Yelling from the sidelines? How German parties employ populist and crisis-related messages on Facebook

References

• Aalberg, T., F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback, and C. H. D. Vreese, eds. 2017. Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., C. Mudde, and A. Zaslove. 2014. “How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (9): 1324–1353. doi:10.1177/0010414013512600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, K. 2015. “The AfD: Finally a Successful Right-Wing Populist Eurosceptic Party for Germany?” West European Politics 38 (3): 535–556. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1004230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, K., and C. C. Berning. 2019. “How the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and Their Voters Veered to the Radical Right, 2013–2017.” Electoral Studies 60: 102040. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2019.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. 2018. “Measuring Populist Discourse with Semantic Text Analysis: An Application on Grassroots Populist Mobilization.” Quality & Quantity 52 (3): 1241–1263. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0517-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, R. R. 2009. “Populists, Outsiders and Anti-Establishment Politics.” Party Politics 15 (1): 29–48. doi:10.1177/1354068808097890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisch, V. N., and C. Schäfer. 2020. “Internetnutzung mit Großer Dynamik: Medien, Kommunikation, Social Media.” ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie 2020: 20.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, A. R., R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. 2016. “On the Relevance of Irrelevant Alternatives.” Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, 963–973. doi:10.1145/2872427.2883025
   Google Scholar
• Berbuir, N., M. Lewandowsky, and J. Siri. 2015. “The AfD and its Sympathisers: Finally a Right-Wing Populist Movement in Germany?” German Politics 24 (2): 154–178. doi:10.1080/09644008.2014.982546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, L., and H. Kriesi. 2019. “Populism in election times: A comparative analysis of 11 countries in Western Europe.” West European Politics 42 (6): 1–21. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1596694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blassnig, S., N. Ernst, F. Büchel, and S. Engesser. 2018. “Populist Communication in Talk Shows and Social Media. A Comparative Content Analysis in Four Countries.” Studies in Communication | Media 7 (3): 338–363. doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2018-3-338
   Google Scholar
• Blassnig, S., N. Ernst, F. Büchel, S. Engesser, and F. Esser. 2018. “Populism in Online Election Coverage: Analyzing populist statements by politicians, journalists, and readers in three countries.” Journalism Studies 20 (8): 1110–1129. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2018.1487802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., and K. Brants. 2014. “Populist Rhetoric in Politics and Media: A Longitudinal Study of the Netherlands.” European Journal of Communication 29 (6): 703–719. doi:10.1177/0267323114545709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2017. “Why Populism?” Theory and Society 46 (5): 357–385. doi:10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47 (1): 2–16. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramani, D. 2017. “Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 54–67. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, B., S. Jungkunz, M. Helbling, and L. Littvay. 2020. “An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (2): 409–424. doi:10.1177/1065912919833176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. 2017. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power (Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., N. Ernst, F. Esser, and F. Büchel. 2017. “Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (8): 1109–1126. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., N. Fawzi, and A. O. Larsson. 2017. “Populist Online Communication: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1279–1292. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., S. Blassnig, S. Engesser, F. Büchel, and F. Esser. 2019. “Populists Prefer Social Media Over Talk Shows: An Analysis of Populist Messages and Stylistic Elements Across Six Countries.” Social Media + Society 5 (1). doi:10.1177/2056305118823358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., S. Engesser, F. Büchel, S. Blassnig, and F. Esser. 2017. “Extreme Parties and Populism: An Analysis of Facebook and Twitter Across six Countries.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1347–1364. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, P., and K. Goldstein. 1999. “Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1189–1208. doi:10.2307/2991823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gest, J., T. Reny, and J. Mayer. 2018. “Roots of the Radical Right: Nostalgic Deprivation in the United States and Britain.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1694–1719. doi:10.1177/0010414017720705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giebler, H., M. Hirsch, B. Schürmann, and S. Veit. 2020. “Discontent With What? Linking Self-Centered and Society-Centered Discontent to Populist Party Support.” Political Studies 69 (4): 1–21. doi:10.1177/0032321720932115 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshek, J., and K. Koc-Michalska. 2017. “Helping Populism win? Social Media use, Filter Bubbles, and Support for Populist Presidential Candidates in the 2016 US Election Campaign.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1389–1407. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gründl, J. 2020. “Populist ideas on social media: A dictionary-based measurement of populist communication.” New Media & Society, 641–659. doi:10.1177/1461444820976970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasti, P. 2020. “Populism in Power and Democracy: Democratic Decay and Resilience in the Czech Republic (2013–2020).” Politics and Governance 8 (4): 473–484. doi:10.17645/pag.v8i4.3420 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A., R. E. Carlin, L. Littvay, and C. R. Kaltwasser, eds. 2018. The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, A., and N. Malhotra. 2013. “Retrospective Voting Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 285–306. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., and J. Tilley. 2016. “Fleeing the Centre: The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis.” West European Politics 39 (5): 971–991. doi:10.1080/01402382.2016.1181871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., and P. Norris. 2017. “Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse.” Perspectives on Politics 15 (2): 443–454. doi:10.1017/S1537592717000111 .
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319–345. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., R. Schroeder, and S. Stier. 2019. “Digital Media and the Surge of Political Outsiders: Explaining the Success of Political Challengers in the United States, Germany, and China.” Social Media + Society 5 (3): 1–12. doi:10.1177/2056305119875439 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, C. R. 2012. “The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy.” Democratization 19 (2): 184–208. doi:10.1080/13510347.2011.572619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. 2017. “The populism of the Alternative for Germany (AfD): An extended Essex School perspective.” Palgrave Communications 3 (1): 5. doi:10.1057/s41599-017-0008-1
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. 2021. “ … Because the homeland cannot be in opposition: Analysing the discourses of Fidesz and Law and Justice (PiS) from opposition to power.” East European Politics 37 (2): 332–351. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1791094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R., and M. W. Richter. 2006. “Crisis.” Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (2): 357–400. doi:10.1353/jhi.2006.0013 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, W., and A. Wagner. 2019. “Becoming part of the gang? Established and nonestablished populist parties and the role of external efficacy.” Party Politics 27 (1): 161–173. doi:10.1177/1354068819839210 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, and T. Frey, eds. 2006. “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (6): 921–956. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., T. S. Pappas, H. Kriesi, and T. S. Pappas, eds. 2015. “Populism in Europe During Crisis: An Introduction.” In European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, 1–19. ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. “Populism. What’s in a Name?” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (First Printing Edition, edited by F. Panizza, 32–49. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., and I. B. Rovner. 2009. “Negative Campaigning.” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (1): 285–306. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.071905.101448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, M., H. Giebler, and A. Wagner. 2016. “Rechtspopulismus in Deutschland. Eine Empirische Einordnung der Parteien zur Bundestagswahl 2013 Unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung der AfD.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 57 (2): 247–275. doi:10.5771/0032-3470-2016-2-247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, L. 2017. “Left and Right Populism Compared: The British Case.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (2): 282–303. doi:10.1177/1369148117701753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G. 2008. “Populism and the Media.” In Twenty-first Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, edited by D. Albertazzi and D. McDonell, 49–64. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, D., and J. L. Newell. 2011. “Outsider Parties in Government in Western Europe.” Party Politics 17 (4): 443–452. doi:10.1177/1354068811400517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Mény, and Y. Surel. 2002. “The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by Y. Mény and Y. Surel. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. 2015. “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Government and Opposition 50 (02): 189–217. doi:10.1017/gov.2014.13
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mols, F., and J. Jetten. 2016. “Explaining the Appeal of Populist Right-Wing Parties in Times of Economic Prosperity: Economic Prosperity and Populist Right-Wing Parties.” Political Psychology 37 (2): 275–292. doi:10.1111/pops.12258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. “The “End of Politics” and the Challenge of Right-Wing Populism.” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (First Printing Edition), edited by F. Panizza, 50–71. London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2018. “Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667–1693. doi:10.1177/0010414018789490..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2013. “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government and Opposition 48 (02): 147–174. doi:10.1017/gov.2012.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2017. “Was ist Populismus?” Zeitschrift Für Politische Theorie 7 (2): 187–201. doi:10.3224/zpth.v7i2.03
   Google Scholar
• Muller, C. J., and R. F. MacLehose. 2014. “Estimating Predicted Probabilities from Logistic Regression: Different Methods Correspond to Different Target Populations.” International Journal of Epidemiology 43 (3): 962–970. doi:10.1093/ije/dyu029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, T. 2017. “Measuring Populism: A Review of Current Approaches.” In Political Populism, edited by R. C. Heinisch, C. Holtz-Bacha, and O. Mazzoleni, 123–136. Baden-Baden: Nomos. doi:10.5771/9783845271491-123 .
   Google Scholar
• Petrarca, C. S., H. Giebler, and B. Weßels. 2020. “Support for Insider Parties: The Role of Political Trust in a Longitudinal-Comparative Perspective.” Party Politics. doi:10.1177/1354068820976920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., S. Lacy, B. R. Watson, and F. Fico. 2019. Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rippl, S., and C. Seipel. 2018. “Modernisierungsverlierer, Cultural Backlash, Postdemokratie: Was erklärt rechtspopulistische Orientierungen?” KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 70 (2): 237–254. doi:10.1007/s11577-018-0522-1
   Google Scholar
• Rone, J. 2021. “Far Right Alternative News Media as ‘Indignation Mobilization Mechanisms’: How the far Right Opposed the Global Compact for Migration.” Information, Communication & Society, 1–18. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1864001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. 2014. “The Nucleus of Populism: In Search of the Lowest Common Denominator.” Government and Opposition 49 (4): 573–599. doi:10.1017/gov.2013.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., and T. Akkerman. 2017. “Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe.” Party Politics 23 (3): 193–204. doi:10.1177/1354068815596514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., and B. Burgoon. 2018. “The Paradox of Well-Being: Do Unfavorable Socioeconomic and Sociocultural Contexts Deepen or Dampen Radical Left and Right Voting Among the Less Well-Off?” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1720–1753. doi:10.1177/0010414017720707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., and T. Pauwels. 2011. “Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis.” West European Politics 34 (6): 1272–1283. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.616665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., S. van Kessel, C. Froio, A. Pirro, S. L. de Lange, D. Halikiopoulou, P. Lewis, C. Mudde, and P. Taggart. 2019. The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe. http://www.popu-list.org
   Google Scholar
• Schmuck, D., and M. Hameleers. 2019. “Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-Election periods.” Information, Communication & Society 23 (10): 1–18. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1588909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., P. Müller, C. Schemer, D. S. Wirz, M. Wettstein, and W. Wirth. 2017. “Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 30 (2): 316–326. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edw037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwemmer, C. 2021. “The Limited Influence of Right-Wing Movements on Social Media User Engagement. Social Media + Society 7 (3): 1–13. doi:10.1177/20563051211041650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, J. C. M., M. Shahrezaye, O. Papakyriakopoulos, and S. Hegelich. 2019. “The rise of Germany’s AfD: A social media analysis.” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society, 214–223. doi:10.1145/3328529.3328562
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., P. Tolochko, J.-M. Eberl, O. Eisele, E. Greussing, T. Heidenreich, F. Lind, S. Galyga, and H. G. Boomgaarden. 2020. “In Validations We Trust? The Impact of Imperfect Human Annotations as a Gold Standard on the Quality of Validation of Automated Content Analysis.” Political Communication 37 (4): 1–23. doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1723752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieß, E., D. Frieß, and A. Schulz. 2020. “Populismus auf Facebook: Ein explorativer Vergleich der Parteien- und Anschlusskommunikation von AfD, CDU und SPD.” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 30: 219–240. doi:10.1007/s41358-020-00221-8
   Google Scholar
• Spruyt, B., G. Keppens, and F. Van Droogenbroeck. 2016. “Who supports populism and what attracts people to it?” Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 335–346. doi:10.1177/1065912916639138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., A. Bleier, H. Lietz, and M. Strohmaier. 2018. “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication 35 (1): 50–74. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., L. Posch, A. Bleier, and M. Strohmaier. 2017. “When Populists Become Popular: Comparing Facebook use by the Right-Wing Movement Pegida and German Political Parties.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1365–1388. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. 2004. “Populism and Representative Politics in Contemporary Europe.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 269–288. doi:10.1080/1356931042000263528
   Google Scholar
• van der Bles, A. M., T. Postmes, and R. R. Meijer. 2015. “Understanding collective discontents: A psychological approach to measuring zeitgeist.” PloS One 10 (6): 1–26. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130100 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Wardt, M., C. E. De Vries, and S. B. Hobolt. 2014. “Exploiting the Cracks: Wedge Issues in Multiparty Competition.” The Journal of Politics 76 (4): 986–999. doi:10.1017/S0022381614000565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kessel, S. 2015. Populist Parties in Europe: Agents of Discontent?. London: Palgrave Macmilan.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A. S., W. van der Brug, and P. van Praag. 2014. “When the Stakes Are High: Party Competition and Negative Campaigning.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (4): 550–573. doi:10.1177/0010414013488543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. 2001. “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1. doi:10.2307/422412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmann, T. 2021. “How Emotional Are Populists Really? Factors Explaining Emotional Appeals in the Communication of Political Parties.” Political Psychology 42 (1): 163–181. doi:10.1111/pops.12693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., F. Esser, M. Wettstein, S. Engesser, D. S. Wirz, A. Schulz, N. Ernst, et al. 2016. The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. Working Paper No. 88.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., M. Wettstein, D. Wirz, N. Ernst, F. Büchel, A. Schulz, F. Esser, et al. 2017. Codebook: NCCRdemocracy Module II: The Appeal of Populist Ideas and Messages.
   Google Scholar
• Wirz, D. S., M. Wettstein, A. Schulz, N. Ernst, C. Schemer, and W. Wirth. 2019. “How populist crisis rhetoric affects voters in Switzerland.” Studies in Communication Sciences 1: 69–83. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2019.01.006 .
   Google Scholar