References
- Canto, M. 1989. Euthydème, Paris: Flammarion.
- Chance, T. 1992. Plato’s Euthydemus: Analysis of What Is and Is Not Philosophy, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Duncombe, M. 2013. The Greatest Difficulty at Parmenides 133c–134e and Plato’s Relative Terms, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45: 43–62.
- Duncombe, M. 2015. The Role of Relatives in Plato’s Partition Argument, Republic 4, 436b9–439c9, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48/1: 37–60.
- Hawtrey, R. S. W. 1981. Commentary on Plato’s Euthydemus, American Philosophical Society.
- Jansen, L. 2006. Aristoteles’ Kategorie Des Relativen Zwischen Dialektik Und Ontologie, Philosophiegeschichte Und Logische Analyse 9: 1–33.
- McCabe, M.M. 2005. Does Your Plato Bite?, in Agonistes: Essays in Honour of Denis O’Brien, eds John Dillon and Monique Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate: 103–14.
- McCabe, M.M. 2021. First Chop Your Logos … : Socrates and the Sophists on Language, Logic and Development, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/2: 131–50.
- Quine, W.V. 1956. Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes, The Journal of Philosophy 53: 177–87. doi: 10.2307/2022451
- Sprague, R. 1962. Plato’s Use of Fallacy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.