Exponential random graph modeling of a faculty hiring network: The IEOR case

References

• Ali, I., Cook, W.D. and Kress, M. (1986) On the minimum violations ranking of a tournament. Management Science, 32(6), 660–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, C.M. (2006) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Burris, V. (2004) The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69, 239–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charon, I. and Hudry, O. (2010) An updated survey on the linear ordering problem for weighted or unweighted tournaments. Annals of Operations Research, 175, 107–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauset, A., Arbesman, S. and Larremore, D.B. (2015) Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Science Advances, 1(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, H.A. (1987) Ranking from unbalanced paired-comparison data. Biometrika, 74(2), 432–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H. (1995) An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Animal Behavior, 50, 1375–1389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H. (1998) Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: A new procedure and review. Animal Behavior, 55, 827–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., Stevens, J.M.G. and Vervaecke, H. (2006) Measuring and testing the steepness of dominance hierarchies. Animal Behavior, 71, 585–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, J.H., Grofman, B. and Masouka, N. (2007) Social networks in political science hiring and placement of Ph.D.s, 1960-2002. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(4), 729–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handcock, M.S. and Raftery, A.E. (2007) Model-based clustering for social networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Socitety, A, 179 (part 2), 310–354.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, B., Wang, S. and Reddy, N. (2015) Who is hiring whom: A new method in measuring graduate programs. Presented at 112nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, D.M., Gubler, J.R., Zelner, J., Bommarito, I.I. and Provins M.J. and Ingall, E. (2011) Reproduction of hierarchy? A social network analysis of the American Law Professoriate, Journal of Legal Education, 61(1), 76–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P.J. (2008) Finding Groups in Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Krivitsky, P.N. and Handcock, M.S. (2008) Fitting position latent cluster models for social networks with latentnet. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(5), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Krivitsky, P.N., Handcock, M.S., Raferty, A.E. and Hoff, P.D. (2009) Representing degree distribution, clustering, and homophily in social networks with latent cluster random effects models. Social Networks, 31, 204–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, H.G. (1951) On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 13, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mai, B., Liu, J. and Gonzalez-Bailon, S. (2015) Network effects in the academic market: Mechanisms for hiring and placing Ph.D.s in Communication (2007-2014). Journal of Communications, 65, 558–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S.A., Mucha, P.J. and Porter, M.A. (2011) Mathematical genealogy and department prestige. Chaos, 21(041104).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2011) A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (with CD). The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M.E.J. (2010) Networks, and Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Pedings, K.E., Langville, A.N. and Yamamoto, Y. (2012). A minimum violations ranking method. Optimization in Engineering, 13, 349–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schichor, D. (1970) Prestige of sociology departments and the placing of new Ph.D.’s. The American Sociologist, 5(2), 157–160.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, B.M. and Chingos, M.M. (2007) Ranking doctoral programs by placement: A new method. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(3), 523–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R., Walther, G. and Hastie, T. (2001) Estimating the number of data clusters via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 63, 411–423.
   Google Scholar
• Way, S.F., Larremore, D.B. and Clauset, A. (2016) Gender, productivity, and Prestige in computer science faculty hiring networks, in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, Montréal, Québec, Canada, pp. 1169–1179.
   Google Scholar