Lung Disease, Indigestion, and Two-way Tables

References

• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2013). The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics, Version 4.1, 1 February 2013. Sydney, NSW: ACARA.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Education Council. (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Batanero, C., Estepa, A., Godino, J. D., & Green, D. R. (1996). Intuitive strategies and preconceptions about association in contingency tables. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 151-169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callingham, R., & Watson J. M. (2008). Overcoming research design issues using Rasch measurement: The StatSmart project. In P. Jeffery (Ed.), Proceedings of the AARE annual conference, Fremantle, December, 2007. Available at http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/cal07042.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Callingham, R., & Watson, J. (2011). Measuring levels of statistical pedagogical content knowledge. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics – Challenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/IASE study (pp. 283-293). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Estrada Roca, A., & Batanero, C. B. (2006). Computing probabilities from two way tables: An exploratory study with future teachers. In A. Rossman, & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on teaching statistics: Working cooperatively in statistics education, Salvador, Brazil. [CDRom]. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Association for Statistical Education and the International Statistical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A preK-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (1996). The psychology of good judgment frequency formats and simple algorithms. Medical Decision Making, 16, 273-280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Reckoning with risk: Learning to live with uncertainty. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684-704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pfannkuch, M., Seber, G. A. F., & Wild, C. J. (2002). Probability with less pain. Teaching Statistics, 24(1), 24-30.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, C. R. (1975). Teaching of statistics at the secondary level: An interdisciplinary approach. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 6, 151-162.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedslund, J. (1963). The concept of correlation in adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 165-174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. M. (1995). Conditional probability: Its place in the mathematics curriculum. Mathematics Teacher, 88, 12-17.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. M. (2011). Cheating partners, conditional probability and contingency tables. Teaching Statistics, 33(3), 66-70.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. M., & Callingham, R. A. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3-46.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. M., & Callingham, R. A. (2005). Statistical literacy: From idiosyncratic to critical thinking. In G. Burrill & M. Camden (Eds.), Curricular development in statistics education. International Association for Statistical Education (IASE) Roundtable, Lund, Sweden, 2004 (pp. 116-162). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/rt04/4.1_Watson&Callingham.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Callingham, R., & Donne, J. (2008). Proportional reasoning: Student knowledge and teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Navigating currents and charting directions (Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Brisbane, Vol. 2, pp. 555-562). Adelaide: MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., & Nathan, E. (2010). Assessing the interpretation of two-way tables as part of statistical literacy. Refereed paper in C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Teaching of Statistics, Ljubljana, Slovenia, July). [CDRom] Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
   Google Scholar