Assessment of Response Bias in Forensic Contexts in the UK: A Systematic Review

References

• Alleyne, E., Gannon, T. A., Mozova, K., Page, T. E., & Ciardha, C. Ó. (2016). Female Fire-Setters: Gender-Associated Psychological and Psychopathological Features. Psychiatry, 79(4), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2016.1185892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Archer, R. P., Wheeler, E. M. A., & Vauter, R. A. (2016). Empirically Supported forensic assessment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(4), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, R. P., & Wygant, D. (2012). Child custody evaluations: Ethical, scientific, and practice considerations. Psychology Faculty and Staff Research, 5. https://encompass.eku.edu/psychology_fsresearch/5
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y., & Tellegen, A. (2008/2011). MMPI-2 RF (Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 restructured form). Pearson assessment systems. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. (2009) . Assessment of effort in clinical testing of cognitive functioning for adults.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, B. L., Ploetz, D. M., & Kirkwood, M. W. (2016). A survey of neuropsychologists’ use of validity tests with children and adolescents. Child Neuropsychology, 22(8), 1001–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2015.1075491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchett, D., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2019). Methodological considerations for developing and evaluating response bias indicators. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1497–1511. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., & Dahlstrom, W. G. (2001). MMPI-2: Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory - 2. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• CASP Checklists - CASP - Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018, May 1). https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
   Google Scholar
• Cassano, A., & Grattagliano, I. (2019). Lying in the medicolegal field: Malingering and psychodiagnostic assessment. Clinical Therapeutics, 170(2), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2019.2123
   Google Scholar
• Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in Six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(8), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (1987). CVLT, California verbal learning test: Adult version: Manual. Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Drob, S. L., Meehan, K. B., & Waxman, S. E. (2009). Clinical and conceptual problems in the attribution of malingering in forensic evaluations. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 37 (1), 98–106. PMID:19297641. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19297641/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., Whittaker, M. K., Beckett, R., Bishopp, D., & Bates, A. (2012). Adolescents who have sexually harmed: An evaluation of a specialist treatment programme. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2011.635317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeland, J., Andresson, S., Sundseth, O. O., & Schanke, A. K. (2014). Types of modes of malingering? A confirmatory factor analysis of performance and symptom validity tests. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2014.910212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott, I. A., Beech, A. R., Mandeville-Norden, R., & Hayes, E. (2009). Psychological profiles of internet sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208326929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, M. B., & Frandsen, T. F. (2018). The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: A systematic review. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (junior and adult). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(3), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, T. A., Alleyne, E., Butler, H., Danby, H., Kapoor, A., Lovell, T., and Ciardha, C. Ó. (2015). Specialist group therapy for psychological factors associated with firesetting: Evidence of a treatment effect from a non-randomized trial with male prisoners. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 73(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gannon, T. A., Ciardha, C. Ó., Barnoux, M. F., Tyler, N., Mozova, K., & Alleyne, E. K. (2013). Male imprisoned firesetters have different characteristics than other imprisoned offenders and require specialist treatment. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 76(4), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2013.76.4.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green P. (2003). Green‘s Word Memory Test for windows: User‘s manual. Edmonton, Canada: Green's Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald HJ, Satow Y. A Short Social Desirability Scale. Psychological Reports. 1970;27(1):131–135. doi:10.2466/pr0.1970.27.1.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, K. J. (1995). The assessment of malingering in neuropsychological evaluations: Research-based concepts and methods for consultants. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 47(4), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.47.4.246
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1951). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory; Manual (Revised). Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Conference, P. (2009). American academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(7), 1093–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040903155063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, O., Mandeville-Norden, R., Hayes, E., & Egan, V. (2010). Do internet-based sexual offenders reduce to normal, inadequate and deviant groups? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600903454132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., Savovic, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2019, July). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In J. P. T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, & V. A. Welch (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.0. Cochrane. Retrieved February, 10, 2020, from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
   Google Scholar
• Huntley, F. L., Palmer, E. J., & Wakeling, H. C. (2011). Validation of an adaptation of Levenson’s Locus of control scale with adult male incarcerated sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211403163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Niesten, I. J. M., Jelicic, M., Huhnt, B., & Campo, J. Á. (2017). Biased symptom reporting and antisocial behaviour in forensic samples: A weak link. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(4), 530–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1256017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobson, L., Stanbury, A., & Langdon, P. E. (2013). The self- and other-deception questionnaires-intellectual disabilities (SDQ-ID and ODQ-ID): Component analysis and reliability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(10), 3576–3582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon, P. E., Clare, I. C., & Murphy, G. H. (2010). Measuring social desirability amongst men with intellectual disabilities: The psychometric properties of the Self- and Other-Deception Questionnaire—Intellectual Disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(6), 1601–1608. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees-Warley, G. T. (2014). Deliberate fire-setting by adults with developmental disabilities [ Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, V. (2015). The MMPI-2 criminal offender infrequency scale and PAI negative distortion scale: A comparison study of malingering scales within a forensic sample [ Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Alliant International University
   Google Scholar
• Mann, R., & Hollin, C. (2010). Self-reported schemas in sexual offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21(6), 834–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2010.511240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marilyn, A., & Oliver, C. (2022). Assessment of self-report response bias in high functioning autistic people. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law 10.1080/13218719.2021.2006097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathie, N. L., & Wakeling, H. C. (2011). Assessing socially desirable responding and its impact on self-report measures among sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(3), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903113681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarter, R. J., Walton, N. H., Brooks, D. N., & Powell, G. E. (2009). Effort testing in contemporary UK neuropsychological practice. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(6), 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802665790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messa, I., Holcomb, M., Lichtenstein, J. D., Tyson, B. T., Roth, R. M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2021). They are not destined to fail: A systematic examination of scores on embedded performance validity indicators in patients with intellectual disability. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2020.1865457
   Google Scholar
• Millon, T. (1994). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory Manual-III manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Millon, T., Grossman, S., & Millon, C. (2015). MCMI-IV. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J. F., Loza, W., & Kroner, D. G. (2003). Predictive validity despite social desirability: Evidence for the robustness of self-report among offenders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 13(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.536
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G.; The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L. C. (1991). The personality assessment inventory: Professional manual. PAR.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, H. , & Molinder, I. (1984). Manual for the Multiphasic Sex Inventory. (Available from Criminal and Victim Psychology Specialists, 437 Bowes Drive, Tacoma,)
   Google Scholar
• Niesten, I. J., Nentjes, L., Merckelbach, H., & Bernstein, D. P. (2015). Antisocial features and “faking bad”: A critical note. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 41 (1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.03.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohlsson, I. M., & Ireland, J. L. (2011). Aggression and offence motivation in prisoners: Exploring the components of motivation in an adult male sample. Aggressive Behavior, 37(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, I. M., & Ireland, J. L. (2011). Aggression and offence motivation in prisoners: exploring the components of motivation in an adult male sample. Aggressive Behavior, 37(3), 278–288. 10.1002/ab.20386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598–609. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. San Diego: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Paulhus deception scales: User manual. MHS.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (p. 49–69). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Perinelli, E., & Gremigni, P. (2016). Use of social desirability scales in clinical psychology: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, P., Carr, A., Dooley, B., & Rooney, B. (2011). Psychological characteristics of Irish clerical sexual offenders. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 32(1–2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2011.610191
   Google Scholar
• Ray, J. V., Hall, J., Rivera-Hudson, N., Poythress, N. G., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Morano, M. (2013). The relation between self-reported psychopathic traits and distorted response styles: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, A. (1964). L’examen clinique en psychologie [The clinical examination in psychology]. Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2018a). An introduction to response styles. In R. Rogers & S. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed., pp. 3–17). Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured interview of reported symptoms (SIRS) and professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Rorschach, H. (1932). Psychodiagnostik: Second edition. edited by Morgenthaler, W. Hans Huber, Bern and Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, S., Tatt, I. D., & Higgins, J. P. (2007). Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(3), 666–676. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schardt, C., Adams, M. B., Owens, T., Keitz, S., & Fontelo, P. (2007). Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-7-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2007). Appraising systematic reviews. Focus, Technical Brief, 17 (1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470750605.ch5
   Google Scholar
• Schmand, B., Lindeboom, J., Merten, T., & Millis, S. (2005). Amsterdam short-term memory test. PsycTESTS Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/t12622-000
   Google Scholar
• Schmand, B., Lindeboom, J., Merten, T., & Millis, S. (2005). Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test. PsycTESTS Dataset. doi: 10.1037/t12622-000
   Google Scholar
• Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A.; the PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharland, M., & Gfeller, J. (2007). A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sher, M. A. (2020). Understanding self-report response bias in high-functioning Autism [ Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Soble, J. R. (2021). Future directions in performance validity assessment to optimize detection of invalid neuropsychological test performance: Special issue introduction. Psychol Inj Law, 22, 1–5. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34567346; PMCID: PMC8455301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09425-x
   Google Scholar
• Spittlehouse, M. A. K. E. C. (2000). Introducing critical appraisal skills training in UK social services: Another link between health and social care? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 14(4), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820020003946
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J., Beech, A. R., Craig, L. A., & Gannon, T. A. (2010). Comparing intra-familial and extra-familial child sexual abusers with professionals who have sexually abused children with whom they work. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x09359194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szlachcic, R., Fox, S., Conway, C., Lord, A., & Christie, A. (2015). The relationship between schemas and offence supportive attitudes in mentally disordered sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(3), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2014.966166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, L., & Grace, R. C. (2008). Social desirability and sexual offenders: A review. Sexual Abuse, 20(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208314820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas-Peter, B. A., Jones, J., Campbell, S., & Oliver, C. (2000). Debasement and faking bad on the Millon clinical multi-axial inventory III: An examination of characteristics, circumstances and motives of forensic patients. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532500167985
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, D. (2010). Scoring guide for Risk Matrix 2000.10/SVC. London, England: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). TOMM: Test of memory malingering. Pearson Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, R. J., & Bailey, T. (2017). Validation of the Paulhus deception scales (PDS) in the UK and examination of the links between PDS and personality. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 3(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcrpp-10-2016-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., McLachlan, K., & Vincent, G. M. (2010). Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in Juvenile and adult offenders: A survey of clinical practices. Assessment, 17(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191109359587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10001354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, G. K., Pearce, E., & McGuire, J. (2011). Are internet offenders emotionally avoidant? Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(5), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903292246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widows, M. R., & Smith, G. P. (2005). SIMS: Structured inventory of malingered symptomatology: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2017). PTSD in court III: Malingering, assessment, and the law. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 52(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.03.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar