Dominating the debate: visibility bias and mentions of British MPs in newspaper reporting on Brexit

References

• Adam, S., B. Eugster, E. Antl-Wittenberg, R. Azrout, J. Möller, C. de Vreese, M. Maier, and S. Kritzinger. 2019. “News Media’s Position-Taking Regarding the European Union: the Synchronization of Mass Media’s Reporting and Commentating in the 2014 European Parliament Elections.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (1): 44–62. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1375546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aftab, S. A. 2018. “Brexit Referendum and Media Coverage. An Appraisal.” Journal of European Studies 34 (1): 68–81.
   Google Scholar
• Aidt, T., F. Grey, and A. Savu. 2019. “The Meaningful Votes: Voting on Brexit in the British House of Commons.” Public Choice. doi: 10.1007/s11127-019-00762-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. 1993. “Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 267–285. doi: 10.2307/2939040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A. 2002. “Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 91–109. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402004252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC. 2019. “Brexit: MPs reject Theresa May’s deal for a second time.” BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47547887.
   Google Scholar
• Berkel, B. 2006. “Political Parallelism in News and Commentaries on the Haider Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Austrian, British, German, and French Quality Newspapers.” Communications 31 (1): 85–104. doi: 10.1515/COMMUN.2006.006
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg, H. 2005. “Political Bias in the Irish Media: A Quantitative Study of Campaign Coverage During the 2002 General Election.” Irish Political Studies 20 (3): 297–322. doi: 10.1080/07907180500359350
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg, H. 2006. “Party Strategy and Media Bias: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2005 UK Election Campaign.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16 (2): 157–178. doi: 10.1080/13689880600716027
   Google Scholar
• Broockman, D. E., and J. L. Kalla. 2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing.” Science 352 (6282): 220–224. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I., H.-D. Klingemann, A. Volkens, J. Bara, et al. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. 2019. “Confidence and Supply Agreement between the Conservative and Unionist Party and the Democratic Unionist Party.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/conservative-and-dup-agreement-and-uk-government-financial-support-for-northern-ireland/agreement-between-the-conservative-and-unionist-party-and-the-democratic-unionist-party-on-support-for-the-government-in-par.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S., and J. Burton. 2004. “Research Note: The Influence of the Press in Shaping Public Opinion Towards the European Union in Britain.” Political Studies 52 (3): 623–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00499.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheibub, J. A. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, P., and N. Copsey. 2017. “Rethinking Britain and the European Union: Politicians, the Media and Public Opinion Reconsidered.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (4): 709–726. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushion, S., A. Kilby, R. Thomas, M. Morani, and R. Sambrook. 2018. “Newspapers, Impartiality and Television News.” Journalism Studies 19 (2): 162–181. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1171163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushion, S., and J. Lewis. 2017. “Impartiality, Statistical tit-for-Tats and the Construction of Balance: UK Television News Reporting of the 2016 EU Referendum Campaign.” European Journal of Communication 32 (3): 208–223. doi: 10.1177/0267323117695736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daddow, O. 2012. “The UK Media and ‘Europe’: From Permissive Consensus to Destructive Dissent.” International Affairs 88 (6): 1219–1236. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessio, D., and M. Allen. 2000. “Media Bias in Presidential Elections: a Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Communication 50 (4): 133–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02866.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, D., D. Wring, E. Harmer, J. Downey, et al. 2016. “Hard Evidence: Analysis Shows Extent of Press Bias towards Brexit Hard Evidence: Analysis Shows Extent of Press Bias towards Brexit.” University of Loughborough. The Conversation (16th June 2016). https://theconversation.com/hard-evidence-analysis- shows-extent-of-press-bias-towards-brexit-61106.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, H. 1995. “Time as a Scarce Resource: Governmental Control of the Agenda.” In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, edited by H. Döring, 223–247. Frankfurt (Main): Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Eberl, J. M., H. G. Boomgaarden, and M. Wagner. 2017. “One Bias Fits All? Three Types of Media Bias and Their Effects on Party Preferences.” Communication Research 44 (8): 1125–1148. doi: 10.1177/0093650215614364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilders, C. 1999. “Synchronization of Issue Agendas in News and Editorials of the Prestige Press in Germany.” Communications 24 (3): 301–328. doi: 10.1515/comm.1999.24.3.301
   Google Scholar
• Eilders, C. 2002. “Conflict and Consonance in Media Opinion: Political Positions of Five German Quality Newspapers.” European Journal of Communication 17 (1): 25–63. doi: 10.1177/0267323102017001606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilders, C., F. Neidhardt, and B. Pfetsch. 2004. Die Stimme Der Medien: Pressekommentare Und Politische Öffentlichkeit in Der Bundesrepublik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Elgot, J. 2018. “Pro remain Tory MPs will form Group to Vote Down May’s Brexit deal.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/oct/10/pro-remain-tory-mps-will-form-group-vote-down-may-brexit-deal.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 2010. “Media Framing Biases and Political Power: Explaining Slant in News of Campaign 2008.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 11 (4): 389–408. doi: 10.1177/1464884910367587
   Google Scholar
• Firmstone, J. 2016. “Newspapers’ Editorial Opinions During the Referendum Campaign.” In EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign, edited by D. Jackson, E. Thorsen, and D. Wring. Bournemouth University – The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community. www.referendumanalysis.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Foos, F., and D. Bischof. 2019. “Tabloid Boycott Decreases Euroscepticism.” Working Paper, 17 November 2019. http://www.florianfoos.net/resources/Foos_Bischof_Hillsborough_APSA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, R., and M. Goodwin. 2017. “Britain After Brexit: A Nation Divided.” Journal of Democracy 28 (1): 17–30. doi: 10.1353/jod.2017.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, A. 2002. Euroscepticism in Contemporary British Politics: Opposition to Europe in the British Conservative and Labour Parties Since 1945. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A. 2004. The European Union and British Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M., and J. M. Shapiro. 2006. “Media Bias and Reputation.” Journal of Political Economy 114 (2): 280–316. doi: 10.1086/499414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowland, D. 2017. Britain and the European Union. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C., P. B. Mortensen, and G. Thesen. 2017. “News Tone and the Government in the News: When and Why Do Government Actors Appear in the News?” In How Political Actors Use the Media, edited by P. V. Aelst, and S. Walgrave, 207–223. Cham: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Groeling, T. 2008. “Who’s the Fairest of Them All? An Empirical Test for Partisan Bias on ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox News.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (4): 631–657. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02668.x
   Google Scholar
• Groseclose, T., and J. Milyo. 2005. “A Measure of Media Bias.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (4): 1191–1237. doi: 10.1162/003355305775097542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, L. M. 1993. “Opportune Witnesses: An Analysis of Balance in the Selection of Sources and Arguments in the Leading German Newspapers’ Coverage of the Census Issue.” European Journal of Communication 8 (3): 317–343. doi: 10.1177/0267323193008003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., and P. Mancini. 2007. “The North Atlantic or Liberal Media Model Countries: Introduction.” In European Media Governance: National and Regional Dimensions, edited by G. Terzis, 27–32. Chicago: intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, B. 2012. “Nation, Separation and Threat: An Analysis of British Media Discourses on the European Union Treaty Reform Process.” Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (4): 561–577. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02248.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., T. J. Leeper, and J. Tilley. 2020. “Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of Brexit.” British Journal of Political Science In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D. N., C. H. de Vreese, and E. Albæk. 2011a. “Incumbency Bonus in Election News Coverage Explained: The Logics of Political Power and the Media Market.” Journal of Communication 61 (2): 264–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01540.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D. N., P. Van Aelst, and G. Legnante. 2011b. “Political Balance in the News: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and key Findings.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 13 (2): 240–257. doi:10.1177/1464884911427804.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D. N., R. Vliegenthart, C. De Vreese, and E. Albæk. 2010. “Effects of Election News Coverage: How Visibility and Tone Influence Party Choice.” Political Communication 27 (4): 389–405. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.516798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D., E. Thorson, and D. Wing. 2016. EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Bournemouth University – The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. F., and P. J. Kenney. 2002. “The Slant of the News: How Editorial Endorsements Influence Campaign Coverage and Citizens’ Views of Candidates.” American Political Science Review 95 (1): 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kalla, J. L., and D. E. Broockman. 2018. “The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence From 49 Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 112 (1): 148–166. doi: 10.1017/S0003055417000363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larcinese, V., and I. Sircar. 2017. “Crime and Punishment the British way: Accountability Channels Following the MPs’ Expenses Scandal.” European Journal of Political Economy 47 (1): 75–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. A., B. Aslan, and D. Bironzo. 2016. UK Press Coverage of the EU Referendum. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/uk-press-coverage-eu-referendum.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., and S. Cushion. 2019. “Think Tanks, Television News and Impartiality: The Ideological Balance of Sources in BBC Programming.” Journalism Studies 20 (4): 480–499. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1389295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LML. 2019. Leave Means Leave. Brexit will win in the end. https://www.leavemeansleave.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, T. M., M. Haselmayer, and M. Wagner. 2020. “Who Gets Into the Papers? Party Campaign Messages and the Media.” British Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 281–302. doi: 10.1017/S0007123417000400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad, I. 2018. Media Coverage of the Role of Big Data in the 2016 Brexit Referendum. An Analysis of The Guardian and The Telegraph Coverage Using Social Responsibility Theory. Tallinn: School of Governance, Law and Society. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322928023.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., and P. S. Martin. 2001. “Facilitating Communication Across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media.” American Political Science Review 95 (1): 97–114. doi: 10.1017/S0003055401000223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oegema, D., and J. Kleinnijenhuis. 2000. “Personalization in Political Television News: A 13-Wave Survey Study to Assess Effects of Text and Footage.” Communications 25 (1): 43–60. doi: 10.1515/comm.2000.25.1.43
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Publishers Audience Measurement Company. 2019. Individual Brand Reach – Newsbrands. April 2018 – March 2019. https://pamco.co.uk/pamco-data/data-archive/.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlinson, F. 2019. How Press Propaganda Paved the Way to Brexit. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour-Ure, C. 1974. The Political Impact of the Mass Media. London: Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., and S. D. Reese. 2014. Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Startin, N. 2015. “Have we Reached a Tipping Point? The Mainstreaming of Euroscepticism in the UK.” International Political Science Review 36 (3): 311–323. doi: 10.1177/0192512115574126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolson, A. 2019. “‘Out is out and That’s it the People Have Spoken’: Uses of vox Pops in UK TV News Coverage of the Brexit Referendum.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (4): 420–431. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2019.1592768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., A. R. T. Schuck, H. G. Boomgaarden, and C. H. De Vreese. 2008. “News Coverage and Support for European Integration, 1990–2006.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20 (4): 415–439. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edn044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonbun-Feldbauer, R., and J. Matthes. 2018. “Do Channels Matter?” Journalism Studies 19 (16): 2359–2378. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1349547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreese, C. d. 2007. “A Spiral of Euroscepticism: The Media’s Fault?” Acta Politica 42 (2–3): 271–286. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K., R. J. Sambrook, M. Berry, et al. 2013. Breadth of Opinion in BBC Output. London: BBC Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S. 2019. “Better off Without You? How the British Media Portrayed EU Citizens in Brexit News.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 24 (2): 210–232. doi: 10.1177/1940161218821509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes, G., and D. Wring. 1998. “The British Press and European Integration.” In Britain for or Against Europe? British Politics and the Question of European Integration, edited by D. Baker, and D. Seawright, 185–205. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yi Zhu, Y., and N. Carl. 2018. Are PPE graduates ruining Britain? MPs who studied it at university are among the most pro-Remain. LSE Brexit Blog, 11 November 2018. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2018/11/14/mps-who-studied-ppe-at-university-are-among-the-most-pro-remain/.
   Google Scholar
• YouGov. 2019. In hindsight, do you think Britain was right or wrong to vote to leave the EU? https://whatukthinks.org/eu/questions/in-highsight-do-you-think-britain-was-right-or-wrong-to-vote-to-leave-the-eu/?notes.
   Google Scholar
• Young, H. 1999. This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. 1996. “Political Persuasion and Attitude Change.” In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, edited by D. C. Mutz, B. Richard A, and S. Paul M, 17–78. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar