An ontology-based multi-criteria decision support system to reconfigure manufacturing systems

References

• Abdi, M.R. (2005) Selection of a layout configuration for reconfigurable manufacturing systems using the AHP. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Multi-criteria Decision Making. Creative Decisions Foundation, Honolulu, Hawaii. Available from: http://www.isahp.org/2005Proceedings/Papers/AbdiR_AHPInReconfigurableManufacturingSystems.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Abdi, M.R. (2009a) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for evaluating reconfigurable machines. International Journal of Production Economics, 117(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi, M.R. (2009b) Layout configuration selection for reconfigurable manufacturing systems using the fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 17(1/2), 149–165.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, M. (2015) On learning of weights through preferences. Information Sciences, 321, 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali-Qureshi, Z. and ElMaraghy, W.H. (2014) Procurement of reconfigurable assembly system: A justification for effective production ramp-up planning. Procedia CIRP, 16: 164–69.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, A.T de, Almeida, J.A. de, Costa, A.P.C.S and Almeida-Filho, A.T. (2016) A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoff. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(1), 179–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascheri, A., Ippolito, M., Colombo, G., Furini, F. and Atzeni, A. (2014) Automatic configuration of a powertrain assembly line layout based on a KBE approach, in Procedings of the Emerging Technology and Factory Automation Conference, Sep 16–19, IEEE, Spain. pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, J., Leitão, P., Adam, E. and Trentesaux, D. (2015) Dynamic self-organization in holonic multi-agent manufacturing systems: The ADACOR evolution. Computers in Industry, 66, 99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayar, N., Darmoul, S., Hajri-Gabouj, S. and Pierreval, H. (2014) An immune based ontology implementation of hazard and operability analysis in production systems, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Technologies, Trans Tech Publications, Penang, Malaysia, pp. 884–894.
   Google Scholar
• Bayar, N., Darmoul, S. Hajri-Gabouj, S. and Pierreval, H. (2015) Using immune designed ontologies to monitor disruptions in manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 81, 67–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayar, N., Hajri-Gabouj, S. and Darmoul, S. (2018) Knowledge-based disturbance propagation in manufacturing systems : A case study,in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Systems and Electrical Technologies, IEEE, Tunisia, pp. 467–472.
   Google Scholar
• Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, K.S., Yazdani, M. and Ignatius, J. (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051–13069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensmaine, A., Dahane, M. and Benyoucef, L. (2012) Process plan generation in reconfigurable manufacturing systems using AMOSA and TOPSIS. IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), 14, 560–565.
   Google Scholar
• Bi, Z.M., Wang, L. and Lang, S.Y.T. (2007) Current status of reconfigurable assembly systems. International Journal of Manufacturing Research, 2(3), 303–328.
   Google Scholar
• Borgo, S. and Leitão, P. (2007) Foundations for a core ontology of manufacturing in R. Sharman, R. Kishore, & R. Ramesh, (eds), Ontologies. Integrated Series in Information Systems, 14, Springer, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Bright, G. and Padayachee, J. (2013) The design of reconfigurable assembly stations for high variety and mass customization manufacturing. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 24, 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruccoleri, M., Renna, P. and Perrone, G. (2005) Reconfiguration: A key to handle exceptions and performance deteriorations in manufacturing operations. International Journal of Production Research, 43(19), 4125–4145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, A., Hu, J. and Koren, Y. (2013) Assembly system reconfiguration planning. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 135(4), 1087–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calle, M., González-R, P.L., Leon, J.M., Pierreval, H. and Canca, D. (2016) Integrated management of inventory and production systems based on floating decoupling point and real-time information: A simulation based analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheikh, S.B., Hajri-Gabouj, S. and Darmoul, S. (2015) Reconfiguring manufacturing systems using an analytic hierarchy process with strategic and operational indicators, in IEOM 2015 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEEE, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
   Google Scholar
• Cheikh, S.B., Hajri-Gabouj, S. and Darmoul, S. (2016) Manufacturing configuration selection under arduous working conditions : A Multi-criteria decision approach, in Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M.F. and Tzeng, G.H. (2004) Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40(13), 1473–1490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmoul, S., Pierreval, H. and Hajri–Gabouj, S. (2011a) An immune inspired multi agent system to handle disruptions in manufacturing production systems, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, International Institute for Innovation, Industrial Engineering and Entrepreneurship Publication, METZ France.
   Google Scholar
• Darmoul, S., Pierreval, H. and Hajri–Gabouj, S. (2011b) Using ontologies to capture and structure knowledge about disruptions in manufacturing systems: An immune driven approach, in Proceedings of the IEEE 16th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Darmoul, S., Pierreval, H. and Hajri–Gabouj, S. (2013) Handling disruptions in manufacturing systems: An immune perspective. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(1), 110–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efthymiou, K., Sipsas, K., Mourtzis, D. and Chryssolouris G. (2015) On knowledge reuse for manufacturing systems design and planning: A semantic technology approach. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 8, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanli, M., Dalong, T. and Yuechao, W. (2006) Modeling of common organizational structure for reconfigurable assembly system, in Proceedins of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, 2: pp. 6738–43, IEEE Publication, Dalian, China.
   Google Scholar
• Farid, A.M. (2014) Measures of reconfigurability and its key characteristics in intelligent manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(2), 353–369.
   Google Scholar
• Farid, A.M. and McFarlane, D.C. (2006) A tool for assessing reconfigurability of distributed manufacturing systems in Proccedings of the 12th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, INCOM 2006, and Associated Industrial Meetings: EMM’2006, BPM’2006, JT’2006, May 17, 2006 - May 19, 2006, 12(part 1): pp. 1–6, Elsevier Publication, Saint-Etienne, France.
   Google Scholar
• Fasth-Berglund, Å. and Stahre, J. (2013) Cognitive automation strategy for reconfigurable and sustainable assembly systems. Assembly Automation, 33(3), 294–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., Greco, S. and Ehrgott, M. (eds.) (2005) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis : State of the Art Surveys, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. Available from: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387230818.
   Google Scholar
• Figueira, J. and Roy, B. (2002) Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(2), 317–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadalla, M. and Xue, D. (2017) Recent advances in research on reconfigurable machine tools: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 55(5), 1440–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galan, R., Racero, J., Eguia, I. and Garcia, J.M. (2007) A systematic approach for product families formation in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 23, 489–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaske, N. and Anderl, R. (2016) Disruption management for resilient processes in cyber-physical production systems. Procedia CIRP, 50, 442–447.
   Google Scholar
• González-R, P.L., Framinan, J.M. and Pierreval, H. (2012) Token-based pull production control systems: An introductory overview. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(1), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan, K. and Jepsen, M.B. (2016) ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(1), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, K.K., Jain, P.K. and Jain, M. (2013) A novel methodology to measure the responsiveness of RMTs in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(4), 724–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groover, M.P. (2008) Automation, Production Systems, and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. Prentice Hall Press Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Gyulai, D., Vén, Z., Pfeiffer, A., Váncza, J. and Monostori, L. (2012) Matching demand and system structure in reconfigurable assembly systems. Procedia CIRP, 3, 579–584.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, F., Jain, P.K. and Kumar, D. (2014) Service level as performance index for reconfigurable manufacturing system involving multiple part families. Procedia Engineering, 69, 814–821.
   Google Scholar
• Heilala, J. and Voho, P. (2001) Modular reconfigurable flexible final assembly systems. Assembly Automation, 21(1), 20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirani, H., Ratchev, S., Lohse, N. and Valtchanov, G. (2006) Methodology for knowledge enriched requirements specification for assembly system reconfiguration. Assembly Automation, 26(4), 307–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, J.K.L. (2005) A proposed approach for reconfiguration of flexible assembly line systems by motion genes. International Journal of Production Research, 43(9), 1729–1749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B. and Dean, M. (2004) SWRL : A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission 21, no. May.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, F.S. (2018) Design of scalable agent-based reconfigurable manufacturing systems with Petri nets. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 748–759. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2018.1429665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H.S., Dismukes, J.P., Shi, J., Su, Q., Razzak, M.A., Bodhale, R. and Robinson, D.E. (2003) Manufacturing productivity improvement using effectiveness metrics and simulation analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 41(3), 513–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C-L. and Yoon, K. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B. and Ivanova, M. (2016) Disruptions in supply chains and recovery policies: State-of-the art review. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 1436–1441.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, T.G., Crossley, R., Smith, T. and Ratchev, S. (2013) Review of reconfigurable assembly systems technologies for cost effective wing structure assembly, in Proceedings of the SAE 2013 Aerotech Congress/Exhibition, Montréal, Canada. doi:10.4271/2013-01-2336.
   Google Scholar
• Kashkoush, M. and ElMaraghy, H. (2014) Product family formation for reconfigurable assembly systems. Procedia CIRP, 17, 302–307.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, Z. and Cegiarek, D. (2003) Rapid deployment of reconflgurable assembly flxtures using workspace synthesis and visibility analysis. IRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 52(1), 13–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Z. and Ceglarek, D. (2006) Fixture workspace synthesis for reconfigurable assembly using procrustes-based pairwise configuration optimization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 25(1), 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koren, Y., Gu, X. and Guo, W. (2017) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems : Principles, design, and future trends. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 13(2), 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lateef-Ur-Rehman, A.U.R., (2013) Manufacturing configuration selection using multi-criteria decision tool. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 65(5), 625–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lateef-Ur-Rehman, A.U.R., and Subash Babu, A. (2009a) Evaluation of reconfigured manufacturing systems : An AHP framework. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 4(2), 228–246.
   Google Scholar
• Lateef-Ur-Rehman, A.U.R., and Subash Babu, A. (2009b) The evaluation of manufacturing systems using concordance and disconcordance properties. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 5(3), 326–349.
   Google Scholar
• Lafou, M., Mathieu, L., Pois, S. and Alochet, M. (2015) Manufacturing system configuration: flexibility analysis for automotive mixed-model assembly lines, Proceedings of the 15th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 94–99.,
   Google Scholar
• Landherr, M. and Westkämper, E. (2014) Integrated product and assembly configuration using systematic modularization and flexible integration, in Variety Management in Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 47th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Elsevier, Windsor, Canada. 17, pp. 260–265.
   Google Scholar
• Leitão, P., Rodrigues, N., Barbosa, J., Turrin, C. and Pagani, A. (2015) Intelligent products: The grace experience. Control Engineering Practice, 42, 95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepuschitz, W., Zoitl, A., Vallée, M. and Merdan, M. (2011) Toward self-reconfiguration of manufacturing systems using automation agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 41(1), 52–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Li, W., Lian, J. and Yin, Y. (2012) Reconfiguration of assembly systems: From conveyor assembly line to Serus. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 31(3), 312–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse, N., Hirani, H. and Ratchev, S. (2006) Equipment ontology for modular reconfigurable assembly systems. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 17, 301–314.
   Google Scholar
• Lohse, N., Ratchev, S. and Chrisp, A. (2004) Function-behaviour-structure model for modular assembly equipment, in Proceedings of the International Precision Assembly Seminar IPAS’2004, Springer, Bad Hofgastein, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Mabkhot, M.M., Al-Ahmari, A.M., Salah, B. and Alkhalefah, H. (2018) Requirements of the smart factory system: A survey and perspective. Machines, 6(2), 22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabkhot, M.M., Al-Samhan, A.M. and Darmoul, S. (2016) An information model to support reconfiguration of manufacturing systems, in Proceedings of the 4th IFAC International Conference on Intellegent Control and Automation Science, International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), Reims, France, pp. 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Maier-Speredelozzi, V. and Hu, S.J. (2002) Selecting manufacturing system configurations based on performance using AHP. Technical Paper Society of Manufacturing Engineers MS, no. MS02-179.
   Google Scholar
• Makris, S., Michalos, G., Eytan, A. and Chryssolouris, G. (2012) Cooperating robots for reconfigurable assembly operations: Review and challenges. Procedia CIRP, 3, 346–351.
   Google Scholar
• Matson, J.B. and McFarlane, D.C. (1999) Assessing the responsiveness of existing production operations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(8), 765–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabi, M.G., Ulsoy, A.G. and Koren, Y. (2000) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Key to future manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11(4), 403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalos, G., Sipsas, P., Makris, S. and Chryssolouris, G. (2015) Decision making logic for flexible assembly lines reconfiguration. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 37, 233–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modrak, V., Marton, D. and Bednar, S. (2015) The influence of mass customization strategy on configuration complexity of assembly systems, in Proceedings of the 9th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering Elsevier, Capri, Italy, 33, pp. 538–43.
   Google Scholar
• Moghaddam, S.K., Houshmand, M. and Valilai, O.F. (2017) Configuration design in scalable reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS); A case of single-product flow line (SPFL). International Journal of Production Research, 7543, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Y-M. and Kota, S. (2002) Design of reconfigurable machine tools. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 124(2), 480–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mun, J. Ryu, K. and Jung, M. (2006) Self-reconfigurable software architecture: Design and implementation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 51(1), 163–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murty, M.N. and Devi, V.S. (2011) Nearest neighbour based classifiers, in Pattern Recognition. Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science, pp. 48–85, Springer, London.
   Google Scholar
• Negri, E., Fumagalli, L., Garetti, M. and Tanca, L. (2015) Requirements and languages for the semantic representation of manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 81, 55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olabanji, O.M. and Mpofu, K. (2014) Comparison of weighted decision matrix, and analytical hierarchy process for CAD design of reconfigurable assembly fixture. Procedia CIRP, 23, 264–269.
   Google Scholar
• Pinedo, M.L. (2005) Planning and Scheduling in Manufacturing and Services, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, D. and Jayswal, S.C. (2018) Scheduling of products for reconfiguration effort in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(2), 4167–4174.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, L. (2015) Semantic web for manufacturing, trends and open issues. Toward a state of the art. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 90, 444–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratchev, S. and Lohse, N. (2004) Data modelling for web enabled design of modular precision assembly devices. Assembly Automation, 24, 63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratchev, S.M., Hirani, H. and Bonney, M. (2007) Knowledge based formation of re-configurable assembly cells. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(3), 401–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riabacke, M., Danielson, M. and Ekenberg, L. (2012) State-of-the-art prescriptive criteria weight elicitation. Advances in Decision Sciences, 12, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, T. and Gonçalves, G. (2010) Formal methods for reconfigurable assembly systems, in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ron, A., De, J. and Rooda, J.E. (2006) OEE and equipment effectiveness: An evaluation. International Journal of Production Research, 44(23), 4987–5003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, K., Son, Y. and Jung, M. (2003) Modeling and specifications of dynamic agents in fractal manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 52(2), 161–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayed, M.S. and Lohse, N. (2013) Distributed Bayesian diagnosis for modular assembly systems - a case study. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(3), 480–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneor, Y. (2018) Reconfigurable machine tool: CNC machine for milling, grinding and polishing. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 221–227.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R.K., Khilwani, N. and Tiwari, M.K. (2007) Justification for the selection of a reconfigurable manufacturing system: A fuzzy analytical hierarchy based approach. International Journal of Production Research, 45(14), 3165–3190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A. and Katz, Y. (2007) Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5(2), 51–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siskos, E. and Tsotsolas, N. (2015) Elicitation of criteria importance weights through the Simos method: A robustness concern. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(2), 543–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speredelozzi, M., Koren, Y. and Hu, S.J. (2003) Convertibility measures for manufacturing systems. Annals of the CIRP, 52(1), 367–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (2012) Protégé. Protégé.
   Google Scholar
• Tolio, T., Ceglarek, D., ElMaraghy, H.A., Fischer, A., Hu, S.J., Laperrière, L., Newman, S.T. and Váncza, J. (2010) SPECIES—co-evolution of products, processes and production systems. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 59(2), 672–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trentesaux, D. and Thomas, A. (2013) Product-driven control: Concept, literature review and future trends, in Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi Agent Manufacturing and Robotics, pp. 135–150, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Switzerland..
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, T.N. (2014) Selection of the optimal configuration for a flexible surface mount assembly system based on the interrelationships among the flexibility elements. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 67(1), 146–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaur, R.C. (2011) Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(8), 4295–4304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsourveloudis, N., Doitsidis, L. and Ioannidis, S. (2007) Work-in-process scheduling by evolutionary tuned fuzzy controllers. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 34(7), 748–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman, Z., Young, R.I.M., Chungoora, N., Palmer, C., Case, K. and Harding, J.A. (2013) Towards a formal manufacturing reference ontology. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 6553–6572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorne industries n.d. Overall equipment effectiveness. Available at http://www.oee.com/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T-C. and Lee, H-D. (2009) Developping a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems With Applications, 36, 8980–8985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webbink, R.F. and Hu, S.J. (2005) Automated generation of assembly system-design solutions. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2(1), 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Weyer, S., Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M. and Gorecky, D. (2015) Towards industry 4 . 0 - Standardization as the crucial challenge for highly modular, multi-vendor production systems, in Proceedings of the 15th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), Ottawa, Canada, pp. 613–618.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, T., Xi, L., Pan, E. and Ni, J. (2017) Reconfiguration-oriented opportunistic maintenance policy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 166, 87–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Dong, M. and Miao, R. (2008) Computeraided design development of a product configuration system with an ontology-based approach. CAD Computer Aided Design, 40, 863–878.
   Google Scholar