Rethinking the D'Hondt method

References

• Baixauli-Soler, J. Samuel, Eva Alfaro-Cid, and Matilde O. Fernandez-Blanco. 2011. “Mean-VaR Portfolio Selection Under Real Constraints.” Computational Economics 37 (2): 113–131. doi: 10.1007/s10614-009-9195-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balinski, Michael L., and H. Peyton Young. 1982. Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth. 2000. “Which Electoral Formula is the Most Proportional? A New Look with New Evidence.” Political Analysis 8 (4): 381–388. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029822
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, Jean. 1969. An Introduction to Comparative Government. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Borisyuk, Galina, Colin Rallings, and Michael Thrasher. 2004. “Selecting Indexes of Electoral Proportionality: General Properties and Relationships.” Quality & Quantity 38 (1): 51–74. doi: 10.1023/B:QUQU.0000013239.55304.98
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, Nils-Christian, and Matt Golder. 2013. “Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World, 1946–2011.” Electoral Studies 32 (2): 360–369. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clogg, C. C., T. Rudas, and L. Xi. 1995. “A New Index of Structure for the Analysis of Models for Mobility Tables and Other Cross-classifications.” Sociological Methodology 25, 197–222. doi: 10.2307/271067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dančišin, Vladimír. 2015. “Hľadanie Volebného Deliteľa Victorom D'Hondtom.” [Victor D'Hondt's Search for a Divisor.] Evropská Volební Studia 10 (1): 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• D'Hondt, Victor. 1882. Système Pratique Et Raisonné De Représentation Proportionnelle. Librairie C. Brussels: Muquardt.
   Google Scholar
• D'Hondt, Victor. 1885. Exposé Du Système Pratique De Représentation Proportionnelle. Gante: Imprimerie Eug. Van der Haeghen.
   Google Scholar
• Dorfleitner, Gregor, and Thomas Klein. 1999. “Rounding with Multiplier Methods: An Efficient Algorithm and Applications in Statistics.” Statistical Papers 40, 143–157. doi: 10.1007/BF02925514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2017. “Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics.”
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, David M. 2011. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael. 1991. “Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 10 (1): 33–51. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael. 1992. “Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes and Majorities.” British Journal of Political Science 22 (4): 469–496. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gini, Corrado. 1914. “Di Una Misura Della Dissomiglianza Tra Due Gruppi Di Quantità E Delle Sue Applicazioni Allo Studio Delle Relazione Statistiche.” Atti Del Reale Instituto Veneto Di Scienze, Lettere Ed Arti (Series 8) 74, 185–213.
   Google Scholar
• Grilli di Cortona, Pietro, Cecilia Manzi, Aline Pennisi, Federica Ricca, and Bruno Simeone. 1999. Evaluation and Optimization of Electoral Systems. SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Herrero, Carmen, and Ricardo Martínez. 2008. “Balanced Allocation Methods for Claims Problems with Indivisibilities.” Social Choice and Welfare 30 (4): 603–617. doi: 10.1007/s00355-007-0262-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibaraki, Toshihide, and Naoki Katoh. 1988. Resource Allocation Problems: Algorithmic Approaches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, Thomas. 1792. Opinion on Apportionment Bill, 4 April 1792. Founders Online, National Archives, last modified on 12 July, 2016. [Original source: The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 23, textit1 January–31 May 1792, edited by Charles T. Cullen. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990, pp. 370–377.] Accessed December 7, 2016. http://founders.archivesgov/documents/Jefferson/01-23-02-0324.
   Google Scholar
• Jeworutzki, Sebastian. 2016. Cartogram: Create cartograms with R. R package version 0.0.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cartogram.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Richard, Ron Johnston, and Iain McLean. 2014. “Overrepresenting UKIP, Underrepresenting the Greens and Lib Dems: the 2014 European Elections in Great Britain.” Representation 50 (4): 429–437. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2014.982694
   Google Scholar
• Karpov, Alexander. 2008. “Measurement of Disproportionality in Proportional Representation Systems.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 48 (9): 1421–1438. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.05.027
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, Rudolf, Christian Borgelt, Christian Braune, Sanaz Mostaghim, and Matthias Steinbrecher. 2016. Computational Intelligence. A Methodological Introduction. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, Takuya, and Masayoshi Aritsugi. 2017. “Assignment Strategies for Ground Truths in the Crowdsourcing of Labeling Tasks.” Journal of Systems and Software 126, 113–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebeda, Tomáš. 2006. “Teorie Reálné Kvóty, Alternativní Přístup K Meření Volební Proporcionality.” [Real Quota Theory, An Alternative Approach to Measuring Electoral Proportionality.] Czech Sociological Review 42 (4): 657–681.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. 1986. “Degrees of Proportionality of Proportional Representation Formulas.” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, edited by B. Grofman and A. Lijphart. New York, NY: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend, and Robert W. Gibberd. 1977. “Thresholds and Payoffs in List Systems of Proportional Representation.” European Journal of Political Research 5 (3): 219–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1977.tb01289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore, John, and Victor J. Hanby. 1971. “The Theoretical Limits of Maximum Distortion: Some Analytic Expressions for Electoral Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 1 (4): 467–477. doi: 10.1017/S000712340000925X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markatou, Marianthi, and Yang Chen. 2018. “Non-quadratic Distances in Model Assessment.” Entropy 20 (6): 464. doi: 10.3390/e20060464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, Iain, and Ron Johnston. 2009. “When is Proportional Not Proportional? Great Britain's 2009 Elections to the European Parliament.” Representation 45 (4): 349–355. doi: 10.1080/00344890903235199
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, Burt L. 1994. “Disproportionality and Malapportionment: Measuring Electoral Inequity.” Electoral Studies 13 (2): 132–149. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)90031-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, Horst F., and Alice C. Niemeyer. 2008. “Apportionment Methods.” Mathematical Social Sciences 56 (2): 240–253. doi: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Leary, Brendan, Bernard Grofman, and Jørgen Elklit. 2005. “Divisor methods for sequential portfolio allocation in multi-party executive bodies: Evidence from Northern Ireland and Denmark.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 198–211. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00118.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennisi, Aline. 1998. “Disproportionality Indexes and Robustness of Proportional Allocation Methods.” Electoral Studies 17 (1): 3–19. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(97)00052-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pukelsheim, Friedrich. 2014. Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Riedwyl, Hans, and Jürg Steiner. 1995. “What is Proportionality Anyhow?” Comparative Politics 27 (3): 357–369. doi: 10.2307/422063
   Google Scholar
• Rudas, T. 2005. “Mixture Models of Missing Data.” Quality & Quantity 39 (1): 19–36. doi: 10.1007/s11135-004-5945-2
   Google Scholar
• Rudas, T., C. C. Clogg, and B. G. Lindsay. 1994. “A New Index of Fit Based on Mixture Methods for the Analysis of Contingency Tables.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 56 (4): 623–639. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1994.tb02004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudas, Tamas. 1999. “The Mixture Index of Fit and Minimax Regression.” Metrika 50 (2): 163–172. doi: 10.1007/s001840050042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudas, Tamas, Emese Verdes, and Juraj Medzihorsky. 2019. “Model Based Analysis of Incomplete Data Using the Mixture Index of Fit.” In Advances in Latent Class Analysis: A Festschrift in Honor of C. Mitchell Dayton, edited by G. R. Hancock and G. B. Macready. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sainte-Laguë, André. 1910. “La représentation Proportionnelle et la méthode des moindres carrés.” Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure 27: 529–542.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, Karsten, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mathias Drton, and Norman R. Draper. 2003. “Seat Biases of Apportionment Methods for Proportional Representation.” Electoral Studies 22 (4): 651–676. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00027-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz, Robert R. 1951. “On the Measurement of Income Inequality.” The American Ecoomic Review 41 (1): 107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taagepera, Rein, and Bernard Grofman. 2003. “Mapping the Indices of Seats–votes Disproportionality and Inter-election Volatility.” Party Politics 9 (6): 659–677. doi: 10.1177/13540688030096001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taagepera, Rein, and Markku Laakso. 1980. “Proportionality Profiles of West European Electoral Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (4): 423–446. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00582.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taagepera, Rein, and M. S. Shugart. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takai, Kazuyuki. 2016. “CodHonEditor: Spreadsheets for Codon Optimization and Editing of Protein Coding Sequences.” Nucleosides, Nucleotides and Nucleic Acids 35 (5): 223–232. doi: 10.1080/15257770.2015.1127962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Puyenbroeck, Tom. 2008. “Proportional Representation, Gini Coefficients, and the Principle of Transfers.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 20 (4): 498–526. doi: 10.1177/0951629808093778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Bo, Zheng Zhang, Ziyu Ren, Jian Ma, and Wendong Wang. 2016. “Energy-efficient Software-defined Data Collection by Participatory Sensing.” IEEE Sensors Journal 16 (20): 7315–7324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar