References
- Adjorlolo, S., Chan, H., & DeLisi, M. (2019). Mentally disordered offenders and the law: Research update on the insanity defense, 2004–2019. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 67, 101507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101507
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013) . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Publications.
- Bennion, E. (2011). Death is different no longer: Abolishing the insanity defense is cruel and unusual under Graham v. Florida. DePaul Law Review, 61(1). https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol61/iss1/2
- Borum, R., & Grisso, T. (1995). Psychological test use in criminal forensic evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26(5), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.26.5.465
- Case Rate – Organize, Calculate, Compare. (2019, August 28). CONCEPT Professional Training. Retrieved October 26, 2020, from https://concept.paloaltou.edu/case-rate-organize-calculate-compare/
- Certification of Forensic Examiners, Missouri Department of Mental Health D.O.R. 6.478. (2018).
- Chauhan, P., Warren, J., Kois, L., & Wellbeloved-Stone, J. (2015). The significance of combining evaluations of competency to stand trial and sanity at the time of the offense. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000026
- Cizek, G., Koons, H., & Rosenberg, S. (2012). Finding validity evidence: An analysis using mental measurements yearbook. In J. Bovaird, K. Geisinger, & C. Buckendahl (Eds.), High-stakes testing in education: Science and practice in K-12 settings (pp. 119–138). American Psychological Association.
- Cochran-Armitage test for trend for 2xI tables. (2020, April 14). IBM Support. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cochran-armitage-test-trend-2xi-tables
- Cochrane, R. E., Grisso, T., & Frederick, R. I. (2001). The relationship between criminal charges, diagnoses, and psycholegal opinions among federal pretrial defendants. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19(4), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.454
- Dirks-Linhorst, A., Linhorst, D. M., & Loux, T. M. (2018). The role of race in court-ordered pretrial psychiatric evaluations. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 16(3), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2018.1517070
- Dirks-Linhorst, P. A., Linhorst, D. M., & Loux, T. M. (2019). Criminal court-ordered psychiatric evaluations: Does gender play a role? Women & Criminal Justice, 29(6), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2018.1520673
- Fuger, K. D., Acklin, M. W., Nguyen, A. H., Ignacio, L. A., & Gowensmith, W. N. (2014). Quality of criminal responsibility reports submitted to the Hawaii judiciary. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(3), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.020
- Fukunaga, K., Pasewark, R., Hawkins, M., & Gudeman, H. (1981). Insanity plea: Interexaminer agreement and concordance of psychiatric opinion and court verdict. Law and Human Behavior, 5(4), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044947
- Gardner, B. O., Murrie, D. C., & Torres, A. N. (2018). Insanity findings and evaluation practices: A state-wide review of court-ordered reports. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 36(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2344
- Goldstein, A., Morse, S., & Packer, I. (2012). Evaluation of criminal responsibility. In I. Weiner & R. K. Otto (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (2nd ed). (pp. 440-472). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop211019
- Gowensmith, W. N., Murrie, D. C., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2013). How reliable are forensic evaluations of legal sanity? Law and Human Behavior, 37(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000001
- Grisso, T. (1987). The economic and scientific future of forensic psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 42(9), 831. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.42.9.831
- Hawaii Revised Statutes § 704-400. (2019).
- Heilbrun, K. (1992). The role of psychological testing in forensic contexts. Law and Human Behavior, 16(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044769
- Heilbrun, K., & Collins, S. (1995). Evaluations of trial competency and mental state at time of offense: Report characteristics. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.26.1.61
- Kamens, J., & Crawley, J. (Eds.). (2020). Insanity defense claims curbed by high court in murder case (2). Bloomberg Law. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/kansas-wins-u-s-supreme-court-dispute-over-insanity-defense
- Kois, L., Wellbeloved-Stone, J., Chauhan, P., & Warren, J. (2017). Combined evaluations of competency to stand trial and mental state at the time of the offense: An overlooked methodological consideration? Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000236
- Larkin, P., Jr., & Canaparo, G. (2020). Are criminals bad or mad: Premeditated murder, mental illness, and Kahler v. Kansas. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 43(1), 85–154. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3426522
- Linhorst, D. M., Dirks-Linhorst, P. A., McGraugh, S., Choate, L., & Riley, S. (2018). A comparison of defendants with mental illness represented by public defenders and private attorneys: An analysis of court-ordered pretrial psychiatric evaluations. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(4), 810–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9430-6
- McLaughlin, J., & Kan, L. (2014). Test usage in four common types of forensic mental health assessment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036318
- Melton, G., Petrilla, J., Poythress, N., Solobogin, C., Otto, R., Mossman, D., & Condie, L. (2017). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (4th ed.). Guilford.
- Missouri Revised Statutes § 552.030. (2018).
- Morse, S., & Bonnie, R. J. (2013). Abolition of the insanity defense violates due process. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 41(4), 488–495. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1603
- Neal, T., & Grisso, T. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(12), 1406–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814548449
- Neal, T., Slobogin, C., Saks, M., Faigman, D., & Geisinger, K. (2019). Psychological assessment in legal contexts: Are courts keeping “junk science” out of the courtroom? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20(3), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619888860
- Nicholson, R., & Norwood, S. (2000). Quality of forensic psychological assessments, reports, and testimony: Analyzing the gap between promise and practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005422702678
- Office of the Inspector General. (2017). Review of the federal bureau of prisons’ use of restrictive housing for inmates with mental illness. U.S. Department of Justice. https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2017/e1705.pdf
- Packer, I. (2009). Evaluation of criminal responsibility. Oxford University Press.
- Perlin, M. (2017). The insanity defense: Nine myths that will not go away. Articles & Chapters, 1128. 3–22. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters/1128
- Perry, B., Neltner, M., & Allen, T. (2013). A paradox of bias: Racial differences in forensic psychiatric diagnosis and determinations of criminal responsibility. Race and Social Problems, 5(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/.doi:10.1007/s12552-013-9100-3
- Roesch, R., Kayfitz, J., Watt, M., Cooper, B., Guy, L., Hill, D., Haag, A., Pomichalek, M., & Kolton, D. (2019). Fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility assessments: Advocating for changes to the Canadian criminal code. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 60(3), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000173
- Warren, J. I., Murrie, D. C., Chauhan, P., Dietz, P. E., & Morris, J. (2004). Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at time of offense: An examination of 5,175 pretrial evaluations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.559
- Warren, J. I., Rosenfeld, B., Fitch, W. L., & Hawk, G. (1997). Forensic mental health clinical evaluation: An analysis of interstate and intersystemic differences. Law and Human Behavior, 21(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024855118855
- Zonana, H. V., Wells, J. A., Getz, M. A., & Buchanan, J. (1990). Part I: The NGRI registry: Initial analyses of data collected on Connecticut insanity acquittees. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 18(2), 115–128.