References
- Cocchio C, Johnson J, Clifton S. Review of North American pit viper antivenoms. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020;77(3):1–4. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz278.
- Bush SP, Ruha AM, Seifert SA, et al. Comparison of F(ab’)2 versus Fab antivenom for pit viper envenomation: a prospective, blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Clin Toxicol. 2015;53(1):37–45. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.974263.
- Gerardo CJ, Keyler DE, Rapp-Olson M, et al. Control of venom-induced tissue injury in copperhead snakebite patients: a post hoc Sub-group analysis of a clinical trial comparing F(ab’)2 to Fab antivenom. Clin Toxicol. 2022;60(4):521–523. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1973489.
- ANAVIP. Package insert. Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V; 2021.
- Ali AJ, Horwitz DA, Mullins ME. Lack of coagulopathy after copperhead snakebites. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65(4):404–409. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.08.006.
- Wills BK, Billet M, Rose SR, et al. Prevalence of hematologic toxicity from copperhead envenomation: an observational study. Clin Toxicol. 2020;58(4):262–265. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1644346.
- Ramirez-Cueva F, Larsen A, Knowlton E, et al. Predictors of FabAV use in copperhead envenomation. Clin Toxicol. 2022;60(5):609–614. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.2018454.
- Ruha AM, Kleinschmidt KC, Greene S, et al. The epidemiology, clinical course, and management of snakebites in the North American snakebite registry. J Med Toxicol. 2017;13(4):309–320. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0633-5.
- Phase 3 multicenter comparative study to confirm safety and effectiveness of the F(ab)2 Antivenom Anavip. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00636116. Updated January 01, 2012. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00636116.
- Wilson BZ, Larsen J, Smelski G, et al. Use of crotalidae equine immune F(ab’)2 antivenom for treatment of an agkistrodon envenomation. Clin Toxicol. 2021;59(11):1023–1026. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1892718.