Gaussian process based optimization algorithms with input uncertainty

References

• Ankenman, B., Nelson, B.L. and Staum, J. (2010) Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Operations Research, 58(2), 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, R.R. and Meckesheimer, M. (2006) Metamodel-based simulation optimization. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 13, 535–574.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, R.R., Nelson, B.L. and Xie, W. (2013) Quantifying input uncertainty via simulation confidence intervals. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 26(1), 74–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, R.R. and Schruben, L.W. (1993) Uniform and bootstrap resampling of empirical distributions, in Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Winter Simulation, IEEE, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 503–508.
   Google Scholar
• Bashyam, S. and Fu, M.C. (1998) Optimization of (s,S) inventory systems with random lead times and a service level constraint. Management Science, 44(12-part-2), S243–S256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J.O. (1985) Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Binois, M., Huang, J., Gramacy, R.B. and Ludkovski, M. (2019) Replication or exploration? Sequential design for stochastic simulation experiments. Technometrics, 61(1), 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G. and Meng, X.-L. (2011) Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, R.C. and Holland, W. (1997) Sensitivity of computer simulation experiments to errors in input data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 57(1-4), 219–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, R.C. and Holland, W. (2004) Calculation of confidence intervals for simulation output. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), 14(4), 344–362.
   Google Scholar
• Chick, S.E. (2001) Input distribution selection for simulation experiments: Accounting for input uncertainty. Operations Research, 49(5), 744–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corlu, C.G. and Biller, B. (2013) A subset selection procedure under input parameter uncertainty, in Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 463–473.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N. (1992) Statistics for spatial data. Terra Nova, 4(5), 613–617.
   Google Scholar
• De Oliveira, V. and Kone, B. (2015) Prediction intervals for integrals of Gaussian random fields. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 83, 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1983) Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvement on cross-validation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(382), 316–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, W., Hong, L.J. and Zhang, X. (2013) Robust selection of the best, in Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 868–876.
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, P., Powell, W. and Dayanik, S. (2009) The knowledge-gradient policy for correlated normal beliefs. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 21(4), 599–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Stern, H.S., Carlin, J.B., Dunson, D.B., Vehtari, A. and Rubin, D.B. (2013) Bayesian Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Gentle, J.E. (2009) Computational Statistics, Springer Science & Business Media. Springer, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M.D. and Gelman, A. (2014) The no-u-turn sampler: Adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1), 1593–1623.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, D., Allen, T.T., Notz, W.I. and Zeng, N. (2006) Global optimization of stochastic black-box systems via sequential kriging meta-models. Journal of Global Optimization, 34(3), 441–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalali, H. and van Nieuwenhuyse, I. (2015) Simulation optimization in inventory replenishment: A classification. IIE Transactions, 47(11), 1217–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalali, H., van Nieuwenhuyse, I. and Picheny, V. (2017) Comparison of kriging-based algorithms for simulation optimization with heterogeneous noise. European Journal of Operational Research, 261(1), 279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M.E., Moore, L.M. and Ylvisaker, D. (1990) Minimax and maximin distance designs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 26(2), 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M. and Welch, W.J. (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. Journal of Global Optimization, 13(4), 455–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, R.E. and Wasserman, L. (1996) The selection of prior distributions by formal rules. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(435), 1343–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J.P. (2015) Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments, Springer. Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner, H. and Yin, G. (2003) Stochastic Approximation and Recursive Algorithms and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan, S. and Venkateswaran, J. (2017) Robust simulation based optimization with input uncertainty, in Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 2257–2267.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, H. (2016) Advanced tutorial: Input uncertainty and robust analysis in stochastic simulation, in Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Press, pp. 178–192.
   Google Scholar
• Mood, A.M. (1954) On the asymptotic efficiency of certain nonparametric two-sample tests. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25(3), 514–522.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, D. (1993) Determining sample sizes for Monte Carlo integration. The College Mathematics Journal, 24(3), 254–259.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, S.H. and Yin, J. (2012) Bayesian kriging analysis and design for stochastic simulations. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 22(3), pp. 17:1–17:26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ólafsson, S. (2006) Metaheuristics. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 13, 633–654.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, M. and Branke, J. (2017) Bayesian simulation optimization with input uncertainty. in Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 2268–2278.
   Google Scholar
• Picheny, V. (2015) Multiobjective optimization using Gaussian process emulators via stepwise uncertainty reduction. Statistics and Computing, 25(6), 1265–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picheny, V., Wagner, T. and Ginsbourger, D. (2013) A benchmark of kriging-based infill criteria for noisy optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(3), 607–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preuss, M., Wagner, T. and Ginsbourger, D. (2012) High-dimensional model-based optimization based on noisy evaluations of computer games, in Learning and Intelligent Optimization, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Quan, N., Yin, J., Ng, S.H. and Lee, L.H. (2013) Simulation optimization via kriging: A sequential search using expected improvement with computing budget constraints IIE Transactions, 45(7), 763–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C.E. and Williams, C.K.I. (2006) Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, C.P. and Casella, G. (2004) Monte Carlo Statistical Methods (Springer Texts in Statistics), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J. and Wynn, H.P. (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science, 4(4), 409–423.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, J.P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J.F., Power, D.J., Sharda, R. and Carlsson, C. (2002) Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decision Support Systems, 33(2), 111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villemonteix, J., Vazquez, E. and Walter, E. (2009) An informational approach to the global optimization of expensive-to-evaluate functions. Journal of Global Optimization, 44(4), pp. 509–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D., Zhu, H. and Zhou, E. (2018) A Bayesian risk approach to data-driven stochastic optimization: Formulations and asymptotics. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 28(2), 1588–1612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, W., Nelson, B.L. and Barton, R.R. (2014) A Bayesian framework for quantifying uncertainty in stochastic simulation. Operations Research, 62(6), 1439–1452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., Huang, E., Chen, C.-H. and Lee, L.H. (2015) Simulation optimization: A review and exploration in the new era of cloud computing and big data. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 32(03), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, J., Ng, S.H. and Ng, K.M. (2011) Kriging metamodel with modified nugget-effect: The heteroscedastic variance case. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(3), 760–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. and Ding, L. (2016) Sequential sampling for Bayesian robust ranking and selection, in Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 758–769.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, E. and Wu, D. (2017) Simulation optimization under input model uncertainty. Advances in Modeling and Simulation, Springer, Cham, pp. 219–247.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, E. and Xie, W. (2015) Simulation optimization when facing input uncertainty, in Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, in IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 3714–3724.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Hale, J. and Zhou, E. (2016) Optimizing conditional value-at-risk via gradient-based adaptive stochastic search, in Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 726–737.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Hale, J. and Zhou, E. (2018) Simulation optimization of risk measures with adaptive risk levels. Journal of Global Optimization, 70(4), 783–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zouaoui, F. and Wilson, J.R. (2003) Accounting for parameter uncertainty in simulation input modeling. IIE Transactions, 35(9), 781–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar