The value of jumboization in transportation ships: A real options approach

References

• ABS (2013) Ship energy efficiency measures: Status and guidance. Available at https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/advisories-and-debriefs/ABS_Energy_Efficiency_Advisory.pdf (accessed April 14, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Amin, K.I. (1993) Jump diffusion option valuation in discrete time. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1833–1863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, N., Lee, H. and Mansouri, S.A. (2017) Speed optimization and bunkering in liner shipping in the presence of uncertain service times and time windows at ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(1), 143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bačkalov, I., Radojčić, D., Molter, L., Wilcke, T., van Der Meij, K., Simić, A. and Gille, J. (2014) Extending the life of a ship by extending her length: Technical and economic assessment of lengthening of inland vessels, in Proceedings of European Inland Waterway Navigation Conference, pp. 10–12, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Besbes, O. and Savin, S. (2009) Going bunkers: The joint route selection and refueling problem. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11(4), 694–711.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, M.C. (2012) Analyzing underway replenishments through spatial mapping. Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Boros, E., Lei, L., Zhao, Y. and Zhong, H. (2008) Scheduling vessels and container-yard operations with conflicting objectives. Annals of Operations Research, 161(1), 149–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulk Carrier Guide (2010) Hull girder shear forces and bending moments - bulk carrier limitations. Available at http://bulkcarrierguide.com/shearing-forces-&-bending-moments-limitations.html (accessed April 14, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, I.L. and Stephenson, G.H. (2001) Evaluating design for upgradeability: A simulation based approach for ships and marine products, in Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on The Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures Conference, pp. 293–300.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z.L., Lei, L. and Zhong, H. (2007) Container vessel scheduling with bi-directional flows. Operations Research Letters, 35(2), 186–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, T.S., Wang, C.J., Lyuu, Y.D. and Liu, Y.C. (2010) An efficient and accurate lattice for pricing derivatives under a jump-diffusion process. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217(7), 3174–3189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neufville, R., Scholtes, S. and Wang, T. (2006) Real options by spreadsheet: Parking garage case example. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12(2), 107–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Weck, O.L., Neufville, R.D. and Chaize, M. (2004) Staged deployment of communications satellite constellations in low Earth orbit. Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information and Communication, 1(3), 119–136.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, A.K. and Pindyck, R.S. (1994) Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Doerry, N.H. (2014) Institutionalizing modular adaptable ship technologies. Journal of Ship Production and Design, 30(3), 126–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Technology Centre (2018) Fuel oil no. 5. Available at http://www.etc-cte.ec.gc.ca/databases/Oilproperties/pdf/WEB_Fuel_Oil_No._5.pdf (accessed April 14, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ericson, M. and Lake, H. (2014) Lengthening of a specialized reefer ship: Is it economically viable? Master’s thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerholt, K. (1999) Optimal fleet design in a ship routing problem. International Transactions in Operational Research, 6(5), 453–464.
   Google Scholar
• Finnlines (2017) Jumboization for energy efficiency. Available at https://www.finnlines.com/company/our-stories/jumboisation-energy-efficiency (accessed April 14, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• González, H. (2013) What to look for? Available at http://marinesurveypractice.blogspot.com/2013/01/que-mirar-donde-mirar.html (accessed April 14, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, J.A. (2003) Real options for naval ship design and acquisition: A method for valuing flexibility under uncertainty. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gryglewicz, S., Huisman, K.J. and Kort, P.M. (2008) Finite project life and uncertainty effects on investment. Journal Economic Dynamics and Control, 32(7), 2191–2213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilliard, J.E. and Schwartz, A. (2005) Pricing European and American derivatives under a jump-diffusion process: A bivariate tree approach. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(3), 671–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.J., Chang, Y.T., Kim, K.T. and Kim, H.J. (2012) An epsilon-optimal algorithm considering greenhouse gas emissions for the management of a ship’s bunker fuel. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(2), 97–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klebaner, F.C. (2005) Introduction to Stochastic Calculus with Applications, Imperial College Press, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J.T. (2014) A prospect theory-based real option analogy for evaluating flexible systems and architectures in naval ship design, PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J.T. and Singer, D.J. (2012) A real options approach to evaluating flexible architectures in ship design, in Proceedings of 11th International Marine Design Conference, pp. 153–161, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J.T. and Singer, D.J. (2014) Applying real options analysis to naval ship design, in Proceedings of American Society of Naval Engineers, ASNE Day; Engineering America's Maritime Dominance, American Society of Naval Engineers, Virginia, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Kucuksayacigil, F. and Min, K.J. (2017) Value of jumboization in ship design: A real options approach, in Proceedings of Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers Annual Conference, pp. 1595–1600, Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE), Georgia, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Kucuksayacigil, F. and Min, K.J. (2020) A lattice method for jump-diffusion process applied to transmission expansion investments under demand and distributed generation uncertainties. Energy Systems, 12(3), 773–800.
   Google Scholar
• Martzoukos, S.H. and Trigeorgis, L. (2002) Real (investment) options with multiple sources of rare events. European Journal of Operational Research, 136(3), 696–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niese, N.D. and Singer, D.J. (2014) Assessing changeability under uncertain exogenous disturbance. Research in Engineering Design, 25(3), 241–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NYSERDA (2018) Average home heating oil prices. Available at https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/Researchers-and-Policymakers/Energy-Prices/Home-Heating-Oil/Average-Home-Heating-Oil-Prices (accessed April 14, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Page, J. (2012) Flexibility in early stage design of US Navy ships: An analysis of options. Journal of Ship Production and Design, 28(3), 128–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen, S.S. and Erikstad, S.O. (2017) Assessing flexible offshore construction vessel designs combining real options and epoch-era analysis. Ship Technology Research, 64(2), 76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, J. (1999) AO-177 Cimarron. Available at https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/ao-177.htm (accessed April 14, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Rehn, C.F., Pettersen, S.S., Erikstad, S.O. and Asbjørnslett, B.E. (2018) Investigating tradeoffs between performance, cost and flexibility for reconfigurable offshore ships. Ocean Engineering, 147, 546–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehn, C.F., Pettersen, S.S., Garcia, J.J., Brett, P.O., Erikstad, S.O., Asbjørnslett, B.E., Ross, A.M. and Rhodes, D.H. (2019) Quantification of changeability level for engineering systems. Systems Engineering, 22(1), 80–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, P. and Yang, J. (1998) Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design, Springer, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, T.K. (2014) 2014 in Review. The U.S. Navy’s Military Sealift Command, Norfolk, VA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T. (2005) Real options “in” projects and systems design: Identification of options and solution for path dependency. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
   Google Scholar
• White House (2016) Budget assumptions. Available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/a94/dischist-2017.pdf (accessed April 14, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Xu, S.X., Lu, Q. and Li, Z. (2012) Optimal modular production strategies under market uncertainty: A real options perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 266–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar