116
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The importance of preference interactions in joint health-state utility values applied to decision analyses for shared decision-making

ORCID Icon

References

  • Abbas, A. E. (2018). Foundations of multiattribute utility. Cambridge University Press.
  • Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46(11), 1497–1512. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1497.12080
  • Adejare, A. A., Jr., & Eckman, M. H. (2020). Automated tool for health utility assessments: The Gambler II. MDM Policy & Practice, 5(1), 1–12.
  • Ara, R., & Wailoo, A. J. (2013). Estimating health state utility values for joint health conditions: A conceptual review and critique of the current evidence. Medical Decision Making, 33(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X12455461
  • Baron, J., & Ubel, P. A. (2002). Types of inconsistency in health-state utility judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(2), 1100–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00019-5
  • Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making—The pinnacle of patient-centered care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780–781. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1109283
  • Basu, A., Dale, W., Elstein, A., & Meltzer, D. A. (2009). A linear index for predicting joint health states utilities from single health-states utilities. Health Economics, 18(4), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1373
  • Bleichrodt, H. (2001). Probability weighting in choice under risk: An empirical test. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011136203223
  • Bleichrodt, H., Abellan-Perpinan, J. M., Pinto-Prades, J. L., & Mendez-Martinez, I. (2007). Resolving inconsistencies in utility measurement under risk: Tests of generalizations of expected utility. Management Science, 53(3), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0647
  • Bleichrodt, H., & Pinto-Prades, J. L. (2000). A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Science, 46(11), 1485–1496. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1485.12086
  • Bleichrodt, H., Pinto-Prades, J. L., & Wakker, P. (2001). Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Management Science, 47(11), 1498–1514. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1498.10248
  • Boersma, P., Black, L. I., & Ward, B. W. (2020). Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among US adults, 2018. Preventing Chronic Disease, 17E, 106. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200130
  • Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8
  • Chaganty, N. R., & Joe, H. (2006). Range of correlation matrices for dependent Bernoulli random variables. Biometrika, 93(1), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/93.1.197
  • Chernick, M. R. (2008). Bootstrap methods: A guide for practitioners and researchers (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cowen, M. E., Miles, B. J., Cahill, D. F., Giesler, R. B., Beck, J. R., & Kattan, M. W. (1998). The danger of applying group-level utilities in decision analyses of the treatment of localized prostate cancer in individual patients. Medical Decision Making, 18(4), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9801800404
  • Dale, W., Bilir, S. P., Hemmerich, J., Basu, A., Elstein, A., & Meltzer, D. (2011). The prevalence, correlates, and impact of logically inconsistent preferences in utility assessments for joint health states in prostate cancer. Medical Care, 49(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f37bf2
  • Dawson, N. V., & Weiss, R. (2012). Dichotomizing continuous variables in statistical analysis: A practice to avoid [Editorial]. Medical Decision Making, 32(2), 225–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X12437605
  • Dewitt, B., Feeny, D., Fischhoff, B., Cella, D., Hays, R. D., Hess, R., Pilkonis, P. A., Revicki, D. A., Roberts, M. S., Tsevat, J., Yu, L., & Hanmer, J. (2018). The prevalence, correlates, and impact of logically inconsistent preferences in utility assessments for joint health states system: The PROMIS®-Preference (PROPr) scoring system. Medical Decision Making, 38(6), 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X18776637
  • Dyer, J. S., & Jia, J. (2013). Preference theory. In S. I. Gass & M. C. Fu (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of operations research and management science. Springer.
  • Elkin, E. B., Cowen, M. E., Cahill, D., Steffel, M., & Kattan, M. W. (2004). Preference assessment method affects decision-analytic recommendations: A prostate cancer treatment example. Medical Decision Making, 24(5), 504–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X04268954
  • Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L. Jr. (2007). Patient-centered communication in cancer care: Promoting healing and reducing suffering [NIH Publication No. 07-6225]. National Cancer Institute.
  • Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., DePauw, S., Denton, M., & Boyle, M. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40(2), 113–128.
  • Finkelstein, A., Luttmer, E. F. P., & Notowidigdo, M. J. (2009). Approaches to estimating the health state dependence of the utility function. American Economic Review, 99(2), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.2.116
  • Fortin, M., Lapointe, L., Hudon, C., Vanasse, A., Ntetu, A. L., & Maltais, D. (2004). Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: A systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(51), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-51
  • Fréchet, M. (1935). Généralisations du théorème des probabilités totales. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 25(1), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.4064/fm-25-1-379-387
  • Gandhi, M., Rand, K., & Luo, N. (2019). Valuation of health states considered to be worse than death—An analysis of composite time trade-off data from 5 EQ-5D-5L valuation studies. Value in Health, 22(3), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.10.002
  • Gerteis, J., Izrael, D., Deitz, D., LeRoy, L., Ricciardi, R., Miller, T., & Basu, J. (2014). Multiple chronic conditions chartbook [Publication No. Q14-0038]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
  • Henderson, J., & Quandt, R. E. (1958). Microeconomic theory: A mathematical approach. McGraw-Hill.
  • Howard, R. A., & Abbas, A. E. (2016). Foundations of decision analysis. Pearson Education.
  • Hu, B., & Fu, A. Z. (2010). Predicting utility for joint health states: A general framework and a new nonparametric estimator. Medical Decision Making, 30, E29–E39.
  • Hunink, M. G. M., Weinstein, M. C., Wittenberg, E., Drummond, M. F., Joseph, S., Pliskin, J. S., Wong, J. B., & Glasziou, P. P. (2014). Decision making in health and medicine: Integrating evidence and values (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Joe, H. (1997). Multivariate models and multivariate dependence concepts. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Johnston, M. C., Crilly, M., Black, C., Prescott, G. J., & Mercer, S. W. (2019). Defining and measuring multimorbidity: A systematic review of systematic reviews. European Journal of Public Health, 29(1), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky098
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  • Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kirkwood, C. W. (1997). Strategic decision making: Multiobjective decision analysis with spreadsheets. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  • Kirkwood, C. W., & Sarin, R. K. (1980). Preference conditions for multiattribute value functions. Operations Research, 28(1), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.28.1.225
  • Kurowicka, D., & Cooke, R. (2006). Uncertainty analysis with high dimensional dependence modelling. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kujawski, E. (2019). On the appropriateness/inappropriateness of the Keeney-Raiffa multiplicative utility function for medical decision making. PPI SyEN, 79, 5–17.
  • Law, A. V., Pathak, D. S., & McCord, M. R. (1998). Health status utility assessment by standard gamble: A comparison of the probability equivalence and the lottery equivalence approaches. Pharmaceutical Research, 15(1), 105–109. [Mismatch ]
  • Lipman, S. A., Brouwer, W. B. F., & Attema, A. E. (2019). QALYs without bias? Nonparametric correction of time trade-off and standard gamble weights based on prospect theory. Health Economics, 28(7), 843–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3895
  • Lugnér, A. K., & Krabbe, F. M. (2020). An overview of the time tradeoff method: Concept, foundation, and the evaluation of distorting factors in putting a value on health. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 20(4), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2020.1779062
  • McCord, M. R., & de Neufville, R. (1986). “Lottery equivalents”: Reduction of the certainty effect problem in utility assessment. Management Science, 32(1), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.1.56
  • McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., & Tversky, A. (1988). On the framing of medical decisions. In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. 562–568). Cambridge University Press.
  • Miyamoto, J. M., Wakker, P. P., Bleichrodt, H., & Peters, H. J. M. (1998). The zero-condition: A simplifying assumption in QALY measurement and multiattribute utility. Management Science, 44(6), 839–849. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.6.839
  • Naveršnik, K., & Rojnik, K. (2012). Handling input correlations in pharmacoeconomic models. Value in Health, 15(3), 540–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.12.008
  • Neumann, P. J., & Cohen, J. T. (2018). QALYs in 2018—Advantages and concerns. JAMA, 319(24), 2473–2474.
  • Pettitt, D. A., Raza, S., Naughton, B., Roscoe, A., Ramakrishnan, A., Ali, A., Davies, B., Dopson, S., Hollander, G., Smith, J. A., Brindley, D. A. (2016). The limitations of QALY: A literature review. Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 6(4), 334–340.
  • Politi, M. C., Studts, J. L., & Hayslip, J. W. (2012). Shared decision making in oncology practice: What do oncologists need to know? The Oncologist, 17(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0261
  • Rodríguez-Míguez, E., Pinto-Prades, J. L., & Mosquera-Nogueira, J. (2019). Eliciting health state utilities using paired-gamble methods: The role of the starting point. Value in Health, 22(4), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.007
  • Sabo, R. T., & Chaganty, N. R. (2010). What can go wrong when ignoring correlation bounds in the use of generalized estimating equations. Statistics in Medicine, 29(24), 2501–2507. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4013
  • Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
  • Shih, W. J., & Huang, W. M. (1992). Evaluation correlation with proper bounds. Biometrics, 48(4), 1207–1213. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532712
  • Stiggelbout, A. M., & Haes, J. C. (2001). Patient preference for cancer therapy: An overview of measurement approaches. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19(1), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.1.220
  • Thompson, A. J., Sutton, M., & Payne, K. (2019). Estimating joint health condition utility values. Value in Health, 22(4), 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.09.2843
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
  • Valderas, J. M., Starfield, B., Sibbald, B., Salisbury, C., & Roland, M. (2009). Defining comorbidity: Implications for understanding health and health services. Annals of Family Medicine, 7(4), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.983
  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.