Assessing the Risk of Intimate Partner Violence: Expert Evaluations Versus the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment

References

• Ægisdottír, S., White, M., Spengler, P., & Maugherman, A. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-Six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3), 341–382. doi:10.1177/0011000006286696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkes, H. R. (1981). Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(3), 323–330. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.49.3.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtson, S., & Langstrom, N. (2007). Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: A direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(2), 135–153. doi:10.1177/107906320701900205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Otto, R., & Golding, S. (1993). Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic evaluation. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 21(1), 35–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) [Federal Statistical Office]. (2013). Sektion Demografie und Migration [Section Demography and Migration]. Retrieved from: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, A. G., Nicholls, T. L., Seto, M. C., Côté, G., Charette, Y., & Caulet, M. (2015). The National Trajectory Project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 1: context and methods. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 60(3), 98–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Cox, D. N., & Webster, C. D. (1999). Violence risk assessment: Science and practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4(Part2), 149–184. doi:10.1348/135532599167824
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2003). Multiple facets of risk for violence: The impact of judgmental specificity on structured decisions about violence risk. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2(1), 19–34. doi:10.1080/14999013.2003.10471176
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, L., Hargreaves, T., & Gulayets, M. (2015). The integrated threat and risk assessment centre: A program evaluation investigating the implementation of threat management recommendations. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2(2), 114.
   Google Scholar
• Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Bristish Medical Journal, 24, 345.
   Google Scholar
• Gerth, J., Rossegger, A., Bauch, E., & Endrass, J. (2017). Assessing the discrimination and calibration of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment in Switzerland. Partner Abuse, 8(2), 168–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessessment, 12(1), 19–30. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwet, K. (2001). Handbook of inter-rater reliability (pp. 223–246). Gaithersburg, MD: STATAXIS.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessessment, 21(1), 1–21. doi:10.1037/a0014421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. J. (2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the “margins of error” of group v. individual predictions of violence. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(49), s60–s65. doi:10.1192/bjp.190.5.s60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, N. Z., Carter, A. M., Harris, G. T., & Sharpe, A. J. B. (2008). Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(2), 171–188. doi:10.1177/0886260507309337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, N. Z., & Harris, G. T. (2009). How nonrecidivism affects predictive accuracy: Evidence from a cross-validation of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(2), 326–337. doi:10.1177/0886260508316478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2001). Predicting violence by serious wife assaulters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(5), 408–423. doi:10.1177/088626001016005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2010). Risk assessment for domestically violent men. Washington, DC: American Psychlogical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Houghton, R. E., & Eke, A. W. (2008). An indepth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: The domestic violence risk appraisal guide. Law and Human Behavior, 32(2), 150–163. doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9088-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Lang, C., Cormier, C. A., & Lines, K. J. (2004). A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario domestic assault risk assessment. Psychological Assessessment, 16(3), 267–275. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilvinger, F., Rossegger, A., Urbaniok, F., & Endrass, J. (2012). Risikokalkulation bei häuslicher Gewalt. Fortschritte Der Neurologie - Psychiatrie, 80(6), 312–319. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1273200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsnorth, R. (2006). Intimate partner violence: Predictors of recidivism in a sample of arrestees. Violence Against Women, 12(10), 917–935. doi:10.1177/1077801206293081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A. R., & Tobin, T. (2008). A longitudinal study of arrested batterers, 1995–2005: Career criminals. Violence Against Women, 14(2), 136–157. doi:10.1177/1077801207312396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropp, P. R. (2008). Intimate partner violence risk assessment and management. Violence and Victims, 23(2), 202–220. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.2.202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing, J. T., & Thaller, J. (2013). The average predictive validity of intimate partner violence risk assessment instruments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(7), 1537–1558. doi:10.1177/0886260512468250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J., & Skeem, J. L. (2014). The evolution of violence risk assessment. CNS Spectr, 19(5), 419–424. doi:10.1017/s1092852914000145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J., & Thomson, M. E. (2010). Clinical judgement in violence risk assessment. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6(1), 128–149.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, T., & Brodsky, S. L. (2016). Forensic psychologists’ perceptions of bias and potential correction strategies in forensic mental health evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(1), 58–76. doi:10.1037/law0000077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, R. K. (2013). Improving clinical decision making in forensic evaluation. Paper presented at the Florida Psychological Association, West Palm Beach, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rettenberger, M., & Eher, R. (2013). Actuarial risk assessment in sexually motivated intimate-partner violence. Law and Human Behavior, 37(2), 75–86. doi:10.1037/b0000001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P. (2013). Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: A methodological primer. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(1), 8–22. doi:10.1002/bsl.2052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., Hurducas, C., Arbach-Lucioni, K., Condemarin, C., Dean, K., . . . Otto, R. K. (2014). International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(3), 193–206. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.922141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem, J. L., & Monahan, J. (2011). Current directions in violence risk assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 38–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, J. E., Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Belfrage, H., & Strand, S. (2014). Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 256–271. doi:10.1177/0093854813503960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmukler, G., Everitt, B., & Leese, M. (2012). Risk assessment and receiver operating characteristic curves. Psychological Medicine, 42(5), 895–898. doi:10.1017/S003329171100208X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbaniok, F. (2007). FOTRES: Forensisches Operationalisiertes Therapie-Risiko-Evaluations-System [FOTRES: Forensic Operationalized Therapy/Risk Evaluation-System]. Bern, Switzerland: Zytglogge.
   Google Scholar
• Urbaniok, F., Rinne, T., Held, L., Rossegger, A., & Endrass, J. (2008). Forensische Risikokalkulationen: Grundlegende methodische Aspekte zur Beurteilung der Anwendbarkeit und Validität verschiedener Verfahren [Forensic risk calculations: Basic methodological aspects in assessing utility and validity of different instruments]. Fortschritte Der Neurologie Und Psychiatrie, 76(8), 470–477. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1038228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar