Strategien der autoritären Rechten. Campus Verlag.
  • Seifert, R. (1993). Die zweite Front – Zur Logik sexueller Gewalt in Kriegen. Sicherheit + Frieden, 11(2), 66–71.
  • Togashi K. (2008). A New Dimension of Twinship Selfobject Experience and Transference. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 4(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551020802337492
  • Togashi, K. (2012). Mutual finding of oneself and not-oneself in the other as a twinship experience. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 7(3), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551024.2012.686157
  • Togashi, K., & Kottler, A. (2012). The many faces of twinship: From the psychology of the self to the psychology of being human. International Journal of Self Psychology, 7(3), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551024.2012.685158
  • Togashi, K., & Kottler, A. (2021). From a Cohesive self to a relational being: The evolution of the psychology of the self to the psychology of being human. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 41(3), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2021.1886825
  • Zimmermann, P., Roser, K., Powell, G., Livingston, L., & Hagman, G. (2019). An introduction to intersubjective self psychology. In G. Hagman, H. Paul, & P. Zimmermann (Eds.), Intersubjective self psychology. A primer (pp. 3–13). Routledge.
  • Zwiebel, R. (2020). Wann ist ein Psychoanalytiker genügend gut analysiert? Zu einer immer aktuellen Frage. Psyche, 74(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.21706/ps-74-1-45

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.