Long-term changes in the diversity of amphibian communities inhabiting small water bodies in the urban area of Olsztyn (NE Poland)

References

• Alford RA, Wilbur HM. 1985. Priority effects in experimental pond communities: Competition between Bufo and Rana. Ecology 66(4):1097–1105. DOI: 10.2307/1939161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold N, Ovenden D. 2004. A field guide to the reptiles and amphibians of Britain and Europe. London: HarperCollins Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Baillie JEM, Griffiths J, Turvey ST, Loh J, Collen B. 2010. Evolution lost: Status and trends of the world’s vertebrates. UK: Zoological Society of London.
   Google Scholar
• Baker JMR, Halliday TR. 1999. Amphibian colonization of new ponds in an agricultural landscape. Herpetological Journal 9:55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbee TJC. 1996. Ecology and conservation of amphibians. London: Chapman & Hall. pp. 214.
   Google Scholar
• Becker CG, Fonseca CF, Haddad CFB, Batista RF, Prado PI. 2007. Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science 318(5857):1775–1777. DOI: 10.1126/science.1149374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beninde J, Veith M, Hochkirch A. 2015. Biodiversity in cities needs space: A meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecology Letters 8:581–592. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12427.
   Google Scholar
• Berven KA, Grudzien TA. 1990. Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): Implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44(8):2047–2056. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04310.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs J, Williams P, Whitfield M, Nicolet P, Weatherby A. 2005. 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: Results and lessons learned from the work of pond conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15(6):693–714. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs J, von Fumetti S, Kelly-Quinn M. 2017. The importance of small waterbodies for biodiversity and ecosystem services: Implications for policy makers. Hydrobiologia 793(1):3–39. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-016-3007-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonato L, Fracasso G. 2003. Movements, distribution pattern and density in a population of Salamandra atra aurorae (Caudata: Salamandridae). Amphibia–Reptilia 24(3):251–260. DOI: 10.1163/156853803322440736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford DF, Neale AC, Nash MS, Sada DW, Jaeger JR. 2003. Habitat patch occupancy by toads (Bufo punctatus) in a naturally fragmented desert landscape. Ecology 84(4):1012–1023. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1012:hpobtb]2.0.co;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell RB. 1966. The screen test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1(2):245–276. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Céréghino R, Boix D, Cauchie HM, Martens K, Oertli B. 2014. The ecological role of ponds in a changing world. Hydrobiologia 723(1):1–6. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-013-1719-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chace JF, Walsh JJ. 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 74(1):46–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clevenot L, Carre C, Pech P. 2018. A review of the factors that determine whether stormwater ponds are ecological traps and/or high-quality breeding sites for amphibians. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6(40). DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00040.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer JS. 2002. The origins of logistic regression. Tinbergen Institute Working Paper No. 2002 119(4):1–15. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.360300.
   Google Scholar
• Czech B, Krausman PR. 1997. Distribution and causation of species endangerment in the United States. Science 277(5329):1116–1117. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5329.1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis JE, Schnabel RB. 1983. Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Devictor V, Clavel J, Julliard R, Lavergne S, Mouillot D, Thuiller W, Venail P, Villéger S, Mouquet N. 2010. Defining and measuring ecological specialization. Journal of Applied Ecology 47(1):15–25/. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01744.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diserud OH, Ødegaard F. 2007. A multiple-site similarity measure. Biology Letters 3(1):20–22. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd CK Jr, editor. 2010. Amphibian ecology and conservation, A handbook of techniques. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dulisz B, Nowakowski JJ. 1996. The species diversity of the avifauna in built-up areas in the city of Olsztyn (NE Poland). Acta Ornithologica 31(1):33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ebisuno M, Gentilli A. 2002. Reproductive site selection and characteristics of sources and sinks in an Italian tree frog metapopulation (Hyla intermedia, Boulenger 1882). Reveu d’ecologie-la Terre Et la Vie 57:263–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faeth SH, Bang C, Saari S. 2011. Urban biodiversity: Patterns and mechanisms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1223(1):69–81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05925.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falaschi M, Manenti R, Thuiller W, Ficetola GF. 2019. Continental‐scale determinants of population trends in European amphibians and reptiles. Global Change Biology 25(10):3504–3515. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falaschi M, Giachello S, Lo Parrino E, Muraro M, Manenti R, Ficetola GF. 2020. Long-term drivers of persistence and colonization dynamics in spatially structured amphibian populations. Conservation Biology 35:1530–1539. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson GA, Takane Y. 1989. Statistical analysis in psychology and education. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ficetola GF, De Bernardi F. 2004. Amphibians in a human-dominated landscape: The community structure is related to habitat features and isolation. Biological Conservation 119(2):219–230. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futuyma DJ, Moreno G. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19(20):207–233. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.001231.
   Google Scholar
• Gasc JP, Cabela A, Crnobrnja-Isailovic J, Dolmen D, Grossenbacher K, Haffner P, Lescure J, Martens H, Martinez Rica JP, Maurin H, Oliveira ME, Sofianidou TS, Veith M, Zuiderwijk A. 2004. Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. Patrimoines naturels 29. Paris: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle.
   Google Scholar
• Gaston KJ, editor. 2010. Urban ecology. (Ecological Reviews). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs JP, Whiteleather KK, Schueler FW. 2005. Changes in frog and, toad populations over 30 years in New York State. Ecological Applications 15(4):1148–1157. DOI: 10.1890/03-5408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gledhill, DG, James, P, and Davies, DH 2008. Pond density as a determinant of aquatic species richness in an urban landscape. Landscape Ecology 23(10):1219–1230. DOI:10.1007/s10980-008-9292-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotkiewicz W, Wittbrodt K, Dragańska E. 2020. The dynamics of changes in the amphibian (Amphibia) population size in the masurian landscape park monitoring results of Spring migration monitoring from the years 2011–2019. Environmental Protection and Natural Resources 31(4):8–16. DOI: 10.2478/oszn-2020-0013.
   Google Scholar
• Green DM. 2003. The ecology of extinction: Population fluctuation and decline in amphibians. Biological Conservation 111(3):331–343. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00302-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths RA, Sewell D, McCrea RS. 2010. Dynamics of a declining amphibian metapopulation: Survival, dispersal and the impact of climate. Biological Conservation 143(2):485–491. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerry AD, Hunter ML. 2002. Amphibian distributions in a landscape of forests and agriculture: An examination of habitat composition and configuration. Conservation Biology 16(3):745–754. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00557.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen EO, Hagen O, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Petchey OL, Evans KL. 2017. Impacts of urban areas and their characteristics on avian functional diversity. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 5(84):1–16. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00084.
   Google Scholar
• Hamer AJ, McDonnell MJ. 2008. Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: A review. Biological Conservation 141(10):2432–2449. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski I. 1989. Metapopulation dynamics: Does it help to have more of the same? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4(4):17–38. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90061-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: Concepts, models and observations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42(1–2):17–38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00549.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski I, Pakkala T, Kuussaari M, Lei G. 1995. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72(1):21–28. DOI: 10.2307/3546033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill MJ, Biggs J, Thornhill I, Briers RA, Gledhill DG, White JC, Wood PJ, Hassall C. 2017. Urban ponds as an aquatic biodiversity resource in modified landscapes. Global Change Biology 23(3):986–999. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlahan JE, Keddy PA, Makkay K, Findlay CS. 2006. The effects of adjacent land use on wetland species richness and community composition. Wetlands 26(1):79–96. DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[79:TEOALU]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheson K. 1970. A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology 29(1):151–154. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(70)90124-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. 2020. IBM manuals. IBM® SPSS® statistics algorithms. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard P. 1912. The distribution of the flora of the Alpine zone. New Phytologist 11(2):37–50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x.
   Google Scholar
• Juszczyk W. 1987. Płazy i gady krajowe. Vol. 2. Warszawa: PWN. [ in Polish].
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. 1958. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23(3):187–200. DOI: 10.1007/BF02289233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenward MG, Roger JH. 1997. Small sample inference for fixed effects estimator from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53(3):983–997. DOI: 10.2307/2533558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson M, Sauer J, Olsen D, Mossman M, Hemesath L, Lannoo M. 1999. Effects of Landscape Composition and Wetland Fragmentation on Frog and Toad Abundance and Species Richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, U.S.A. Conservation Biology 13(6):1437–1446. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98445.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koleff P, Gaston KJ, Lennon JJ. 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology 72(3):367–382. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00710.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondracki J. 2002. Regional geography of Poland. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Konowalik A, Najbar A, Konowalik K, Dylewski Ł, Frydlewicz M, Kisiel P, Starzecka A, Zaleśna A, Kolenda K. 2020. Amphibians in an urban environment: A case study from a central European city (Wrocław, Poland). Urban Ecosystems 23(2):235–243. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-019-00912-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovar R, Brabec M, Bocek R, Vita R. 2009. Spring migration distances of some Central European amphibian species. Amphibia-Reptilia 30(3):367–378. DOI: 10.1163/156853809788795236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger DJD, Andrew J, Hamer AJ, Du Preez LH. 2015. Urbanization affects frog communities at multiple scales in a rapidly developing African city. Urban Ecosystems 18(4):1333–1352. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-015-0443-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn I, Klotz S. 2006. Urbanization and homogenization – Comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany. Biological Conservation 127(3):292–300. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupfer A. 1998. Wanderstrecken einzelner Kammolche (Triturus cristatus) in einem Agrarlebensraum. Zeitschrift Für Feldherpetologie 5:238–242.
   Google Scholar
• Kwet A. 2009. New Holland European reptile and amphibian guide. London: New Holland Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• La Sorte FA, Lepczyk CA, Aronson MFJ, Goddard MA, Hedblom M, Katti M, MacGregor‐Fors I, Mörtberg U, Nilon CH, Warren PS, Williams NSG, Yang J. 2018. The phylogenetic and functional diversity of regional breeding bird assemblages is reduced and constricted through urbanization. Diversity & Distributions 24(7):928–938. DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laan R, Verboom B. 1990. Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biological Conservation 54(3):51–262. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(90)90055-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen RM, Galatowitsch SM, Tester JR. 1999. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1007/BF03161728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ. 2001. The geographical structure of British bird distributions: Diversity, spatial turnover and scale. Journal of Animal Ecology 70(6):966–979. DOI: 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00563.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levins R. 1969. Some genetic and demographic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15(3):237–240. DOI: 10.1093/besa/15.3.237.
   Google Scholar
• Löfvenhaft K, Runborg S, Sjögren-Gulve P. 2004. Biotope patterns and amphibian distribution as assessment tools in urban landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 68(4):403–427. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00154-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomolino MV. 2000. Ecology’s most general, yet protean 1 pattern: The species-area relationship. Journal of Biogeography 27(1):17–26. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00377.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck G, Smallbone L. 2011. The impact of urbanization on taxonomic and functional similarity among bird communities. Journal of Biogeography 38(5):894–906. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02449.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magurran A. 1996. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Cambridge: Chapman & Hall
   Google Scholar
• Makomaska-Juchiewicz M, Baran P. 2012. Monitoring of animal species. Methodological guide. Part three. Warszawa: GIOŚ.
   Google Scholar
• Manley PN, Van Horne B, Roth JK, Zielinski WJ, McKenzie MM, Weller TJ, Weckerly FW, Vojta C. 2006. Multiple species inventory and monitoring technical guide. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-73. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. p. 204.
   Google Scholar
• Manly BFJ. 1986. Multivariate statistical methods. A primer. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Marzluff JM. 2001. Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R, editors. Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer. pp. 19–47. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_2.
   Google Scholar
• Mazerolle MJ, Desrochers A, Rochefort L. 2005. Landscape characteristics influence pond occupancy by frogs after accounting for detectability. Ecological Applications 15(3):824–834. DOI: 10.1890/04-0502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazgajska J. 1996. Distribution of amphibians in urban water bodies (Warsaw agglomeration, Poland). Ekologia Polska 44:245–257.
   Google Scholar
• Mazgajska J, Mazgajski TD. 2020. Two amphibian species in the urban environment: Changes in the occurrence, spawning phenology and adult condition of common and green toads. The European Zoological Journal 87(1):170–179. DOI: 10.1080/24750263.2020.1744743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCleery RA. 2010. Urban mammals. In: Aitkenhead-Peterson J, Volder A, editors. Urban ecosystem ecology. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc. DOI: 10.2134/agronmonogr55.c5
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch CE, Searle SR. 2001. Generalized, linear, and mixed models. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney ML, Lockwood JL. 1999. Biotic homogenization: A few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14(11):450–453. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney ML. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience 52(10):883–890. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney ML. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127(3):247–260. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merckx T, Van Dyck H. 2019. Urbanization-driven homogenization is more pronounced and happens at wider spatial scales in nocturnal and mobile flying insects. Global Ecology and Biogeography 28(10):1440–1455. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minton SA Jr. 1968. The fate of amphibians and reptiles in a suburban area. Journal of Herpetology 2(3/4):113–116. DOI: 10.2307/1563109.
   Google Scholar
• Morelli F, Benedetti Y, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Jokimäki J, Mänd R, Tryjanowski P, Møller AP. 2016. Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography 25(11):1284–1293. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin PJ, Johnson EA. 1988. Experimental studies of asymmetric competition among anurans. Oikos 53(3):398–407. DOI: 10.2307/3565542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta-Tavares T, Rocha C, Anjos L. 2020. The influence of matrix type in the relationship between patch size and amphibia richness: A global meta-analysis. Acta Oecologica 105:103577. DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2020.103577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowakowski JJ. 1996. Changes in the breeding avifauna of Olsztyn (NE Poland) in the years 1968-1993. Acta Ornithologica 31(1):39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Nowakowski JJ, Dulisz B, Lewandowski K. 2006. Birds of Olsztyn city. Olsztyn: Elset.
   Google Scholar
• Nowakowski JJ, Górski A, Lewandowski K, Dulisz B. 2008. Płazy i gady Olsztyna [Amphibian and reptiles of Olsztyn city]. In: Indykiewicz P, Jerzak L, and Barczak T, editors. Fauna Miast – Ochronić różnorodność biotyczną w miastach. SAR „Pomorze”, Bydgoszcz. pp. 151–167.
   Google Scholar
• Nowakowski JJ, Górski A, Lewandowski K. 2010. Amphibian communities in small water bodies in the city of Olsztyn. Fragmenta Faunistica 53(2):213–231. DOI: 10.3161/00159301FF2010.53.2.213.
   Google Scholar
• Nowakowski JJ, Górski A, Lewandowski K, Dulisz B. 2011. Habitat selection of amphibians in water bodies in Olsztyn city. In: Indykiewicz P, Jerzak L, Böhner J, and Kavanagh B, editors. Studies of animal biology, ecology and conservation in European cities. Bydgoszcz: UTP. pp. 333–344.
   Google Scholar
• Oertli B, Joye DA, Castella E, Juge R, Cambin D, Lachavanne J. 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biological Conservation 104(1):59–70. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00154-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogielska M, Kierzkowski P. 2010. Long term data on the amphibians of Wrocław. Fragmenta Faunistica 53(2):195–212. DOI: 10.3161/00159301FF2010.53.2.195.
   Google Scholar
• Ożgo M. 2010. The role of small water bodies in the protection of biodiversity. National Parks and Nature Reserves 29(3):117–124. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-016-3007-0.
   Google Scholar
• Palacio FX, Ibañez LM, Maragliano RE, Montalti D. 2018. Urbanization as a driver of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity losses in bird communities. Canadian Journal of Zoology 96(10):1114–1121. DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2018-0008.
   Google Scholar
• Parris MJ, Semlitsch RD. 1998. Asymmetric competition in larval amphibian communities: Conservation implications for the northern crawfish frog, Rana areolata circulosa. Oecologia 116(1–2):219–226. DOI: 10.1007/PL00013822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parris KM. 2006. Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. Journal of Animal Ecology 75(3):757–764. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01096.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretelli MG, Isacch JP, Cardoni DA. 2018. Species-area relationships of specialist versus opportunistic pampas grassland birds depend on the surrounding landscape matrix. Ardeola 65(1):3–23. DOI: 10.13157/arla.65.1.2018.ra1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkonen O. 1938. Statisch-ökologische Untersuchungen über die terrestrische Käferwelt der finnischen Bruchmoore. Annales Botanici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fennicae 6:1–231.
   Google Scholar
• Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD. 2007. Distribution of amphibians in terrestrial habitat surrounding wetlands. Wetlands 27(1):153–161. DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[153:DOAITH]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbrock HH. 1960. An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function. The Computer Journal 3(3):175–184. DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/3.3.175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ML. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy AH, Rosemond AD, Paul MJ, Leigh DS, Wallace JB. 2003. Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia, U.S.A.). Freshwater Biology 48(2):329–346. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.00979.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubbo MJ, Kiesecker JM. 2005. Amphibian breeding distribution in an urbanized landscape. Conservation Biology 19(2):504–511. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.000101.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybicki J, Hanski I. 2013. Species-area relationships and extinctions caused by habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecology Letters 16:27–38. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH. 2000. Biodiversity: Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 270:1770–1774. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5459.1770.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffers B, Paszkowski C. 2011. The effects of urbanization on North American amphibian species: Identifying new directions for urban conservation. Urban Ecosystems 15(1):133–147. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-011-0199-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffers B, Paszkowski C. 2013. Amphibian use of urban stormwater wetlands: The role of natural habitat features. Landscape and Urban Planning 113:139–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenov DV, Leontyeva OA, Pavlinov IJ. 2000. Analysis of the environmental determinants of the amphibian (Vertebrata: Amphibia) distribution on the urbanized territories in Moscow City. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Biological Series 105(2):3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR. 2003. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conservation Biology 17(5):1219–1228. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02177.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semlitsch RD, Skelly D. 2007. Ecology and conservation of pool-breeding amphibians. In: Calhoun AJK, and De Maynadier PG, editors. Science and conservation of vernal pools in Northeastern North America: Ecology and conservation of seasonal wetlands in Northeastern North America. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 127–148.
   Google Scholar
• Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D. 2006. From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21(4):186–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shochat E, Lerman SB, Anderies JM, Warren PS, Faeth SH, Nilon CH. 2010. Invasion, competition, and biodiversity loss in urban ecosystems. Bioscience 60(3):199–208. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sievers M, Hale R, Parris KM. 2019. Frog occupancy of polluted wetlands in urban landscapes. Conservation Biology 33(2):389–402. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillero N, Campos J, Bonardi A, Corti C, Creemers R, Crochet PA, Isailović JC, Denoël M, Ficetola GF, Gonçalves J, Kuzmin S. 2014. Updated distribution and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of Europe. Amphibia-Reptilia 35(1):1–31. DOI: 10.1163/15685381-00002935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvano DL, Segalla MV. 2005. Conservation of Brazilian Amphibians. Conservation Biology 19(3):653–658. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00681.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon JA, Snodgrass JW, Casey RE, Sparling DW. 2009. Spatial correlates of amphibian use of constructed wetlands in an urban landscape. Landscape Ecology 24(3):361–373. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-008-9311-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson GG. 1943. Mammals and the nature of continents. American Journal of Science 241(1):1–31. DOI: 10.2475/ajs.241.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Sinsch U. 1988. Temporal spacing of breeding activity in the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita. Oecologia 76(3):399–407. DOI: 10.1007/BF00377035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinsch U. 1992. Structure and dynamic of a natterjack toad metapopulation (Bufo calamita). Oecologia 90(4):489–499. DOI: 10.1007/BF01875442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinsch U, Seidel D. 1995. Dynamics of local and temporal breeding assemblages in a Bufo calamita metapopulation. Australian Journal of Ecology 20:351–361. DOI: 10.1111/J.1442-9993.1995.TB00550.X.
   Google Scholar
• Sinsch U. 1997. Postmetamorphic dispersal and recruitment of first breeders in a Bufo calamita metapopulation. Oecologia 112(1):42–47. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjögren P. 1991. Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: The case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42(1–2):135–147. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00556.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjögren-Gulve P. 1994. Distribution and extinction patterns within a northern metapopulation of the pool frog Rana lessonae Ecology 75:1357–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skei JK, Dolmen D, Rønning L, Ringsby TH. 2006. Habitat use during the aquatic phase of the newts Triturus vulgaris (L.) and T. cristatus (Laurenti) in central Norway: Proposition for a conservation and monitoring area. Amphibia-Reptilia 27:309–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelly DK, Werner EE, Cortwright SA. 1999. Long-term distributional dynamics of a Michigan amphibian assemblage. Ecology 80(7):2326–2337. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2326:LTDDOA]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Śledź D. 2012. Report on the state of the city of Olsztyn for the years 2010, 2011. Olsztyn: Institute of Research and Analysis, Olsztyn School of Business
   Google Scholar
• Smart SM, Thompson K, Marrs RH, Le Duc MG, Maskell LC, Firbank LG. 2006. Biotic homogenization and changes in species diversity across human-modified ecosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:2659–2665. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MA, Green DM. 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: Are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28(1):110–128. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass JW, Casey RE, Joseph D, Simon JA. 2008. Microcosm investigations of stormwater pond sediment toxicity to embryonic and larval amphibians: Variation in sensitivity among species. Environmental Pollution 154(2):291–297. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1994. Biometry: The principles and practices of statistics in biological research. 3rd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitudes in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish Commons. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Biologiske Skrifter 5(4):1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart RIA, Andersson GKS, Brönmark C, Klatt BK, Hansson L-A, Zülsdorff V, Smith HG. 2017. Ecosystem services across the aquatic–terrestrial boundary: Linking ponds to pollination. Basic and Applied Ecology 18:13–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2016.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbosch H. 1979. Habitat selection of amphibians during their aquatic phase. Oikos 33(3):363–372. DOI: 10.2307/3544324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurman LL, Garcia TS. 2019. Asymmetric competition shapes amphibian response to rapid environmental change. Ecosphere 10(12):e02950. DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TIBCO Software Inc. 2017. Statistica (Data analysis software system), version 13. http://statistica.io.
   Google Scholar
• TIBCO Software Inc. 2020. Data science textbook. https://docs.tibco.com/data-science/textbook.
   Google Scholar
• Turner MG. 2005. Landscape ecology: What is the state of the science? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36(1):319–344. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vad CF, Péntek AL, Cozma NJ, Földi A, Tóth A, Tóth B, Böde NA, Móra A, Ptacnik R, Ács É, Zsuga K, Horvath Z. 2017. Wartime scars or reservoirs of biodiversity? The value of bomb crater ponds in aquatic conservation. Biological Conservation 209:253–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder JJ, Aarts HMJ, H-JWM S. 1986. Routes and speed of migrating toads (Bufo bufo L.): A telemetric study. Herpetological Journal 1:111–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tienderen PH. 1991. Evolution of generalists and specialist in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution 45(6):1317–1331. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02638.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vershinin VL, Vershinina SD, Berzin DL, Zmeeva DV, Kinev AV. 2015. Long-term observation of amphibian populations inhabiting urban and forested areas in Yekaterinburg, Russia. Scientific Data 2(1):150018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2015.18.
   Google Scholar
• Vos CC, Stumpel AHP. 1996. Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog (Hyla arborea). Landscape Ecology 11(4):203–214. DOI: 10.1007/BF02071811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos CC, Chardon JP. 1998. Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis. Journal of Applied Ecology 35(1):44–56. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00284.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos CC, Verboom J, Opdam PFM, Ter Braak CJF. 2001. Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. The American Naturalist 157(1):24–41. DOI: 10.2307/3079086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD. 2005. The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:706–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner EE, Yurewicz KL, Skelly DK, Relyea RA. 2007. Turnover in an amphibian metacommunity: The role of local and regional factors. Oikos 116(10):1713–1725. DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.16039.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker RH. 1975. Communities and ecosystems. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar