Progressing Toward Airliners’ Reduced-Crew Operations: A Systematic Literature Review

References

• Abbott, K., McKenney, D., & Railsback, P. (2013). Operational use of flight path management systems final report of the Performance-based operations – Aviation Rulemaking Committee (PARC)/Commercial Aviation Safety Team Flight Deck Automation Working Group (CAST). Washington, DC: Commercial Aviation Safety Team Flight Deck Automation Working Group.
   Google Scholar
• ACROSS Consortium. (2016a). Incapacitated crew: Emergency Aircraft Control System (EACS). Bruessels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved from http://www.across-fp7.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ACROSS-WP10-03_Emergency-Aircraft-Control-System-EACS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ACROSS Consortium. (2016b). Mental workload monitoring with fNIR optical brain imaging technology: Turkish Aerospace Industries TAI. European Commission. Retrieved from http://www.across-fp7.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ACROSS-WP9-01_Mental-Workload-Monitoring-with-fNIR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aimar, J. L. (2010). US Patent No. US 7,792,615 B2. Google Patents: The Boeing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Airbus. (2011a). A350-900: Flight deck and systems briefing for pilots (Vol. 2). Blagnac Cedex, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Airbus. (2011b). Airbus A380 flight crew operating manual. Blagnac Cedex, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Airbus. (2018). Global networks, global citizens: 2018-2037. Blagnac Cedex, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Aircraft Accident Investigation Branch. (2016). Embraer EMB-505 Phenom 300, HZ-IBN (EW/C2015/07/04). Farnborough, UK: Aircraft Accident Investigation Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J. J., Shelton, K. J., Prinzel, L. J., & Bailey, R. E. (2016). Performance evaluation of speech recognition systems as a next-generation pilot-vehicle interface technology (NASA-TM–2016–219329). Retrieved from Hampton, VA, USA https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20160010565.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. E., Kramer, L. J., Kennedy, K. D., Stephens, C. L., & Etherington, T. J. (2017). An assessment of reduced crew and single pilot operations in commercial transport aircraft operations. Paper presented at the 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), St. Petersburg, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, R. (2008). Ensuring VLJ operational safety: learning to ask the right questions. SAE Technical Paper, 2008-01-2239. doi:10.4271/2008-01-2239
   Google Scholar
• Battiste, V., Lachter, J., Brandt, S. L., Alvarez, A., Strybel, T., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2018). Human-Automation teaming: Lessons learned and future directions. In S. Yamamoto & H. Mori (Eds.), Human Interface and the Management of Information. HIMI 2018 (pp. 395–368). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Benitez, D. M., del Corte Valiente, A., & Lanzi, P. (2018). A novel global operational concept in cockpits under peak workload situations. Safety Science, 102, 38–50. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, K. A., & Pace, J. J. (2011). Examining the actors and functions of an airline operations center. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1412–1416. doi:10.1177/1071181311551294
   Google Scholar
• Bilimoria, K. D., Johnson, W. W., & Schutte, P. C. (2014). Conceptual framework for single pilot operations. Proceedings of the international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Boeing. (2018). Commercial market outlook: 2018-2037. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Boeing Commercial Airplanes. (2018). Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents: Worldwide operations | 1959 – 2017. Retrieved from Seattle, WA: www.boeing.com/news/techissues/pdf/statsum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, R. E. (2010). How flying got smarter. Paper presented at the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, M., Taylor, R. M., Fletcher, K., & Miller, C. A. (2000). Adaptive automation and decision aiding in the military fast jet. In D. B. Kaber & M. R. Endsley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation: User centered design for the new Millenium (pp. 154–159). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
   Google Scholar
• Boy, G. A. (2011). Cognitive function analysis in the design of human and machine multi-agent systems. In G. A. Boy (Ed.), The handbook of human-machine interaction (pp. 189–206). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Boy, G. A. (2015). Requirements for single pilot operations in commercial aviation: A first high-level cognitive function analysis. In F. Boulanger, D. Korb, G. Morel, & J.-C. Roussel (Eds.), Complex systems design & management (pp. 227–234). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boy, G. A. (2016). Flexibility. In G. A. Boy (Ed.), Tangible interactive systems: Grasping the real world with computers (pp. 107–129). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, S. L., Lachter, J., Battiste, V., & Johnson, W. (2015). Pilot situation awareness and its implications for single pilot operations: Analysis of a human-in-the-loop study. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Supplement C), 3017–3024. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.846
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, S. L., Lachter, J., Russell, R., & Shively, R. J. (2017). A human-autonomy teaming approach for a flight-following task. In C. Baldwin (Ed.), Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 (pp. 12–22). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno,J., Herrería, J. A., & SOFIA Consortium. (2010). SOFIA (Safe automatic flight back and landing of aircraft): Final publishable activity report. EC contract.
   Google Scholar
• Burian, B. K. (2007). Very light jets in the national airspace system. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Burian, B. K., & Dismukes, K. (2007). Alone at 41,000 feet. AeroSafety World, 2(11), 30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Çakır, M. P., Vural, M., Koç, S. Ö., & Toktaş, A. (2016). Real-Time monitoring of cognitive workload of airline pilots in a flight simulator with fNIR optical brain imaging technology. In D. Schmorrow & C. M. Fidopiastis (Eds.), Foundations of augmented cognition: Neuroergonomics and operational neuroscience (pp. 147–158). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. A., Mallis, M. M., Caldwell, J. L., Paul, M. A., Miller, J. C., & Neri, D. F. (2009). Fatigue countermeasures in aviation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 80(1), 29–59. doi:10.3357/asem.2435.2009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carey, B. (2018, August 1). Airline pilots unions join to oppose single-pilot research. Aviation Daily. Retrieved from https://aviationweek.com/awincommercial/airline-pilots-unions-join-oppose-single-pilot-research.
   Google Scholar
• Comerford, D., Brandt, S. L., Lachter, J., Wu, S.-C., Mogford, R., Battiste, V., & Johnson, W. W. (2013). NASA’s single-pilot operations technical interchange meeting: Proceedings and findings. Moffett Field, CA: NASA.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, M. A. (2009). A drowsiness detection system for pilots: Optalert®. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 80(2), 149. doi:10.3357/ASEM.21001.2009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cover, M., Reichlen, C., Matessa, M., & Schnell, T. (2018). Analysis of airline pilots subjective feedback to human autonomy teaming in a reduced crew environment. In S. Yamamoto & H. Mori (Eds.), Human Interface and the Management of Information. HIMI 2018 (pp. 359–368). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, M. L., Stimpson, A., & Clamann, M. (2016). Functional requirements for onboard intelligent automation in single pilot operations. Paper presented at the AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• DeMik, R. J., Allen, J. M., & Welsh, B. W. (2008). Very light Jets: Requirements for pilot qualification and collegiate Aviation’s role. Collegiate Aviation Review, 26(2), 37.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, S., & Pew, R. W. (2005). Single pilot commercial aircraft operation (BBN Report). Cambridge, MA: BBN Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K., Roy, A., & Ponchak, D. S. (2017). Cyber safety and security for reduced crew operations (RCO). Paper presented at the 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference DASC, St. Petersburg, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, K., Roy, A., Ponchak, D. S., & Downey, A. N. (2017). Cyber safety and security for Reduced Crew Operations (RCO). Paper presented at the Aerospace Conference, 2017 IEEE, Big Sky, MT.
   Google Scholar
• Embraer, S. A. (2015). Phenom 300. São José dos Campos, Brazil: Embraer S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37(2), 381–394. doi:10.1518/001872095779064555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, A., & Stanton, N. A. (2017). Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: Noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Human Factors, 59(4), 689–705. doi:10.1177/0018720816685832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherington, T. J., Kramer, A. F., Bailey, R. E., Kennedy, K. D., & Stephens, C. L. (2016). Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety for normal and non-normal airline operations. Paper presented at the 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, T. J., Kramer, L. J., Bailey, R. E., & Kennedy, K. D. (2017). Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety during an in-flight airspeed failure. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (ISAP), Dayton, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, T. J., Kramer, L. J., Kennedy, K. D., Bailey, R. E., & Last, M. C. (2017). Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety during dual generator failure. Paper presented at the 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), St. Petersburg, FL.
   Google Scholar
• FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (H.R.302). (2018). Washington, DC: Congress.
   Google Scholar
• FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (H.R.4). (2018). Washington, DC: Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Faulhaber, A. (2019). From crewed to single-pilot operations: Pilot performance and workload management Paper presented at the 20th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration. (2017). 14 C.F.R. part 135 (FSIS FAA Order 8900.1). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Feigh, K. M., & Pritchett, A. R. (2014). Requirements for effective function allocation: A critical review. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8(1), 23–32. doi:10.1177/1555343413490945
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. J., Mitchell, C. M., Caisse, S., Sandusky, L., Smith, P. J., & Mitchell, C. M. (1999). Air traffic management: The view from the ground. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 43(3), 204–208. doi:10.1177/154193129904300316
   Google Scholar
• Gateau, T., Ayaz, H., & Dehais, F. (2018). In silico vs. Over the clouds: On-the-Fly mental state estimation of aircraft pilots, using a functional near infrared spectroscopy based passive-BCI. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(187), 1–14. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gateau, T., Durantin, G., Lancelot, F., Scannella, S., & Dehais, F. (2015). Real-Time state estimation in a flight simulator using fNIRS. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaultier, D., & SAFEE Consortium. (2008). SAFEE (Security of Aircraft in the Future European Environment): Final publishable report (EC contract AIP3-CT-2003-503521). Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/publications/1247/124772271-6_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gore, B. F., & Wolter, C. A. (2014). A task analytic process to define future concepts in aviation. In V. G. Duffy (Ed.), Digital human modeling (pp. 236–246). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Hopkins, C., Loeber, A., & Trivedi, S. (2014). Design of a single pilot cockpit for airline operations. Paper presented at the Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), Charlottesville, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, E., Salmon, P. M., Stevens, N., Goode, N., & Read, G. J. M. (2018). Back to the future: What do accident causation models tell us about accident prediction? Safety Science, 104, 99–109. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (2007). A human‐centred design agenda for the development of single crew operated commercial aircraft. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 79(5), 518–526. doi:10.1108/00022660710780650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (2017). The future flight deck. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics: Cognition and design (Vol. 10276, pp. 222–230). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (2018). Network re-analysis of Boeing 737 accident at Kegworth using different potential crewing configurations for a single pilot commercial aircraft. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 572–582). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D., Stanton, N. A., & Starr, A. (2015). Spot the difference: Operational event sequence diagrams as a formal method for work allocation in the development of single-pilot operations for commercial aircraft. Ergonomics, 58(11), 1773–1791. doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1044574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G. (2006). Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX): 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904–908. doi:10.1177/154193120605000909
   Google Scholar
• Ho, N., Johnson, W., Panesar, K., Wakeland, W., Sadler, G., Wilson, N., … Brandt, S. L. (2017). Application of human-autonomy teaming to an advanced ground station for reduced crew operations. Paper presented at the 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), St. Petersburg, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, A., & Lyall, B. (2016). Human factors guidelines for unmanned aircraft systems. Ergonomics in Design, 24(3), 23–28. doi:10.1177/1064804616640632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddlestone, J., Harris, D., Richards, D., Scott, S., & Sears, R. (2014). Dual pilot and single pilot operations – hierarchical task decomposition analysis of doing more with less. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 365–376). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Huddlestone, J., Sears, R., & Harris, D. (2017). The use of operational event sequence diagrams and work domain analysis techniques for the specification of the crewing configuration of a single-pilot commercial aircraft. Cognition, Technology & Work, 19(2–3), 289–302. doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0423-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Air Transport Association. (2011). Flight crew computer errors (FMS, EFB) case studies (1 ed.). Montreal, Quebec: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Air Transport Association. (2015). FMS data entry error prevention best practices (1 ed.). Montreal, Quebec: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, A. R., Graeber, D. A., & Wiedemann, J. (2010). Crew station design and integration. In E. Salas & D. Maurino (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (2nd ed., pp. 533–560). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, S. R., Brandt, S. L., Lachter, J., Matessa, M., Sadler, G., & Battiste, H. (2016). Application of Human-Autonomy Teaming (HAT) Patterns to Reduced Crew Operations (RCO). In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 244–255). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, D. P., Salmon, P. M., & Walker, G. H. (2008). Event analysis of systematic teamwork. In N. A. Stanton, C. Baber, & D. Harris (Eds.), Modelling command and control (pp. 49–118). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. W., Lachter, J., Feary, M., Comerford, D., Battiste, V., & Mogford, R. (2012). Task allocation for single pilot operations: A role for the ground. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace, New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kaliardos, B., & Lyall, B. (2014). Human factors of unmanned aircraft system integration in the national airspace system. In K. P. Valavanis & G. J. Vachtsevanos (Eds.), Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles (pp. 2135–2158). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koltz, M. T., Roberts, Z. S., Sweet, J., Battiste, H., Cunningham, J., Battiste, V., … Strybel, T. Z. (2015). An investigation of the harbor pilot concept for single pilot operations. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2937–2944. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.948
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, L. J., Etherington, T. J., Bailey, R. E., & Kennedy, K. D. (2017). Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety during hydraulic systems failure. In N. A. Stanton (Ed.), Advances in human aspects of transportation. AHFE 2017 (pp. 15–26). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, L. J., Etherington, T. J., Last, M. C., Kennedy, K. D., & Bailey, R. E. (2017). Quantifying pilot contribution to flight safety during drive shaft failure. Paper presented at the 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), St. Petersburg, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Lachter, J., Battiste, V., Matessa, M., Dao, Q. V., Koteskey, R., & Johnson, W. W. (2014). Toward single pilot operations: The impact of the loss of non-verbal communication on the flight deck. Proceedings of the international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lachter, J., Brandt, S. L., Battiste, V., Ligda, S. V., Matessa, M., & Johnson, W. W. (2014). Toward single pilot operations: Developing a ground station. Proceedings of the international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lachter, J., Brandt, S. L., Battiste, V., Matessa, M., & Johnson, W. W. (2017). Enhanced ground support: Lessons from work on reduced crew operations. Cognition, Technology & Work, 19(2–3), 279–288. doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0422-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laviv, O., & Speijker, L. J. P. (2007). SAFEE - Security of Aircraft in the Future European Environment. Amsterdam, Netherlands: National Aerospace Laboratory NLR.
   Google Scholar
• Leveson, N. G. (2004). A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science, 42(4), 237–270. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(03)00047-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveson, N. G. (2011). Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ligda, S. V., Fischer, U., Mosier, K., Matessa, M., Battiste, V., & Johnson, W. W. (2015). Effectiveness of advanced collaboration tools on crew communication in reduced crew operations. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 416–427). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Y., Bassien-Capsa, V., Ramasamy, S., Liu, J., & Sabatini, R. (2017). Commercial airline single-pilot operations: System design and pathways to certification. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 32(7), 4–21. doi:10.1109/maes.2017.160175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y., Ramasamy, S., Gardi, A., & Sabatini, R. (2017). A virtual pilot assistant system for single pilot operations of commercial transport aircraft. In 17th Australian International Aerospace Congress: AIAC 2017 (pp. 139–145). Barton, A.C.T.: Engineers Australia, Royal Aeronautical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Ma, X., Zhang, Y., Jin, Z., & Dong, D. (2017). A practice for the certification of minimum flight crew workload. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), HCI international 2017 – Posters’ extended abstracts (pp. 339–346). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Gardi, A., Ramasamy, S., Lim, Y., & Sabatini, R. (2016). Cognitive pilot-aircraft interface for single-pilot operations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 112, 37–53. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. B., Sadler, G. G., Koltai, K., Battiste, H., Ho, N. T., Hoffmann, L. C., … Shively, R. (2017). Shaping trust through transparent design: theoretical and experimental guidelines. In P. Savage-Knepshield & J. Chen (Eds.), Advances in human factors in robots and unmanned systems (pp. 127–136). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maiolo, L., Maita, F., Castiello, A., Minotti, A., & Pecora, A. (2017). Highly wearable wireless wristband for monitoring pilot cardiac activity and muscle fine movements. 2017 IEEE international workshop on metrology for aerospace (metroaerospace) (pp. 271–275). Padua, Italy: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, A., & Gollnick, V. (2016). Impact of reduced crew operations on airlines – Operational challenges and cost benefits. Paper presented at the 16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Mallis, M. M., Maislin, G., Konowal, N., Bryne, V., Bierman, D., Davis, R., … Dinges, D. F. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to drowsy driving alarms and alerting stimuli (NHTSA Contractor Report). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Mallis, M. M., Neri, D. F., Colletti, L. M., Oyung, R. L., Reduta, D. D., & Van Dongen, H. P. (2004). Feasibility of an automated drowsiness monitoring device on the flightdeck. Sleep, 27(Abstract Suppl.), A167–A168.
   Google Scholar
• Matessa, M., Vu, K.-P. L., Strybel, T., Battiste, V., Schnell, T., & Cover, M. (2018). Using distributed simulation to investigate human-autonomy teaming. In S. Yamamoto & H. Mori (Eds.), Human Interface and the Management of Information. HIMI 2018 (pp. 541–550). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moehle, R., & Clauss, J. (2015). Wearable technologies as a path to single-pilot part 121 operations. SAE International Journal of Aerospace, 8(1), 81–88. doi:10.4271/2015-01-2440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouloua, M., Gilson, R., Daskarolis-Kring, E., Kring, J., & Hancock, P. A. (2001). Ergonomics of UAV/UCAV mission success: Considerations for data-link, control, and display issues. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45(2), 144–148. doi:10.1177/154193120104500231
   Google Scholar
• Munro, P., & Mogford, R. (2018). Managing variability: A cognitive ethnography of the work of airline dispatchers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 182–186. doi:10.1177/1541931218621043
   Google Scholar
• National Transportation Safety Board. (2016). Aerodynamic stall and loss of control during approach: Embraer EMB-500, N100EQ, Gaithersburg, Maryland, December 8, 2014 (NTSB/AAR-16/01). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Neis, S. M., Klingauf, U., & Schiefele, J. (2018). Classification and review of conceptual frameworks for commercial single pilot operations. Paper presented at the 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. G. (2014). Flying fast Jets: Human factors and performance limitations. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, M. (2007). Economic opportunities and technological challenges for reduced crew operations. Technical paper prepared for: Crew Vehicle Interface Element, NASA, Hampton, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, L. M. L., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Mação, B. M., Nicolau, P. A., & Zhou, L. (2012). A WSN solution for light aircraft pilot health monitoring. Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (pp. 119–124). Shanghai, China: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Onken, R., & Schulte, A. (2010). System-Ergonomic design of cognitive automation (SCI, Vol. 235). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pleydell-Pearce, K., Dickinson, B., & Whitecross, S. (2000). Cognition monitor: A system for real time pilot state assessment. In P. T. McCabe, M. A. Hanson, & S. A. Robertson (Eds.), Contemporary ergonomics 2000 (pp. 65–69). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett, A. R., Kim, S. Y., & Feigh, K. M. (2014a). Measuring human-automation function allocation. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8(1), 52–77. doi:10.1177/1555343413490166
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett, A. R., Kim, S. Y., & Feigh, K. M. (2014b). Modeling human–Automation function allocation. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8(1), 33–51. doi:10.1177/1555343413490944
   Google Scholar
• Ranter, H. (2019). Aviation Safety Network releases 2018 airliner accident statistics. Retrieved from https://news.aviation-safety.net/2019/01/01/aviation-safety-network-releases-2018-airliner-accident-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Reitsma, J., van Passen, R., & Mulder, M. (2019). Operational alerting concept for commercial single pilot operations systems Paper presented at the 20th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Revell, K. M., Allison, C., Sears, R., & Stanton, N. A. (2019). Modelling distributed crewing in commercial aircraft with STAMP for a rapid decompression hazard. Ergonomics, 62(2), 156–170. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1514467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revell, K. M., Allison, C., Stanton, N. A., & Sears, R. (2016). Modelling distributed crewing with STAMP. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Revell, K. M., Stanton, N. A., & Kelleher, G. (2016). Exploring changes in pilot behaviour during distributed crewing. Paper presented at the The Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors Annual Conference, 19th–21st April, Daventry, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, T. (2012). ON-WINGS: ON Wing ice detection and monitoring system. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/docs/publications/1436/143672651-8_en.zip
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, G., Battiste, H., Ho, N., Hoffmann, L., Lyons, J., Johnson, W., … Smith, D. (2016). Effects of transparency on pilot trust and agreement in the autonomous constrained flight planner. Paper presented at the 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Piscataway, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M. (2016). Bigger, bolder, better: Methodological issues in ergonomics science. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 17(4), 337–344. doi:10.1080/1463922x.2016.1156783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., Read, G. J. M., Goode, N., & Stanton, N. A. (2016). Fitting methods to paradigms: Are ergonomics methods fit for systems thinking? Ergonomics, 60(2), 194–205. doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1103385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2016). A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation. Human Factors, 58(3), 377–400. doi:10.1177/0018720816634228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, D. (2017). A workload-centered perspective on reduced crew operations in commercial aviation. Paper presented at the H-Workload 2017: The first international symposium on human mental workload, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, D., & Korn, B. (2017). A tripartite concept of a remote-copilot center for commercial single-pilot operations. Paper presented at the AIAA SciTech 2017 Forum, Grapevine, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, D., & Korn, B. (2018). The operational issue of an airliner’s reduced-crew caused by data-link break-up to remote support. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62, 71–75. doi:10.1177/1541931218621016
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, D., Korn, B., & Stanton, N. A. (2019). Evaluating the reduced flight deck crew concept using cognitive work analysis and social network analysis: Comparing normal and data-link outage scenarios. Cognition, Technology & Work, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s10111-019-00548-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, D., Korn, B., Wies, M., & Stanton, N. A. (2019). Managing a data-link failure of a single-piloted airliner during flight: A system-theoretic process analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors And Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63, 106–110. doi:10.1177/1071181319631001
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2018). How are laser attacks encountered in commercial aviation? A hazard analysis based on systems theory. Safety Science, 110, 178–191. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2019a). Considering single-piloted airliners for different flight durations: An issue of fatigue management. In N. A. Stanton (Ed.), Advances in human factors of transportation (pp. 683–694). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2019b). A future airliner’s reduced-crew: Modelling pilot incapacitation and homicide-suicide with systems theory. Human-Intelligent Systems Integration, 1(1), 27–42. doi:10.1007/s42454-019-00001-y
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2019c). The training of operators in single pilot operations: An initial system theoretic consideration. Paper presented at the 20th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, D., Vollrath, M., & Stanton, N. A. (2018). The System Theoretic Accident Modelling and Process (STAMP) of medical pilot knock-out events: Pilot incapacitation and homicide-suicide. Safety Science, 110, 58–71. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D.-R., Többen, H., & Philippens, H. (2010). Passivation of misused aircraft to protect passengers, airports and infrastructure. In I. Grant (Ed.), 27th congress of the international council of aeronautical sciences (pp. 1–3). Edinburgh, UK: Optimage.
   Google Scholar
• Schutte, P. C. (2015). How to make the most of your human: Design considerations for single pilot operations. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 480–491). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schutte, P. C. (2017). Task analysis of two crew operations in the flight deck: Investigating the feasibility of using single pilot. Paper presented at the 19th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (ISAP), Dayton, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Schutte, P. C., Goodrich, K. H., Cox, D. E., Jackson, E. B., Palmer, M. T., Pope, A. T., … Barry, J. S. (2007). The naturalistic flight deck system: An integrated system concept for improved single-pilot operations. Hampton, VA: NASA.
   Google Scholar
• Serovy, R. M., & Sitter, C. J. (2017). US Grant Patent No. US9826941B1. Google Patents: Rockwell Collins Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shively, R. J. (2017). Human-Autonomy teaming in a flight following task. Paper presented at the NATO HFM-247, Leiden, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Shively, R. J., Lachter, J., Brandt, S. L., Matessa, M., Battiste, V., & Johnson, W. W. (2017). Why human-autonomy teaming? In C. Baldwin (Ed.), Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering. AHFE 2017 (pp. 3–11). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. J., Billings, C. E., Denning, R., McCoy, E., Gee, T., Van Horn, A., … Rodvold, M. (1996). Control by permission: A case study of cooperative problem solving in the interactions of airline dispatchers with ATCSCC. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 4(4), 229–247. doi:10.2514/atcq.4.4.229
   Google Scholar
• Sprengart, S. M., Neis, S. M., & Schiefele, J. (2018). Role of the human operator in future commercial reduced crew operations. Paper presented at the 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., & Baber, C. (2008). Modelling of alarm handling responses times: A case of the Ladbroke Grove rail accident in the UK. Ergonomics, 51(4), 423–440. doi:10.1080/00140130701695419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Harris, D., & Starr, A. (2014). Modelling and analysis of single pilot operations in commercial aviation. Proceedings of the international conference on human-computer interaction in aerospace. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Harris, D., & Starr, A. (2016). The future flight deck: Modelling dual, single and distributed crewing options. Applied Ergonomics, 53(Part B), 331–342. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Plant, K. L., Revell, K. M. A., Griffin, T. G. C., Moffat, S., & Stanton, M. J. (2017). Macrocognition in flight operations: Representing distributed teamworking in sociotechnical systems. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making, Bath, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Plant, K. L., Revell, K. M. A., Griffin, T. G. C., Moffat, S., & Stanton, M. J. (2019). Distributed cognition in aviation operations: A gate-to-gate study with implications for distributed crewing. Ergonomics, 62(2), 138–155. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1520917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., & Walker, G. (2018). Systems thinking in practice: Applications of the event analysis of systemic teamwork method. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., & Jenkins, D. P. (Eds.). (2017). Cognitive work analysis: Applications, extensions and future directions. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., Salas, E., & Hancock, P. A. (2017). State-of-science: Situation awareness in individuals, teams and systems. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 60(4), 449–466. doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1278796
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (1999). What price ergonomics? Nature, 399, 197–198. doi:10.1038/20298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimpson, A. J., Ryan, J. C., & Cummings, M. L. (2016). Assessing pilot workload in single-pilot operations with advanced autonomy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 675–679. doi:10.1177/1541931213601155
   Google Scholar
• Strybel, T., Keeler, J., Barakezyan, V., Alvarez, A., Mattoon, N., Vu, K.-P. L., & Battiste, V. (2018). Effectiveness of human autonomy teaming in cockpit applications. In S. Yamamoto & H. Mori (Eds.), Human Interface and the Management of Information. HIMI 2018 (pp. 465–476). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Strybel, T., Keeler, J., Mattoon, N., Alvarez, A., Barakezyan, V., Barraza, E., … Battiste, V. (2017). Measuring the effectiveness of human autonomy teaming. In C. Baldwin (Ed.), Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering. AHFE 2017 (pp. 23–33). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. M. (1990). Situational Awareness Rating Technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew design. Proceedings of the AGARD AMP symposium: situational awareness in aerospace operations (Vol. 478). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. M., Abdi, S., Dru-Drury, R., & Bonner, M. (2001). Cognitive cockpit systems: Information requirements analysis for pilot control of cockpit automation. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Edinburgh, Scotland: Aerospace and Transportation Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, T. H., Behrend, F., Fünning, N., & Arango, A. (2018). Single pilot operations with AR-Glasses using Microsoft HoloLens. Paper presented at the 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, K.-P. L., Lachter, J., Battiste, V., & Strybel, T. (2018). Single pilot operations in domestic commercial aviation. Human Factors, 60(6), 755–762. doi:10.1177/0018720818791372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warm, J. S., Matthews, G., & Finomore, V. S. (2008). Vigilance, workload, and stress. In J. L. Szalma & P. A. Hancock (Eds.), Performance under stress (pp. 114–115). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., Harron, G., Lyall, B., Hoffa, B., & Jones, E. (2013). Understanding Single Pilot Operations (SPO) certification requirements. Moffet Field, CA: Research Integrations Incorporated prepared for NASA Langely Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Wolter, C. A., & Gore, B. F. (2015). A validated task analysis of the single pilot operations concept (NASA/TM—2015–218480). Moffett Field, CA: NASA.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, Z., Zhang, R., & Joon Lim, T. (2016). Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(5), 36–42. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2016.7470933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2015). State of science: Mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics, 58(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.956151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar