Multi-criteria classification of reward collaboration proposals

References

• Anzoom, R., Nagi, R. and Vogiatzis, C. (2022) A review of research in illicit supply-chain networks and new directions to thwart them. IISE Transactions, 54(2), 134–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basilio, M.P., Pereira, V. and Costa, H.G. (2019) Classifying the integrated public safety areas (IPSAs): A multi-criteria based approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 14(1), 106–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baycik, N.O., Sharkey, T.C. and Rainwater, C.E. (2018) Interdicting layered physical and information flow networks. IISE Transactions, 50(4), 316–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, J., Prates, L.E.A. and Amon, J.J. (2021) Supreme Court v. necropolitics: The chaotic judicialization of COVID-19 in Brazil. Health and Human Rights Journal, 23(1), 151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choquet, G. (1953) Theory of capacities. Annales de l'Institut Fourier, 5, 131–295.
   Google Scholar
• Fishburn, P.C. (1970) Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Fishlow, A. (2020) Lava Jato in perspective. Corruption and the Lava Jato Scandal in Latin America, Routledge, New York, pp. 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gavião, L.O., Sant’Anna, A.P., Lima, G.B.A. and Garcia, P.A. de A. (2018) CPP: Composition of Probabilistic Preferences. R package version 0.1.0. Available at https:cran.rproject.org/web/packages/CPP/index.html (accessed 24 February 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Ocantos, E. and Hidalgo, V.B. (2019) Lava Jato beyond borders. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 15(1), 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Grabisch, M., Kojadinovic, I. and Meyer, P. (2008) A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 766–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inotai, A., Nguyen, H.T., Hidayat, B., Nurgozhin, T., Kiet, P.H.T., Campbell, J.D., Bertalan Németh, B., Maniadakis, N., Brixner, D., Wijaya, K. and Kaló, Z. (2018) Guidance toward the implementation of multicriteria decision analysis framework in developing countries. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 18(6), 585–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanner, S.L., Rosen, D., Zohar, Y. and Alberstein, M. (2019) Managerial judicial conflict resolution (JCR) of plea bargaining: Shadows of law and conflict resolution. New Criminal Law Review, 22(4), 494–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, R.A., Trapp, A.C., Palmbach, T.M. and Blom, J.S. (2017) Overcoming human trafficking via operations research and analytics: Opportunities for methods, models, and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 733–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovač, M. and Bezerra, M.N. (2020) Eroded rule of law, endemic violence and social injustice in Brazil. LeXonomica, 12(2), 211–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, S. (2011) A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point Likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), 412–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limongi, F. (2021) From birth to agony: The political life of operation car wash (operação lava jato). University of Toronto Law Journal, 71(supplement 1), 151–173.
   Google Scholar
• Luz, R.D. and Spagnolo, G. (2017) Leniency, collusion, corruption, and whistleblowing. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 13(4), 729–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meszaros, G. (2020) Caught in an authoritarian trap of its own making? Brazil’s ‘Lava jato’anti-corruption investigation and the politics of prosecutorial overreach. Journal of Law and Society, 47, S54–S73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishijima, M., Sarti, F.M. and Cati, R.C. (2019) The underlying causes of Brazilian corruption. In Corruption in Latin America, Springer, Cham, pp. 29–56.
   Google Scholar
• Pardieck, A.M., Edkins, V.A. and Dervan, L.E. (2020) Bargained justice: The rise of false testimony for false pleas. Fordham International Law Journal, 44(2), 469–528.
   Google Scholar
• R-Core-Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna-Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org (accessed 31 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H. (1982) The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Roza, D.A., Aguiar, G.T., Lima, E.P., Costa, S.E.G. and Adamczuk, G.O. (2020) Decision model for selecting advanced technologies for municipal solid waste management. International Business, Trade and Institutional Sustainability, Springer, Cham, pp. 201–220.
   Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna, A.P. (2023) Rcode CPPTRI reward, Zenodo,
   Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna, A.P., Costa, H.G. and Pereira, V. (2015) CPP-TRI: A sorting method based on the probabilistic composition of preferences. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 7(3), 193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna, A.P., Gavião, L.O. and Sant’Anna, T.L. (2020) Abordagem multicritério para a delação premiada. In: Annals of LII SBPO. Available at https://proceedings.science/sbpo-2020/papers/abordagem-multicriterio-para-a-delacao-premiada?lang=pt-br (accessed 31 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna, A.P. and Sant’Anna, J.L. (2019) A principle of preference concentration applied to the unsupervised evaluation of the importance of multiple criteria. Pesquisa Operacional, 39(2), 317–338.
   Google Scholar
• Shapley, L. (1953) A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. II. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 307–317.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A.K. and Alkon, C. (2019) Bargaining in the dark: The need for transparency and data in plea bargaining. New Criminal Law Review, 22(4), 434–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straffin, P. (1980) The prisoner’s dilemma. The UMAP Journal, 1, 101–103.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J.I. (2020) Transparency in plea bargaining. Notre Dame Law Review, 96(3), 973–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar