The Testament Definition Scale (TDS): Normative Data from the Italian Population and Clinical Usability in Neurodegenerative Diseases

References

• Aiello, E. N., Esposito, A., Gramegna, C., Gazzaniga, V., Zago, S., Difonzo, T., Appollonio, I. M., & Bolognini, N. (2022). The frontal assessment battery (FAB) and its sub-scales: Validation and updated normative data in an Italian population sample. Neurological Sciences : Official Journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 43(2), 979–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05392-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiello, E. N., Gramegna, C., Esposito, A., Gazzaniga, V., Zago, S., Difonzo, T., Maddaluno, O., Appollonio, I. M., & Bolognini, N. (2022). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): updated norms and psychometric insights into adaptive testing from healthy individuals in Northern Italy. Aging Clinical Experimental Research, 34(2), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01943-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balestrino, M., Brugnolo, A., Girtler, N., Pardini, M., Rizzetto, C., Alessandro, A. P., Cocito, L., & Schiavetti, I. (2024). Cognitive impairment assessment through handwriting (COGITAT) score: A novel tool that predicts cognitive state from handwriting for forensic and clinical applications. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.127531510.3389/fpsyg.2024.1275315.s00110.3389/fpsyg.2024.1275315.s002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balestrino, M., Fontana, P., Terzuoli, S., Volpe, S., Inglese, M. L., & Cocito, L. (2012). Altered handwriting suggests cognitive impairment and may be relevant to posthumous evaluation. Journal of Forensic Science, 57(5), 1252–1258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02131.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini, N., Gramegna, C., Esposito, A., Aiello, E. N., Difonzo, T., & Zago, S. (2021). The Testamentary Capacity Assessment Tool (TCAT): Validation and normative data. Neurological Sciences, 43(4), 2831–2838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05736-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini, N., & Zago, S. (2021). La capacità di disporre per testamento. Quadro giuridico e valutazione clinica (pp. 111–114). Hogrefe Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Brenkel, M., Whaley, K., Herrmann, N., Crawford, K., Hazan, E., Cardiff, L., Owen, A. M., & Shulman, K. (2018). A case for the standardized assessment of testamentary capacity. Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 21(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.21.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capitani, E., & Laiacona, M. (1997). Composite neuropsychological batteries and demographic correction: Standardization based on equivalent scores, with a review of published data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19(6), 795–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639708403761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capitani, E., & Laiacona, M. (2017). Outer and inner tolerance limits: Their usefulness for the construction of norms and the standardization of neuropsychological tests. Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(6–7), 1219–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1334830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casio. (2020). Beta distribution calculator. Keisan online calculator. Retrieval from httpp://kesia.casio.com/exec/system/1189573225
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Litvan, I., & Pillon, B. (2000). The FAB: A frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology, 55(11), 1621–1626. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.55.11.1621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economou, A., & Kontos, J. (2023). Testamentary capacity assessment in dementia using artificial intelligence: Prospects and challenges. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1137792. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1137792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, P., Dagnino, F., Cocito, L., & Balestrino, M. (2008). Handwriting as a gauge of cognitive status: A novel forensic tool for posthumous evaluation of testamentary capacity. Neurological Sciences, 29(4), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0977-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstenecker, A., Martin, R. C., Hebert, K., Triebel, K., & Marson, D. C. (2022). Cognitive correlates of impaired testamentary capacity in Alzheimer’s dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 37(6), 1148–1157. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinik, J., Werner, P., & Lin, R. (1999). How do cognitively impaired elderly patients define “testament”: Reliability and validity of the testament definition scale. Israel Journal of Psychiatry, 36(1), 23–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 25.0.
   Google Scholar
• The jamovi project. (2020). Jamovi (Version 1.2.2.). Computer software. Retrieval from https://www.jamovi.org/
   Google Scholar
• Kenepp, A., Johnson, E., Lee, G. J., Sunderaraman, P., Denburg, N. L., & Nguyen, C. M. (2021). A comprehensive approach to assessment of testamentary capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 789494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.789494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magni, E., Binetti, G., Bianchetti, A., Rozzini, R., & Trabucchi, M. (1996). Mini‐Mental state examination: A normative study in Italian elderly population. European Journal of Neurology, 3(3), 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.1996.tb00423.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marson, D. C. (2020). Assessment of testamentary capacity. In J. Moye (Ed.), Assessing capacities of older adults: A casebook to guide difficult decisions (pp. 187–206). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Marson, D. C., Huthwaite, J. S., & Hebert, K. (2004). Testamentary capacity and undue influence in the elderly: A jurisprudent therapy perspective. Law Psychological Review, 28, 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Mart, G. M. (2016). Neuropsychological assessment of testamentary capacity and undue influence. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., Gerstenecker, A., Hebert, K., Triebel, K., & Marson, D. (2022). Assessment of testamentary capacity in older adults: Description and initial validation of a standardized interview instrument. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 37(6), 1133–1147. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milin, P., Feldman, L. B., Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Baayen, R. H., & van Rijn, H. (2017). Discrimination in lexical decision. Public Library of Science ONE, 12(2), e0171935. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171935
   Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. M., Block, C., Linck, J., & Denburg, I. (2019). Development and validation of the testamentary capacity measure among older adults and patients with dementia. Innovation in Aging, 3(Suppl 1), S705. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.2594
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, S. G., Voskou, P., Economou, A., Beratis, I., Douzenis, A., & Grinberg, L. (2018). Testamentary capacity assessment tool (TCAT): A brief instrument for patients with dementia. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 61(3), 985–994. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peisah, C., & Shulman, K. I. (2012). Testamentary capacity. In G. Demakis (Ed.), Civil capacities in clinical neuropsychology: Research findings and practical applications (pp. 95–120). Oxford UK Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Computer Software. Retrieval from https://cran.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Roth, M., Huppert, F. A., Tym, E., Mountjoy, C. Q., Diffident-Brown, A., & Shoesmoth, D. J. (1988). CAMDEX: The Cambridge examination for mental disorders in the elderly. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, K. I., Peisah, C., Jacoby, R., Heinik, J., & Finkel, S. (2009). Contemporaneous assessment of testamentary capacity. International Psychogeriatrics, 21(3), 433–439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610209008874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spar, J. E., & Garb, A. S. (1992). Assessing competency to make a will. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 722–727. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.149.2.169
   Google Scholar
• Wulff, D. U., De Deyne, S., Jones, M. N., Mata, R., & Aging Lexicon Consortium. (2019). New perspectives on the aging lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 686–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zago, S., & Bolognini, N. (2020). Neuropsychological autopsy of testamentary capacity: Methodology and issues in the elderly. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 29(4), 570–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1791869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar