From Data to Insights: Developing a Tool to Enhance Our Decision Making Using Reflexive Thematic Analysis and Qualitative Evidence

References

• Armstrong, R., Waters, E., Dobbins, M., Anderson, L., Moore, L., Petticrew, M., … Swinburn, B. (2013). Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: Intervention design and implementation plan. Implementation Science, 8(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aronson, J. (1995). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/1995.2069
   Google Scholar
• Austin, Z., & Sutton, J. (2014). Qualitative research: Getting started. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 67(6), 436–440. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barends, E., Rousseau, D. M., & Briner, R. B. (2014). Evidence-based management: The basic principles. Retrieved 3 March from https://www.cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Evidence-Based-Practice-The-Basic-Principles.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, E. C. (2022). Values-Based practice in EBLIP: A review. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 17(3), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A. (2002). From EBM to EBL. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 21(3), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J115v21n03_04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2022). ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(2), 424–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brice, A., & De Brún, C. (2022). How to identify and access reports of existing research.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley Woods, H. (2013). Eblip and active learning: A case study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 8(4), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8BW2K
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
   Google Scholar
• Cersosimo, G. (2020). Pragmatism. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036837556
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, B., & Ryan, P. (2016). Public libraries. In D. Koufogiannakis, & A. Brettle (Eds.), Being evidence based in library and information practice (pp. 105–120). Facet Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2022). CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist. Retrieved 15 January from https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/.
   Google Scholar
• Dierckx de Casterlé, B., Gastmans, C., Bryon, E., & Denier, Y. (2012). QUAGOL: A guide for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(3), 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucette, L. (2016). Acknowledging the political, economic, and values-based motivators of assessment work: An analysis of publications on academic library assessment. In S. Baughman, S. Hiller, K. Monroe, & A. Pappalardo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Library Assessment Conference: Building effective, sustainable, practical assessment (pp. 288–298). Association of Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Eldredge, J. D. (2012). The evolution of evidence based library and information practice, part I: Defining EBLIP. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(4), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8GC99
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, M. E., Léon, G., Bouchard, G., Lavis, J. N., Ouimet, M., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2013). What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? a qualitative study. Implementation Science, 8(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellinger, A. (2005). Case study research methods. In R. Swanson, & E. Holton (Eds.), Research in organisations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 327–351). Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, G. (2001). Evidence-based practice: Tools and techniques Systems, settings, people: Workforce development challenges for the alcohol and other drugs field, Issue.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., Miller, F., Partridge, H., Bruce, C., & Howlett, A. (2017). What Do Australian library and information professionals experience as evidence? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8R645
   Google Scholar
• Given, L. (2006). Qualitative research in evidence-based practice: A valuable partnership. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610692145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Given, L. M. (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
   Google Scholar
• Grant, G., & Ramcharan, P. (2007). Valuing people and research: The learning disability research initiative – overview report. Department of Health. https://hscbusiness.hscni.net/pdf/DH_Learning_disability_research_report-2007_pdf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grefsheim, S. F., Rankin, J. A., & Whitmore, S. C. (2007). Making a commitment to EBLIP: The role of library leadership. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2(3), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8ZK56
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., MacQueen, K., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Habich, E. C. (2009). Analyzing LibQUAL+® comments using Excel: An accessible tool for engaging discussion and action. In S. Hiller, K. Justh, M. Kyrillidou, & J. Self (Eds.), Proceedings of the Library Assessment Conference: Building effective, sustainable,practical assessment (pp. 417–423). Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Hallam, G. (2018). Being evidence based makes sense!. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 42(3), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2018-0067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, R., Eaker, C., Jackson, J., & Bouquin, D. (2015). # DitchTheSurvey: Expanding Methodological Diversity in LIS Research. Retrieved 16 Mar from https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2015/ditchthesurvey-expanding-methodological-diversity-in-lis-research/.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2016). Toward more “evidence-informed” policy making? Public Administration Review, 76(3), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. C., & Patterson, C. (2013). Assessment from a distance: A case study implementing focus groups at an online library. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 20(3-4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2013.829376
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, A. (2018). Time to move EBLIP forward with an organizational lens. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 13(3), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsucker, R. L. (2007). The theory and practice of evidence-based information work: One world? 4th International Evidence Based Library & Information Practice Conference, https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/the-theory-and-practice-of-evidencebased-information-work-one-world(b005f9e0-a8be-412e-9483-ac43397571c5).html.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. W., Eklund Karlsson, L., Skovgaard, T., & Aro, A. R. (2019). Organisational factors that facilitate research use in public health policy-making: A scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0490-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali, H. R. (2018). Use of research by librarians and information professionals. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1733. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1733
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, H. (2011). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper, & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy (pp. 209–223). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119973249.ch15
   Google Scholar
• Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131: Medical Teacher No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N., & Brooks, J. (2018). Thematic analysis in organisational research. In C. Cassell, A. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: Methods and challenges (pp. 219–236). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kosciejew, M. (2021). The coronavirus pandemic, libraries and information: A thematic analysis of initial international responses to COVID-19. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(4/5), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2020-0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, A., Edwards, N., Hamel, N., & Judd, M. (2009). Is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research. Implementation Science, 4(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koufogiannakis, D. (2012). Considering the place of practice-based evidence within Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP). Library and Information Research, 35(111), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg486
   Google Scholar
• Koufogiannakis, D. (2013). Eblip7 keynote: What We talk about when We talk about evidence. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 8(4), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8659R
   Google Scholar
• Koufogiannakis, D., & Brettle, A. (2016). Being evidence based in library and information practice. London: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, A., van Gelder, T., & Thorburn, L. (2021). The impact of evidence on decision making-final report. Center for Excellence in Biosecurity Risk Analysis, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Lakos, A. (2007). Evidence-based library management: The leadership challenge. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(4), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2007.0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamond, H. (2020). Evidence based library and information practice: A New Zealand perspective. New Zealand Library & Information Management Journal, 57(2), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12725387.v1
   Google Scholar
• Lembinen, L. (2018). Academic library directors’ strategic decision-making process. LIBER Quarterly, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10224
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, S., & Glenton, C. (2018). Are we entering a new era for qualitative research? Using qualitative evidence to support guidance and guideline development by the World Health Organization. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0841-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2016). Reflections on using patrons’ stories as practice-based evidence. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(1), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.18438/B87K8T
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Wilson, V. (2015). Being a solo EBLIP practitioner. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(4), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.18438/B84594
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A., & Futing Liao, T. (2004). The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Sage Publictions, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412950589
   Google Scholar
• Library Applied Research Kollective. (2022). LARK. Retrieved 15 January from https://lark-kollektive.blogspot.com/?m=0.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, L. (2018). Experiencing evidence-based library and information practice (EBLIP): academic librarians' perspective. College & Research Libraries, 79(4), 554. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.4.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maquire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 3352–33514.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, J., Olsson, C., & Atikcan, EÖ. (2021). Research methods in the social sciences: An A-Z of Key concepts. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. (2022). Rapid Review: What is known about strategies to implement evidence-informed practice at an organizational level? Retrieved 8 January from https://www.nccmt.ca/pdfs/res/eidm-strategies.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, K., Peters, K., Wilson, N., & Kwok, C. (2018). Use of pragmatism to explore women's experiences of traumatic brain injury: A kaleidoscopic view of the world. Nurse Researcher, 25(4), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, H., Bruce, C., Gillespie, A., & Miller, F. (2016). Building the basis for evidence based library and information practice 2016 Australian library and information association national conference (ALIA 2016): Engage, Create, Lead, Adelaide, Australia. https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q3977/building-the-basis-for-evidence-based-library-and-information-practice.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, H., Given, L., Murphy, A., & Howlett, A. (2022). Documenting research experiences in the Australian library and information sector: A survey of pracitioners’ Views Australian library and information association national conference (ALIA 2022). Diversity. https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q7q3z/documenting-research-experiences-in-the-australian-library-and-information-sector-a-survey-of-pracitioners-views.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, H., Glanville, C., Edwards, S., & Hallam, G. (2007). The practitioner’s experience and conception of evidence based library and information practice: An exploratory analysis 4th International Evidence Based Library and Information Practice Conference, Durham, United States. https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q5wv6/the-practitioner-s-experience-and-conception-of-evidence-based-library-and-information-practice-an-exploratory-analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, H., Haidn, I., Weech, T., Silipigni Connaway, L., & Seadle, M. (2014). The researcher librarian partnership: Building a culture of research. Library and Information Research, 38(18), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg619
   Google Scholar
• Pearce-Smith, N. (2006). A journal club is an effective tool for assisting librarians in the practice of evidence-based librarianship: A case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 23(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00638.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirson, L., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M., & Mowat, D. (2012). Building capacity for evidence informed decision making in public health: A case study of organizational change. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, J. (2013). Interactive, technology-enhanced self-regulated learning tools in healthcare education: A literature review. Nurse Education Today, 33(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, R. R., Baker, L. M., & Mika, J. J. (2002). Library and information science practitioners and research. Library & Information Science Research, 24(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(01)00104-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulston, K. (2001). Data analysis and ‘theorizing as ideology’. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100302
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (2018). Making evidence-based organizational decisions in an uncertain world. Organizational Dynamics, 47(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sproule, W. (2006). Content analysis. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social research methods: An Australian perspective. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In W. Stainton Rogers, & C. Willig (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 17–37). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, C. (2021). Announcing and advocating: The missing step in the EBLIP model. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 16(4), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, C., & Howlett, A. (2020). Applied and conceptual approaches to evidence-based practice in research and academic libraries. LIBER Quarterly, 30(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10320
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, C., & Howlett, A. (2020). Understanding EBLIP at an organizational level: An initial maturity model. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 15(1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, C., & Howlett, A. (2021). Visualising the pandemic pivot: Using evidence-based practice to capture and communicate an academic library’s COVID-19 response. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 70(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2021.1943772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, C., Partridge, H., & Edwards, S. (2008). Are library and information professionals ready for evidence-based practice. Proceedings of the Australian library and information association biennial conference 2008 (pp. 1–12). Australian Library and Information Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tight, M. (2019). Documentary research in the social sciences. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, C., & Blair, A. (2015). Listen to what You cannot hear, observe what You cannot See: An introduction to evidence-based methods for evaluating and enhancing the user experience in distance library services. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 9(1-2), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2014.946354
   Google Scholar
• Trainor, L. R., & Bundon, A. (2021). Developing the craft: Reflexive accounts of doing reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(5), 705–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2020.1840423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, P., & Turner, C. (2016). Decoding via coding: Analyzing qualitative text data through thematic coding and survey methodologies. Journal of Library Administration, 56(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1105035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills, J., Jones, O., Lake, R., Cutchin, M., Fuller, C., Wood, N., … Farahani, A. (2020). The power of pragmatism: Knowledge production and social inquiry. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, F. (2015). The quality maturity model: Your roadmap to a culture of quality. Library Management, 36(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-09-2014-0102
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, V. (2015). Evidence, local context, and the hierarchy. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(4), 268–269. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8K595
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, V. (2017). Research in practice: Mythbusting EBLIP. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(2), 184–186. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8N37B
   Google Scholar
• Xu, W., & Zammit, K. (2020). Applying thematic analysis to education: A hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692091881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920918810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldız, A. K. (2015). Evidence-based decision making in library management. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4(3), 693–698.
   Google Scholar
• Yost, J., Dobbins, M., Traynor, R., DeCorby, K., Workentine, S., & Greco, L. (2014). Tools to support evidence-informed public health decision making. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 728. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-728
   PubMedGoogle Scholar