Morphometric analyses of Neyyar River Basin, southern Kerala, India

References

• Ali, U., & Ali, S. A. (2014). Analysis of drainage morphometry and watershed prioritization of Romushi-Sasar catchment, Kashmir valley, India using remote sensing and GIS technology. Journal of Advanced Research, 2, 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. E. (1972). Hydrograph response to geometric model watershed characteristics and precipitation variables. Journal of Hydrology, 17, 309–329.10.1016/0022-1694(72)90090-X
   Google Scholar
• Broscoe, A. J. (1959). Quantitative analysis of longitudinal stream profiles of small watersheds ( Project N. 389-042, Tech. Bep. 18). New York, NY: Columbian University.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E. H. (1952). The river Ystwyth, Cardiganshire: A geomorphological analysis. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 63, 244–269.
   Google Scholar
• Chorley, R. J. (1969). Introduction to fluvial processes. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• da Cunha, E. R., & Bacani, V. M. (2016). Morphometric characterization of a watershed through SRTM data and geoprocessing technique. Journal of Geographic Information System, 8, 238.10.4236/jgis.2016.82021
   Google Scholar
• Deepak, K., Arun, M., Prabash, K. M., Sananda, K., & Pramod, K. M. (2014). Morphometric analysis for prioritization using remote sensing and GIS techniques in a hilly catchment in the state of Uttarakhand, India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 7, 50–62.
   Google Scholar
• Faniran, A. (1968). The index of drainage intensity – A provisional new drainage factor. Australian Journal of Science, 31, 328–330.
   Google Scholar
• Farhan, Y., Anbar, A., Enaba, O., & Al-Shaikh, N. (2015). Quantitative analysis of geomorphometric parameters of Wadi Kerak, Jordan, using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 7, 456–475.10.4236/jwarp.2015.76037
   Google Scholar
• Gravelius, H. (1914). Grundrifi der gesamten gewcisserkunde, Band I: Flufikunde [Compendium of Hydrology, vol. I. Rivers, in German]. Berlin: Goschen.
   Google Scholar
• Hack, J. T. (1957). Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. U.S. Cool. Survey Prof. Paper 294- B, B45-897.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R. E. (1932). Drainage-basin characteristics. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 13, 350–361.10.1029/TR013i001p00350
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56, 275–370.10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khare, D., Mondal, A., Mishra, P. K., Kundu, S., & Meena, P. K. (2014). Morphometric analysis for prioritization using remote sensing and GIS techniques in a hilly catchment in the state of Uttarakhand, India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 7, 1650–1662.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, U. D., Davalbhakt, H. A., & Waikar, M. L. (2014). Geomorphological analysis of tank catchment using geographical information system: A case STUDY. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 4, 867–872.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, M. A. (1957). An analysis of the relations among elements of climate, surface properties and geomorphology ( Project NR 389042, Tech. Rep. 11). New York, NY: Columbia University.10.21236/AD0148373
   Google Scholar
• Melton, M. A. (1965). The geomorphic and paleoclimatic significance of alluvial deposits in Southern Arizona. The Journal of Geology, 73, 1–38.10.1086/627044
   Google Scholar
• Miller, V. C. (1953). A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee ( Of. Nav. Res. Proj. NR 389-042, Tech. Rep. 3, PhD dissertation). Columbia University, p.30.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. E. (1968). An introduction to the hydraulic and topographic sinuosity indexes 1. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 58, 371–385.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1968.tb00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareta, K. (2004). Hydro-Geomorphology of Sagar District (M.P.): A Study through Remote Sensing Technique. Proceeding in XIX M. P. Young Scientist Congress, Madhya Pradesh Council of Science & Technology (MAPCOST). Bhopal.
   Google Scholar
• Pareta, K., & Pareta, U. (2011a). Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna basin, India using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2, 248–269.
   Google Scholar
• Pareta, K., & Pareta, U. (2011b). Hydromorphogeological study of Karawan watershed using GIS and remote sensing techniques. International Scientific Research Journal, 3, 243–268.
   Google Scholar
• Pareta, K., & Pareta, U. (2012). Quantitative geomorphological analysis of a watershed of Ravi River Basin, HP India. International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 1, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, P. C., & Baker, V. R. (1976). Morphometry and floods in small drainage basins subject to diverse hydrogeomorphic controls. Water Resources Research, 12, 941–952.10.1029/WR012i005p00941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, D. P. (2002). Remote sensing application in geomorphology. Tropical ecology, 43, 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rekha, B. V., George, A. V., & Rita, M. (2011). Morphometric analysis and micro-watershed prioritization of Peruvanthanam sub-watershed, the Manimala River Basin, Kerala, South India. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 57, 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, J. L. (1916). A geographical method of determining the average inclination of a land surface from a contour map. Transaction, Illinois Academy of Science, 9, 195–199.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, S. A. (1956). Evolution of drainage systems & slopes in badlands at Perth Anboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 67, 597–646.10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., & Dubey, A. (1994). Geoenvironmental planning of watersheds in Indian. Allahabad: Chugh Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, J. S., & Surkan, A. J. (1967). The relation between mainstream length and area in drainage basins. Water Resources Research, 3, 963–973.10.1029/WR003i004p00963
   Google Scholar
• Snow, R. S., & Slingerland, R. L. (1987). Mathematical modeling of graded river profiles. The Journal of Geology, 95, 15–33.10.1086/629104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreedevi, P. D., Subrahmanyam, K., & Shakeel, A. (2005). The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environmental Geology, 47, 412–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. N. (1952). Hypsometric analysis of erosional topography. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 63, 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. N. (1953). Revisions of Horton’s quantitative factors in erosional terrain. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 34, 345.
   Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. N. (1956). Quantitative slope analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 67, 571–596.10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[571:QSA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. N. (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel network. In V. T. Chow (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Hydrology, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Suresh Babu, D. S., & Thrivikramaji, K. P. (1993). Paleogeographic interpretation of Kerala beach placers, southwest coast of India. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 22, 203–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentworth, C. K. (1930). A simplified method of determining the average slope of land surface. America Journal of Science, Series 5(Newhaven Connecticut), 20, 184–190.
   Google Scholar
• Yunus, A. P., Oguchi, T., & Hayakawa, Y. S. (2014). Morphometric analysis of drainage basins in the Western Arabian Peninsula using multivariate statistics. International Journal of Geosciences, 5(5), 527.
   Google Scholar