The ‘European Green Deal’ – a paradigm shift? Transformations in the European Union’s sustainability meta-discourse

References

• Antaki, C. 2008. “Discourse Analysis and Conversation Analysis.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods, edited by P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, and J. Brannen, 431–446. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barroso, J. 2005. Working Together for Growth and Jobs: A New Start for the Lisbon Strategy. Speech at the European Parliament. Brussels, February 2.
   Google Scholar
• Barroso, J. 2010. Preface to EUROPE 2020. Brussels, March 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bassot, E., and W. Hiller. 2019. The Juncker Commission’s Ten Priorities. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, W., H. Norlén, L. Dijkstra, and S. Athanasoglou. 2020. “Wrapping Up the Europe 2020 Strategy: A Multidimensional Indicator Analysis.” Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 8: 100075. doi:10.1016/j.indic.2020.100075.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, I., A. Bongardt, L. Csaba, C. Egenhofer, K. Lannoo, P. Pochet, L. Soete, and F. Torres. 2010. “Europe 2020 – A Promising Strategy?” Intereconomics 45 (3): 136–170. doi:10.1007/s10272-010-0332-9.
   Google Scholar
• Bongardt, A., and F. Torres. 2020. “The Lisbon Strategy and Europe 2020.” Oxford Research Encyclopedias – Politics. Accessed April 4, 2022. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1040.
   Google Scholar
• Brzozowski, A. 2021. “We Don’t Want to See Any Flash Points in the Arctic, EU Envoy Says.” Euractiv, October 17.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary. 2021. Perception. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perception.
   Google Scholar
• Capra, F. 1996. The Web of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Climate Action Tracker. 2021. European Union. September 15. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, P., and D. Papadimitriou. 2012. The EU’s Lisbon Strategy – Evaluating Success, Understanding Failure. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T. 2014. “Speaking Europe, Drawing Boundaries: Reflections on the Role of Discourse in EU Foreign Policy and Identity.” In EU Foreign Policy Through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making Sense of Diversity, edited by C. Carta, and F. Morin, 27–41. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbs, M., V. Gravey, and L. Petetin. 2021. “Driving the European Green Deal in Turbulent Times.” Politics and Governance 9 (3): 316–326. doi:10.17645/pag.v9i3.4321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, E., and O. Kovalevska. 2021. “Sustainability in the European Union: Analyzing the Discourse of the European Green Deal.” Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14: 80. doi:10.3390/jrfm14020080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development, COM(2001) 264 final. Brussels, May 15.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2005. Working Together for Growth and Jobs: A New Start for the Lisbon Strategy, COM(2005) 24 final. Brussels, February 2.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. EUROPE 2020 - A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, COM(2010) 2020. Brussels, March 3.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. The European Green Deal, COM(2019) 640 final. Brussels, December 11.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021a. The Recovery and Resilience Facility. Website. Accessed November 17, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/recovery-coronavirus/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021b. ‘Fit For 55’: Delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the Way to Climate Neutrality, COM(2021) 550 Final. Brussels, July 14.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021c. Regulation on the Making Available on the Union Market as well as Export from the Union of Certain Commodities and Products associated with Deforestation and Forest Degradation, COM(2021) 706 final. Brussels, November 17.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative. 2021. A Stronger EU Engagement for a Peaceful, Sustainable and Prosperous Arctic, JOIN(2021) 27. Brussels, October 13.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2000. Presidency Conclusions. Lisbon, March 23-24.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2001a. Presidency Conclusions. Stockholm, March 23-24.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2001b. Presidency Conclusions. Göteborg, June 15-16.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2010. Conclusions of the Meeting of 25-26 March. Brussels, March 26.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2019. Presidency Conclusions. Brussels, December 12.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2021. Sustainable Development. Website. Accessed July 25, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, R., J. J. Schoenefeld, T. Hoerber, and S. Oberthür. 2021. “Europe’s Transition to Sustainability: Actors, Approaches and Policies (Special Issue).” The International Spectator 56 (3): 1–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friends of the Earth Europe. 2020. Principles for Transformation: How the European Green Deal Can Achieve System Change. April 30. Accessed July 25, 2021. http://www.foeeurope.org/Principles-for-transformation.
   Google Scholar
• Göpel, M. 2016. The Great Mindshift. How a New Economic Paradigm and Sustainability Transformations Go Hand in Hand. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guégen, D. 2020. “Green Deal: The Long Battles Lying Ahead.” EurActiv, June 19.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausknost, D., and M. Hammond. 2020. “The Environmental State and the Glass Ceiling of Transformation.” Environmental Politics 29 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1680062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, B., M. Mellor, and G. O’Brien. 2005. “Sustainable Development: Mapping Different Approaches.” Sustainable Development 13 (1): 38–52. doi:10.1002/sd.244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joao Rodrigues, M., ed. 2002. The New Knowledge Economy in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J. 2021. “The Evolution of Environmental Concern in Europe.” In Research Handbook on Environmental Sociology, edited by A. Franzen, and S. Mader, 79–96. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, S., P. H. Feindt, G. Winkel, and R. Keller. 2019. “Discourse Analysis of Environmental Policy Revisited: Traditions, Trends, Perspectives.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (5): 445–463. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-A., and E. Lorenz. 2012. “From the Lisbon Strategy to EUROPE 2020.” In Towards a Social Investment Welfare State?, edited by N. Morel, B. Palier, and J. Palme, 333–351. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed, edited by R. Wodak, and M. Meyer, 1–33. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ossewaarde, M., and R. Ossewaarde-Lowtoo. 2020. “The EU’s Green Deal: A Third Alternative to Green Growth and Degrowth?” Sustainability 12: 9825. doi:10.3390/su12239825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleari, S. 2022. The Impact of the European Green Deal on EU Environmental Policy. The Journal of Environment & Development. Accessed April 4, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965221082222.
   Google Scholar
• Pallemaerts, M. 2013. “Developing More Sustainably?” In Environmental Policy in the EU, edited by A. Jordan, and C. Adelle, 346–366. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pontecorvo, E. 2019. “Europe’s ‘Green Deal’ Doesn’t Live Up to Its Name, Critics Say.” Grist, December 13. Accessed July 21, 2021. https://grist.org/politics/europes-green-deal-doesnt-live-up-to-its-name-critics-say/.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, J. 2021. “Trade Officials ‘Taking A Chainsaw’ to EU Forest Protection Plans.” The Guardian, November 12.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. D. 2019. “Europe’s Green Deal.” Project Syndicate. December 13. Accessed July 21, 2021. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/europe-green-deal-is-global-beacon-by-jeffrey-d-sachs-2019-12.
   Google Scholar
• Samper, J. A., A. Schockling, and M. Islar. 2021. “Climate Politics in Green Deals: Exposing the Political Frontiers of the European Green Deal.” Politics and Governance 9 (2): 8–16. doi:10.17645/pag.v9i2.3853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tendero, M. 2022. “The Time has Come! The Development of the European Environmental Conscience: Evidence from the Eurobarometer Surveys from 1974 to 2020.” In The European Environmental Conscience in EU Politics, edited by T. Hoerber, and G. Weber, 156–184. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. 2016. Research Design in Political Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tubiana, L. 2021. The Green Deal is the New Social Contract. Groupe d’Etudes Géopolitiques. September. Accessed October 10, 2021. https://geopolitique.eu/en/2021/09/28/laurence-tubiana-green-deal/.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hees, S. 2014. “Sustainable Development in the EU: Redefining and Operationalizing the Concept.” Utrecht Law Review 10 (2): 60–76. doi:10.18352/ulr.269.
   Google Scholar
• Von der Leyen, U. 2019a. Speech at the Debate on the European Green Deal. European Parliament, Strasbourg, December 11.
   Google Scholar
• Von der Leyen, U. 2019b. Speech at the Debate on the Conclusions of the European Council Meeting of 12 and 13 December 2019. European Parliament, Strasbourg, December 18.
   Google Scholar