Alternative Access for Mechanical Circulatory Support

References

• Sandhu A, McCoy LA, Negi SI, et al. Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the national cardiovascular data registry. Circulation. 2015;132(13):1243‐1251. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turi ZG. An evidence-based approach to femoral arterial access and closure. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2008;9:7–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilingiroglu M, Feldman T, Salinger MH, Levisay J, Turi ZG. Fluoroscopically-guided micropuncture femoral artery access for large-caliber sheath insertion. J Invasive Cardiol. 2011;23:157–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuyama K, Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, et al. Transfemoral access assessment for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: evidence-based application of computed tomography over invasive angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015:;8(1):e001995. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.001995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arko F, Mettauer M, McCollough R, et al. Use of intravascular ultrasound improves long-term clinical outcome in the endovascular management of atherosclerotic aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:614–623. doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70225-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (Femoral arterial access with ultrasound trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:751–758. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ, et al. Association of use of an intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist device vs intra-aortic balloon pump with in-hospital mortality and major bleeding among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA. 2020;323(8):734–745. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng R, Hachamovitch R, Kittleson M, et al. Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(2):610‐616. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihal CS, Naidu SS, Givertz MM, et al. SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS clinical expert consensus statement on the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiovascular care: endorsed by the American Heart Association, the cardiological society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; affirmation of value by the Canadian association of interventional cardiology-association Canadienne de Cardiologie d’intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(19):e7–e26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Kostousov V, Teruya J. Bleeding and thrombotic complications in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2018;44(1):20–29. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1606179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka D, Hirose H, Cavarocchi N, Entwistle JW. The impact of vascular complications on survival of patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(5):1729–1734. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb KM, DiMuzio PJ, Johnson A, et al. Arterial protocol including prophylactic distal perfusion catheter decreases limb ischemia complications in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(4):1074–1079. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henn MC, Percival T, Zajarias A, et al. Learning alternative access approaches for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: implications for new transcatheter aortic valve replacement centers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1399–1405. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekken J, Jongsma H, Ayez N, Hoogewerf CJ, Van Weel V, Fioole B. Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;29(5):CD007561. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das T, Mustapha J, Indes J, et al. Technique optimization of orbital atherectomy in calcified peripheral lesions of the lower extremities: the CONFIRM series, a prospective multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:115–122. doi:10.1002/ccd.25046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley R, Kolski B, Devireddy C, et al. Percutaneous impella mechanical circulatory support delivery using intravascular lithotripsy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;2:250–254.
   Google Scholar
• Merella P, Lorenzoni G, Viola G, et al. Balloon-assisted tracking for challenging transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a case report. ‎Eur Heart J. 2018;2(2):yty054. doi:10.1093/ehjcr/yty054.
   Google Scholar
• Reifart N, Sotoudeh N. The parallel sheath technique in severe iliac tortuosity: a simple and novel technique to improve catheter manoeuvrability. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:231–235. doi:10.4244/EIJV10I2A37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Fouad L, Basir M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of MANTA vascular closure device after large-bore mechanical circulatory support: real-world experience. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020;21(7):875–878. doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2020.03.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thawabi M, Cohen M, Wasty N. Post-close technique for arteriotomy hemostasis after impella removal. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019;31:E159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfana M, Altawil M, Basir M, et al. Transcaval access for the emergency delivery of 5.0 liters per minute mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. doi:10.1002/ccd.29235.
   Google Scholar
• Halabi M, Ratnayaka K, Faranesh AZ, et al. Aortic access from the vena cava for large caliber transcatheter cardiovascular interventions: pre-clinical validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(16):1745–1746. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman RJ, Babaliaros VC, Greenbaum AB. How to perform transcaval access and closure for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86(7):1242–1254. doi:10.1002/ccd.26141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros VC, Chen MY, et al. Transcaval access and closure for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A prospective investigation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(5):511–521. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman RJ, Babaliaros VC, Rogers T, et al. The fate of transcaval access tracts: 12-month results of the prospective NHLBI transcaval transcatheter aortic valve replacement study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(5):448–456. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilingiroglu M, Salinger M, Zhao D, et al. Technique of temporary subcutaneous “Figure-of-Eight” sutures to achieve hemostasis after removal of large-caliber femoral venous sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78(1):155–160. doi:10.1002/ccd.22946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Direct Percutaneous Access Technique for Transaxillary Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Schafer. 2012. (PMID: 22625184).
   Google Scholar
• Safety and efficacy of the percutaneous transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation using various transcatheter heart valves in 100 consecutive patients U. Schäfer. 2017. (PMID: 28118931).
   Google Scholar
• Completely percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation through transaxillary route: an evolving concept van Mieghem. 2012. (PMID: 22157411).
   Google Scholar
• Preferential short cut or alternative route: the transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation Schofer. 2015. (PMID: 26543600).
   Google Scholar
• Safety and Effectiveness of Percutaneous Axillary Artery Access for Complex Aortic Interventions Agrusa. 2019. (PMID: 31394224).
   Google Scholar
• Percutaneous Axillary Artery Access for Endovascular Treatment of Complex Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Branzan. 2019. (PMID: 31375342).
   Google Scholar
• Insertion of the Impella via the axillary artery for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention Truong. 2018. (PMID: 29422276).
   Google Scholar
• Deploying Mechanical Circulatory Support via the Axillary Artery in Cardiogenic Shock and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention KAJI. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Percutaneous Axillary Artery Access in Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair: Meertens. 2019. (PMID: 31031090).
   Google Scholar
• Caliber and fitness of the axillary artery as a conduit for large-bore cardiovascular procedures: Arnett. 2017. (PMID: 29130612).
   Google Scholar
• CT Angiography Analysis of Axillary Artery Diameter versus Common Femoral Artery Diameter: Implications for Axillary Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Hostile Aortoiliac Segment and Advanced Lung Disease: Tayal. 2016. (PMID: 27110403).
   Google Scholar
• Alternative Percutaneous Access for Large Bore Devices: McCabe. 2020
   Google Scholar
• Axillary Artery Access for Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Patients With Prohibitive Peripheral Arterial Disease Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock: Kaki. 2019. (PMID: 30879608).
   Google Scholar
• Large bore occlusive sheath management: Kaki. 2018. (PMID: 30689277).
   Google Scholar
• Percutaneous access and closure using the MANTA vascular closure device in Trans-axillary Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Rück. 2019. (PMID: 31793886).
   Google Scholar