Parametric analysis of time-censored aggregate lifetime data

References

• Bakhvalov, N.S. (2015) On the approximate calculation of multiple integrals. Journal of Complexity, 31(4), 502–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, N. and Mitra, D. (2013) Likelihood inference based on left truncated and right censored data from a gamma distribution. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 62(3), 679–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C.P., Filippi, S., Stumpf, M.P. and Thorne, T. (2012) Considerate approaches to constructing summary statistics for ABC model selection. Statistics and Computing, 22(6), 1181–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaumont, M.A., Cornuet, J.-M., Marin, J.-M. and Robert, C.P. (2009) Adaptive approximate Bayesian computation. Biometrika, 96(4), 983–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. and Ye, Z.-S. (2016) Random effects models for aggregate lifetime data. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 66(1), 76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. and Ye, Z.-S. (2017) Estimation of field reliability based on aggregate lifetime data. Technometrics, 59(1), 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coit, D.W. and Dey, K.A. (1999) Analysis of grouped data from field-failure reporting systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 65, 95–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coit, D.W. and Jin, T. (2000) Gamma distribution parameter estimation for field reliability data with missing failure times. IIE Transactions, 32, 1161–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crema, E., Edinborough, K., Kerig, T. and Shennan, S. (2014) An approximate Bayesian computation approach for inferring patterns of cultural evolutionary change. Journal of Archaeological Science, 50, 160–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denson, W., Crowell, W., Jaworski, P. and Mahar, D. (2014) Electronic Parts Reliability Data 2014, Reliability Information Analysis Center, Rome, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Drton, M., Lin, S., Weihs, L. and Zwiernik, P. (2017) Marginal likelihood and model selection for Gaussian latent tree and forest models. Bernoulli, 23(2), 1202–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt, R.G., Johansen, A.M., Rowing, E. and Evdemon-Hogan, M. (2017) Bayesian model comparison with un-normalised likelihoods. Statistics and Computing, 27(2), 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friel, N. and Pettitt, A.N. (2008) Marginal likelihood estimation via power posteriors. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 70(3), 589–607.
   Google Scholar
• Givens, G.H. and Hoeting, J.A. (2012) Computational Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, A. and Wand, M.P. (2013) Simple marginally noninformative prior distributions for covariance matrices. Bayesian Analysis, 8(2), 439–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, E. and Madigan, M. (2017) astroABC: An approximate Bayesian computation sequential Monte Carlo sampler for cosmological parameter estimation. Astronomy and Computing, 19, 16–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, R.E. and Raftery, A.E. (1995) Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, J.F. (2002) Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, H. and Tian, Z. (2013) A framework for predicting the remaining useful life of a single unit under time-varying operating conditions. IIE Transactions, 45(9), 964–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepe, J., Kirk, P., Filippi, S., Toni, T., Barnes, C.P. and Stumpf, M.P. (2014) A framework for parameter estimation and model selection from experimental data in systems biology using approximate Bayesian computation. Nature Protocols, 9(2), 439–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louzada, F. and Ramos, P.L. (2018) Efficient closed-form maximum a posteriori estimators for the gamma distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 88(6), 1134–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahar, D., Fields, W., Reade, J., Zarubin, P. and McCombie, S. (2011) Nonelectronic Parts Reliability Data 2011, Reliability Information Analysis Center, Rome, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, J.-M., Pudlo, P., Robert, C.P. and Ryder, R.J. (2012) Approximate Bayesian computational methods. Statistics and Computing, 22(6), 1167–1180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, P. (2016) Approximate Bayesian computation of the occurrence and size of defects in advanced gas-cooled nuclear reactor boilers. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 146, 21–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshkani, M., Fallah, A. and Kavousi, A. (2016) Bayesian analysis of covariance under inverse Gaussian model. Journal of Applied Statistics, 43(2), 280–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, V.M., Nott, D.J., Tran, M.-N., Sisson, S.A. and Drovandi, C.C. (2018) Variational Bayes with synthetic likelihood. Statistics and Computing, 28(4), 971–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OREDA (2009) OREDA Offshore Reliability Data Handbook, Det Norske Veritas, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Price, L.F., Drovandi, C.C., Lee, A. and Nott, D.J. (2018) Bayesian synthetic likelihood. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 27(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, K.M., Turner, R.M. and Higgins, J.P. (2015) Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(1), 52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadegh, M. and Vrugt, J.A. (2014) Approximate Bayesian computation using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation: Dream. Water Resources Research, 50(8), 6767–6787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, L. and Kadane, J.B. (1986) Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(393), 82–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toni, T., Welch, D., Strelkowa, N., Ipsen, A. and Stumpf, M.P. (2009) Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 6(31), 187–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S.N. (2010) Statistical inference for noisy nonlinear ecological dynamic systems. Nature, 466(7310), 1102–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S.N. (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 73(1), 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, L., Deng, X. and Yang, J. (2016) Constrained hierarchical modeling of degradation data in tissue-engineered scaffold fabrication. IIE Transactions, 48(1), 16–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, Q., Chen, P., Hong, L. and Shen, L. (2018) A random-effects Wiener degradation model based on accelerated failure time. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 180, 94–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, N. and Yang, Q. (2015) Optimal maintenance planning for repairable multi-component systems subject to dependent competing risks. IIE Transactions, 47(5), 521–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Pan, R., del Castillo, E. and Xie, M. (2019) An adaptive two-stage Bayesian model averaging approach to planning and analyzing accelerated life tests under model uncertainty. Journal of Quality Technology, 51(2), 181–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X. and Xie, M. (2017) Using accelerated life tests data to predict warranty cost under imperfect repair. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 107, 223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar