Patients’ and care partners’ perspectives on the design of a vascular connection for a mobile dialysis device

References

• Ayatollahi, H., Langarizadeh, M., & Chenani, H. (2016). Confirmation of expectations and satisfaction with hospital information systems: A nursing perspective. Healthcare Informatics Research, 22(4), 326–332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett, P. N., Schatell, D., & Shah, K. D. (2015). Psychosocial aspects in home hemodialysis: a review. Hemodialysis International, 19, S128–S134. https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.12258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, N., Carter, J., & Harker, S. (2015). August). ISO 9241-11 revised: What have we learnt about usability since 1998? In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 143–151). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, J. R., Hanson, C. S., Winkelmayer, W. C., Craig, J. C., Palmer, S., Strippoli, G. F., & Tong, A. (2014). Patients’ perspectives on hemodialysis vascular access: A systematic review of qualitative studies. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 64(6), 937–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M. R. (2008, November). Hemodialysis central venous catheter dysfunction. In Seminars in Dialysis. (Vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 516–521). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, M. L., Chau, K. Y., Lam, M. H. S., Tse, G., Ho, K. Y., Flint, S. W., Broom, D. R., Tso, E. K. H., & Lee, K. Y. (2019). Examining consumers’ adoption of wearable healthcare technology: The role of health attributes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, D. N., Taylor, D. W., Cook, R. J., LaPlante, P., Barre, P., Cartier, P., Fay, W. P., Goldstein, M. B., Jindal, K., Mandin, H., McKenzie, J. K., Muirhead, N., Parfrey, P. S., Posen, G. A., Slaughter, D., Ulan, R. A., & Werb, R. (1992). Canadian hemodialysis morbidity study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 19(3), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6386(13)80002-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Devers, K. J. (1999). How will we know “good” qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1153–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, B. S. (2006). Why don’t fistulas mature? Kidney International, 70(8), 1413–1422. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5001747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisikovits, Z., & Koren, C. (2010). Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1642–1655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310376520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethier, J., Mendelssohn, D. C., Elder, S. J., Hasegawa, T., Akizawa, T., Akiba, T., Canaud, B. J., & Pisoni, R. L. (2008). Vascular access use and outcomes: An international perspective from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 23(10), 3219–3226. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfn261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridlund, B., & Hildingh, C. (2000). Health and qualitative analysis methods. Qualitative research methods in the service of health., 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosbee, J. (2002). Human factors engineering and patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11(4), 352–354. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.11.4.352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gura, V., Rivara, M. B., Bieber, S., Munshi, R., Smith, N. C., Linke, L., Kundzins, J., Beizai, M., Ezon, C., Kessler, L., & Himmelfarb, J. (2016). A wearable artificial kidney for patients with end-stage renal disease. JCI Insight, 1(8), e86397. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.86397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, N. J., Van Cleef, S., & Agarwal, A. K. (2012). Central venous catheters in dialysis: the good, the bad and the ugly. The Open Urology & Nephrology Journal, 5(1), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarskjöld, F., Berg, S., Hanberger, H., Taxbro, K., & Malmvall, B. E. (2014). Sustained low incidence of central venous catheter-related infections over six years in a Swedish hospital with an active central venous catheter team. American Journal of Infection Control, 42(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, K. E., Barbara, J., Thorburn, L., & Torpey, K. (2013). The long-term use of a tunnelled central venous catheter for haemodialysis. Renal Society of Australasia Journal, 9(3), 126.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelfarb, J., & Ratner, B. (2020). Wearable artificial kidney: Problems, progress and prospects. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 16(10), 558–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-0318-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jónsdóttir, A. A., Firestone, S., Kessler, L., & Kim, J. E. (2021, September). Human Factors Considerations in Designing a Portable Dialysis Device: Understanding Patients’ and Care Partners’ Needs for Increased Mobility. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 520–524). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jónsdóttir, A. A., Kessler, L., & Kim, J-E. (2022b). Design requirements for monitoring systems for a mobile hemodialysis device: patients’ and care partners’ perspectives. Applied Sciences, 2(19), 9934. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199934
   Google Scholar
• Jónsdóttir, A. A., Kessler, L. G., Rim, S. Y., & Kim, J. E. (2022). What patients and care partners want in a wearable dialysis device: A mixed-methods study. IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 12(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2021.1958273
   Google Scholar
• Jónsdóttir, A. A., Kessler, L., Rim, S. Y., & Kim, J. E. (2020, December). Users’ needs in designing a mobile dialysis device. Insights from an Interview in a Mixed Methods Study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. (Vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 746–749). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jónsdóttir, A. A., Lazo, G. R., Kessler, L. G., Smith, N. C., & Kim, J. E. (2022a). Nephrology nurses’ perspectives for the designs of mobile hemodialysis devices: A human factors engineering approach. Nephrology Nursing Journal: Journal of the American Nephrology Nurses’ Association, 46(6), 481–530. https://doi.org/10.37526/1526-744X.2022.49.6.481
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jónsdóttir, A. A., Lazo, G. R., Sundar, S., Kessler, L., & Kim, J. E. (2022c, September). Nephrologists’ and nephrology nurses’ design preferences for a wearable dialysis device. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 208–212). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181322661168
   Google Scholar
• Kalankesh, L. R., Nasiry, Z., Fein, R. A., & Damanabi, S. (2020). Factors influencing user satisfaction with information systems: A systematic review. Galen Medical Journal, 9, e1686. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v9i0.1686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kherlakian, G. M., Roedershelmer, L. R., Arbaugh, J. J., Newmark, K. J., & King, L. R. (1986). Comparison of autogenous fistula versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft fistula for angioaccess in hemodialysis. The American Journal of Surgery, 152(2), 238–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(86)90249-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidney X. (2022). Finalist: The Ambulatory Kidney to Improve Vitality (AKTIV). Retrieved from May 4, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. Y. (2014). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Nonparametric statistical methods: 2. Nonparametric methods for comparing three or more groups and repeated measures. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 39(4), 329–332. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.4.329
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, J.-E., Kessler, L., McCauley, Z., Niiyama, I., & Boyle, L. N. (2020). Human factors considerations in designing a personalized wearable dialysis device: An interview study. Applied Ergonomics, 85, 103003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosa, S. D., Bhola, C., & Lok, C. E. (2016). Hemodialysis patients’ satisfaction and perspectives on complications associated with vascular access related interventions: are we listening? The Journal of Vascular Access, 17(4), 313319. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., & Lee, K. (2018). Factors that influence an individual’s intention to adopt a wearable healthcare device: The case of a wearable fitness tracker. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., Wickens, C. D., Liu, Y., & Boyle, L. N. (2017). Designing for people: An introduction to human factors engineering. CreateSpace.
   Google Scholar
• Lok, C. E., Allon, M., Moist, L., Oliver, M. J., Shah, H., & Zimmerman, D. (2006). Risk equation determining unsuccessful cannulation events and failure to maturation in arteriovenous fistulas (REDUCE FTM I). Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 17(11), 3204–3212. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006030190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manns, B., Tonelli, M., Yilmaz, S., Lee, H., Laupland, K., Klarenbach, S., Radkevich, V., & Murphy, B. (2005). Establishment and maintenance of vascular access in incident hemodialysis patients: A prospective cost analysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 16(1), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2004050355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, K., Van Til, J. A., & IJzerman, M. J. (2014). Medical devices early assessment methods: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 30(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462314000026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A., & Chmiel, M. (2014). Generalization in and from qualitative analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 7(37), 540–553.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, Z., Niiyama, I., Kessler, L., & Kim, J.-E. (2019). User-centered design for a customized mobile dialysis device for patients with ESRD: an interview study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 762–766). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moist, L. M., Lok, C. E., Vachharajani, T. J., Xi, W., AlJaishi, A., Polkinghorne, K. R., & Lee, T. C. (2012, November). Optimal hemodialysis vascular access in the elderly patient. In Seminars in Dialysis (Vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 640–648). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motti, V. G., & Caine, K. (2014). September). Human factors considerations in the design of wearable devices. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1820–1824). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Muhr, T. (1997). ATLAS. ti: The knowledge workbench: Visual qualitative data, analysis, management, model building: Short user’s manual. Scientific Software Development.
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Kidney Centers. (2021). 2021 Annual Report July 2020 to June 2021. https://www.nwkidney.org/annual-report-2021
   Google Scholar
• Ogrodnik, P. J. (2019). Medical device design: Innovation from concept to market. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pandya, M., & Desai, C. (2013). Compensation in clinical research: The debate continues. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 4(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.106394
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel, P. R., & Brinsley-Rainisch, K. (2018). The making dialysis safer for patients coalition: A new partnership to prevent hemodialysis-related infections. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 13(1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.02730317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, M. B., Browne, N., Grocott, P., & Weir, H. (2005). Part A: Methods to capture user perspectives in medical device development a review of the literature in health care. Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technology Centre for Health. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=7e408db6f9860b7aad82ae4fd7aad4c6b0327e87
   Google Scholar
• Ram, M. B., Grocott, P. R., & Weir, H. C. (2008). Issues and challenges of involving users in medical device development. Health Expectations. 11(1), 63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S. G. S., & Robinson, I. (2007). Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 23(1), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462307051677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamer, M., Lee, T. C., Wasse, H., Glickman, M. H., Qian, J., Gottlieb, D., Toner, S., & Pflederer, T. A. (2018). Medicare costs associated with arteriovenous fistulas among US hemodialysis patients. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 72(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, A. J., Chopra, V., Brown, E., Kleidon, T., Cooke, M., Rickard, C. M., & Bernstein, S. J. (2020). Developing appropriateness criteria for pediatric vascular access. Pediatrics, 145(Supplement_3), S233–S242. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3474G
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United States Renal Data System. (2021). USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
   Google Scholar
• van Gelder, M. K., Mihaila, S. M., Jansen, J., Wester, M., Verhaar, M. C., Joles, J. A., & Gerritsen, K. G. (2018). From portable dialysis to a bioengineered kidney. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 15(5), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2018.1462697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanVoorhis, C. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043
   Google Scholar
• Ward, F. L., Faratro, R., & McQuillan, R. F. (2018). Self‐cannulation of the vascular access in home hemodialysis: Overcoming patient‐level barriers. Seminars in Dialysis, 31(5), 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, K., & Lok, C. E. (2016). New insights into dialysis vascular access: what is the optimal vascular access type and timing of access creation in CKD and dialysis patients? Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 11(8), 1487–1494. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.02190216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, H., Lacson, E., Wang, W., Curhan, G. C., & Brunelli, S. M. (2010). Choice of vascular access among incident hemodialysis patients: a decision and cost-utility analysis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 5(12), 2289–2296. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03210410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, E. W., Dykstra, D. M., Goodkin, D. A., Mapes, D. L., Wolfe, R. A., & Held, P. J. (2002). Hemodialysis vascular access preferences and outcomes in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Kidney International, 61(6), 2266–2271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar