Recruiting Eyewitness Science in Criminal Investigations: The Pocket Man Case

References

• Baddeley, A., Eysenck, W., & Anderson, M. C. (2015). Memory. London, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhshay, S., & Haney, C. (2018). The media’s impact on the right to a fair trial: A content analysis of pretrial publicity in capital cases. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 24, 326–340. doi:10.1037/law0000174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (2013). Expert testimony in a child sex abuse case: Translating memory development research. Memory, 21, 556–565. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.769606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., McGorty, E. K., & Penrod, S. D. (2008). Forgetting the once-seen face: Estimating the strength of an eyewitness’s memory representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 139–150. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (eds.). (2018). The psychology of criminal investigation: Theory into practice. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A., & Rachlew, A. (2018). From interrogation to investigative interviewing. – The application of psychology. Pp. 154–178, In A. Griffiths & R. Milne (Eds.), The psychology of criminal investigation: Theory into practice. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, J. K., & Germine, L. T. (2015). When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span. Psychological Science, 26, 433–443. doi:10.1177/0956797614567339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korva, N., Porter, S., O’Connor, B. P., Shaw, J., & Ten Brinke, L. (2013). Dangerous decisions: Influence of juror attitudes and defendant appearance on legal decision-making. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20, 384–398. doi:10.1080/13218719.2012.692931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Serota, K. B., Shulman, J., Clare, D. D., Park, H. S., Shaw, A. S., … Lee, J. H. (2011). Sender demeanor: Individual differences in sender believability have a powerful impact on deception detection judgements. Human Communication Research, 37, 377–403. doi:10.111/j.1468-2958.2011.0/404.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2013). Eyewitness testimony in the Lockerbie bombing case. Memory, 21, 584–590. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.774417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen, S., Melinder, A., Raja, A. Q., & Stridbeck, U. (2010). Beliefs about factors affecting the reliability of eyewitness testimony: A comparison of judges, jurors and the general public. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 122–133. doi:10.1002/acp.1550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen, S., Wise, R., Raja, A. Q., Safer, M., Pawlenko, N., & Stridbeck, U. (2008). What judges know about eyewitness testimony: A comparison of Norwegian and US judges. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14, 177–188. doi:10.1080/10683160701580099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megreya, A., Sandford, A., & Burton, M. (2013). Matching face images taken on the same day or months apart: The limitations of photo ID. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 700–706. doi:10.1002/acp.2965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newlin, C., Steele, L. C., Chamberlin, A., Anderson, J., Kenniston, J., Russell, A., … Vaughan-Eden, V. (2015). Child forensic interviewing: Best practices. (Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Report.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L. G., Rönnberg, J., & Lyxell, B. (1991). Eyewitness testimony: Validation of a line-up tape in a historical murder case. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Supplement 11, 452–462.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S., Ten Brinke, L., & Gustaw, C. (2010). Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability. Psychology, Crime and Law, 16, 477–491. doi:10.1080/1068316090926141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruva, C. L., & Guenther, C. C. (2015). From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors’ decisions, impressions, and memory. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 294–310. doi:10.1037/lhb0000117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N. (2018). All is not what it seems: Avoidable pitfalls in the interpretation of lineup field data. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 24, 292–306. doi:10.1037/law0000171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Fitzgerald, R. J. (2016). Identifying the culprit: An international perspective on the National Academy of Science report on eyewitness identification evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 135–138. doi:10.1002/acp.3164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, W. A. (2009). Expert witness in international war crime tribunals. Psychology, Crime and Law, 15, 583–596. doi:10.1080/1068316082438338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G., Malpass, R. S., Lindsay, R. C. L., Fisher, R. P., Turtle, J. W., & Fulero, S. M. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55, 581–598. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.6.581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Clark, S. E., Gronlund, S. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2015). Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy. American Psychologist, 70, 515–526. doi:10.1037/a0039510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18, 10–65. doi:10.1177/1529100616686966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar