References
- American Psychological Association. 2010. Publication manual of the American psychological association. 6th ed. APA.
- Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. 2006. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 1(1):50–57.
- Borg DN, Minett GM, Stewart IB, Drovandi CC. 2018. Bayesian methods might solve the problems with magnitude-based inference. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 50(12):2609–2610.
- Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, Carlin JB, Poole C, Goodman SN, Altman DG. 2016. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol. 31(4):337–350.
- Hopkins WG, Batterham AM. 2018. The vindication of magnitude-based inference. Sportscience. 22:19–29.
- Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. 2009. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 41(1):3–13.
- IJE (2018). Instructions to authors. [accessed 2018 Dec 7]. https://academic.oup.com/ije/pages/Instructions_To_Authors.
- Lakens D. 2017. Equivalence tests: a practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 8(4):355–362.
- Sainani KL. 2018. The problem with “magnitude-based inference”. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 50(10):2166–2176.
- Szucs D, Ioannidis JPA. 2017. When null hypothesis significance testing is unsuitable for research: a reassessment. Front Hum Neurosci. 11:390.
- Welsh AH, Knight EJ. 2015. “Magnitude-based inference”: a statistical review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 47(4):874–884.