Life history traits of a temporary water ostracod Heterocypris incongruens (Crustacea, Ostracoda) are affected by power frequency (50 Hz) electromagnetic environmental pollution

References

• Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR. 2008. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to software and statistical methods. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.
   Google Scholar
• Angell RW, Hancock JW. 1989. Response of eggs of Heterocypris incongruens (Ostracoda) to experimental stress. Journal of Crustacean Biology 9:381–386. DOI: 10.2307/1548561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child SZ, Hartman CL, Schery L, Carstensen EL. 1992. A test for increased lethality in land snails exposed to 60 Hz magnetic fields. Neuroscience Letters 134:169–170. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90508-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2015. PRIMER v7: User manual/tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic D, Savic T, Andelkovic M, Prolic Z, Janac B. 2014. Extremely low frequency magnetic field (50 Hz, 0.5 mT) modifies fitness components and locomotor activity of Drosophila subobscura. International Journal of Radiation Biology 90:337–343. DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2014.888105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive. 2004. Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields). Official Journal of the European Union L 159:1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty PF, Grubb TC. 1998. Reproductive success of cavity-nesting birds breeding under high-voltage powerlines. The American Midland Naturalist 140:122–128. DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(1998)140[0122:RSOCNB]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernie KJ, Reynolds SJ. 2005. The effects of electromagnetic fields from power lines on avian reproductive biology and physiology: A review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews 8:127–140. DOI: 10.1080/10937400590909022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goiceanu C, Danulescu R. 2006. Occupational exposure to power frequency fields in some electrical transformation stations in Romania. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 12:149–153. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2006.11076676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham JH, Fletcher D, Tigue J, McDonald M. 2000. Growth and developmental stability of Drosophila melanogaster in low frequency magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 21:465–472. DOI: 10.1002/()1521-186X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutzeit HO. 2001. Biological effects of ELF-EMF enhanced stress response: New insights and new questions. Electro- and Magnetobiology 20:15–26. DOI: 10.1081/JBC-100103157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanningan J. 2013. Effects of electric and magnetic fields on transmission line design. Electric Energy T & D Magazine 17:33–36.
   Google Scholar
• ICNIPR. 2010. International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time‐varying electric and magnetic fields (1 HZ-100 kHZ). Health Physics 99:818–836. DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f06c86.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2012. International Organization for Standardization: ISO standard 14371:2012 water quality – Determination of fresh water sediment toxicity to Heterocypris incongruens (Crustacea, Ostracoda) – Bibliography. Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14371:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed Jan 2020 5.
   Google Scholar
• Kaune WT. 1993. Introduction to power-frequency electric and magnetic fields. Environmental Health Perspectives 101(Suppl. 4):73–81. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.93101s473.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kołodziejczyk L, Kuźna-Grygiel W, Gonet B, Podraza W. 2010. Extremely low frequency magnetic field and the hatching rate of Fasciola hepatica eggs, the fecundity and survival of liver fluke-infected snail, Lymnaea truncatula. Folia Biologica (Krakow) 58:157–161. DOI: 10.3409/fb58_3-4.157-161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornicker LS, Sohn IG. 1971. Viability of ostracode eggs egested by fish and effect of digestive fluids on ostracode shells – Ecologic and paleoecologic implications. Bulletin du Centre de Recherches 5 Suppl:285–293.
   Google Scholar
• Krylov VV. 2008. Impact of alternating electromagnetic field of ultralow and low frequencies upon survival, development, and production parameters in Daphnia magna Straus (Crustacea, Cladocera). Inland Water Biology 1:134–140. DOI: 10.1134/S1995082908020053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krylov VV. 2010. Effects of electromagnetic fields on parthenogenetic eggs of Daphnia magna Straus. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 73:62–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krylov VV, Osipova EA. 2013. The response of Daphnia magna Straus to the long-term action of low-frequency magnetic fields. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 96:213–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.06.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuźna-Grygiel W, Gonet B, Jaborowska M, Kołodziejczyk L. 2005. Effect of power network frequency magnetic field on embryonic development of Ascaris suum (Nematoda). Folia Biologica (Krakow) 53:101–105. DOI: 10.3409/1734916054663393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin M, Ernst SG. 1997. Applied DC magnetic fields cause alterations in the time of cell divisions and developmental abnormalities in early sea urchin embryos. Bioelectromagnetics 18:255–263. DOI: 10.1002/()1521-186X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewczuk B, Redlarski G, Żak A, Ziółkowska N, Przybylska-Gornowicz B, Krawczuk M. 2014. Influence of electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields on the circadian system: Current stage of knowledge. BioMed Research International 69459. DOI: 10.1155/2014/169459.
   Google Scholar
• Martins MJF, Vandekerkhove J, Mezquita F, Schmit O, Rueda J, Rossetti G, Namiotko T. 2009. Dynamics of sexual and parthenogenetic populations of Eucypris virens (Crustacea: Ostracoda) in three European ponds. Hydrobiologia 636:219–232. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-009-9952-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins MJF, Vandekerkhove J, Namiotko T. 2008. Environmental stability and the distribution of the sexes: Insights from life history experiments with the geographic parthenogen Eucypris virens (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Oikos 117:829–836. DOI: 10.1111/oik.2008.117.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisch C. 2000. Freshwater Ostracoda of Western and central Europe. Heidelberg-Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Microbiotests. 2020. MicroBio Tests Inc.: Toxkits publications. Available: https://www.microbiotests.com/information/publications/. Accessed Jan 2020 5.
   Google Scholar
• Ossenkopp KP, Kavaliers M, Lipa S. 1990. Increased mortality in land snails (Cepaea nemoralis) exposed to powerline (60-Hz) magnetic fields and effects of the light-dark cycle. Neuroscience Letters 114:89–94. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(90)90433-A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan H. 1996. The effect of a 7 T magnetic field on the egg hatching of Heliothis virescens. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 14:673–677. DOI: 10.1016/0730-725X(96)00057-4.
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A, Lioliousis C. 2013. ELF alternating magnetic field decreases reproduction by DNA damage induction. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 67:703–716. DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9560-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandir D, Sahingoz R, Ercan FS. 2013. Mediterranean flour moth Ephestia kuehniella eggs and larvae exposed to a static magnetic field and preference by Trichogramma embryophagum. Biocontrol Science and Technology 23:1402–1411. DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2013.835789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor VW. 1964. Viability of crustacean eggs recovered from ducks. Ecology 45:656–658. DOI: 10.2307/1936124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez E, Monteagudo JL, García-Gracia M, Delgado JMR. 1983. Oviposition and development of Drosophila modified by magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 4:315–326. DOI: 10.1002/bem.2250040404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recommendation. 1999. Recommendation 1999/519/EC of the European Council on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz). Official Journal of the European Union L 159:59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Redlarski G, Lewczuk B, Żak A, Koncicki A, Krawczuk M, Piechocki J, Jakubiuk K, Tojza P, Jaworski J, Ambroziak D, Skarbek Ł, Gradolewski D. 2015. The influence of electromagnetic pollution on living organisms: Historical trends and forecasting changes. BioMed Research International 234098. DOI: 10.1155/2015/234098.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter RJ. 1993. Static and extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure: Reported effects on the circadian production of melatonin. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 51:394–403. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.v51.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Yu H, Sun Y, Yang C, Lian H, Cai P. 2015. The energy metabolism in Caenorhabditis elegans under the extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Scientific Reports 5:8471. DOI: 10.1038/srep08471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn IG, Kornicker LS. 1979. Viability of freeze-dried eggs of the freshwater Heterocypris incongruens. In: Krstić N, editor. Taxonomy, biostratigraphy and distribution of ostracodes: Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Ostracodes. Belgrade: Serbian Geological Society. pp. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Stam R. 2018. Comparison of international policies on electromagnetic fields (power frequency and radiofrequency fields). Bilthoven: The Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. 1989. Biological effects of power frequency electric and magnetic fields. Background paper OTA-BP-E-53. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broecke L, Martens K, Pieri V, Schön I. 2012. Ostracod valves as efficient UV protection. Journal of Limnology 71:119–124. DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2012.e12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandekerkhove J, Martens K, Rossetti G, Mesquita-Joanes F, Namiotko T. 2013. Extreme tolerance to environmental stress of sexual and parthenogenetic resting eggs of Eucypris virens (Crustacea,Ostracoda). Freshwater Biology 58:237–247. DOI: 10.1111/fwb.2012.58.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchia P. 2007. Exposure of humans to electromagnetic fields. Standards and regulations. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità 43:260–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walters E, Carstensen EL. 1987. Test for the effects of 60-Hz magnetic fields on fecundity and development in Drosophila. Bioelectromagnetics 8:351–354. DOI: 10.1002/()1521-186X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2007. Extremely low frequency fields. Geneva: World Health Organization Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman S, Zimmerman AM, Winters WD, Cameron IL. 1990. Influence of 60-Hz magnetic fields on sea urchin development. Bioelectromagnetics 11:37–45. DOI: 10.1002/()1521-186X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmejkoski D, Petkovic B, Pavkovic-Lucic S, Prolic Z, Andelkovic M, Savic T. 2017. Different responses of Drosophila subobscura isofemale lines to extremely low frequency magnetic field (50 Hz, 0.5 mT): Fitness components and locomotor activity. International Journal of Radiation Biology 93:544–552. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2017.1268281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar